Faculty Opinions recommendation of Phase II Randomized Trial of Transoral Surgery and Low-Dose Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in Resectable p16+ Locally Advanced Oropharynx Cancer: An ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group Trial (E3311).

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Nuyts ◽  
Heleen Bollen
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Research ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Transoral Surgery ◽  
Oropharynx Cancer ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Group Trial

scholarly journals The Outcome and CT Findings of Low-Dose Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy with SQAP in a Cat with Thymoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 203
Author(s):  
Kenji Kutara ◽  
Yohei Mochizuki ◽  
Akihiro Ohnishi ◽  
Ikki Mitsui ◽  
Teppei Kanda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Large Mass ◽  
Domestic Cat ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Total Radiation Dose ◽  
Post Radiation

A 9-year-old male intact domestic cat weighing 4.6 kg was referred for tachypnea. A large mass was visible in computed tomography (CT) scans of the thoracic cavity. A histopathological evaluation of the mass was consistent with thymoma. The cat was treated with 2 × 8 Gy intensity modulated radiation therapy and sulfoquinovosyl acyl propanediol (SQAP). Post radiation therapy (RT), the tumor structure appeared cystic in the CT, and the tumor volume decreased by approximately 80% after aspiration than that before aspiration. The tumor was removed surgically. RT treatment with SQAP made it possible to treat the thymoma with a low total radiation dose.

scholarly journals Early Clinical Outcomes of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy/Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Combination in Comparison with Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Alone in Oropharynx Cancer Patients

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1549
Author(s):  
Han Gyul Yoon ◽  
Yong Chan Ahn ◽  
Dongryul Oh ◽  
Jae Myoung Noh ◽  
Seung Gyu Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Proton Therapy ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy ◽  
Oropharynx Cancer ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Early Clinical Outcomes

Purpose: To report the early clinical outcomes of combining intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in comparison with IMRT alone in treating oropharynx cancer (OPC) patients. Materials and Methods: The medical records of 148 OPC patients who underwent definitive radiotherapy (RT) with concurrent systemic therapy, from January 2016 till December 2019 at Samsung Medical Center, were retrospectively reviewed. During the 5.5 weeks’ RT course, the initial 16 (or 18) fractions were delivered by IMRT in all patients, and the subsequent 12 (or 10) fractions were either by IMRT in 81 patients (IMRT only) or by IMPT in 67 (IMRT/IMPT combination), respectively, based on comparison of adaptive re-plan profiles and availability of equipment. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was done on 76 patients (38 from each group) for comparative analyses. Results: With the median follow-up of 24.7 months, there was no significant difference in overall survival and progression free survival between groups, both before and after PSM. Before PSM, the IMRT/IMPT combination group experienced grade ≥ 3 acute toxicities less frequently: mucositis in 37.0% and 13.4% (p < 0.001); and analgesic quantification algorithm (AQA) in 37.0% and 19.4% (p = 0.019), respectively. The same trends were observed after PSM: mucositis in 39.5% and 15.8% (p = 0.021); and AQA in 47.4% and 21.1% (p = 0.016), respectively. In multivariate logistic regression, grade ≥ 3 mucositis was significantly less frequent in the IMRT/IMPT combination group, both before and after PSM (p = 0.027 and 0.024, respectively). AQA score ≥ 3 was also less frequent in the IMRT/IMPT combination group, both before and after PSM (p = 0.085 and 0.018, respectively). Conclusions: In treating the OPC patients, with comparable early oncologic outcomes, more favorable acute toxicity profiles were achieved following IMRT/IMPT combination than IMRT alone.

Interim analysis of a phase II study of simultaneously integrated boost intensity modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT) in combination with 5-FU and mitomycin-C among patients with locally advanced anal canal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15501-e15501
Author(s):  
Carmen Florescu ◽  
Justine Lequesne ◽  
Jean-Michel Grellard ◽  
Aurélie Parzy ◽  
Marie-Pierre Galais ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Anal Canal ◽  
Mitomycin C ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Intensity Modulated ◽  
Phase 2 Trial

e15501 Background: Concomitant radiochemotherapy is the standard treatment of locally advanced epidermoid anal canal carcinoma (EACC) but conventional radiotherapy (RT) frequently induces significant non-hematological toxicities, resulting in long treatment breaks. Given the numerous anatomic pelvic structures, EACC has become of interest for Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) despite the induced cutaneous toxicities responsible for RT breaks. Given the deleterious effect of treatment duration on local control and survival in other epidermoid cancers, continuous IMRT is challenging to control EACC. Several SIB-IMRT schedules provided similar results with moderate doses and schedules delivering higher doses with short breaks. Yet, standard SIB-IMRT schedule in EACC still not exists. We propose to concomitantly assess the safety and efficacy of continuous SIB-IMRT without planned breaks and concurrent chemotherapy (CT) to improve the treatment of locally advanced EACC by reducing the proportion of patients (pts) requiring RT breaks for toxicities. Methods: The CANAL-IMRT-01 phase 2 trial (NCT02701088) targets pts with histologically proven EACC candidate for concomitant RT of pelvic and inguinal nodes plus CT. Applying a two-step Bryant & Day design, the main criterion is based on both efficacy and safety. Efficacy is defined as the proportion of pts alive with no local disease progression 3 months after the end of IMRT; safety is defined as the proportion of pts with no RT breaks required by grade ≥3 toxicities. Assuming the unacceptable and acceptable proportions of pts without toxicity requiring IMRT break are 60 and 80% respectively, the unacceptable and acceptable 3-month-progression-free-survival are 80 and 90%, 14 assessable pts at first step and 46 in the second are required (alpha risk 5%, 90% power). To anticipate a 10% drop out rate, 16 pts were needed in first step, with ≥11 objective local responses and ≤6 toxicity-induced IMRT breaks to pursue. Treatment consists in 50 days of concomitant CT (2 cycles of 5FU and Mitomycin-C) and SIB-IMRT delivered by helical tomotherapy: 61.2Gy/1.7Gy to the primary tumor, 57.6Gy/1.6Gy to involved nodes, and 54/1.5Gy to elective pelvic lymph nodes. Results: From December 2015 to June 2017, 16 pts were enrolled: 11 female (73%), median age 62 [55-66]. 15 pts were assessable for efficacy and safety. All 15 pts had a 3-month locoregional response (12 complete responses, 3 partial responses). SIB-IMRT breaks were required by toxicities for 4 out of 15 pts: G1 radiodermitis, G2 inguinal and epithelitis, G1 fever, G3 anorexia and vertigo. Conclusions: The planned interim analysis of continuous SIB-IMRT plus CT allowed pursuing this phase 2 trial to assess the relevance of such schedule for locally advanced ASCC. Enrolment is still ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02701088.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document