scholarly journals Multimarker approach for assessing efficiency of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with sinus rhythm

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-29
Author(s):  
V. A. Kuznetsov ◽  
T. N. Enina ◽  
A. M. Soldatova ◽  
T. I. Petelina ◽  
S. M. Dyachkov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Renal Dysfunction ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
P Value ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Purpose: to design mathematical model, that can predict positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and sinus rhythm, according to complex analysis of neurohumoral and immune activation biomarkers, fibrosis, renal dysfunction, echocardiography.Material and methods: parameters of echocardiography, plasma levels of NT-proBNP, interleukins-1β, 6, 10, tumor necrosis factor α, С-reactive protein (СRP), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (ММР-9), tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase 1 and 4, cystatin С (CYSTATIN) were studied in 40 CHF patients with sinus rhythm (65% coronary artery disease patients, 75% males, mean age 54.8±10.6 years old) during the period of maximum decrease of left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) (mean duration 27.5 [11.1; 46.3] months). Responders (decrease in LVESV ≥15%) and non-responders (decrease in LVESV ˂15%) were identified.Results: the number of responders was 26 (65%). Initial set of variables included: age, left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), systolic pressure in the pulmonary artery, right ventricle size and NT-proBNP, СRP, ММР-9, CYSTATIN. According to logistic regression analysis, a model was created: F=3.231 + 0.344 х EF - 3.479 x CYSTATIN - 0.039 х ММР-9 - 0.638 х CRР. Prediction of response to CRT (P) was carried out using the equation: Р=1/(1+е(-F)); a less than 0.696 p-value was associated with membership of non-responders group; p-value greater than or equaled to 0.696 was associated with group of responders. The specificity of the model was 92.9%, sensitivity - 83.3%, AUC=0.952 (р˂0.001).Conclusions: the proposed model, based on assessment of left ventricular EF and laboratory data, that reflect key mechanisms of development and progression of CHF - immune inflammation, fibrosis, renal dysfunction, suggests a possible response to CRT.

scholarly journals Multimarker approach for assessing efficiency of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with sinus rhythm

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 17-24
Author(s):  
V. A. Kuznetsov ◽  
T. N. Enina ◽  
A. M. Soldatova ◽  
T. I. Petelina ◽  
S. M. Dyachkov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Complex Analysis ◽  
Systolic Pressure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Purpose. To design a mathematical model, that can predict a positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) and sinus rhythm, according to complex analysis of neurohumoral and immune activation biomarkers, fibrosis, renal dysfunction, echocardiography.Methods. Parameters of echocardiography, plasma levels of NT-proBNP, interleukins-1β, 6, 10, tumor necrosis factor α, С-reactive protein (СRP), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (ММР-9), tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase 1 and 4, cystatin С (CYSTATIN) were studied in 40 CHF patients with sinus rhythm (65% coronary artery disease patients, 75% males, mean age 54.8±10.6 years old) during the period of maximum decrease of left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) (mean duration 27.5 [11.1; 46.3] months). Responders (decrease in LVESV ≥15%) and non-responders (decrease in LVESV <15%) were identified.Results. The number of responders was 26 (65%). The initial set of variables included: age, left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), pulmonary artery systolic pressure, right ventricle size and NT-proBNP, СRP, ММР-9, CYSTATIN. According to logistic regression analysis, a prediction model of positive CRT response was created. The specificity of the model was 92.9%, sensitivity - 83.3%, AUC=0.952 (р˂0.001).Conclusion. The proposed model, based on the assessment of left ventricle EF and circulating biomarkers of inflammation, fibrosis, and renal function, strongly suggests a higher possibility of response to CRT.

P1240Is resynchronization therapy really efficient in laminopathy?

