scholarly journals Myeloidderived peripheral blood suppressor cells at haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation in multiple myeloma patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 218-230
Author(s):  
T. A. Aristova ◽  
E. V. Batorov ◽  
V. V. Sergeevicheva ◽  
S. A. Sizikova ◽  
G. Yu. Ushakova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Suppressor Cells ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Haematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Hla Dr ◽  
Healthy Donors

Introduction. Multiple myeloma (MM) is a B-cell malignancy with clonal expansion of plasma cells in bone marrow. Highdose chemotherapy with autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is among main consolidation therapies in MM. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are immature myeloid-accompanying cells able to suppress the immune response. The administration of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) to mobilise haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) increases the MDSC count in peripheral blood (PB).Aim — to study MDSC subsets in PB of remission MM patients and their incidence dynamics at HSC mobilisation.Methods. The study surveyed 35 MM patients prior to and after HSC mobilisation. The counts of granulocytic (G-MDSCs; Lin–HLA-DR–CD33+ CD66b+), monocytic (М-MDSCs; CD14+ HLA-DRlow/–) and early MDSCs (E-MDSCs; Lin–HLA-DR– CD33+ CD66b–) were estimated in flow cytometry.Results. Remission MM patients differed from healthy donors in higher relative counts of G-MDSCs (Lin–HLA-DR– CD33+ CD66b+) and increased relative and absolute counts of М-MDSCs (CD14+ HLA-DRlow/–). М-MDSCs significantly outnumbered G-MDSCs. MDSC subset counts were elevated in complete response (CR) and very good partial response (VGPR), as well as in partial response (PR). Higher relative MDSC counts were associated with greater pretreatment (2–3 lines of chemotherapy). After HSC mobilisation with cyclophosphamide 2–4 g/m2 + G-CSF (filgrastim 5 μg/kg/day), the median relative E-MDSC and M-MDSC counts increased by 2.3 and 2.0 times, respectively, while the relative G-MDSC count raised 46-fold perturbing the MDSC subset balance.Conclusion. Remission MM patients had the increased relative G-MDSC and both relative and absolute M-MDSC counts compared to donors. A greater patient pretreatment was associated with higher relative G-MDSC counts. Treatment response (CR/VGPR vs. PR) was not coupled with MDSC count variation. The G-CSF-induced HSC mobilisation entailed a significant expansion of all three MDSC subsets in PB.

scholarly journals Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma complicated by dialysis-dependent renal failure

2020 ◽  
Vol 92 (7) ◽  
pp. 70-76
Author(s):  
M. V. Firsova ◽  
L. P. Mendeleeva ◽  
M. V. Solovev ◽  
I. G. Rekhtina ◽  
O. S. Pokrovskaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Renal Failure ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Haematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Renal Response ◽  
Good Partial Response

Aim.To assess the safety and efficacy of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients with dialysis-dependent renal failure. Materials and methods.During a period from May 2010 to December 2016 fourteen MM patients with dialysis-dependent renal failure aged 48 to 65 years underwent auto-HSCT. After the induction therapy complete response, very good partial response, partial response were documented in 64, 29, 7% of patients, respectively. In no case was a renal response achieved. Haematopoietic stem cell mobilization in most patients (13/14) was performed according to the scheme: G-CSF 10 g/kg. Melphalan in 3 dosages was used as pre-transplant conditioning: 100, 140 and 200 mg/m2; 13 patients underwent a single and in one case underwent a tandem auto-HSCT against the background of hemodialysis. Evaluation of the antitumor and renal response was assessed on the 100th day after auto-HSCT. Subsequently, against the background of programmed hemodialysis and in the setting of high-dosed melphalan (100200 mg/m2), 13 patients underwent a single and one patient underwent a tandem auto-HSCT. At +100 days after auto-HSCT, an antitumor response and renal response were assessed. Results.The period of agranulocytosis after auto-HSCT was from 5 to 12 days (median 8,5) and was accompanied by infectious complications, cardiac and neurological dysfunctions. At +100 days after auto-HSCT, the complete response was confirmed in 71% patients and very good partial response was confirmed in 29% patients. The minimal renal response was registered in 2 patients (14%), hemodialysis was stopped. The transplant-related mortality was absent. After a median follow-up of 53 months 5-year progression-free survival was 59%, and overall survival was 93%. Conclusion.Carrying out auto-HSCT in patients with dialysis-dependent renal failure contributed to the achievement of a minimal renal response in 14% of cases, which allowed these patients to stop hemodialysis. Patients whose conditioning regimen was performed using melphalan at a dose of 200 mg/m2showed more frequent complications in the early post-transplant period compared to patients who received a lower dose of melphalan (100140 mg/m2). Auto-HSCT in MM patients with dialysis-dependent renal failure is a feasible and effective treatment method, which in some cases contributes to independence from hemodialysis.

