scholarly journals CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL STUDY OF ACUTE APPEDDICITIS WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE ROLE OF WBC COUNT, C-REACTIVE PROTEIN (CRP), USG AND ALVARADO SCORE IN DIAGNOSIS

2020 ◽  
pp. 59-61
Author(s):  
Md. Mushir Reyaz ◽  
Kumari Pallavi ◽  
C. M. Narayan ◽  
Debarshi Jana
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Iliac Fossa ◽  
The Other ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Right Iliac Fossa Pain ◽  
Wbc Count

Background: Acute appendicitis is one of the commonest surgical emergencies in all ages. Diagnosis is mainly clinical, delay in diagnosis definitely increases the morbidity, mortality and cost of treatment, more aggressive surgical approach has resulted in increased white appendectomies. Methods: A total 140 cases hospitalized with abdominal pain, suggestive of acute appendicitis on the basis of WBC count, C-Reactive protein (CRP), USG and Alvarado scoring system and were subsequently operated, were included in the present study in our institute. Results: Males belonging to young age group of 21-30 were most commonly affected. Abdominal pain was seen in 100% of patients.Most of the patients of acute appendicitis presented with more than one of above symptoms. The most common presenting symptom was right iliac fossa pain affecting 96.19% of cases (migratory 62.86% and non-migratory 33.33%), followed by anorexia (78.10%) and nausea (66.67%). The other symptoms were fever (65.71%), vomiting (46.67%), constipation (28.57%), right sided flank pain (22.86%), dysurea (19.05%), suprapubic pain (15.24%), diarrhoea (14.29%) and generalized abdominal pain (13.33%) in decreasing order of frequency. Right iliac fossa pain was the most common presentation in non-appendicitis group, followed by anorexia. There was no significant difference in symptoms among these two groups.In this study 54.29% of patients with acute appendicitis had Alvarado score between 7 – 8 and 34.29% of patients with acute appendicitis had Alvarado score between 9 – 10. On the other hand majority of the patients of non-appendicitis group had a score below 7. Conclusions: Young males are most commonly affected almost always presents with abdominal pain. The Modified Alvarado scoring system is a reliable and practicable diagnostic modality to increase the accuracy in diagnosis of acute appendicitis and thus to minimise unnecessary appendectomy.

scholarly journals Predictive values of Alvarado score, serum C-reactive protein, and white blood cell count in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a prospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ademola Olusegun Talabi ◽  
Tewogbade Adeoye Adedeji ◽  
Oludayo Adedapo Sowande ◽  
Olusanya Adejuyigbe
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Blood Cell ◽  
Cell Count ◽  
White Blood Cell Count ◽  
White Blood Cell ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Blood Cell Count ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Wbc Count

Abstract Background The diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children is quite challenging as the rate of negative appendectomy varies between 15 and 57%. Increased utilization of imaging diagnostic facilities in advanced countries seems to have reduced the incidence of operating on normal appendix to a single digit. In low- and middle-income countries, the incidence remains unacceptably high (double digits). Inflammatory markers and scoring systems may be a suitable adjunct to increase diagnostic yield in most third world countries. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of Alvarado score, white blood cell count, and serum C-reactive protein in children with acute appendicitis. Results The ages of patients ranged between 4 and 15 years with a mean of 11.2 ± 2.8 years. The male to female ratio was 1.4 to 1.0. Nineteen percent of patients had negative appendiceal findings on histological examination. The sensitivity and specificity of Alvarado score, C-reactive protein estimation, total white blood cell count in diagnosing acute appendicitis were 86.4% and 63.2%, 98.8% and 36.8%, and 51.9% and 89.5% respectively. Alvarado score has the highest area under ROC curve analysis 0.824, 95% CI of 0.724 to 0.924 compared with CRP, 0.769. 95% CI of = 0.647 to 0.891 and WBC count, 0.765, 95% CI of 0.643 to 0.887. Both CRP and WBC count showed higher discriminatory values between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis, p < 0.001. Conclusion Alvarado score outperformed other tests in setting the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. However, none of the tests can be relied on wholly for operative decision. Clinical judgement remains the bedrock for diagnosis and operative management.

scholarly journals Role of C-Reactive Protein, White Blood Cell Counts, Bilirubin Levels, and Imaging in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis as a Cause of Right Iliac Fossa Pain

Cureus ◽  
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shetty Sushruth ◽  
Chellappa Vijayakumar ◽  
Krishnamachari Srinivasan ◽  
Nagarajan Raj Kumar ◽  
Gopal Balasubramaniyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Blood Cell ◽  
Iliac Fossa ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
Blood Cell Counts ◽  
Right Iliac Fossa Pain ◽  
White Blood Cell Counts

scholarly journals A comparative study of RIPASA and Alvarado score for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 4006
Author(s):  
Praveena Suresh ◽  
Rajan Janardhanan ◽  
Deepak Paul
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Iliac Fossa ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Right Iliac Fossa Pain ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Ripasa Score

