Faculty Opinions recommendation of Peritoneal mesothelioma and asbestos exposure: a population-based case-control study in Lombardy, Italy.

Author(s):  
Sherwood Burge
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (1) ◽  
pp. 2470
Author(s):  
Lidija Latifovic ◽  
Paul J Villeneuve ◽  
Marie-Elise Parent ◽  
Kenneth C Johnson ◽  
Canadian Cancer Registries Group ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 282-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jill S Hardt ◽  
Roel Vermeulen ◽  
Susan Peters ◽  
Hans Kromhout ◽  
John R McLaughlin ◽  
...  

RMD Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. e000978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Ilar ◽  
Lars Klareskog ◽  
Saedis Saevarsdottir ◽  
Pernilla Wiebert ◽  
Johan Askling ◽  
...  

ObjectiveAirborne agents including cigarette smoke associate with an increased risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We analysed to which extent occupational exposure to asbestos and silica confers an increased risk of developing serologically defined subsets of RA.MethodsThis Swedish population-based case-control study enrolled incident RA cases between 1996 and 2013 (n=11 285), identified through national public authority and quality registers, as well as from the Epidemiological Investigation of Rheumatoid Arthritis (EIRA) Study. Controls (n=1 15 249) were randomly selected from Sweden’s population register and matched on sex, age, index year and county. Occupational histories were obtained from national censuses. Exposure to asbestos and silica was assessed by job-exposure matrices. Logistic regression was used to calculate ORs adjusted for age, sex, county, index year, alcohol use and smoking.ResultsResults showed that male workers exposed to asbestos had higher risk of seropositive RA (OR=1.2, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.4) and seronegative RA (OR=1.2, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.5) compared with unexposed workers. The risk was highest among workers exposed to asbestos from 1970, before a national ban was introduced. Male workers exposed to silica also had higher risk of RA (seropositive RA: OR=1.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.6; seronegative RA: OR=1.3, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.5). For the largest subset, seropositive RA, the OR increased with the number of years exposed to silica, up to OR=2.3 (95% CI 1.4 to 3.8, p for trend <0.0001). Women overall had lower ORs than men, but the duration and intensity of their exposure were lower.ConclusionsIn conclusion, we observed an association between asbestos exposure and risk of developing RA and extended previous findings of an association between silica exposure and RA risk, where a dose-response relationship was observed.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lidija Latifovic ◽  
◽  
Paul J. Villeneuve ◽  
Marie-Élise Parent ◽  
Linda Kachuri ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 191-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Farioli ◽  
Kurt Straif ◽  
Giovanni Brandi ◽  
Stefania Curti ◽  
Kristina Kjaerheim ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo assess the association between occupational exposure to asbestos and the risk of cholangiocarcinoma (CC).MethodsWe conducted a case–control study nested in the Nordic Occupational Cancer (NOCCA) cohort. We studied 1458 intrahepatic CC (ICC) and 3972 extrahepatic CC (ECC) cases occurring among subjects born in 1920 or later in Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. Each case was individually matched by birth year, gender and country to five population controls. The cumulative exposure to asbestos (measured in fibres (f)/ml × years) was assessed by applying the NOCCA job-exposure matrix to data on occupations collected during national population censuses (conducted in 1960, 1970, 1980/81 and 1990). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI were estimated using conditional logistic regression models adjusted by printing industry work.ResultsWe observed an increasing risk of ICC with cumulative exposure to asbestos: never exposed, OR 1.0 (reference category); 0.1–4.9 f/mL × years, OR 1.1 (95% CI 0.9 to 1.3); 5.0–9.9 f/mL × years, OR 1.3 (95% CI 0.9 to 2.1); 10.0–14.9 f/mL × years, OR 1.6 (95% CI 1.0 to 2.5); ≥15.0 f/mL × years, OR 1.7 (95% CI 1.1 to 2.6). We did not observe an association between cumulative asbestos exposure and ECC.ConclusionsOur study provides evidence that exposure to asbestos might be a risk factor for ICC. Our findings also suggest that the association between ECC and asbestos is null or weaker than that observed for ICC. Further studies based on large industrial cohorts of asbestos workers and possibly accounting for personal characteristics and clinical history are needed.


2005 ◽  
Vol 173 (4S) ◽  
pp. 146-146
Author(s):  
Eric J. Bergstralh ◽  
Rosebud O. Roberts ◽  
Michael M. Lieber ◽  
Sara A. Farmer ◽  
Jeffrey M. Slezak ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document