The Impact of Different Mobilization Strategies in the Setting of Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3254-3254
Author(s):  
Francesco Mazziotta ◽  
Gabriele Buda ◽  
Nadia Cecconi ◽  
Giulia Cervetti ◽  
Lorenzo Iovino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

INTRODUCTION Multiple myeloma (MM) is considered an incurable disease. Despite the introduction of novel agents allowed deeper response, high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remain the standard of care for patients (pts) in good clinical conditions. The most used strategies to mobilize stem cells from bone marrow (BM) into peripheral blood are high-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CTX) plus G-CSF and G-CSF plus plerixafor (G-CSF+P). The goal of this retrospective study is to investigate whether the two different mobilization strategies have an impact on the clearance of monoclonal PCs in the apheresis products and on pts' outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed 62 pts (median age 61, range 41-75, 37 males and 25 women) diagnosed with MM and treated with ASCT between Mar 2014 and Mar 2018 at our Hematology Division (Pisa, Italy). All pts received induction therapy with at least 4 cycles of bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (VTD). 9/62 pts obtained a less than partial response (PR) and received lenalidomide-based regimens. After induction, 8 (12,9%) pts achieved complete remission (CR), 26 (41,9%) were in PR, 28 (45,2%) obtained a very good partial response (VGPR). 43/62 fit pts received HD-CTX (2-3 g/sqm) on day 1 followed by G-CSF (30 MU/day) started on day 4 until day 7, increased to 60 MU/day from day 8 until the end of apheresis. In 19/62 pts, after 4 days of G-CSF (60 MU/day) administration and not sufficient mobilization, we added plerixafor (0,24 mg/kgbw) for up to 4 consecutive days. In 43/62 pts we collected apheresis samples (10μl) analyzed through flow citometry to enumerate clonal residual PCs. The panel used to asses clonality included: CD138 Per-Cp, CD38 APC, CD19 PE-Cy7, CD45 APC-Cy7, cytoplasmic immunoglobulin K chain and L chain. RESULTS At the end of the peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection, pts treated with HD-CTX presented a higher CD34+ absolute count (p=0.0489) and achieved the threshold of 5x106 CD34+ cells/kgbw in a significantly (p=0.006) higher percentage. We found a nearly significant (p=0.0517) lower count of CD34+ PBSCs in pts who received lenalidomide-based regimens before the mobilization. Performing flow citometry on apheresis samples, we observed that the number of the harvested clonal PCs showed a significant correlation (p=0.0115) with the occurrence of post-ASCT relapse. ROC curve analysis investigating the predictive effect of the number of pathological PCs on disease relapse showed an area under the curve of 0,6978 (95% CI 0.5392-0.8564; p=0.0267). Neither BM residual PCs detectable on BM biopsies performed before apheresis (r=-0.1323; p=0.609) nor the type of mobilization scheme (p=0.707) had an impact on the proportion of clonal PCs in the graft. Additionally, we did not observe any statistically significant difference in progression free- (PFS) (p=0.8276) and overall survival (OS) (p=0.2475) between the HD-CTX and G-CSF+P groups. DISCUSSION PBSC mobilization has a succession rate > 85%. Despite the use of HD-CTX to increase PBSC yields and decrease tumor burden, there is not clear evidence of a superior mobilization strategy. Additionally, HD-CTX has a not negligible toxicity and approximately 10% of the pts require hospitalization. Conversely, G-CSF+P is a safe and effective approach also in poor mobilizers. In our study, we observed a significative difference in the apheresis yields (p=0.0489) and in the percentage of pts who achieved the threshold of 5x106 CD34+ cells/kgbw (p=0.006) in favor of HD-CTX. Additionally, the detection of harvested residual clonal PCs could be a promising strategy to recognise pts more likely to relapse after ASCT. Nonetheless, we failed to demonstrate a superior effect of HD-CTX in the clearance of harvested clonal PCs, in agreement with the absence of a different pts' outcome amongst the two mobilization strategies. In conclusion, the choice between the two regimens is challenging and requires careful consideration of multiple factors. Overall, young fit pts, especially in the high-risk setting, should be treated with all appropriate modalities including chemiomobilization followed by double-ASCT. Conversely, in pts candidate to a single-ASCT it is reasonable to use G-CSF+P, since HD-CTX does not improve PFS and OS and add toxicity. The absence of an in-vivo purging effect on apheresis products of chemiomobilization further strengthens a chemotherapy-free mobilization. Disclosures Galimberti: Roche: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau.