Background: Acute appendicitis is a common problem and can be difficult to diagnose at time. There are many scoring systems to predict the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The most commonly used scoring system is Alvarado scoring system but, it is far from perfect. In this study we compare Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) scoring system to Alvarado scoring system in correctly diagnosing acute appendicitis.Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in the department of general surgery, Sree Gokulam Medical College and Research Foundation. It comprised of 60 consecutive patients who were admitted with suspicion of appendicitis who had right iliac fossa pain. RIPASA and Alvarado scoring was done and compared to histopathology after surgery. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy was calculated.Results: Majority of the patients were below 30 years of age majority were males 36 (60%). When Alvarado score predicted appendicitis in 31 (51.77%) and RIPASA in 54 (90%). When the RIPASA score was >7.5 the sensitivity was 100%, specificity 67% and accuracy was 95%.Conclusions: RIPASA scoring system is more accurate to diagnose acute appendicitis especially when RIPASA score is >7.5. literatures.

Diagnostic Value of Interleukin-6 and C-Reactive Protein in Acute Appendicitis

Swiss Surgery ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 169-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erkasap ◽  
Ates ◽  
Ustuner ◽  
Sahin ◽  
Yilmaz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Interleukin 6 ◽  
Iliac Fossa ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Perforated Appendix ◽  
Right Iliac Fossa Pain ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Serum Crp

The aim of this study is prospectively to evaluate the serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels in detection of acute appendicitis in patients with right iliac fossa pain. Data were collected in prospective manner on 102 consecutive patients with right iliac fossa pain. Laparotomy was performed for suspected acute appendicitis for 55 of the 102 patients, of whom 49 patients had appendicitis, 6 patients non-appendicitis (NA), and the other 47 patients had nonspecific abdominal pain (NSAP) and they did not undergo operation. Among those with appendicitis 31 had acute appendix (AA), 8 had gangrenous appendix (GA), and 10 had perforated appendix (PA). The WBC and CRP the mean (SEM) values were significantly different in AA, GA, and PA groups compared with NSAP and NA groups (P < 0.05). Although the mean IL-6 levels were significantly different only in PA group than the others groups (P < 0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of serum CRP measurements were calculated as 96% and 87%, respectively whereas these were 33% and 83% for IL-6 levels for the diagnosis of the acute appendicitis. As a result, measurement of the CRP levels and WBC have an additional diagnostic value on the diagnosis of the acute appendicitis but determination of IL-6 levels which added to the test combination of WBC and CRP, the sensitivity for the diagnosis of the acute appendicitis was not changed whereas the specificity was decreased to 66%.

scholarly journals Evaluation of using Alvarado score and C-reactive protein in diagnosing acute appendicitis in children

2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (8) ◽  
pp. 644-648
Author(s):  
Ana Kostic ◽  
Andjelka Slavkovic ◽  
Zoran Marjanovic ◽  
Jelica Madic ◽  
Marijana Krstic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Diagnostic Challenge ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii

Background/Aims. Acute appendicitis (AA) remains a diagnostic challenge in children, despite ongoing researches. With an aim to facilitate making diagnosis of AA many scoring systems have been created; among them Alvarado score is the most popular. C-reactive protein (CRP) has proven significance for diagnosing AA in adults, but not in children. The aim of this study was to evaluate significance of Alvarado score, as well as CRP values, in making diagnosis of AA in children. Methods. This prospective six-month study was performed on 257 patients under the age of 15, admitted for acute abdominal pain in the Clinic of Pediatric Surgery and Orthopedics in the Clinical Centre of Nis. Alvarado score and CRP values were determined on admission and compared with final diagnosis on discharge. The patients were divided into two groups: group I - non operated patients with abdominal pain (n = 184) and group II - operated on patients for appendectomy (n = 73). Results. Values of Alvardo score were statistically significantly different between groups (group I: 4.9 ? 1.21, group II: 8.55 ? 1.32). Also, our results showed significantly high values of CRP measured in operated children (group I: 8.17 ? 4.7 mg/L, group II: 38 ? 26 mg/L). Values of validity parameters for Alvarado score were: sensitivity 90%, specifity 80%, positive predictive values 87%; for CRP 95%, 70% and 80%, respectively. Conclusion. Alvarado score and CRP are very useful adjuvant diagnostic tool for AA to a less experienced surgeon. High values of Alvarado score and CRP cannot be ignored neither at the same time, used as the sole diagnostic method for discriminating children with AA.

