scholarly journals COMPARISION OF ROPIVACAINE AND BUPIVACAINE IN SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXSUS BLOCK

2020 ◽  
pp. 17-19
Author(s):  
Prajapati Jigar s ◽  
Alka Shah ◽  
Pujaben barad ◽  
Keta Patel ◽  
Dipesh shah
Keyword(s):  
Upper Limb ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Residual Effect ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Toxic Effects ◽  
Upper Limb Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group B

Background : Regional Anesthesia in the form of supraclavicular approach to the brachial plexus is often used for orthopedic surgeries of the upper limb. It is often used either as an adjuvant to general anesthesia or as the primary anaesthetic. Bupivacaine’s cardiac and central nervous system toxic effects in some patients prompted the researchers to develop new local anesthetic agent with a profile similar to Bupivacaine without considerable toxic effects. One such possible replacement for Bupivacaine was Ropivacaine. However Ropivacaine’s latency of sensory analgesia was approximately two thirds that of Bupivacaine, therefore it was not as effective in promoting prolonged post-operative analgesia. Method : This was a prospective randomized double blinded comparative study on all patients of orthopaedic department affiliated with tertiary care centre who was undergoing upper limb surgery during the study period. Patients with higher ASA grade (3 or 4), with severe morbidity conditions and having allergy to local anaesthetic drugs were excluded from study. A total 60 patients were selected and assigned into two groups randomly (30 in each group).Group A received 20ml of 0.75% of Ropivacaine plus Xylocaine 2% 10 ml while Group B received 20ml of 0.5% of Bupivacaine plus Xylocaine 2% 10 ml by supraclavicular route. Intraoperatively all the vital parameter monitored. At the end of surgery, the residual effect and duration of surgery noted and after shifting of patient to the ward, patients visited for the assessment. Postoperative analgesia assessed by 10 point of visual analogue scale.Results : There was no significant difference regarding age, weight and sex distribution between two groups. The Onset of sensory block of Group R is nearly 7.07+/-0.82 minutes while in Group B it is 7.1+/-0.84 minutes and the Onset of motor block in Group R is 11.23+/-1 minutes while that in group B is 11.2+/-0.99 minutes. The duration of sensory block in Group R is nearly 9.80+/-0.41 hours (548.2 ± 24.62 minutes) while that in Group B is 9.81+/-0.46 hours (589.2 ± 27.74 minutes) and the duration of motor block in Group R is 9.95+/-0.46 hours (534.4 ± 27.65 minutes) while in Group B it is 9.96+/-0.41 hours (596.0 ± 24.70 minutes).Conclusion : Onset of sensory block and onset of motor block in ropivacaine group andbupivacaine group are similar and there are no clinical and statistical differences in the two groups. Duration of sensory and duration of motor blockade in in ropivacaine group and bupivacaine group are similar and there are no clinical and statistical differences in the two groups. No differences are found in in hemodynamic parameters (HR, BP, SPO2) in the two groups. All the patients in two groups were stable hemodynamically during surgery.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Efficacy of Magnesium Sulphate as an Adjuvant to Lignocaine for Intravenous Regional Anaesthesia for Upper Limb Surgery

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 840-844 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Narang ◽  
J. S. Dali ◽  
M. Agarwal ◽  
R. Garg
Keyword(s):  
Upper Limb ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Magnesium Sulphate ◽  
Regional Anaesthesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Tourniquet Pain ◽  
Upper Limb Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Intravenous Regional Anaesthesia

Several additives have been combined with local anaesthetics for intravenous regional anaesthesia to improve block quality, analgesia and to decrease tourniquet pain. Magnesium sulphate is one potential additive. This prospective, randomised, double-blinded study was conducted in 30 ASA physical status I or II patients undergoing upper limb surgery under tourniquet. In group L, patients received intravenous regional anaesthesia with lignocaine alone (9 ml of 2% lignocaine diluted with normal saline to total volume of 36 ml). Patients in group M received intravenous regional anaesthesia with lignocaine plus magnesium sulphate (6 ml of 25% magnesium sulphate plus 9 ml of 2% lignocaine diluted with normal saline to total volume of 36 ml). Assessment was by observing the response to injection of drug; sensory and motor block and tourniquet pain. The mean time of onset of sensory block was 12.40 and 3.47 minutes in groups L and M respectively (P <0.001). The average times of onset of motor block in groups L and M were 17 and six minutes respectively (P <0.001). Of the patients in group M, 66.7% reported moderate to severe pain while the drug was being injected, compared to 20% in group L (P=0.011). There was a statistically significant difference in visual analogue scale for tourniquet pain at 10 and 30 minutes after tourniquet inflation (lower in group M). These findings indicate that magnesium sulphate added as an adjuvant to lignocaine hastens the onset of sensory and motor block and decreases tourniquet pain. However, there is increased incidence of transient pain on injection if magnesium sulphate is added.