Elimination of CD20-Expressing Cells in Multiple Myeloma by Iodine I-131 Tositumomab (Bexxar®) Correlates with Response to Therapy

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 5176-5176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej J. Jakubowiak ◽  
Malathi Hari ◽  
Tara Kendall ◽  
Yasser Khaled ◽  
Shin Mineishi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Myeloma Cells ◽  
Consolidation Treatment ◽  
Anti Cd20

Abstract It has been proposed that treatment failures in multiple myeloma (MM) are related to the chemoresistance of a subset of malignant myeloma cells with clonogenic potential to the anti-myeloma drugs (Matsui et al., Cancer Research2008, 68:190). Studies suggest that these putative myeloma stem cells (MSC) are CD138neg and express CD20, which is usually absent in more differentiated malignant plasma cells (Matsui et al., Blood2004, 15:2332). These findings provided a rationale for a treatment strategy to eliminate chemoresistant clonogenic MSC using anti-CD20 antibodies. To evaluate the clinical effects of anti-CD20 treatment, we developed a phase II trial with Bexxar as a consolidation treatment for MM. We hypothesized that Bexxar would be more efficacious than unlabeled antibody in the eradication of highly radiosensitive myeloma cells by both direct and cross-fire effects. Preclinical studies showed that tositumomab, the antibody used in Bexxar, inhibited colony formation of clonogenic myeloma cells. To be eligible for Bexxar treatment, patients must have completed at least 4 cycles of therapy (1st to 3rd line) and have measurable disease in a plateau of at least partial response (PR). To date, 10 of 30 patients have been enrolled, of which 5 were treated with Bexxar after completion of initial therapy prior to proceeding to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Patients proceeding to ASCT required hematopoietic stem cells collection prior to Bexxar and 3 months after Bexxar. Eight patients are evaluable for response and toxicities. At 3 months post Bexxar, 1 patient achieved a partial response (PR), 4 patients had stable disease (SD), and 1 patient progressed (PD). At 1 year post Bexxar, 1 patient with initial PR achieved CR and remains in CR, 1 patient is in unconfirmed CR, 2 are in partial response (PR), and 3 remain in SD. After a median 20 months of followup (range 4–24), all patient are alive, 4 in continued response, 3 with SD. Hematological toxicities were mild to moderate (1 patient grade 3 and 4 patients grade 2 thrombocytopenia, 4 patients grade 2 neutropenia). Non-hematological toxicity was limited to HAMA (6 patients). Out of patients who received Bexxar prior to transplant, 3 collected stem cells post-Bexxar without problems, one requires re-collection. Three patients who proceeded to ASCT to date using the post-Bexxar stem cell collection, engrafted at 11–12 days, and had no unexpected toxicities with ASCT. We also analyzed CD20+ cells in bone marrow aspirates (BM) and stem cell collections (SCC) using samples collected from 4 patients before and after Bexxar. Bexxar treatment eliminated a median 80% of CD20+ cells (range 23–97). For a given patient, elimination of CD20+ cells from SCC correlated with elimination of CD20+ cells from BM. The most complete elimination of CD20+ cells from BM was observed in 2 patients who at 1 year achieved CR (94% and 97%), compared to patients who achieved PR (23% and 68%). We conclude that anti-CD20 consolidation treatment of myeloma patients with Bexxar used as targeted therapy against clonogenic myeloma cells is feasible and well tolerated. Clinical outcomes to date are encouraging considering that clonogenic MSC represent <5% of malignant plasma cells and delayed responses observed in this study could be expected. While early, clinical outcomes appear to correlate with the efficacy of the CD20+ cell elimination by Bexxar treatment in myeloma.

