Dynamics of Cost, Returns and Profitability of Soybean across Leading States of India

2021 ◽  
pp. 282-288
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rates ◽  
Production Cost ◽  
Net Income ◽  
Market Prices ◽  
Significant Growth ◽  
Support Price ◽  
Cost Of Production ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Cost

The results revealed that cost concepts of soybean were increased at highly significant growth rates. Net income was positive, and the B.C. ratio was more than one in the base year, which indicated that soybean was profitable in the base year only. The differential yield of soybean was positive, which denoted that farmers managed to produce above the break-even level (profit zone). The difference between the cost of production and minimum support price was positive, indicating that MSP fixed by the government was less than the cost of production (Cost C ), indicating no assurance of profit if the market prices also tumble below the cost of 2 production.

scholarly journals An economic analysis of cost, return and profitability of groundnut across leading states of India

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 278-284
Author(s):  
Prasanna Kolar ◽  
P.K. Awasthi ◽  
Ankita Sahu
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Tamil Nadu ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Annual Growth Rate ◽  
Net Income ◽  
Minimum Support ◽  
Support Price ◽  
Cost Of Production ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Cost

The current study was undertaken with the objectives to estimate the dynamics of cost, returns, profitability and break-even production of groundnut across the leading states of India. For that secondary data were collected from Directorate of Economics and Statistics for the period 1996-97 to 2015-16. For statistical analysis tools like relative change, compound growth rate and cuddy della valle index were used. The study found that Cost A1, cost A2, cost B1 and cost C1 of groundnut in Gujarat and cost B2, cost C2 and cost C2 revised in Andhra Pradesh were found to be increased at higher annual growth rate during the study period than any other states. These cost concepts showed high instability for almost all the leading states. Groundnut was more profitable in Gujarat due to higher net income and B:C ratio than other states. Differential yield and the difference between the cost of production and minimum support price were found better among Gujarat and Tamil Nadu states. In other states, the actual yield was lower than break-even and the cost of production was higher than minimum support price leading to the losses for the groundnut growers.

scholarly journals ANALISYS PRODUCTION COST of SAWMILL ON THE PT KATINGAN TIMBER CELEBES IN WAMLANA VILLAGE BURU REGENCY

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-79
Author(s):  
Fitri N.S. Ellis ◽  
Troice E. Siahaya ◽  
Mersiana Sahureka
Keyword(s):  
Production Cost ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
Labor Cost ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Overhead Cost ◽  
Interview Methods ◽  
Sawmill Industry ◽  
Cost Of Production ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Cost

The objective of this study was to find out components of production cost and analyzing the cost of production materials which used full costing method and variable costing method. This research was conducted at October 2019 on PT. Katingan Timber Celebes Wamlana Village, Fenaleisela Subdistrict, Buru Regency. The company is a buried sawmill industry at Buru Island when has a primary industrial license for timber. Research data were collected by observation, documentation and interview methods, and then analyzed by full costing and variable costing methods. The result showed that the components of production cost consist of raw materials cost, direct labor cost used fixed factory overhead cost and variable factory overhead cost. The cost of production used costing method have value of  Rp.5.120.341.644,- more higher compered to variable costing is Rp.4.542.320.899,- the difference value of the cost of production due to full costing methods which imposes the fixed overhead cost and the variable overhead cost, that the cost of production is higher than with variable costing methods which imposes by factory overhead cost.

scholarly journals Analisis Penerapan Job Order Costing Method Terhadap Harga Pokok Produksi Untuk Meningkatkan Akurasi Harga Jual Produk Pada Maju Jaya Aluminium Kecamatan Cina Kabupaten Bone

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-162
Author(s):  
Martinah Martinah ◽  
Muctar Nuhung
Keyword(s):  
Calculation Method ◽  
Production Cost ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Selling Price ◽  
Labor Costs ◽  
Profit Rate ◽  
Cost Of Production ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Cost

This study aims to compare the cost of the 2M CA type of storefront production that has been applied in Forward Jaya Aluminum by calculating the production cost principle using the job order costing method. Data is collected through observation, interviews, and documentation. Furthermore, the data is analyzed using qualitative methods. While the calculation method used in this study is the method of job order costing or the cost of the order. The results of the study found that the calculation of the cost of production of type 2 M CA storefront was IDR 1,300,000 with a set profit rate of 19.6% with a selling price of IDR 1,550,000, while the calculation using the job order costing method was equal to Rp 1,329,217 with a selling price of Rp 1,589,744 with a profit rate of 19.6%. Based on the results of his analysis, the difference in the calculation of cost of goods manufactured is due to the fact that Maju Jaya Aluminum does not identify in detail the elements of the cost of production, so the cost of production calculated by Maju Jaya Aluminum is lower than using the job order costing method. We recommend that Maju Jaya Aluminum correct the calculation of cost of goods manufactured according to the job order costing method by calculating and identifying raw material costs, direct labor costs, and factory head costs so that the specified selling price can be accurate and increase.

