Corporate Governance, Karakteristik Perusahaan dan Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (02) ◽  
pp. 203-217
Author(s):  
Heti Herawati
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Sampling Procedure ◽  
Jel Classification ◽  
Firm Age ◽  
Mining Companies ◽  
Corporate Social

A B S T R A C T The issue of corporate responsibility disclosure (CSRD) grows widely. The purpose of this research is to examine empirically wether institutional ownership, independent board, profitability, firm size and firm age have influence toward CSRD of mining companies listed at IDX. This research has causal characteristic, that is is reviewing the relationship between institutional ownership, independent board, profitability, firm size and firm age has an effect CSRD. The population of this research is mining companies at IDX up to 2013. Sampling procedure utilities sampling purposive method. The number of sample uses 90 data and analyzed by multiple regression analysis. The result of hypothesis test shows that institutional ownership and independent board doesn’t have influence toward CSRD, whereas profitability, company size and age partially have influence towards CSRD. A B S T R A K Isu tentang pengungkapan corporate social responsibility berkembang dengan cepat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji secara empiris, apakah kepemilikan institusional, dewan komisaris independen, profitabilitas, size perusahaan dan umur perusahaan mempunyai pengaruh terhadap pengungkapan corporate social responsibility perusahaan pertambangan yang listing di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Penelitian ini bersifat kausal yaitu mengkaji hubungan antara kepemilikan institusional, dewan komisaris independen, profitabilitas, size perusahaan dan umur perusahaan mempunyai pengaruh terhadap pengungkapan corporate social responsibility. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah perusahaan-perusahaan pertambangan yang telah terdaftar di BEI sampai dengan tahun 2013. Prosedur pemilihan sampel menggunakan metode purposive sampling. Jumlah sampel yang digunakan 90 dan dianalisis dengan metode regresi linier. Hasil pengujian hipotesis menunjukkan bahwa variabel kepemilikan institusional dan dewan komisaris independen yang tidak berpengaruh terhadap pengungkapan corporate social responsibility, sedangkan profitabilitas, size perusahaan dan umur perusahaan secara parsial berpengaruh terhadap pengungkapan corporate social responsibility. JEL Classification: G34, M14

scholarly journals Corporate Governance, Karakteristik Perusahaan dan Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (02) ◽  
pp. 203-217
Author(s):  
Heti Herawati
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Sampling Procedure ◽  
Jel Classification ◽  
Firm Age ◽  
Mining Companies ◽  
Corporate Social

A B S T R A C T The issue of corporate responsibility disclosure (CSRD) grows widely. The purpose of this research is to examine empirically wether institutional ownership, independent board, profitability, firm size and firm age have influence toward CSRD of mining companies listed at IDX. This research has causal characteristic, that is is reviewing the relationship between institutional ownership, independent board, profitability, firm size and firm age has an effect CSRD. The population of this research is mining companies at IDX up to 2013. Sampling procedure utilities sampling purposive method. The number of sample uses 90 data and analyzed by multiple regression analysis. The result of hypothesis test shows that institutional ownership and independent board doesn’t have influence toward CSRD, whereas profitability, company size and age partially have influence towards CSRD. A B S T R A K Isu tentang pengungkapan corporate social responsibility berkembang dengan cepat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji secara empiris, apakah kepemilikan institusional, dewan komisaris independen, profitabilitas, size perusahaan dan umur perusahaan mempunyai pengaruh terhadap pengungkapan corporate social responsibility perusahaan pertambangan yang listing di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Penelitian ini bersifat kausal yaitu mengkaji hubungan antara kepemilikan institusional, dewan komisaris independen, profitabilitas, size perusahaan dan umur perusahaan mempunyai pengaruh terhadap pengungkapan corporate social responsibility. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah perusahaan-perusahaan pertambangan yang telah terdaftar di BEI sampai dengan tahun 2013. Prosedur pemilihan sampel menggunakan metode purposive sampling. Jumlah sampel yang digunakan 90 dan dianalisis dengan metode regresi linier. Hasil pengujian hipotesis menunjukkan bahwa variabel kepemilikan institusional dan dewan komisaris independen yang tidak berpengaruh terhadap pengungkapan corporate social responsibility, sedangkan profitabilitas, size perusahaan dan umur perusahaan secara parsial berpengaruh terhadap pengungkapan corporate social responsibility. JEL Classification: G34, M14

PENGARUH KARAKTERISTIK PERUSAHAAN TERHADAP PENGUNGKAPAN TANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL DENGAN KEPEMILIKAN INSTITUSIONAL SEBAGAI VARIABEL MODERASI

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 201-214
Author(s):  
Niki Ratnasari ◽  
Iren Meita
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Significant Influence ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Firm Age ◽  
Size Firm ◽  
Corporate Social