scholarly journals Pre-B cells in peripheral blood of multiple myeloma patients

Blood ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 416-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
LM Pilarski ◽  
MJ Mant ◽  
BA Ruether
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
B Cells ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
B Lymphocyte ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Peanut Agglutinin ◽  
Surface Phenotype ◽  
Large Pool ◽  
Hla Dr ◽  
B And T Lymphocytes

Abstract Although multiple myeloma is a disease of plasma cells, abnormalities have been detected in both B and T lymphocytes in peripheral blood. Although multiple myeloma patients are deficient in surface Ig (sIg)- positive B lymphocytes, analysis of lymphocytes present in blood indicates an abnormally large pool of circulating pre-B cells. These pre-B cells express BA-1, do not bear sIg, and contain cytoplasmic mu chains. High numbers of pre-B cells occur in 88% of individuals with frank myeloma and in 44% of individuals with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Pre-B cells bearing BA-1 differ between patients in their expression of HLA-DR and receptors for peanut agglutinin (PNA). Those pre-B cells in myeloma patients are either BA- 1+ PNA- HLA-DR+ (54% of patients) or BA-1+ PNA+ HLA-DR- (30% of patients), or have a mixture of phenotypes (14% of patients). Pre-B cells of the PNA- phenotype are almost always HLA-DR+, and PNA+ pre-B cells are HLA-DR-. Within the same patient, the pre-B cell population varies by both quantitative and qualitative definitions. The number of pre-B cells may increase 460-fold and temporal shifts of surface phenotype from BA-1+ PNA- to BA-1+ PNA+ or vice versa have been detected. These observations indicate an abnormality in the B lymphocyte differentiation pathway leading to pre-B cells in the periphery that vary in number and cell surface phenotype, and that are unable to express sIg.