scholarly journals ACTIVITY BASED COSTING: METODE AKURAT MENENTUKAN BIAYA SEWA KAMAR HOTEL

AdBispreneur ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
Suryanto ◽  
Mas Rasmini ◽  
Thealice Lidwina
Keyword(s):  
Calculation Method ◽  
Production Cost ◽  
Quantitative Method ◽  
Production Method ◽  
Activity Based Costing ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Calculation Results ◽  
Cost Of Production ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Cost

Every company has an interest in calculating the cost of production. Cost of production is a way to calculate the costs used in producing a product. This study aims to analyze the calculation of the cost of the production method used by the hotel and determine the cost of production calculated by the method of activity-based costing (ABC). The method used in this research is a quantitative method. Data collected through observation, unstructured interviews, and literature study. The results of this study indicate that the calculation of the cost of production of hotel rooms conducted by the company occurred under costing for standard, superior, and superior plus types of rooms. As for the type of family room, family plus, and family-standard over costing occurs. The difference in the calculation results occurs because the calculation method by the company has not been done in detail as in the ABC method.Setiap perusahaan berkepentingan terhadap perhitungan harga pokok produksi. Harga pokok produksi adalah cara untuk menghitung biaya yang digunakan dalam menghasilkan suatu produk. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perhitungan metode harga pokok produksi yang digunakan pihak hotel dan mengetahui harga pokok produksi yang dihitung dengan metode Activity Based Costing (ABC). Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kuantitatif. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi, wawancara tidak terstruktur, dan studi pustaka. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa perhitungan harga pokok produksi kamar hotel yang dilakukan oleh pihak perusahaan terjadi undercosting untuk jenis kamar standard, superior, dan  superior plus. Sedangkan untuk jenis kamar family, family plus, dan family standard terjadi overcosting. Perbedaan hasil perhitungan tersebut terjadi karena dalam metode perhitungan yang dilakukan perusahaan belum dilakukan secara detail sebagaimana dalam metode ABC.

IMPLEMENTASI JOB ORDER COSTING METHOD DALAM PERHITUNGAN HARGA POKOK PRODUKSI MAP

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-55
Author(s):  
Ika Yulianti ◽  
Endah Masrunik ◽  
Anam Miftakhul Huda ◽  
Diana Elvianita
Keyword(s):  
Production Process ◽  
Quantitative Data ◽  
Production Cost ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Cost Data ◽  
Method Calculation ◽  
Cost Of Production ◽  
The Right ◽  
The Cost

This study aims to find a comparison of the calculation of the cost of goods manufactured in the CV. Mitra Setia Blitar uses the company's method and uses the Job Order Costing (JOC) method. The method used in this study is quantitative. The types of data used are quantitative and qualitative. Quantitative data is in the form of map production cost data while qualitative data is in the form of information about map production process. The result of calculating the cost of production of the map between the two methods results in a difference of Rp. 306. Calculation using the company method is more expensive than using the Job Order Costing method. Calculation of cost of goods manufactured using the company method is Rp. 2,205,000, - or Rp. 2,205, - each unit. While using the Job Order Costing (JOC) method is Rp. 1,899,000, - or Rp 1,899, - each unit. So that the right method used in calculating the cost of production is the Job Order Costing (JOC) method

How the United Kingdom Controls Pharmaceutical Prices and Spending: Learning From Its Experience

2021 ◽  
pp. 002073142199709
Author(s):  
Marc A. Rodwin
Keyword(s):  
United Kingdom ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Market Prices ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Generic Market ◽  
Pharmaceutical Spending ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Government ◽  
Pharmaceutical Prices ◽  
Limit Access

To control costs and improve access, nations can adopt strategies employed in the United Kingdom to control pharmaceutical prices and spending. Current policy evolved from a system created in 1957 that allowed manufacturers to set launch prices, capped manufacturers’ rates of return, and later cut list prices. These policies did not effectively control spending and had limited effects on purchase prices. The United Kingdom currently controls pharmaceutical spending in 4 ways. (a) Since 1999, it has typically paid no more than is cost-effective. (b) Since 2017, for medicines that will have a significant budget impact, National Health Service England seeks discounts from cost-effective prices or seeks to limit access for 2 years to patients with the greatest need. (c) Since 2014, statutes and a voluntary scheme have required branded manufacturers to pay the government rebates to recoup the difference between the global pharmaceutical budget and actual spending. (d) For hospitals, generics and some patented drugs are procured through competitive bidding; community pharmacies are reimbursed through a system that provides an incentive to beat average generic market prices. These policies controlled the growth of spending, with the largest effects following budget controls in 2014. Changes since 2008 have reduced savings, first by paying more than is cost-effective for cancer drugs and then by applying higher cost-effectiveness thresholds for some drugs used to treat cancer and certain other drugs.

