scholarly journals Temperature Effect and Battery Charging Characteristics Analysis Based on Charging C-Rate

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-165 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Lithium Iron Phosphate ◽  
Dynamic Performance ◽  
Lithium Ion ◽  
Iron Phosphate ◽  
Battery Life ◽  
Battery Charging ◽  
Charging Time ◽  
Fast Charging ◽  
Characteristics Analysis ◽  
Lifepo4 Battery

Developing fast charging proprieties for LiFePo4 battery is a key issue for a wider deployment of EV. The main drawback of LiFePo4 battery charging is overcharge, overcurrent and high temperature which affects longevity, efficiency, and battery life cycle. In this research, lithium iron phosphate (LiFePo4) battery is investigated for fast, and rapid charging with CC-CV principle. MATLAB/Simulink based custom-designed tool was developed. A dynamic model of lithium-ion phosphate battery is proposed in this research by considering the significant temperature and capacity fading effects. Results have shown that the LiFePo4 battery can be used for fast charging up to 100% and rapid charging up to 85% by maintaining the condition for lifespan of the battery and to shorten the charging time. The simulation results have been showed that, the constructed model can really represent the dynamic performance feature of the lithium-ion battery. The modified model can assess the efficiency of battery execution based on charging C-rate conditions.

Graphenised Lithium Iron Phosphate and Lithium Manganese Silicate Hybrid Cathodes: Potentials for Application in Lithium‐ion Batteries

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (12) ◽  
pp. 2982-2999
Author(s):  
Zolani Myalo ◽  
Chinwe Oluchi Ikpo ◽  
Assumpta Chinwe Nwanya ◽  
Miranda Mengwi Ndipingwi ◽  
Samantha Fiona Duoman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lithium Ion Batteries ◽  
Lithium Iron Phosphate ◽  
Lithium Ion ◽  
Iron Phosphate ◽  
Manganese Silicate ◽  
Lithium Manganese

scholarly journals A Novel Pyrometallurgical Recycling Process for Lithium-Ion Batteries and Its Application to the Recycling of LCO and LFP

Metals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 149
Author(s):  
Alexandra Holzer ◽  
Stefan Windisch-Kern ◽  
Christoph Ponak ◽  
Harald Raupenstrauch
Keyword(s):  
Lithium Ion Batteries ◽  
Lithium Iron Phosphate ◽  
Process Development ◽  
Removal Rate ◽  
Continuous Process ◽  
Lithium Ion ◽  
Iron Phosphate ◽  
Recycling Process ◽  
Subsequent Step ◽  
Pre Treatment

The bottleneck of recycling chains for spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is the recovery of valuable metals from the black matter that remains after dismantling and deactivation in pre‑treatment processes, which has to be treated in a subsequent step with pyrometallurgical and/or hydrometallurgical methods. In the course of this paper, investigations in a heating microscope were conducted to determine the high-temperature behavior of the cathode materials lithium cobalt oxide (LCO—chem., LiCoO2) and lithium iron phosphate (LFP—chem., LiFePO4) from LIB with carbon addition. For the purpose of continuous process development of a novel pyrometallurgical recycling process and adaptation of this to the requirements of the LIB material, two different reactor designs were examined. When treating LCO in an Al2O3 crucible, lithium could be removed at a rate of 76% via the gas stream, which is directly and purely available for further processing. In contrast, a removal rate of lithium of up to 97% was achieved in an MgO crucible. In addition, the basic capability of the concept for the treatment of LFP was investigated whereby a phosphorus removal rate of 64% with a simultaneous lithium removal rate of 68% was observed.

Polyol Synthesis of Lithium Iron Phosphate with Carbon Nanotubes: Effect of Dispersion on Crystallinity and Electrochemical Performance

2014 ◽  
Vol 1678 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley D. Tennyson
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Nanotubes ◽  
Carbon Black ◽  
Lithium Iron Phosphate ◽  
Iron Phosphate ◽  
Polyol Synthesis ◽  
Battery Life ◽  
Unique Challenge ◽  
Weight Percentage ◽  
Conductive Additive ◽  
Power Capability

ABSTRACTCarbon nanotubes (CNTs) have been shown to be a viable conductive additive in Li-Ion batteries [1]. By using CNTs battery life, energy, and power capability can all be improved over carbon black, the traditional conductive additive. A significantly smaller weight percentage (5% CNTs) is needed to get the same conductivity as 20% carbon black. Many of the previous efforts found that a combination of conductive additives was most advantageous [2]. Unfortunately many of these efforts did not attend to the unique challenge that dispersing nanotubes presents and used non-optimal methods to disperse CNTs (e.g. ball milling) [3,4]. With poor dispersion a stable and resilient conductive network in the cathode is hard to form with CNTs alone. Here we investigate the formation of LiFePO₄ with CNTs using a polyol process synthesis.

