Faculty Opinions recommendation of Orthostatic hypotension, cardiovascular outcomes, and adverse events: results from SPRINT.

Author(s):  
Costas Tsioufis
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 1646-1647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenechukwu Mezue ◽  
Abhinav Goyal ◽  
Gregg S. Pressman ◽  
Roy Matthew ◽  
Jay C. Horrow ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 366-373
Author(s):  
V. P. Erichev ◽  
A. S. Makarova

The review presents data of the most common comorbid diseases in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma, the features of local and general influence of antiglaucoma drugs, as well as information about the possible drug interactions of local antihypertensive and systemic medicines. Local antihypertensive drugs are often embedded in the daily patients regimen of systemic drugs use. Up to80 % of the active substances in ophthalmic drugs are absorbed systemically, while not subject to the primary stages of metabolism. Anti-glaucoma drugs can cause serious side effects: symptomatic bradycardia, various conduction disturbances in the heart muscle, orthostatic hypotension, syncope, dyspeptic symptoms, exacerbation of chronic diseases of the liver and kidneys, etc. In clinical studies, it was shown that the level of timolol in blood plasma correlates with the development of side effects from the cardiovascular system. In everyday ophthalmic practice, β-blockers are considered as drugs with a minimal number of adverse events, they are the most widely used in hypotensive glaucoma therapy. But another thing is also known: receptors for β-adrenergic blockers are present in almost all organs and tissues of the body. This circumstance determines the frequency, prevalence and nature of adverse events associated with β-blockers intake. with simultaneous systemic and topical application of β-blockers, mutual enhancement of effects is possible (additional IOP decrease and enhancement of β-adrenergic blocking effect on the cardiovascular system). If β₁-, β₂-adrenergic blockers and adrenergic psychotropic drugs should be used together with caution: the latter affect peripheral innervation, the α-adrenoblocking effect is most pronounced, resulting in a decrease in the strength of heart contractions, a drop in blood pressure until orthostatic hypotension develops. All mentioned above must be considered for choosing and prescribing antiglaucoma drugs. It increases compliance, patient’s quality of life and allows to stabilize the glaucomatous process.


2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 571-573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Horger ◽  
Stacy Kandrac ◽  
Daniel S. Longyhore

Objective: To report a case of dysgeusia and dysosmia following midodrine initiation. Methods/Case Summary: A 58-year-old male started midodrine 5 mg tablets 3 times a day for orthostatic hypotension. Two weeks after starting, he began complaining of dysgeusia and dysosmia. He also reported less of an appetite at this time but did not realize it was due to symptoms. He reported his symptoms as tolerable and chose to continue the medicine. At follow-up contact 7 days later, the symptoms were still present but diminishing. Main results/Discussion: Midodrine is used for symptoms of orthostatic hypotension. Dysgeusia and dysosmia are not common adverse events and are not included in the manufacturer’s labeling. There is only one other published case report of this reaction. Our patient only admitted to slight appetite suppression, but it may be more profound in some. The reaction may be dose related, but there is not enough information to make this conclusion. Principal conclusions: Using midodrine may result in dysgeusia and dysosmia. According to this case, both adverse effects may lessen or resolve over time with the use of the medication.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 1247-1252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenechukwu Mezue ◽  
Abhinav Goyal ◽  
Gregg S. Pressman ◽  
Roy Matthew ◽  
Jay C. Horrow ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e001451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Longato ◽  
Barbara Di Camillo ◽  
Giovanni Sparacino ◽  
Lorenzo Gubian ◽  
Angelo Avogaro ◽  
...  

IntroductionSodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) protect type 2 diabetic (T2D) patients from cardiovascular events, but no trial has directly compared their cardiovascular effects. We aimed to address this gap using real-world data.Research design and methodsWe performed a retrospective real-world study on a population of ~5 million inhabitants from North-East Italy. We identified T2D patients who received new prescription of SGLT2i or GLP-1RA from 2014 to 2018. SGLT2i and GLP-1RA initiators were matched 1:1 by propensity scores. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke (three-point major adverse cardiovascular events (3P-MACE)). Secondary endpoints were each component of the primary endpoint, hospitalization for heart failure (HF), revascularization, hospitalization for cardiovascular causes, and adverse events.ResultsFrom a population of 330 193 diabetic patients, we followed 8596 SGLT2i and GLP-1RA matched initiators for a median of 13 months. Patients in both groups were on average 63 years old, 63% men, and 18% had pre-existing cardiovascular disease. T2D patients treated with SGLT2i versus GLP-1RA, experienced a lower rate of 3P-MACE (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.99; p=0.043), myocardial infarction (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.53 to 0.98; p=0.035), hospitalization for HF (HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.99; p=0.048), and hospitalization for cardiovascular causes (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.69 to 0.99; p=0.037). Adverse events were not significantly different between the two groups.ConclusionsIn the absence of dedicated trials, this observational study suggests that SGLT2i may be more effective than GLP-1RA in improving cardiovascular outcomes of T2D.Trial registration numberNCT04184947.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document