Long Term Significance of Response in Multiple Myeloma After Stem Cell Transplantation.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1811-1811
Author(s):  
Joaquin Martínez-López ◽  
Joan Blade ◽  
M. Carmen Gomez del Castillo ◽  
Maria Victoria Mateos ◽  
Adrian Alegre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Abstract Abstract 1811 Poster Board I-837 The prognostic significance of achieving complete remission (CR) in Multiple Myeloma (MM) has finally been accepted. However, available studies have been based on series with a median follow-up around 5 years. This time period is insufficient according to the current life expectation of MM. Aim To establish the real effect of prognosis of the different response categories in a cohort of MM patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after long term follow up. Patients and methods Follow-up from diagnosis of 344 MM patients transplanted between 1989 and 1998 has been updated. These patients were previously included in a study aimed at establishing the post-ASCT response significance in MM and to validate the EBMT classification (Br J Haemat 2000;109:438-46). It was possible to update the follow up of 322 patients as at April 2009. At this date 99 patients were alive with a median follow-up form diagnosis of 12.5 years. Response categories and evaluated cases were: i) Complete Response (IF-) (CR), n= 84 ii) near Complete Response (EF-/IF+) (nCR), n= 66 iii) Very good partial response (VGPR) (<90% reduction of M component), n= 66 iv) Partial response PR (reduction of M component between 90-50%), n= 113 v) Stable Disease (SD), n= 12, y vi) Progression (PD), n=14 Survival analyses were performed by Kaplan-Meier curves (log-rank test). Cox logistic regression was employed to establish variables associated with a higher survival. Results Significant differences in overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) were found between CR and nCR groups (p 0.01 and 0.0022, respectively); or between CR and VGPR (p 0.0001 and 0.0035); no differences were detected between nRC and VGPR groups (p 0.21 and 0.99) and between these groups and PR group (p 0.1 y p 0.8). OS and EFS of patients with ED o PD were lower than the rest of the groups. Overall survival at 12 years was 43% in CR patients, 21% in nCR, 20% in VGPR, 30% in PR, 8% in SD and 0% in PD groups. Median survival (OS, EFS respectively) of each group was 91 months and 36 m, 26 m and 21 m, 20 m and 15 m, 31 m and 12 m, 8 m and 5 m, and 6 and 1 month. Land-mark study (10 years) found a plateau phase in OS and EFS after 11 years. Twenty two percent of patients are still alive with stable status between 11 and 15.54 years and only two cases had relapsed in the non CR group. In a regression study for OS, response was only one variable with statistical significance (CR P <0.0000, OR 0.044, IC-95%: 0.020-0.30). Conclusions In MM achieving CR after ASCT is the most important prognostic factor even after long-term follow-up. Relapse rate is very low in patients with >11 years of follow-up, this could mean a cure for patients in CR. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Increased Frequencies Of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells and Regulatory T-Cells Decrease Response To Donor Lymphocyte Infusions, Independent Of Graft Versus Host Disease In Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2005-2005
Author(s):  
Laurens E. Franssen ◽  
Maarten E. Emmelot ◽  
Niels W.C.J. van de Donk ◽  
Henk Lokhorst ◽  
Tuna Mutis
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Suppressor Cells ◽  
Cellular Immunotherapy ◽  
Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Hla Dr ◽  
Healthy Donors ◽  
Donor Lymphocyte Infusions

Abstract Background Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) followed by donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) can induce durable responses in multiple myeloma (MM) by virtue of the graft versus myeloma (GvM) effect. However, this is only true for a minority of patients and relapse rates after reaching an initial remission remain high. Also, transplant-related mortality and Graft-versus-Host-Disease (GvHD) are still major complications. Towards improving cellular immunotherapy we set out to identify the immune cell subsets that are involved in the GvM effect and GvHD. Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells (MDSCs) are a heterogeneous population of bone marrow-derived myeloid cells, with strong immunosuppressive capacity. In general, they are divided into monocyte-like M-MDSCs en granulocyte-like G-MDSCs. In myeloma, they have been shown to be present in increased frequencies, inhibit T-cell proliferation and promote multiple myeloma cell growth in vitro. Furthermore, regulatory T-cells (T-regs) seem to suppress cellular anti-tumor responses in MM. Methods To determine whether MDSCs and T-regs hamper immunotherapy, we investigated MDSCs and T-regs in peripheral blood (PB) (n=43) from post-allo SCT MM patients, prior to their first DLI, and from healthy donors (n=13). All patients had persistent or progressive disease after allo-SCT. DLI dose was 107 T-cells/kg for sibling donors (n=20) and 106 T-cells/kg for matched unrelated donors (n=23). Results We observed a significantly higher frequency of M-MDSCs (CD14+ HLA-DR-/low) (mean 5.7 vs. 0.7%, P<0.001) and T-regs (CD4+ CD25+ CD127-/low) (11.4 vs. 5.5%, P<0.01), but not of G-MDSCs (CD11b+ HLA-DR-/low CD14-CD33+) in PB of MM patients versus healthy donors. Interestingly, patients responding to DLI had significantly lower amounts of immunosuppressive G-MDSCs (mean 0.6 vs. 1.2%, P=0.04) and T-regs (7.9 vs. 13.9%, P=0.02) in their PB prior to DLI. There was no difference in M-MDSCs between responding and non-responding patients. This effect on GvM was independent of GvHD, as levels of G-MDSCs, M-MDSCs and T-regs did not differ between GvHD+ and GvHD-groups. Conclusion We show that increased frequencies of G-MDSCs and T-regs are associated with resistance to DLI, independent of the occurrence of GvHD. Our data suggest that targeting G-MDSCs as well as T-regs may improve cellular immunotherapy in multiple myeloma. Disclosures: van de Donk: Celgene: Research Funding. Lokhorst:Genmab A/S: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Johnson-Cilag: Honoraria; Mudipharma: Honoraria.

