Lipid control in geriatric DM patients

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a type of chronic disease with exceptional medical care for a patient's lifetime, which ultimately requires lifestyle and behavioural adjustments to prevent complications to death. Patients with good self-care behaviour will cause diabetes to be controlled to avoid complications to death and make patients have a better quality of life. AIM: This study aims (1) to determine the model of self-care behaviour in Type 2 diabetes patients in Binjai City (2) to analyse the effect of self-care behaviour on quality of life, metabolic control and lipid control of Type 2 diabetes patients in Binjai City. METHODS: This type of research is survey-based and explanatory using a cross-sectional approach. The study population was Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) patients who remained patients in 8 primary health centres in Binjai City. The consecutive sampling yielded a sample size of 115 people. Data analysis method uses descriptive statistics and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) using SPSS and Amos 16.0. RESULTS: The results showed that all factors that build T2DM patient self-care behaviour were able to be predictors that shape the patient's self-care behaviour. The self-care behaviour model consists of knowledge, attitudes, communication, financing, family support, motivation, and self-efficacy. Motivation is the most significant predictor of its contribution to the self-care behaviour of Type 2 diabetes patients. Self-care behaviour was also known to be significantly related to the quality of life, metabolic control and lipid control of T2DM patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Self-care behaviour in T2DM patients can have a substantial and significant impact on quality of life, metabolic control and lipid control possessed by Type 2 Diabetes patients.

Download Full-text

The Impact of Changes in Population LDL-C Levels on LDL-C Control in Patients After PCI in China: A Retrospective Cohort Study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-101538/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Huan Liu ◽

Zhipeng Zhou ◽

Yanqing Wu ◽

Jingsong Xu

Keyword(s):

Low Density Lipoprotein ◽

Density Lipoprotein ◽

Blood Lipid ◽

Coronary Intervention ◽

Lifestyle Changes ◽

Treatment Goal ◽

Lipid Lowering ◽

Lipid Control ◽

The Impact

Abstract BANKGROUND: Mortality from coronary artery disease continues to rise, and secondary prevention and treatment are particularly important. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), to describe how treatment outcomes for individual patients changed over time and to examine the potential impact of lipid control rates through population LDL-C levels changes.METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in patients who underwent PCI between July 2017 and June 2019. The main results included LDL-C levels after PCI. To assess the outcome of prevention, three separate measures of LDL-C were considered: baseline, first follow-up, and final follow-up, and LDL-C control rates were analyzed according to different guidelines. we examine the impact of 0.1mmol/l decreases or increases in population LDL-C levels on LDL-C control.RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 423 patients (mean age, 62 ±10 years), and the baseline LDL-C level was 3.11 ± 0.99 mmol/l. 51.5% of the patients achieved the Chinese Lipids Guidelines treatment goal, 22% and 11.6% of the patients achieved the 2016 ESC Lipids Guidelines and 2019 ESC Lipids Guidelines treatment goal at the final follow-up period respectively. LDL-C levels fluctuated during the follow-up period, and the long-term maintenance results could not be guaranteed after PCI. Population LDL-C levels changes in lifestyle could have a very large impact on LDL-C control in China.CONCLUSION: LDL-C control with statins is not ideal in patients after PCI, which is far from the requirements of the latest guidelines. Although clinicians understand the lipid-lowering effect of statins, they should not give up active lifestyle changes, and should strengthen the comprehensive management of blood lipid control.

Download Full-text

Glycemic and Lipid Control in Hospitalized Type 2 Diabetic Patients: Evaluation of 2 Enteral Nutrition Formulas (Low Carbohydrate-High Monounsaturated Fat vs High Carbohydrate)

Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition ◽

10.1177/014860710502900121 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 29 (1) ◽

pp. 21-29 ◽

Cited By ~ 34

Author(s):

M. Leon-Sanz ◽

P. P. Garcia-Luna ◽

M. Planas ◽

A. Sanz-Paris ◽

C. Gomez-Candela ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Enteral Nutrition ◽

Diabetic Patients ◽

Monounsaturated Fat ◽

Type 2 Diabetic Patients ◽

High Carbohydrate ◽

Low Carbohydrate ◽

Lipid Control ◽

Type 2 Diabetic

Download Full-text

Weight and plasma lipid control by decaffeinated green tea

Pharmacological Research ◽

10.1016/j.phrs.2009.01.015 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 59 (5) ◽

pp. 351-354 ◽

Cited By ~ 36

Author(s):

Doriane Richard ◽

Kaouthar Kefi ◽

Ullah Barbe ◽

Andrea Poli ◽

Pedro Bausero ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Green Tea ◽

Plasma Lipid ◽

Lipid Control

Download Full-text

Abstract 278: Lipid Control in Patients With New Symptoms of Peripheral Arterial Disease Evaluated at Vascular Specialty Clinics

Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes ◽

10.1161/circoutcomes.6.suppl_1.a278 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 6 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Kim Smolderen ◽

Jan-Willem Elshof ◽

Moniek van Zitteren ◽

John A Spertus ◽

Johan Denollet ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Peripheral Arterial Disease ◽

Secondary Prevention ◽

Ankle Brachial Index ◽

Arterial Disease ◽

Initial Evaluation ◽

Specialty Clinic ◽

Lipid Control ◽

Peripheral Arterial

Background: Obtaining adequate lipid control (LDL-Cholesterol [LDL] <100 mg/dL) in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a critical, guideline-directed secondary prevention target. Current compliance with this recommendation is unknown. Methods: A total of 616 patients had their LDL levels measured at 2 vascular specialty clinics in the Netherlands (March 2006-November 2011) during the evaluation of new PAD symptoms. A year following this evaluation, 417 (68%) patients had their LDL levels re-assessed. Information about patients’ demographic and clinical factors was systematically abstracted from medical records. Categories of patients were created based on the attainment of the recommended LDL target (<100 mg/dL [on target] vs. ≥100 mg/dL [off target]). Predictors of being off target at initial evaluation and at 1-year follow-up were identified through multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results: Of the total group, 57% (351/616) were off target at initial evaluation and 81% (496/616) were on lipid-lowering drugs after the initial evaluation at the PAD specialty clinic. One year later, only 25% (103/417) got on target, while 35% (147/417) patients remained off target, and an additional 10% (43/417) saw an increase in LDL to become off target. A total of 30% (124/417) remained on target. Patients with hypertension, diabetes, a history of myocardial infarction, and a lower ankle-brachial index were less likely to be off target at initial evaluation. Predictors of being off target at 1-year follow-up were male sex, and having a higher ankle-brachial index ( Table ). Conclusion: About half of patients with PAD seen at vascular specialty clinics had above-target LDL levels both upon entry and 1 year later. Patients with existing cardiovascular risk factors were much better controlled, as compared with patients without such risk factors. Males and those with higher ankle-brachial indices were less likely to be on target 1 year following management at the specialty clinic. Reasons for poorly regulated lipids need to be further explored, and appropriate quality-of-care improvement strategies will likely be needed to optimize secondary prevention.

Download Full-text