scholarly journals Clinico-pathological and etiological evaluation of acute appendicitis and assessment of significance of laboratory and ultrasonography examination as an ancillary aid to clinical diagnosis

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1954
Author(s):  
Sailendra Nath Paul ◽  
Dilip Kumar Das
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Lower Abdominal Pain ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Negative Appendicectomy ◽  
Operative Findings

Background: Timely diagnosis and intervention of acute appendicitis reduces morbidity and mortality associated with the disease condition. The study aimed to evaluate the etiology of acute appendicitis, to analyze the sensitivity of modified Alvarado scoring system and radiology in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and to correlate the observations of laboratory tests, operative findings with the histopathological report of specimen of appendix.Methods: This was a prospective study done on 100 patients with clinical symptoms of acute right lower abdominal pain suggestive of appendicular origin during the period from February 2015 to January 2016 in the department of surgery thorough clinical assessment, laboratory investigations, ultrasound findings as were done for all patients. After confirming the diagnosis of AA the patients had operative intervention and specimens were sent for histopathological study.Results: Male preponderance was seen in the study. Majority of them belongs to 21 to 30 years age group (50%). Faecolith was the most common etiological factor observed (58%). Abdominal pain (100%) was the most common clinical symptom. Alvarado score had sensitivity of 95.74% and specificity of 66.67% in diagnosing AA. In correlation to histopathological findings, ultrasonography findings showed 100% positive visualization rate in all 71 cases. Elevated ESR (94%) had high diagnostic accuracy as confirmed by HPE finding (96.81%) which is statistically significant (p<0.000).Conclusions: Alvarado scoring system, elevated ESR levels and USG findings of the appendix can be considered as adjuncts to clinically diagnose the AA, to improve the diagnostic accuracy thereby consequently the rate of negative appendicectomy can be reduced and thus decreases the complication rates.

APPENDECTOMY IN CHILDREN WITH ACUTE RHEUMATIC FEVER

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1969 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 573-577
Author(s):  
Jer-Shoung Lin ◽  
Ramon Rodriguez-Torres
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Abdominal Pain ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Rheumatic Fever ◽  
Acute Rheumatic Fever ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Initial Symptom ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
The Right

Clinical and laboratory data on five patients with appendectomy, later proved to have acute rheumatic fever, are presented in detail. The findings indicate that abdominal pain simulating acute appendicitis can be presented as the only initial symptom in acute rheumatic fever. Awareness and knowledge of the presence of clues-high fever, rapid sedimentation rate, prolonged P-R interval, and 4 plus C-reactive protein-usually help to make the differential diagnosis. However, if doubt remains, the right approach is to go ahead with surgery since these patients tolerate anesthesia and laparotomy very well.

scholarly journals Diagnostic accuracy of combining C-Reactive protein and Alvarado Score among 2-to-20-year-old patients with acute appendicitis suspected presenting to Emergency Departments

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kinda Altali Alhames ◽  
Francisco Javier Martín-Sánchez ◽  
Pedro Ruiz-Artacho ◽  
Francisco Javier Ayuso ◽  
Victoria Trenchs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Alvarado Score ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Surgical Data ◽  
Suspected Acute Appendicitis

Objective. Main objective was whether the combination of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and Alvarado Score (AS) increase the diagnosis accuracy of AS among 2-to-20-year-old patients with suspected acute appendicitis presenting to Emergency Departments. Materials and methods. This is a secondary analysis of prospective cohort study consecutively including all patients from 2 to 20 years of age attended for suspected acute appendicitis in 4 Spanish Emergency Departments during 6-month period. We collected demographic, clinical, analytic and radiographic, and surgical data. AS categories were retrospectively calculated as low (0-4 points), intermediate (5-6 points) or high (7-10 points). The cut-off levels were >0.5 mg/dl for CRP. The outcome was diagnosis of acute appendicitis within 14 days of the index visit. Results. A total of 331 patients with suspected of acute appendicitis (mean age 11.8 (SD 3.8) years; 52.9% males) were recruited. According to AS, 108 (32.6%) were at low risk, 76 at (23.0%) intermediate risk and 147 (44.4%) at high risk of acute appendicitis. One hundred and sixteen (35.0%) cases had confirmed histopathological diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The AUCs of ROC were 0.76 (0.70-0.81) for AS and 0.79 (95% CI 0.75-0.84) for CRP-AS being the difference statistically significant (p=0.003). The CRP for diagnosis acute appendicitis in low risk AS group had negative predictive value of 95.8% (95%CI 87.3-98.9) and likelihood ratio negative of 0.4 (95%CI 0.2-1.0). Conclusions. CRP-AS has shown to increase the diagnostic accuracy of AS for acute appendicitis. This approach may be useful to rule out the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in paediatric patients attended for abdominal pain suggestive of acute appendicitis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document