scholarly journals Field mapping in Palaeozoic and Mesozoic sediments of Jameson Land, Scoresby Land and Werner Bjerge

1970 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 42-43
Author(s):  
K Perch-Nielsen
Keyword(s):  
Third Party ◽  
The South ◽  
Field Mapping ◽  
The Third ◽  
South West ◽  
Second Year ◽  
The Third Party ◽  
North Western

In this second year of the five year project of mapping the Scoresby Sund region three field parties spent the six-week season mapping in the northern part ofthe area. One party mapped the flat land south-west of Olympen, one party completed the map of the south-western part of Scoresby Land while the third party spent three weeksin the Werner Bjerge and the rest of the season in north-western Jameson Land.

scholarly journals OLD HABITS DIE HARD ‒ THE SOUTH AFRICAN REVENUE SERVICE’S INABILITY TO COMPLY WITH ITS OWN LEGISLATION Sip Project Managers (Pty) Ltd v C:SARS Case number: 11521/2020 Gauteng Division, Pretoria (30 April 2020)

Obiter ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carika Fritz
Keyword(s):  
South African ◽  
Project Managers ◽  
Case Note ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Tax Administration ◽  
The South ◽  
Tax Collection ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Third Party ◽  
Case Number

The South African Revenue Service (SARS) has identified third-party appointment as an important weapon in its tax-collection arsenal. In terms of section 179(1) of the Tax Administration Act 28 of 2011 (TAA), SARS is permitted to issue a third-party appointment notice in terms whereof a third party becomes liable for the taxpayer’s tax debt in instances where the third party holds (or will hold) money on behalf of or due to the taxpayer. Although the usefulness of the appointment of a third party from a collection perspective is apparent, it remains important to ensure that certain built-in measures are in place to ensure that SARS does not use this power in an overzealous manner and that taxpayers’ rights are respected. This case note reflects on the case of Sip Project Managers (Pty) Ltd v C: SARS (Case number: 11521/2020 Gauteng Division, Pretoria (30 April 2020)), where section 179(5) of the TAA was considered. The SIP Project Managers case is important because it provides some perspective on this relatively new insertion in the TAA. In the first part of this case note, the facts of the case and the judgment are provided. In the next part, the judgment is analysed by considering the consequences of SARS’s failure to adhere to peremptory wording and by contemplating whether the tax debt must be “due and payable” before a notice in terms of section 179(5) of the TAA can be delivered. Thereafter, some conclusions are drawn.

scholarly journals II.—Physiographioal Studies in Lakeland

1894 ◽  
Vol 1 (12) ◽  
pp. 539-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Marr
Keyword(s):  
The South ◽  
The West ◽  
The Road ◽  
The Third ◽  
Volcanic Group ◽  
South West ◽  
Northerly Direction ◽  
The Subject ◽  
North Western

To the west of the London and North-Western Eailway, after it has surmounted the incline of Shap Fells, lies the valley of the Eiver Lowther, which eventually flows into the Eamont, whichinturn drains into the Eden. The Lowther, flowing in a general northerly direction, receives the drainage of three important streams, coming from the south-west. The first of these flows through the valley of Wet Sleddale, just north of the Fells, which exhibit the exposures of the Shap Granite. It is lettered W.S.inFig. 1. The second, Swindale (S. Fig. 1), the subject of this paper, joins the Lowther stream at Kossgill Hamlet, about two miles north of Shap Village, whilst the third, Haweswater Beck (H.B. Fig. 1), flows out of Haweswater (H. Fig. 1) and joins the Lowther at Bampton.Proceeding up Swindale from Eossgill, we follow the road over Eossgill Moor, a barren tract of country occupied by Skiddaw Slates, to Swindale Foot, near which the Borrowdale Volcanic Group appears, and causes the fine cliff scenery which marks the upper part of Swindale.