Modification of liquid-phase synthesis of lithium-iron phosphate, a cathode material for lithium-ion battery

2012 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. 879-882 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. N. Kudryavtsev ◽  
R. V. Sibiryakov ◽  
D. V. Agafonov ◽  
V. N. Naraev ◽  
A. V. Bobyl’
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Phase ◽  
Cathode Material ◽  
Lithium Ion Battery ◽  
Lithium Iron Phosphate ◽  
Lithium Ion ◽  
Iron Phosphate ◽  
Phase Synthesis

Iron Phosphates as Cathodes of Lithium-Ion Batteries

2006 ◽  
Vol 973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shijun Wang ◽  
M. Stanley Whittingham
Keyword(s):  
Lithium Ion Batteries ◽  
Lithium Iron Phosphate ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Lithium Ion ◽  
Iron Phosphate ◽  
Environmentally Benign ◽  
Iron Phosphates ◽  
Electrochemical Capacity ◽  
High Theoretical Capacity ◽  
Olivine Structure

ABSTRACTThis study focusses on optimizing the parameters of the hydrothermal synthesis to produce iron phosphates for lithium ion batteries, with an emphasis on pure LiFePO4 with the olivine structure and compounds containing a higher iron:phosphate ratio. Lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4) is a promising cathode candidate for lithium ion batteries due to its high theoretical capacity, environmentally benign and the low cost of starting materials. Well crystallized LiFePO4 can be successfully synthesized at temperatures above 150 °C. The addition of a reducing agent, such as hydrazine, is essential to minimize the oxidation of ferrous (Fe2+) to ferric (Fe3+) in the final compound. The morphology of LiFePO4 is highly dependent on the pH of the initial solution. This study also investigated the lipscombite iron phosphates of formula Fe1.33PO4OH. This compound has a log-like structure formed by Fe-O octahedral chains. The chains are partially occupied by the Fe3+ sites, and these iron atoms and some of the vacancies can be substituted by other cations. Most of the protons can be ion-exchanged for lithium, and the electrochemical capacity is much increased.

Synthesis and Characterization of Mg and Ti Ions Co-Doped Lithium Iron Phosphate and Its Lithium-Ion Batteries

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (09) ◽  
pp. 2084-2090 ◽  
Author(s):  
WANG Zhen-Po ◽  
◽  
LIU Wen ◽  
WANG Yue ◽  
ZHAO Chun-Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lithium Ion Batteries ◽  
Lithium Iron Phosphate ◽  
Lithium Ion ◽  
Iron Phosphate ◽  
Synthesis And Characterization ◽  
Co Doped

scholarly journals LiFePO4-Graphene Composites as High-Performance Cathodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries: The Impact of Size and Morphology of Graphene

Materials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanqing Fu ◽  
Qiliang Wei ◽  
Gaixia Zhang ◽  
Yu Zhong ◽  
Nima Moghimian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electrochemical Performance ◽  
High Performance ◽  
Lithium Iron Phosphate ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Lithium Ion ◽  
Iron Phosphate ◽  
Full Potential ◽  
Active Materials ◽  
Size And Morphology ◽  
The Impact

In this work, we investigated three types of graphene (i.e., home-made G, G V4, and G V20) with different size and morphology, as additives to a lithium iron phosphate (LFP) cathode for the lithium-ion battery. Both the LFP and the two types of graphene (G V4 and G V20) were sourced from industrial, large-volume manufacturers, enabling cathode production at low cost. The use of wrinkled and/or large pieces of a graphene matrix shows promising electrochemical performance when used as an additive to the LFP, which indicates that the features of large and curved graphene pieces enable construction of a more effective conducting network to realize the full potential of the active materials. Specifically, compared to pristine LFP, the LFP/G, LFP/G V20, and LFP/G V4 show up to a 9.2%, 6.9%, and 4.6% increase, respectively, in a capacity at 1 C. Furthermore, the LFP combined with graphene exhibits a better rate performance than tested with two different charge/discharge modes. Moreover, from the economic and electrochemical performance view point, we also demonstrated that 1% of graphene content is optimized no matter the capacity calculated, based on the LFP/graphene composite or pure LFP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document