A meta Analysis on the Effects of Training Program on Driver Distance in Golf Participants

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 15-32
Author(s):  
Jun-Woo Lee ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-26
Author(s):  
Ji-Su Kim ◽  
Jinyoung Lee ◽  
Choung Ryou ◽  
Jung Woo Kim ◽  
Sun Young Park ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. e9
Author(s):  
Mansueto Gomes Neto ◽  
Mariana Moreira da Silva ◽  
Anderson Delano Araujo ◽  
Fabio Luciano Arcanjo de Jesus ◽  
Vitor Oliveira Carvalho ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
James Unverricht ◽  
Siby Samuel ◽  
Yusuke Yamani

Young drivers are overrepresented in motor vehicle crashes, and are shown to be poorer at anticipating potential threats on the roadway compared with their more experienced peers. Literature demonstrates the effectiveness of driver training programs at improving young drivers’ latent hazard anticipation performance. Various hazard anticipation training studies have been undertaken on different population demographics using different training scenario presentation modes and multiple evaluation testbeds. These error-based feedback training programs (3M) allow trainees to make a mistake, show them how to mediate the mistake, and provide an opportunity to master the target skills. The current meta-analytical review focused on 19 peer-reviewed training studies that utilized eye movements to measure improvements in drivers’ latent hazard anticipation performance following training. The role of four moderating factors (mode of delivery – PC-based or non PC-based; presentation of training – egocentric or exocentric; method of evaluation – on-road or driving simulator; and age of sample – teen novices aged 16–17 or young drivers aged 18–21) on the training effects were explored. Overall, the current meta-analysis suggest that: (a) superficial improvements in training programs does not necessarily further improve the drivers’ latent hazard anticipation; (b) drivers who completed a training program with both egocentric and exocentric training views achieved greater levels of latent hazard anticipation performance than those who completed a training program that contained either view, but not both; and (c) the effect sizes of the 3M-based training programs on latent hazard anticipation were greater for drivers aged 18–21 years than drivers aged 16–17.


2021 ◽  
pp. 026921552110401
Author(s):  
Javier Merino-Andrés ◽  
Agustín García de Mateos-López ◽  
Diane L Damiano ◽  
Alberto Sánchez-Sierra

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the effects of strength training program in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy to improve function, activity, and participation. Data sources: Five electronic databases (MEDLINE-Pubmed, Cochrane Library, PEDro, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus) were systematically searched for full-text articles published from inception to 30 June 2021. Review methods: Randomized controlled trials were included, who compared: (i) child population with spastic cerebral palsy population between 0 and 22 years; (ii) studies in which a muscle strength training program was performed and included dosing information; (iii) studies comparing strength training with other physical therapy technique(s) or untreated control group. Studies with similar outcomes were pooled by calculating standardized mean differences. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias and PROSPERO’s registration number ID: CRD42020193535. Results: Twenty-seven studies, comprising 847 participants with spastic cerebral palsy. The meta-analyses demonstrated significant standardized mean differences in favor of strength training program compared to other physical therapy technique(s) or untreated control group(s) for muscle strength at the knee flexors, at the knee extensor, at the plantarflexors, maximum resistance, balance, gait speed, GMFM (global, D and E dimension) and spasticity. Conclusion: A strength training program has positive functional and activity effects on muscle strength, balance, gait speed, or gross motor function without increasing spasticity for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy in Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I, II, and III when adequate dosage and specific principles are utilized.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi Wang ◽  
Qiu-yue Liu ◽  
Yu-Lei Zhao ◽  
Xin-Yi Xu ◽  
Yan Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundBreast cancer has now overtaken lung cancer as the world’s mostly commonly-diagnosed cancer. With the increasing prevalence of breast cancer, the psychological problems of breast cancer patients have also received more and more attention from scholars. The aim of our study was to synthesis the available research evidence on the effectiveness of interventions designed to promote or enhance the resilience of breast cancer patients.MethodsWe performed a systematic and comprehensive search of 12 databases from inception to February 4,2021: Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biology Medicine disc (CBM), WanFang and VIP. We conducted a comprehensive qualification screening of the retrieved records and analysed all the included data using Review Manager Version 5.3 and STATA/SE Version 15.1.ResultsA total of 23 RCTs involving 2,002 women with stage I-Ⅳ breast cancer met the eligibility criteria and 15 of them were included in the meta-analysis. The results showed that the effectiveness of resilience training program (SMD = 0.89; 95% CI 0.54, 1.24; p < 0.00001), health education delivered via mobile devices (SMD = 1.84; 95% CI 0.86, 2.82; p = 0.0002) and peer support (SMD = 2.62; 95% CI 0.61, 4.63; p = 0.01) in the experimental groups was better than that of the control groups. Furthermore, there were seven other kind of interventions which might contribute to improve resilience but with very few evidences available.ConclusionOur findings suggest that resilience training program, health education delivered via mobile devices and peer support are more effective than that of the routine nursing care in improving the resilience of breast cancer patients. In addition, this study cannot draw definitive conclusions regarding the effectiveness of other seven kind of interventions because the sample size in the included is small and cannot be conducted in the meta-analysis. More studies are needed in the future to clarify the effectiveness of these interventions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document