scholarly journals A comparative study to assess the efficacy of addition of dexmedetomidine to levobupivacaine in brachial plexus block

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-160
Author(s):  
Shabeel Aboobacker C P ◽  
Shamjith K ◽  
Melbin Baby ◽  
Salman Mohammed Kutty C
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Random Allocation ◽  
Duration Of Action ◽  
Upper Limb Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Plexus Block

Brachial plexus block is one of the best surgical technique for upper limb surgeries. It is a good anesthetic and analgesic agent. Though levobupivacaine has a duration of action of three to eight hours it has an acceptable analgesic property and few other practical constraints. Addition of vasoconstrictors like α-adrenergic agonists, hyaluronidase, neostigmine, opioids have been found to be effective. Dexmedetomidine, an α2 receptor agonist has found to be a better adjuvant to levobupivacaine by few literatures. To assess the effect of levobupivacaine 0.5% alone and with dexmedetomidine 100 μg as an adjuvant to levobupivacaine 0.5% on the onset and duration of sensory and motor block, the duration of perioperative analgesia, complications and sedation score.This study was conducted after ethical committee clearance in a tertiary care medical college hospital in northern Kerala, India. 60 patients between the age of 18 and 60 years planned for upper limb surgery under brachial plexus block, who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. A pre anesthetic checkup was done to assess the patient before including in the study. The patients who were included in the study were randomly assigned into two groups – one group received 1 ml (100µg) dexmedetomidine with 39 ml of 0.5% Levobupivacaine(LD group) and the second group received 1 ml of 0.9% normal saline and 39 ml of 0.5% Levobupivacaine(LS group) as anesthetic agent through sealed envelope technique. The clinical history, vitals and hemodynamic parameters were monitored and noted prior to and during the surgery. The data collected was analyzed and tabulated. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups with respect to age, Gender and weight signifying proper random allocation of study subjects. None in LD group required post operative analgesia. The mean duration of onset of sensory and motor block was earlier and duration of motor and sensory analgesia was prolonged with the addition of Dexmedetomidine to Levobupivacaine. The hemodynamic stability was better with Dexmedetomidine. Bradycardia was reported in 20% of study participants who were administered dexmedetomidine Dexmedetomidine added to levobupivacaine provides better anesthetic and analgesic care in upper limb surgeries done using brachial plexus block.

scholarly journals Comparison between two mixtures of lidocaine and bupivacaine for infraclavicular block: a double blind randomized trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 1342
Author(s):  
El Kaissi Jaber ◽  
El Moqaddem Amine ◽  
Khalil Mounir ◽  
Kechna Hicham ◽  
Hachimi Moulay Ahmed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Upper Limb Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Infraclavicular Block ◽  
Group B

Background: We compare the two mixtures in terms of efficiency, analgesia, and side effects.Methods: 30 patients scheduled for upper limb surgery were randomized in 2 groups. the group A received a mixture of 50% lidocaine 2% and 50% of bupivacaine 0.5% the group B received a mixture of 75% lidocaine 1% and 25% of bupivacaine 0.5%. Volumes, block onset times, blocks duration times, analgesia, and toxicity were compared.Results: The volumes were equals in both groups. Sensory block onset was 5.43 min in the group A versus 6.73 min in the group B, motor block onset was 11.93 for the group A versus 13.46 min for the group B. Sensory block duration was 5.48 hours in the group A versus 4.05 hours for the group B (p=0.037), motor block duration was 7.75 hours for group A versus 5.50 hours for group B (p=0.014). Analgesia levels are equals between the two groups, there was no side effects listed.Conclusions: The use of low concentrated lidocaine and bupivacaine mixture induces an adequate anaesthesia and decreases the duration of motor block with a reduced level of pain and an equal level of analgesia.