The research aims to analyze the influence of corporate characteristic on the disclosure of corporate social responsibility with institutional ownership as a moderating variable. The population of this research is manufacture companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDK) 2011-2015. Research sampling used purposive sampling technique. There are 22 samples that meet the criteria as a sample of research with 5 years of observation. The total sample studied was 110. The multiple regression analysis was used for hypothesis testing. The results indicate that firm size, firm age, and leverage have a significant influence on the corporate social responsibility; and simultaneously firm size, firm age, and leverage have a significant influence on the corporate social responsibility. Meanwhile, institutional ownership weakens the effect of firm size on the disclosure of social responsibility. While institutional ownership weakens the effect of firm age and leverage on the disclosure of social responsibility. Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure, Firm Size, Firm Age, Leverage, Institutional ownership

scholarly journals PENGARUH TATA KELOLA PERUSAHAAN DAN KARAKTERISTIK PERUSAHAAN TERHADAP PENGUNGKAPAN TANGGUNG JAWAB SOSIAL PERUSAHAAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 572-590
Author(s):  
Yulius Kurnia Susanto ◽  
Daves Joshua
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Ownership Concentration ◽  
Firm Age ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Independent Audit ◽  
Firm Characteristic

The purpose of this study was to get empirical evidence about the effect of corporate governance and firm characteristic on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The corporate governance include board size, board independent, audit committee, ownership concentration, foreign ownership and public ownership. The firm characteristic include firm size, leverage, firm age, type of industry and profitability. Sample of this study consisted of 690 data from 179 non finance companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2011 to 2014 and selected by purposive sampling method. Data were analyzed by multiple regression analysis. The results showed thatboard independent, audit committee, ownership concentration, public ownership, firm size and type of industry have an effect on corporate social responsibility disclosure. While the board size, foreign ownership, leverage, firm age and profitability have no effect on corporate social responsibility disclosure.The better the corporate governance, the control and supervision of management to disclose information about corporate social responsibility is increasing. The bigger the company, the greater the demand for the company to disclose information about corporate social responsibility.

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRUKTUR KEPEMILIKAN, PROFITABILITAS, UKURAN PERUSAHAAN, DAN UMUR PERUSAHAAN TERHADAP PENGUNGKAPAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (STUDI EMPIRIS PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR YANG TERCATAT DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA TAHUN 2014)

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 95
Author(s):  
Rizki Widya Puspitaningsih ◽  
Hotman Tohir Pohan
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Negative Influence ◽  
Positive Influence ◽  
Firm Age ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

<em>The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of ownership structure, profitability, firm size, and firm age on Corporate Social Responsibility disclosure. Sample consists of 87 manufacturing firms in Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014. Multiple regression test is used to test hypothesis developed in this study. Result of this study show that firm size has significantly positive influence on CSR disclosure, whereas ultimat ownership has significantly negative influence on Corporate Social Responsibility disclosure. Foreignt ownership, blockholder ownership, profitability, and firm age, on the other hand, do not have significant influence on CSR disclosure</em>

scholarly journals DETERMINAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE (CSRD) PADA PERUSAHAAN PERTAMBANGAN PERIODE 2014-2018

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-131
Author(s):  
Maria Suryaningsih ◽  
Mulia Ningsih
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Significant Positive Effect ◽  
Ownership Structures ◽  
Mining Companies ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Positive Effect

This research has a problem where the company implements corporate social responsibility with the existence of a law, not from awareness. Companies are also not yet aware of the benefits of implementing corporate social responsibility and there are still different previous researchers.This study aims to examine the effect of profitability, leverage, and ownership structure on corporate social responsibility. This study uses data from 15 mining companies listed on the Stock Exchange Index (IDX) during the period 2014 to 2018 using SPSS 24 software. The results showed that profitability had no effect on corporate social responsibility . Leverage has no effect on corporate social responsibility . Ownership Structure has a significant positive effect on corporate social responsibility . That is, high institutional ownership can increase the existence of corporate social responsibility actions and Simultaneously Profitability, Leverage and ownership structures simultaneously have a significant positive effect on corporate social responsibility .

scholarly journals Empirical study on the effective factors of social responsibility disclosure of Iranian companies

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahdi Salehi ◽  
Hossein Tarighi ◽  
Malihe Rezanezhad
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Audit Fees ◽  
Financial Strain ◽  
Firm Age ◽  
Audit Risk ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Practical Implications