scholarly journals Tandem Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma Patients Based on Response to Their First Transplant—A Prospective Phase II Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. CMO.S16835 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Byrne ◽  
Donya Salmasinia ◽  
Helen Leather ◽  
Christopher R. Cogle ◽  
Amy Davis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Prospective Phase

In this prospective phase II clinical trial, multiple myeloma (MM) patients were randomized to receive a second (tandem) autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) based on whether they achieved a partial response or worse (≤PR) following initial ASCT (ASCT1). Patients who achieved a very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) had salvage ASCT at relapse. Seventy-five patients received conditioning therapy and ASCT1. A total of 44 patients (59%) achieved ≥VGPR, whereas 31 patients entered ≤PR and were offered tandem ASCT. In all, 20 patients agreed to tandem ASCT. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the two cohorts except for median lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) ( P = 0.0141) and percentage of marrow plasma cells before ASCT1 ( P = 0.0047), both lower in the ≥VGPR group. Intent to treat analysis showed that patients who achieved ≥VGPR to ASCT1 had a trend toward improved progression-free survival (PFS) (37 vs. 26 months, P = 0.078) and superior overall survival (OS) (not reached vs. 50 months, P = 0.0073). Patients with ≤PR who declined tandem transplantation had shortened PFS (20 vs. 28 months, P = 0.05) but similar OS (53 vs. 57.5 months, P = 0.29) compared to those who received it. Thus, a favorable clinical response to ASCT1 identifies a low-risk group with superior long-term prognosis despite similar PFS.

Donor cell origin of multiple myeloma occurring after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a patient with refractory anaemia with ring sideroblast

2010 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young-Il Kim ◽  
Hye-Ran Kim ◽  
Myung-Geun Shin ◽  
Young-Jin Lee ◽  
Jong-Hee Shin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Donor Cell ◽  
Haematopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Refractory Anaemia

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a rare but life-threatening complication after solid organ and haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A 40-year-old woman who was diagnosed as having refractory anaemia with ring sideroblast 6 years ago took an ABO mismatched, unrelated allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from a 32-year-old healthy male donor. The bone marrow (BM) study was carried out because of progressing pancytopenia, serum biclonal gammopathy and a distorted ratio of serum level of free κ and λ light chain 138 days after HSCT. The BM examination showed an increased number of plasma cells (12% of total marrow cells) comprising mainly CD45−CD19−CD138+ malignant plasma cells with an immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene rearrangement. Conventional cytogenetics and molecular personal identification studies revealed that all BM cells were totally replaced by donor cells, thus indicating the donor cell origin of PTLD-multiple myeloma. The BM microenvironment of the recipient might be associated with the development of PTLD-multiple myeloma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document