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF 0.5 % BUPIVACAINE WITH FENTANYL VERSUS 0.75% ROPIVACAINE WITH FENTANYL IN EPIDURALANESTHESIA FOR ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY

2021 ◽  
pp. 71-73
Author(s):  
Pravin Vijayan ◽  
Debarshi Jana
Keyword(s):  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Local Anaesthetics ◽  
Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group B ◽  
Time To Onset

INTRODUCTION Abdominal hysterectomy (AH) is a quite common gynaecological surgical procedure and electively done under central neuraxial blockade. AH is performed for malignant as well as benign indications such as uterine leiomyoma, persistent vaginal bleeding, or pelvic organ prolapse. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES Compare the onset of motor and sensory block. Find out the duration of the sensory and motor blockade. Observe intraoperative hemodynamic changes and assess post-operative analgesia requirements in 24 hour. Duration of analgesia assessed by requirement of rst rescue analgesic. Observe any untoward incident during intraoperative and post-operative period and managed accordingly MATERIALS AND METHODS Study Area: Department of Anesthesiology & critical care, DARBHANGAMEDICALCOLLEGE AND HOSPITAL. Study Population: Adult patients (30- 65 years) undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy with regional anaesthesia were included for this study. Study Period:January 2019 to March 2020 Sample Design: Subjects were divided into two groups (n=35) equal in numbers and they sampled as per computerized randomization chart. These patients were divided into two groups, group B (with epidural 0.5% bupivacaine and 100g fentanyl) and group R (with epidural 0.75% ropivavaine and 100g fentanyl). Study Design: Prospective, open, randomized, controlled study. RESULTS: In Our study showed that 3.38kg/m2 and 24.86 3.60 kg/m2in group B and R respectively. The duration of surgery was 100.86 9.35minutes and 98.86 8.32 minutes and the duration of stay, was4.86 0.81days and 4.60 0.914 days in group B and group R respectively. Now with comparison of both groups, time to onset of sensory block (uptoT6) has signicant variation. But the other parameters namely, time to onset of motor block, two segment regression or duration of sensory block, rescue analgesia timing and complete motor recovery time were comparable and not signicant statistically in both groups. SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS To conclude that in the present study using 0.5% bupivacaine with fentanyl and 0.75% ropivacaine with fentanyl epidurally, ropivacaine produced an earlier onset but similar duration of sensory block. The onset, quality and duration of motor block werecomparable in both the groups. It is important that new local anaesthetics with lower cardiotoxic property are adopted to ensure that regional techniques using large amounts of local anaesthetics remain safe with minimal complications. The recovery prole of ropivacaine may be useful where prompt mobilization is require

scholarly journals Comparison between isobaric levobupivacaine 0.5% and hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% in spinal anesthesia in lower limb surgeries and lower abdominal surgeries in adult patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 418
Author(s):  
Preeti Parashar ◽  
Anisha Singh ◽  
Manoj Kumar Sharma ◽  
Dipak L. Raval
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Mean Time

 Background: The aim of our study was to compare sensory and motor block characteristics and hemodynamic changes following intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%) and isobaric levobupivacaine (0.5%) in elective lower limb and lower abdominal surgeries.Methods: 60 patients of either sex, aged 18-60 years, ASA grade I or II scheduled for elective lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries were randomized into two groups, group B (n=30) and group L (n=30) and received either 3 ml of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine or isobaric levobupivacaine intrathecally.Results: The mean time of onset of sensory block at shin of tibia in both the groups was comparable i.e. levobupivacaine (1.19±0.2 minutes) and bupivacaine (1.1+0.2 minutes). The mean time for total duration of sensory block was 211.1±8.2 minutes in group L, while 193.13±13.7 minutes in group B. Time for total duration of motor block in group L was 198.76±8.428 minutes and in group B was 182.6±13.989 minutes. Statistically significant difference was observed in total duration of sensory and motor block in both levobupivaciane and bupivacaine group (p<0.0001). Patients in group L were hemodynamically more stable with significantly less decrease in pulse rate, systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure as compared to group B.Conclusions: We observed that 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine provided better hemodynamic stability, longer duration of sensory and motor block as compared to bupivacaine. 

