COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN OPEN AND LAPAROSCOPIC HERNIOPLASTY IN PARA UMBILICAL HERNIA.

2021 ◽  
pp. 52-53
Author(s):  
Seelam Srinivasa Reddy ◽  
Ravipati Sai Krishna ◽  
Jahnavi Dondapati
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Umbilical Hernia ◽  
Postoperative Morbidity ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Laparoscopic Hernioplasty

In this modern surgery era, laparoscopic surgery has gained paramount importance due to its minimally invasive technique, decreased hospital stay, and better cosmesis. Hence the emphasis is on reducing hospital stay and postoperative morbidity with matter to cosmesis. Even though 1 laparoscopic repair has become more popular for long-term outcomes, it needs further evaluation . The present study compares the paraumbilical 2,3 hernia repair in adults by an open and laparoscopic method in view of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and return to normal activities

scholarly journals One-Stage Total Laparoscopic Treatment for Colorectal Cancer With Synchronous Metastasis. Is It Safe and Feasible?

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Sena ◽  
Arcangelo Picciariello ◽  
Fabio Marino ◽  
Marta Goglia ◽  
Aldo Rocca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Short Term ◽  
One Stage

Liver is the main target organ for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases. It is estimated that ~25% of CRC patients have synchronous metastases at diagnosis, and about 60% of CRC patients will develop metastases during the follow up. Although several teams have performed simultaneous laparoscopic resections (SLR) of liver and colorectal lesions, the feasibility and safety of this approach is still widely debated and few studies on this topic are present in the literature. The purpose of this literature review is to understand the state of the art of SLR and to clarify the potential benefits and limitations of this approach. Several studies have shown that SLR can be performed safely and with short-term outcomes similarly to the separated procedures. Simultaneous laparoscopic colorectal and hepatic resections combine the advantages of one stage surgery with those of laparoscopic surgery. Several reports compared the short-term outcomes of one stage laparoscopic resection with open resections and showed a similar or inferior amount of blood loss, a similar or lower complication rate, and a significant reduction of hospital stay for laparoscopic surgery respect to open surgery but much longer operating times for the laparoscopic technique. Few retrospective studies compared long term outcomes of laparoscopic one stage surgery with the outcomes of open one stage surgery and did not identify any differences about disease free survival and the overall survival. In conclusion, hepatic and colorectal SLR are a safe and effective approach characterized by less intraoperative blood loss, faster recovery of intestinal function, and shorter length of postoperative hospital stay. Moreover, laparoscopic approach is associated to lower rates of surgical complications without significant differences in the long-term outcomes compared to the open surgery.

scholarly journals Robotic and laparoscopic liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases: an experience from a German Academic Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirhasan Rahimli ◽  
Aristotelis Perrakis ◽  
Vera Schellerer ◽  
Andrew Gumbs ◽  
Eric Lorenz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Liver Surgery ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery ◽  
Previous Abdominal Surgery

Abstract Background Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is increasing in incidence. The aim of this work was to present our experience by reporting short-term and long-term outcomes after MILS for CRLM with comparative analysis of laparoscopic (LLS) and robotic liver surgery (RLS). Methods Twenty-five patients with CRLM, who underwent MILS between May 2012 and March 2020, were selected from our retrospective registry of minimally invasive liver surgery (MD-MILS). Thirteen of these patients underwent LLS and 12 RLS. Short-term and long-term outcomes of both groups were analyzed. Results Operating time was significantly longer in the RLS vs. the LLS group (342.0 vs. 200.0 min; p = 0.004). There was no significant difference between the laparoscopic vs. the robotic group regarding length of postoperative stay (8.8 days), measured blood loss (430.4 ml), intraoperative blood transfusion, overall morbidity (20.0%), and liver surgery related morbidity (4%). The mean BMI was 27.3 (range from 19.2 to 44.8) kg/m2. The 30-day mortality was 0%. R0 resection was achieved in all patients (100.0%) in RLS vs. 10 patients (76.9%) in LLS. Major resections were carried out in 32.0% of the cases, and 84.0% of the patients showed intra-abdominal adhesions due to previous abdominal surgery. In 24.0% of cases, the tumor was bilobar, the maximum number of tumors removed was 9, and the largest tumor was 8.5 cm in diameter. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 84, 56.9, and 48.7%, respectively. The 1- and 3-year overall recurrence-free survival rates were 49.6 and 36.2%, respectively, without significant differences between RLS vs. LLS. Conclusion Minimally invasive liver surgery for CRLM is safe and feasible. Minimally invasive resection of multiple lesions and large tumors is also possible. RLS may help to achieve higher rates of R0 resections. High BMI, previous abdominal surgery, and bilobar tumors are not a barrier for MILS. Laparoscopic and robotic liver resections for CRLM provide similar long-term results which are comparable to open techniques.