scholarly journals Aplikasi Metode Simpleks Pada Optimalisasi Biaya Bahan Baku (Studi Kasus: Ukm Najmah Klappertart)

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-140
Author(s):  
D Damayanti ◽  
A I Jaya ◽  
Resnawati
Keyword(s):  
Simplex Method ◽  
Production Cost ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Optimal Production ◽  
Total Cost ◽  
Optimal Cost ◽  
Cost Of Production ◽  
The Cost

ABSTRACT The purpose of this research is to obtain an the optimal production costs of Klappertart based on the basic ingredients comparing the production cost of Klappertart in Najmah Klappertart with production costs using the simplex method. The result showed that the optimal costs is ,-. This result is equal to the total cost of klappertart by SMEs Najmah Klappertart, so it can be concluded that the cost of production klappertart based on the basic ingredients on SMEs Najmah Klappertart were optimal. Keywords      : Optimal Cost, Basic Ingredients, Production Costs. (A-Z), Simplex Method  

scholarly journals Analisis Penentuan Beban Pokok Produksi Pada Usaha Tempe Sumber Mas Jember

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 134
Author(s):  
Luqman Arif Baihaqi ◽  
Imam Mas'ud ◽  
Yosefa Sayekti
Keyword(s):  
Control System ◽  
Production Process ◽  
Production Cost ◽  
Cost Control ◽  
Total Production ◽  
Cost Of Production ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Business Cost

This study aims to find out the system of business cost control of Tempe Sumber Mas. A Controling based difference between the calculation of the cost of production with cost of production of tempe using full costing. and This research uses Descriptive by Source and Technique Triangulation. The results of this study indicate that the cost control system used by the company is still simple and the calculation of the cost of production of tempe using full costing method is greater than calculate the total production cost used in the tempe production process. Keywords: Expense, Cost of Production, Full Costing, Cost Control

scholarly journals Financial stability management as a determinant of competitive development of agrarian formations

2019 ◽  
pp. 13-18
Author(s):  
Nadiia HRYSHCHUK
Keyword(s):  
Financial Stability ◽  
Production Cost ◽  
New Technology ◽  
Fixed Costs ◽  
Qualitative Characteristic ◽  
Agricultural Enterprises ◽  
Cost Of Production ◽  
Labor Resources ◽  
The Cost

The article investigates financial stability as a qualitative characteristic of functioning of agricultural enterprises in modern conditions, the analysis of indicators of financial stability of the enterprise and determination of its type, as well as the effectiveness of forecasting the financial stability of agricultural enterprises. A number of measures is proposed, which is to reduce the cost of production (cost-saving strategy), which will allow agribusinesses to increase competitiveness in the market due to the introduction of new technology, technologies, more rational the use of both material and labor resources, reducing the proportion of fixed costs in the cost of production, in proportion to the increase in profits and competitive development of agricultural enterprises. The basic condition for ensuring the financial stability of the company is the formation of sufficient amounts of funds that enable them to fully fulfill their obligations to the budget, pay employees, creditors, suppliers.

scholarly journals CALCULATION OF PRODUCTION COST IN UD. USAHA BARU WITH FULL COSTING METHOD

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-42
Author(s):  
Suprianto Suprianto ◽  
Bina Andari ◽  
Yely Sulistyawati
Keyword(s):  
Production Cost ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Production Costs ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Labor Costs ◽  
Material Costs ◽  
Other Information ◽  
Cost Of Production ◽  
The Cost

This study aims to evaluate the calculation of cost of production. The accuracy of the calculation of cost of production is influenced by the suitability in the accumulation and calculation of production costs which includes the cost of raw materials, direct labor costs and other costs (factory overhead costs). This research was conducted at UKM UD. Usaha Baru which aims to determine the calculation of cost of production at UD. Usaha Baru and to find out whether the calculation of cost of production is in accordance with the full costing method. The technique (method) of data analysis used in this study is quantitative analysis. Data collection techniques use interview techniques directly to obtain information from the number of units of monthly production, raw material costs, direct labor costs, and factory overhead costs, as well as other information relating to the calculation of cost of production. Based on the evaluation results for the calculation of raw material costs and labor costs are in accordance with the full costing method. However, the calculation of factory overhead costs is not in accordance with the full costing method because there are costs that have not been included in the calculation of production costs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document