Comparative study of (0.5%) levobupivacaine and (0.75%) ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block by lateral approach

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 2426
Author(s):  
Jitesh Kumar ◽  
. Sweta ◽  
Kumari Kanak Lata ◽  
B. K. Prasad ◽  
V. K. Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Lateral Approach ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Upper Limb Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Plexus Block

Background: As compared to general anaesthesia, brachial plexus block for upper limb surgery gives fewer side effects and better postoperative analgesia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of 0.5% levobupivacaine and compare it with 0.75% ropivacaine.Methods: For this prospective randomized, controlled study, 60 patients of both sexes of ASA grade 1 and 2 were enrolled and divided into two groups and supraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed by lateral approach using 30 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine and 0.75% ropivacaine. The onset of sensory and motor block, duration of sensory and motor block and analgesia and possible adverse events were recorded.Results: No statistically significant difference was observed in the onset of sensory block in both groups. Onset of motor block was significantly faster in levobupivacaine group (P<0.05). Duration of sensory block, motor block and analgesia was significantly longer in levobupivacaine group (P<0.05).Conclusions: 0.5% levobupivacaine is better alternative to 0.75% ropivacaine in brachial plexus block in term of early onset of sensory block and long duration of analgesia.

scholarly journals Comparison of prophylactic versus regular use of antibiotics in elective major obstetrical and gynecological surgeries

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 580
Author(s):  
Ramya Sreevarshni Shunmugha Sundharam ◽  
Hiremath P. B. ◽  
Sankareswari R.
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Prophylactic Antibiotic ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Therapeutic Drug ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Background: Surgical site infections better prevented by parenteral antibiotic in sufficient doses generally should be given before the operation which helps to achieve the therapeutic drug level both in the blood and related tissue during the operation. Ceftriaxone, when administered together as a prophylaxis can fulfil the above criteria of a good antibiotic. Thus, this study was planned to assess the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotic usage to that of regular antibiotics usage in patients undergoing elective surgeries.Methods: This randomized controlled study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital during the study period of June 2017 to April 2018 with 140 cases. Group A received a single dose of Injection Ceftriaxone 1g. Group B, received Injection Ceftriaxone 1 gm and Injection Metronidazole 500 mg for five days. The data was entered in excel sheet and analyzed using SPSS (Version 16).Results: The mean age group in Group A and Group B was found to be 34.24±10.5 and 35.97±11.89, respectively. There was no statistical significance between group A and B for incidence of infection in the post-operative period and duration of hospital stay. The mean value in group A for duration of surgery was found to be 67.5±13.5 and in group B mean value was 72.1±14.9. (p value <0.05).Conclusions: This study demonstrated that administration of prophylactic antibiotic rather than conventional antibiotic at caesarean and gynecological surgeries are not associated with significant difference in post-operative morbidities.

scholarly journals Clinical and Postoperative Outcomes of Cancer Surgeries during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comparative Study with its Pre-COVID Surgical Audit at Five Major Tertiary Care Hospitals’ Cancer Departments in India

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (04) ◽  
pp. 311-318
Author(s):  
Anil Heroor ◽  
Rajnish Talwar ◽  
Rama Joshi ◽  
Sandeep Nayak ◽  
B. Niranjan Naik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Cancer Management ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Introduction There has been an exponential rise in number of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-positive infections since March 23, 2020. However, cancer management cannot take a backseat. Objective The aim of this study was to identify any difference in the complication and mortality rates for the cancer patients operated during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database of five centers situated in different parts of India. Variables such as demographics, intraoperative, and postoperative complications were compared between COVID-19 (group A—March 23, 2020–May 22, 2020) and pre-COVID time period (group B—January 1 to January 31, 2020). Results One-hundred sixty-eight cancer surgeries were performed in group B as compared with 148 patients who underwent oncosurgeries in group A. Sixty-two percent lesser cancer surgeries were performed in the COVID-19 period as compared with the specific pre-COVID-19 period. There was no significant difference in age group, gender, comorbidities, and type of cancer surgeries. Except for the duration of surgery, all other intraoperative parameters like blood loss and intraoperative parameters were similar in both the groups. Minimally invasive procedures were significantly lesser in group A. Postoperative parameters including period of intensive care unit stay, rate of infection, need for the change of antibiotics, and culture growth were similar for both the groups. While minor complication like Clavien-Dindo classification type 2 was significantly higher for group A, all other complication rates were similar in the groups. Also, postoperatively no COVID-19-related symptoms were encountered in the study group. A subset analysis was done among the study groups between those tested preoperatively for COVID-19 versus those untested showed no difference in intraoperative and postoperative parameters. No health-care worker was infected from the patient during the time period of this study. Conclusion Our study shows that there is no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative morbidity and mortality rates in surgeries performed during COVID-19 pandemic as compared with non-COVID-19 time period.