Purpose The purpose of this paper is twofold: first, to investigate the relationship between some characteristics of corporations including firm size, financial leverage, profitability, firm age and the type of industry with social responsibility disclosure of firms listed on Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE); and second, to study the association between the level of corporate social responsibility disclosure (CSRD) and some of the audit variables such as audit fees, audit tenure and audit firm’ size. Design/methodology/approach The study population consists of 125 firms listed on the TSE during the years 2010–2015. Following Salehi et al. (2017), content analysis is used to measure the level of social responsibility disclosure, and hypotheses are performed using multiple regression analysis and R software. Findings The results represented that there is a positive significant relationship between a firm size and a firm age with the level of CSRD. However, there is a negative significant association between financial leverage and profitability with the level of CSRD. Given that CSRD is different among various industries and the type of industry can be an influential factor in CSRD, an industry type’ variable in the fourth hypothesis is of a type of index variable and has eight levels, of which the first level is ranked as the base level. Our findings showed that the level of CSRD at industries of machinery and appliances, production of metal products, food and beverage products, and textiles is lower than the baseline level (pharmacy). Nevertheless, companies in the fifth industry (mineral products) have a higher level of CSRD in comparison with the pharmacy industry. Moreover, the authors find that there is a significant positive connection between audit fees and CSRD. This implies that Iranian managers in an inflationary economy probably manage earnings when they provide more CSRDs, which leads to increase in the audit risk and audit fees. Practical implications Needless to say, the findings of this paper will have practical implications for investors, auditors and other users of financial statements. First of all, this study will aware them of the fact that when a country faces economic sanctions and most of its companies are in financial strain investors should not consider the firms engaging in corporate social responsibility activities to behave morally and provide transparent financial reports. Second, the results will convince auditors to be conservative toward the firms that are financially distressed, for audit risk of them will be high. Thus, policymakers should be cautious concerning directors’ opportunistic actions and increase monitoring to enforce social obedience. Originality/value The turning point of this research is related to the time period of research related to firms that have faced severe financial problems due to economic sanctions. In fact, the study revealed another aspect of CSRD that could have negative consequences when managers are in financial strain and take opportunistic actions.

scholarly journals PENGARUH ELEMEN-ELEMEN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DAN KUALITAS AUDIT TERHADAP LUAS PENGUNGKAPAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ester Ayu Febriana ◽  
Abdul Halim ◽  
Ati Retna Sari
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of elements of Corporate Governance (CG) on the extent of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosure in banking companies listed on the IDX and identify the factors that influence companies to conduct disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The elements of Corporate Governance in this study consist of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, audit committee, board of commissioners size, independent board of commissioners and audit quality. The results of the hypothesis test indicate that the Corporate Governance (GCG) variable significantly influences the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on banking companies listed on the IDX. These results can be proven by the results of hypothesis testing which results in Corporate Governance criteria consisting of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, audit committee, board of commissioners, independent board of commissioners and audit quality simultaneously having a significant effect on the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the company banking registered on the IDX. While partially only institutional ownership and audit quality do not significantly influence the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in pharmaceutical sub-sector companies listed on the IDX.

scholarly journals THE IMPACT OF TAX AGGRESSIVENESS, FIRM SIZE, AND FOREIGN OWNERSHIP TO SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 156
Author(s):  
WINNY GRANDIS ◽  
ROSINTA RIA PANGGABEAN
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Foreign Ownership ◽  
Environmental Damage ◽  
Tax Aggressiveness ◽  
Mining Companies ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
The Impact

Mining companies in Indonesia are companies that explore naturalresources as a source of income for the company. The use of mining companies for this study is because the activities undertaken by these companies related to waste and environmental pollution so that the level of industrial risk and environmental damage becomes high. The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of the tax aggressiveness (ETR), firm size (SIZE), and foreign ownership (FOCI) to corporate social responsibility (CSR) of the mining companies. The population in this study are the mining companies which were listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange from year 2010 to 2015. This study uses tax aggressiveness, firm size, and foreign ownership as independent variables; profitability, leverage, and market-to-book ratio as control variables; and also corporate social responsibility as dependent variable. There are 9 samples of mining companies which produced 54 data using purposive sampling technique. This study uselogistic regression method. This study uses Eviews 9 and Microsoft Excel 2007 for data processing. The results showed that the firm size (SIZE) has a significant effect on the company's CSR, while tax aggressiveness and foreign ownership have no significant effect on company’s CSR. This results indicate that the bigger the size of a company will cause greater activities and influences in the society, which make companies pay more attention to social programs and social responsibility disclosures.

scholarly journals The Effect of Firm Size and Corporate Governance Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reghita Nabilla Shafira ◽  
Siti Nur Azizah ◽  
Sri Wahyuni ◽  
Hadi Pramono
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Governance Structure ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Corporate Governance Structure ◽  
Csr Disclosure ◽  
Corporate Social

The purpose of this study is to empirically prove the effect of firm size and corporate governance structure (such as board of commissioner size, institutional ownership and managerial ownership) on corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure. The samples in this study were the mining companies listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2019 using the purposive sampling method. Based on the criteria, there were 58 samples of research data. The data analysis technique used in this study is multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicated that company size, institutional ownership, and managerial ownership have no effect on CSR disclosure. Meanwhile, the size of the board of commissioners has a positive effect on CSR disclosure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document