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Burdeau ◽  
G Viart ◽  
E Gandjbakhch ◽  
A Savoure ◽  
B Godin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Heart Transplantation ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
P Value ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract Introduction Laminopathy (LMNA) is a group of rare disease caused by a mutation of lamin A/C genes. Heart transplantation (HT) is often required. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be an option to postpone HT. Purpose To describe characteristics and outcome of LMNA patients receiving CRT. Methods All consecutive LMNA patients implanted with a CRT device for conventional indications were included in the study. Clinical and echocardiographic (TTE) data were collected during the follow-up period. Results From 2002 to 2017, 68 LMNA patients had CRT implantation. Despite CRT, 30/68 patients (44%) had HT. Population divided into two groups according to response to CRT. Patients were considered without benefit (WHOB-CRT group) if they experienced severe events (inscription on heart transplantation list or death) within two years after CRT implantation. Other patients were in the WB-CRT group. TTE and clinical parameters are described in Table 1. Table 1 Parameters WB-CRT (n=33) WHOB-CRT (n=35) P-value At implantation   Age (years) 52.3±9.7 50.6±9.5 0.27   Women 9 (27%) 13 (37%) 0.45   NYHA class 2.7±0.6 2.8±0.7 0.45   LVEF (%) 33.2±8.8 31.3±7 0.64   LVEDD (mm) 60±6.9 60±6.9 0.96   TAPSE (mm) 23±3.7 14±4.8 0.002 At last follow up   NYHA class 2.2±0.6 2.9±0.7 <0.001   LVEF (%) 36.4±11 27±9 <0.001   LVEDD (mm) 59±5.5 59±7.7 0.98   TAPSE (mm) 19.9±5.5 12.3±3.3 0.003 Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF); Left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD); Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). Conclusion Cardiac resynchronization therapy is less efficient in LMNA patients. An impaired right ventricular stroke function seems to be the only predictive factor leading to poor response to CRT.

scholarly journals His-optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy in a patient with heart failure and right bundle branch block: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmytro Volkov ◽  
Dmytro Lopin ◽  
Stanislav Rybchynskyi ◽  
Dmytro Skoryi
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Right Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Abstract Background  Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an option for treatment for chronic heart failure (HF) associated with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Patients with HF and right bundle branch block (RBBB) have potentially worse outcomes in comparison to LBBB. Traditional CRT in RBBB can increase mortality and HF deterioration rates over native disease progression. His bundle pacing may improve the results of CRT in those patients. Furthermore, atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) for rate control in atrial fibrillation (AF) can be challenging in patients with previously implanted leads in His region. Case summary  We report the case of 74-year-old gentleman with a 5-year history of HF, permanent AF with a rapid ventricular response, and RBBB. He was admitted to the hospital with complaints of severe weakness and shortness of breath. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was decreased (41%), right ventricle (RV) was dilated (41 mm), and QRS was prolonged (200 ms) with RBBB morphology. The patient underwent His-optimized CRT with further left-sided AVNA. As a result, LVEF increased to 51%, RV dimensions decreased to 35 mm with an improvement of the clinical status during a 6-month follow-up. Discussion  Patients with AF, RBBB, and HF represent the least evaluated clinical subgroup of individuals with less beneficial clinical outcomes according to CRT studies. Achieving the most effective resynchronization could require pacing fusion from sites beyond traditional with the intention to recruit intrinsic conduction pathways. This approach can be favourable for reducing RV dilatation, improving LVEF, and maximizing electrical resynchronization.

scholarly journals Minithoracotomy as the primary alternative for left ventricular lead implantation during cardiac resynchronization therapy: Can the cardiac surgeon reduce the number of nonresponders

2017 ◽  
Vol 145 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 576-579
Author(s):  
Dragutin Savic ◽  
Svetozar Putnik ◽  
Milos Matkovic
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Coronary Sinus ◽  
Lateral Wall ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Venous System ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ventricular Lead

Introduction/Objective. Numerous anomalies of the cardiac venous system prevent the optimal endovascular implantation of the left ventricular (LV) lead in more than 15% of patients with indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The endovenous approach in these patients can be one of the potential reasons for the large number of nonresponders reported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of an alternative myoepicardial approach to the stimulation of the left ventricle in CRT. Methods. From June 2014 to December 2015 at the Department of Cardiac Surgery of the Clinical Centre of Serbia, 15 myoepicardial LV leads for CRT were implanted. Coronary sinus venography revealed thrombosis of the coronary sinus in nine patients, and unfavorable anatomy of the coronary venous system in six patients. In all patients, limited left thoracotomy was used as an approach to the lateral wall of the heart. Results. There were no major surgical complications and no lethal hospital outcomes. In a six-month follow-up period we registered a significant increase in the length of the six-minute walk test (for an average of 57.9 m), reduction of the QRS complex width (to 26.25 ms), increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (12.2%), and reduction of mitral regurgitation for 1+. Based on all the parameters, it was concluded that all patients responded favorably to the applied CRT. Conclusion. Closer cooperation between cardiologists and cardiac surgeons in identifying patients who would benefit the most from a myoepicardial approach for LV stimulation is necessary in order to attempt to reduce the nonresponder rate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document