scholarly journals The Effect of Firm Size and Corporate Governance Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures

Author(s):  
Reghita Nabilla Shafira ◽  
Siti Nur Azizah ◽  
Sri Wahyuni ◽  
Hadi Pramono

The purpose of this study is to empirically prove the effect of firm size and corporate governance structure (such as board of commissioner size, institutional ownership and managerial ownership) on corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure. The samples in this study were the mining companies listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2019 using the purposive sampling method. Based on the criteria, there were 58 samples of research data. The data analysis technique used in this study is multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicated that company size, institutional ownership, and managerial ownership have no effect on CSR disclosure. Meanwhile, the size of the board of commissioners has a positive effect on CSR disclosure.

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ester Ayu Febriana ◽  
Abdul Halim ◽  
Ati Retna Sari

The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence of elements of Corporate Governance (CG) on the extent of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosure in banking companies listed on the IDX and identify the factors that influence companies to conduct disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The elements of Corporate Governance in this study consist of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, audit committee, board of commissioners size, independent board of commissioners and audit quality. The results of the hypothesis test indicate that the Corporate Governance (GCG) variable significantly influences the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on banking companies listed on the IDX. These results can be proven by the results of hypothesis testing which results in Corporate Governance criteria consisting of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, audit committee, board of commissioners, independent board of commissioners and audit quality simultaneously having a significant effect on the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the company banking registered on the IDX. While partially only institutional ownership and audit quality do not significantly influence the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in pharmaceutical sub-sector companies listed on the IDX.


JURNAL PUNDI ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sari Octavera ◽  
Febri Rahadi

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) represents the role and concern of the company towards the social and environmental aspects related to the operations of the company that interacts with the environment and society and the efforts towards sustainable development. In addition, no less important in the company's operations and its relation in meeting stakeholder trust and stimulating investors to invest is the emphasis on Corporate Governance (GCG) mechanisms in achieving good corporate governance. Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance mechanism and corporate image, as seen from the company's value (Tobin's Q), Company Size (LnSIZE) and Leverage (DER) will help achieve the objectives of establishing the company and improve the welfare of its owner or shareholder by increasing stock return. The sample of this research is 10 oil palm plantation sub-sector period 2012-2014 period. Testing simultaneously shows CSR, Managerial Ownership, Institutional Ownership, Corporate Value, Size and Leverage effect on stock return of 24.4%. Partially, CSR, managerial ownership and corporate value have a negative effect while institutional ownership has a positive effect on stock return. However, these findings have not been shown to have a significant effect. Meanwhile, firm size and leverage proved to have a positive and significant effect on stock return. Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility, Good Corporate Governance, Firm Value, Firm Size, Leverage, Stock Return. 


2018 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 979-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurleni Nurleni ◽  
Agus Bandang ◽  
Darmawati Darmawati ◽  
Amiruddin Amiruddin

PurposeThis study aims to analyze the effect of ownership structure that consists of managerial ownership and institutional ownership of the extensive of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure.Design/methodology/approachThe population in this study is manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI), as the manufacturing companies are considered to have great potential on environmental damage (Mathews, 2000). The selected sample were the companies which meet certain criteria (purposive sampling) which published the complete annual financial statements from 2011 to 2015. This study used an analysis method using partial least square (WarpPLS) to assess the effect of the structure of ownership consists of managerial ownership and institutional ownership on the extent of the CSR disclosure.FindingsThe results showed that there is a direct effect of a negative and significant correlation between managerial ownership on CSR disclosure, and there is a direct effect of a positive and significant correlation between institutional ownership on CSR disclosure.Originality/valueOriginality of this paper shows PLS (WarpPLS) that applied to determine the effect between variables managerial and institutional ownership on CSR disclosure. This research is collected data financial statements and annual reports of manufacturing companies obtained from the Indonesia Capital Market Reference Center (PRPM), which is located in the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX), which there has not been research by the methods and the same location.


Author(s):  
Yeterina Widi Nugrahanti

The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of political connection and corporate governance mechanisms (independent board of commissioner, institutional ownership, and board of commissioner size) toward Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosures using Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Guidelines. Purposive sampling technique was conducted and 272 non-financial companies listed in the Indonesian Stock Exchange during 2015-2017 were acquired as the samples (816 firm-years). For testing the hypotheses, unbalanced Generalized Least Square panel data regression was employed. The finding shows that political connection and board of commissioner size have a positive impact on CSR disclosures while independent board of commissioner and institutional ownership do not. This study contributes to political connection, corporate governance mechanism, and CSR disclosure literature by identifying CSR disclosure based on GRI guidelines up to the most detailed level, which are 77 disclosure items indicators and 254 sub-indicators. Meanwhile, previous research only identify CSR disclosure up to 77 GRI indicators without paying attention to the sub-indicators in detail.