scholarly journals A CLINICAL COMPARISON OF 0.75% ISOBARIC ROPIVACAINE WITH 0.5% ISOBARIC BUPIVACAINE IN SUPRACLAVICULAR BRACHIAL PLEXUS BLOCK FOR UPPER LIMB SURGERIES

2020 ◽  
pp. 43-46
Author(s):  
Kalyan Sarma ◽  
Bandana Mahanta ◽  
Prabir Pranjal Das
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Motor Blockade ◽  
Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Plexus Block

Background: Regional anaesthesia and analgesia, has the potential to provide excellent operating conditions along with better and prolonged post-operative with pain relief with fewer side effects. As a result, it is becoming increasingly popular for ambulatory anaesthesia and for day care patients.. Among the commonly used local anaesthetics, lignocaine and bupivacaine, bupivacaine has significant cardiovascular and central nervous system toxicity. In addition, bupivacaine also has lesser differentiation between sensory and motor blockade post-operatively. Ropivacaine and levobupivacaine were developed to avoid the bupivacaine related toxicities. The clinical safety profile of ropivacaine seems to be more favourable than that of levobupivacaine. With this background the following study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of ropivacaine 0.75% for brachial plexus block in upper limb surgeries and its clinical comparison with bupivacaine 0.5%. Aims and Objectives: To assess the efficacy and toxicity of ropivacaine 0.75% and bupivacaine 0.5% as potential agents for brachial plexus block for surgeries of the upper limb around and below the elbow. Settings and Design: prospective, comparative, randomized, single blinded clinical trial. Materials and Methods: After institutional ethical committee approval, 100 patients physical status ASA I & II, of either sex, between 18-60 years, weighing between 40-60 kgs posted for upper limb surgeries around the elbow, forearm and hand were divide into two groups of 50 patients each. Group R (Ropivacaine group) received 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine 30 ml in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Group B (Bupivacaine group) received 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine 30 ml in supraclavicular brachial plexus block by using peripheral nerve stimulator. Vitals, sensory, motor and analgesia score at pre-defined intervals intra-operatively were noted. Onset of analgesia, sensory & motor blockade, total duration of post-operative pain relief (VAS ≥ 5) and time of demand of first rescue analgesic were also noted along with any intra-operative complications, if any. Statistical Analysis: All the results were expressed as Mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using Unpaired Student’s t-Test. Statistical significance was considered with a p value of ≤ 0.05. Results: Demographic profile and duration of surgery were comparable among the two groups. The mean time of onset of sensory block, onset of motor block and onset of analgesia were significant (p<0.05) in group R as compared to group B. The mean duration of sensory block and duration of post-operative analgesia were comparable between the two groups. However, the mean duration of motor block was significantly lower (p<0.05) in group R as compared to group B. the baseline hemodynamic variables and requirement of first analgesic dose and other adverse events were equivalent in both the group. Conclusion: Ropivacaine when compared with Bupivacaine, has faster onset of analgesia, sensory & motor blockade, significantly lesser duration of motor blockade. Ropivacaine also provides satisfactory post-operative analgesia with a stable hemodynamic profile similar to Bupivacaine with no undue adverse effects.

scholarly journals Intrathecal Pethidine: An Alternative Anaesthetic for Transurethral Resection of Prostate?

1997 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 650-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. T. H. Sia ◽  
M. Y. H. Chow ◽  
C. K. Koay ◽  
J. L. Chong
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Transurethral Resection ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Transurethral Resection Of Prostate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Randomized Prospective Trial ◽  
Group B

We aimed to determine the usefulness of intrathecal pethidine as the sole anaesthetic for transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) while comparing the incidence of hypotension with intrathecal bupivacaine. A double-binded randomized prospective trial was conducted involving 40 patients for TURP. The patients were divided equally into two groups; group A received 2 ml 0.5% bupivacaine intrathecally and group B received 40 mg pethidine intrathecally. Changes in blood pressure and heart rate were measured over the first 30 minutes. The highest sensory block and the time to reach it were documented. The degree of motor blockade was also recorded. There was no significant difference in the incidence of hypotension. The pethidine group had significantly greater reduction in heart rate, a lower degree of motor block, shorter period before requests for postoperative analgesia but a higher incidence of sedation, nausea and vomiting. Intrathecal pethidine did not offer any advantage over intrathecal bupivacaine for TURP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document