Pneumonectomy for Treatment of Destroyed Lung: A Retrospective Study of 137 Patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 65 (07) ◽  
pp. 528-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuping Li ◽  
Gening Jiang ◽  
Chang Chen ◽  
Xuefei Hu
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Operative Technique ◽  
Independent Risk Factor ◽  
Multivariate Analyses ◽  
Bronchopleural Fistula ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Destroyed Lung

Objectives Whether pneumonectomy is needed for the treatment of destroyed lungs is still controversial and unresolved in the clinic. Pneumonectomy is destructive and is associated with a significant incidence of postoperative complications. The purpose of this study is to analyze the operative techniques, postoperative morbidity, mortality, and long-term outcomes of patients with destroyed lungs who underwent pneumonectomy. Patients and Methods We retrospectively analyzed 137 patients with destroyed lungs who underwent pneumonectomy. The data were queried for the details of operative technique, development of perioperative complications, mortality, and long-term survival. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the risk factors of pneumonectomy among the patients. Results A total of 77 male and 60 female patients were reviewed. The youngest patient was 18 years, and the oldest was 75 years, with a mean age of 40.1 years. Postoperative complications were observed in 25 patients (18.2%). The rate of bronchopleural fistula (BPF) was 5.1% (7/137). Two perioperative deaths (1.5%) were noted. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated the blood loss (hazard ratio [HR], 5.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27–18.50; p = 0.021) was the independent risk factor of postoperative complications, and the type of the disease (HR, 4.50; 95% CI, 1.19–9.69; p = 0.034) was the independent risk factor of the BPF, for the patients with destroyed lung after pneumonectomy. Conclusion Pneumonectomy for destroyed lung is a high risk for postoperative complications. Our findings suggested that pneumonectomy in destroyed lung was satisfactory with strict surgical indications, adequate preoperative preparation, and careful operative technique, and the long-term outcomes can be especially satisfactory. Pneumonectomy for destroyed lung is still a treatment option.

scholarly journals Fast-track protocols in devascularization for cirrhotic portal hypertension

2015 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
pp. 250-257
Author(s):  
Yang Fei ◽  
Guang-quan Zong ◽  
Jian Chen ◽  
Ren-min Liu
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Pulmonary Infection ◽  
Postoperative Morbidity ◽  
Interdisciplinary Approach ◽  
Food Tolerance ◽  
Standard Procedures ◽  
Group A ◽  
Improving Patient Care

Summary Introduction/objective: fast-tract surgery (FTS) has been rapidly embraced by surgeons as a mechanism for improving patient care and driving down complications and costs. The aim of this study was to determine if any improvement in outcomes occurred after FTS protocol for selective double portazygous disconnection with preserving vagus (SDPDPV) compared with non-FTS postoperative care. Methods: patients eligible for SDPDPV in the period January 2012-April 2014 were randomly selected for the FTS group or non-FTS group. A designed protocol was used in the FTS group with emphasis on an interdisciplinary approach. The non-FTS group was treated using previously established standard procedures. The number of postoperative complications, time of functional recovery and duration of hospital stay were recorded. Results: patients in the FTS group (n=59) and non-FTS group (n=57) did not differ in terms of preoperative data and operative details (p>0.05). The FTS procedure led to significantly better control and faster restoration of gastrointestinal functions, food tolerance, rehabilitation and hospital discharge (p<0.05). Postoperative complications, including nausea/vomiting, severe ascites, wound infection, urinary tract infection and pulmonary infection were all significantly lower in the FTS group (p<0.05). According to the postoperative morbidity classification used by Clavien, overall complications and grade I complications were both significantly lower in the FTS group compared with the non-FTS group (p<0.05). Conclusion: adopting the FTS protocol helped to recover gastrointestinal functions, to reduce frequency of postoperative complications and to reduce hospital stay. The FTS strategy is safe and effective in improving postoperative outcomes.

Urologic laparoscopic surgery: Light and shade

1995 ◽  
Vol 62 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 80-84
Author(s):  
G. Breda ◽  
P. Silvestre ◽  
L. Gherardi ◽  
A. Giunta ◽  
A. Tamai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Surgical Approach ◽  
World Wide ◽  
Critical Evaluation ◽  
Minimally Invasive Technique ◽  
Laparoscopic Technique ◽  
Invasive Technique

— Analysing material and world-wide urologic laparoscopie surgery experience, the Authors try to define, also according to their experience, the indications for which the laparoscopic technique is established and well accepted and, on the contrary, those which are still controversial. Critical evaluation about laparoscopic surgery indications are often supported by the costs of the “minimally invasive” technique compared to the traditional surgical approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document