2019 ◽  
pp. 569
Author(s):  
Putu Purnama Dewi ◽  
I Gusti Ayu Emi Eka Yanti

Research on the influence of environmental performance on corporate social responsibility is still rarely studied. However, the influence of earnings management and corporate governance on corporate social responsibility has been investigated. This study used  institutional ownership, managerial ownership, board of commissioners and audit committees as corporate governance’s proxy. This study aimed to investigate the influence of environmental performance, earnings management and corporate governance on corporate social responsibility by using mining companies that have been listed on the Indonesian stock exchange and are also registered with PROPER. In this study using multiple regression analysis method with 45 samples which showed the results of research that only environmental performance had an influence on corporate social responsibility, while earnings management, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, board of commissioners and audit committees did not affect corporate social responsibility. Keywords : Environmental performance, earnings management, corporate governance, corporate social responsibility.


Author(s):  
Apriana Rahmawati ◽  
Roekhudin Roekhudin ◽  
Arum Prastiwi

This research aims to investigate the effect of the role of good corporate governance and corporate social responsibility on firm value with profitability as a moderator variable. The object of this research is manufacturing companies listed in index SRIKEHATI period 2017 until 2019, while the subject is 10 companies. All variables from the research data were gathered through secondary data exactly from Indonesia Stock Exchange and the company’s website. Statistical Analysis of the research data used moderate regression analysis with significance in accordance with the output of SPSS 20. Findings indicated that managerial ownership has a positive significant effect on firm value, institutional ownership has a positive significant effect on firm value, board commissioners have a positive significant effect on firm value, and corporate social responsibility has a negative insignificant effect on firm value. Variable profitability moderates managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and corporate social responsibility on firm value but can’t moderate the board of commissioners on firm value.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Siti Nur Halimah ◽  
Rahmawati Rahmawati

Information on disclosure of corporate social responsibility is information on a company's social responsibility to parties outside the company. This disclosure is disclosed in the company's annual report and corporate governance report. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of corporate governance and the size of the company on the disclosure of Islamic banking in Indonesia and to analyze the effect of moderating variables on disclosure of corporate social responsibility. The number of datatook in this study was 48 data that had been processed. The data used in this study were the annual Islamic banking reports, financial statements, and corporate governance reports respectively. This test used regression tests and moderating variables. The results obtained that CSR commitment has positive correlation to CSR disclosure and the existence of female's board, managerial ownership has negative correlation to CSR disclosure, meanwhile, board size does not affect the CSR disclosure. After applied the moderation variable, it increased the disclosure of corporate social responsibility.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Etty Murwaningsari

<p class="Style1">This study aims to identify the impact of Good Corporate Governance, represented by institutional ownership and managerial ownership, on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance.It examines 126 manufacturing companies listed at the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) and have issued audited financial statements for 2006. The statistical method used to test the hypothesis is Path Analysis. The main results suggest that Good Corporate Governance has effects on both Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance whereas Corporate Social Responsibility has significant effects on Corporate Financial Performance. The other results regarding controlling variables suggest that CEO Tenure, has significant effects on Corporate Social Responsibility. Yet, there is no strong evidence to support that types of industry serve as an influencing factor on Corporate Social Responsibility as well as no influence of Corporate Secretary and Nomination and Remuneration Committee on Corporate Financial Performance.</p><p class="Style1"><strong>Keyword: </strong>corporate governance, corporate social responsibilities, corporate financial performance, Tobin's Q, institutional ownership, managerial ownership.</p>


Author(s):  
Agustin Palupi

Objective – Corporate social responsibility disclosure (CSRD) is an interesting issue, which has an influence on the decision of an investor when deciding whether to invest in a company. This study examines the empirical evidence about the factors which influence CSRD. The factors include media exposure, taxes aggressiveness, and corporate governance. Methodology/Technique – This study uses companies listed in the non-financial sector on the Indonesian Stock Exchange between 2014-2016. There are 64 companies that meet these criteria using a purposive sampling method. Findings – The results show that media exposure, taxes aggressiveness, institutional ownership, independent commissioner, and firm size have an influence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. Firm age, leverage, profitability, liquidity, and managerial ownership have no influence toward corporate social responsibility disclosure. Type of Paper: Empirical Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility; Media Exposure; Taxes Aggressiveness; Firm Age; Leverage; Profitability; Liquidity; Institutional Ownership; Managerial Ownership; Independent Commissioner. Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Palupi, A; 2019. The Relationship among Media Exposure, Taxes Aggressiveness, and Corporate Governance on CSR Disclosure, Acc. Fin. Review 4 (4): 96 – 105 https://doi.org/10.35609/afr.2019.4.4(1) JEL Classification: M14, M19, M41.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document