Resolving tension from the third-party forgiveness effect

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaclyn M. Moloney ◽  
Chelsea A. Reid ◽  
Jody L. Davis ◽  
Jeni L. Burnette ◽  
Jeffrey D. Green
Keyword(s):  
Third Party ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Third Party

Relaxations of Contractual Privity and the Need for Third Party Rights in Chinese Contract Law

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen Lei
Keyword(s):  
Direct Action ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Chinese Law ◽  
The Third ◽  
Right Of Action ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Third Party ◽  
The Right

This chapter examines the position of third party beneficiaries in Chinese law. Article 64 of the Chinese Contract Law states that where a contract for the benefit of a third party is breached, the debtor is liable to the creditor. The author regards this as leaving unanswered the question of whether the thirdparty has a right of direct action against the debtor. One view regards the third party as having the right to sue for the benefit although this right was ultimately excluded from the law. Another view, supported by the Supreme People’s Court, is that Article 64 does not provide a right of action for a third party and merely prescribes performance in ‘incidental’ third party contracts. The third view is that there is a third party right of action in cases of ‘genuine’ third party contracts but courts are unlikely to recognize a third party action where the contract merely purports to confer a benefit on the third party.

Contracts for the Benefit of Third Parties Under the Taiwan Civil Code

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheng-Lin JAN
Keyword(s):  
Civil Code ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Third Party ◽  
The Third ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
The Third Party ◽  
Privity Of Contract

This chapter discusses the position of third party beneficiaries in Taiwan law where the principle of privity of contract is well established. Article 269 of the Taiwan Civil Code confers a right on the third party to sue for performance as long as the parties have at least impliedly agreed. This should be distinguished from a ‘spurious contract’ for the benefit of third parties where there is no agreement to permit the third party to claim. Both the aggrieved party and the third party beneficiary can sue on the contract, but only for its own loss. The debtor can only set off on a counterclaim arising from its legal relationship with the third party. Where the third party coerces the debtor into the contract, the contract can be avoided, but where the third party induces the debtor to contract with the creditor by misrepresentation, the debtor can only avoid the contract if the creditor knows or ought to have known of the misrepresentation.

Attitudes toward Extrarelational Sex as a Function of Participant's and Third Party's Gender

2004 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 965-968
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Qaqiesh ◽  
Pamela C. Regan
Keyword(s):  
Romantic Partner ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Individual Male ◽  
The Third ◽  
The Third Party ◽  
And Gender

An experiment was conducted to examine whether attitudes toward extrarelational sex, i.e., “swinging,” differed as a function of participant's gender and gender of the third party, i.e., the “swinging” partner. Participants were asked to imagine that their current romantic partner had expressed an interest in “swinging” with another individual (male or female, randomly assigned). Analysis yielded several significant differences by participants' gender. Specifically, men expressed greater interest than did women in joining a swinger's club, reported a higher likelihood than did women of actually joining such a club, and believed more than women that their sex life with their partner would improve after joining a swinger's club. Participants also preferred a female more than a male swinging partner, although this comparison was not statistically significant.

scholarly journals Game Theory-Based Analysis of Local Governments’ Behavioral Dissimilation in the Third-Party Soil Pollution Control under Chinese-Style Fiscal Decentralization

Land ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 389
Author(s):  
Caihua Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Local Government ◽  
Soil Pollution ◽  
Pollution Control ◽  
Local Governments ◽  
Central Government ◽  
Fiscal Decentralization ◽  
Third Party ◽  
The Third ◽  
Party Control ◽  
The Third Party

The participation of a third party of the environmental service enterprise theoretically increases the level and efficiency of soil pollution control in China. However, Chinese-style fiscal decentralization may have a negative impact on the behaviors of participants, especially the local government. First, this paper conducts a positioning analysis on participants of the third-party soil pollution control in China and discusses the behavioral dissimilation of the local government under fiscal decentralization. Second, taking the government’s third-party soil pollution control as a case, a two-party game model of the central government and the local government is established around the principal-agent relationship, and a tripartite game model of the central government, the local government, and the third-party enterprise is designed around the collusion between the local government and the third-party enterprise. The results show that Chinese-style fiscal decentralization may lead to the behavioral dissimilation of local governments, that is, they may choose not to implement or passively implement the third-party control, and choose to conspire with third-party enterprises. Improving the benefits from implementing the third-party control of local governments and third-party enterprises, enhancing the central government’s supervision probability and capacity, and strengthening the central government’s punishment for behavioral dissimilation are conducive to the implementation of the third-party soil pollution control. Finally, this study puts forward policy suggestions on dividing the administrative powers between the central and local government in third-party control, building appraisal systems for the local government’s environmental protection performance, constructing environmental regulation mechanisms involving the government, market and society, and formulating the incentive and restraint policies for the participants in the third-party soil pollution control.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document