scholarly journals The association between the quick sequential organ failure assessment score prior to emergency ICU admission and outcomes in adults with suspected infection

2020 ◽  
pp. 149-154
Author(s):  
S Pillay ◽  
T Kisten ◽  
HM Cassimjee
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Icu Mortality ◽  
Suspected Infection ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Icu Stay ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Qsofa Score ◽  
Length Of Icu Stay

Background: Sepsis and septic shock are leading causes of mortality world-wide. In patients outside the intensive care unit (ICU) a rising qSOFA (quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) score correlates with mortality risk. We sought to investigate if the duration of a qSOFA score ≥ 2 prior to ICU admission further affects outcomes, namely: ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality and length of ICU stay. Method: A retrospective chart review was performed using the electronic ICU database at a quaternary level hospital in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, examining entries from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2017. The review included 235 emergency in-hospital adult admissions with suspected infection, of which 144 had a qSOFA score ≥ 2 prior to ICU admission. Results: There was no significant association between the duration of a qSOFA score ≥ 2 prior to ICU admission and ICU mortality (p = 0.975), in-hospital mortality (p = 0.918) and length of ICU stay until demise (p = 0.848) or discharge (p = 0.624). The qSOFA score was significantly associated with ICU mortality with scores of 0, 1, 2 and 3 resulting in ICU mortality rates of 0%, 22.5%, 53.7% and 84.6% respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The duration of a qSOFA score ≥ 2 prior to emergency ICU admission was not significantly associated with ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality or length of ICU stay in adults with suspected infection.

scholarly journals Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Component Score Prediction of In-hospital Mortality From Sepsis

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 810-817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tushar Gupta ◽  
Michael A. Puskarich ◽  
Elizabeth DeVos ◽  
Adnan Javed ◽  
Carmen Smotherman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Sofa Score ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Predictive Ability ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Icu Stay ◽  
Relative Contribution ◽  
Failure Assessment

Objectives: Early organ dysfunction in sepsis confers a high risk of in-hospital mortality, but the relative contribution of specific types of organ failure to overall mortality is unclear. The objective of this study was to assess the predictive ability of individual types of organ failure to in-hospital mortality or prolonged intensive care. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of adult emergency department patients with sepsis from October 1, 2013, to November 10, 2015. Multivariable regression was used to assess the odds ratios of individual organ failure types for the outcomes of in-hospital death (primary) and in-hospital death or ICU stay ≥ 3 days (secondary). Results: Of 2796 patients, 283 (10%) experienced in-hospital mortality, and 748 (27%) experienced in-hospital mortality or an ICU stay ≥ 3 days. The following components of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score were most predictive of in-hospital mortality (descending order): coagulation (odds ratio [OR]: 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-1.93), hepatic (1.58, 95% CI: 1.32-1.90), respiratory (OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.21-1.47), neurologic (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.07-1.35), renal (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.02-1.27), and cardiovascular (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.01-1.25). For mortality or ICU stay ≥3 days, the most predictive SOFA components were respiratory (OR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.79-2.16), neurologic (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.54-1.92), cardiovascular (OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.23-1.54), coagulation (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.10-1.55), and renal (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.08-1.30) while hepatic SOFA (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.98-1.37) did not reach statistical significance ( P = .092). Conclusion: In this retrospective study, SOFA score components demonstrated varying predictive abilities for mortality in sepsis. Elevated coagulation or hepatic SOFA scores were most predictive of in-hospital death, while an elevated respiratory SOFA was most predictive of death or ICU stay >3 days.

scholarly journals Comparison of Proposed Modified and Original Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Scores in Predicting ICU Mortality: A Prospective, Observational, Follow-Up Study

Scientifica ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Afshin Gholipour Baradari ◽  
Hassan Sharifi ◽  
Abolfazl Firouzian ◽  
Maryam Daneshiyan ◽  
Mohsen Aarabi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Diagnostic Odds Ratio ◽  
Icu Mortality ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Assessment Scores ◽  
Failure Assessment

Background. The sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score has been recommended to triage critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). This study aimed to compare the performance of our proposed MSOFA and original SOFA scores in predicting ICU mortality. Methods. This prospective observational study was conducted on 250 patients admitted to the ICU. Both tools scores were calculated at the beginning, 24 hours of ICU admission, and 48 hours of ICU admission. Diagnostic odds ratio and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to compare the two scores. Results. MSOFA and SOFA predicted mortality similarly with an area under the ROC curve of 0.837, 0.992, and 0.977 for MSOFA 1, MSOFA 2, and MSOFA 3, respectively, and 0.857, 0.988, and 0.988 for SOFA 1, SOFA 2, and SOFA 3, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of MSOFA 1 in cut-off point 8 were 82.9% and 68.4%, respectively, MSOFA 2 in cut-off point 9.5 were 94.7% and 97.1%, respectively, and MSOFA 3 in cut-off point of 9.3 were 97.4% and 93.1%, respectively. There was a significant positive correlation between the MSOFA 1 and the SOFA 1 (r: 0.942), 24 hours (r: 0.972), and 48 hours (r: 0.960). Conclusion. The proposed MSOFA and the SOFA scores had high diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for predicting mortality.

scholarly journals Effect of Statins on the Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Sepsis

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1051-1055 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Goodin ◽  
C. Manrique ◽  
M. Dulohery ◽  
J. Sampson ◽  
M. Saettele ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Icu Mortality ◽  
Icu Length Of Stay ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
Statin Use

Despite numerous attempts at novel intervention and tests to aid in earlier diagnosis and improved treatment, there has been an increased incidence of overall mortality related to sepsis, despite improvements in in-hospital mortality. Statins have emerged as potential immunomodulatory and antioxidant agents that might impact on sepsis outcomes. Definitive evidence to support the routine use of statins in patients with sepsis has not yet been elicited. We retrospectively analysed data from patients who presented with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock, stratifiying them according to statin use into two groups (statin and no statin). Sequential Organ Failure Assessment was used to evaluate severity of illness. The primary outcome was hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay, and mechanical ventilation and vasopressor therapy duration. Five hundred and sixty-eight patients were included. Patients with prior statin use (statin group) were older, more obese and had higher prevalence of smoking, diabetes and ischaemic heart disease. There was no difference in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores and mortality did not vary between the two groups (19.6 vs 16.9%). Furthermore, secondary outcomes including ICU mortality, hospital and ICU length of stay, mechanical ventilation and vasopressor duration did not differ. Multivariate analysis revealed age and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score were independent predictors of survival, while history of statin use was not (P=0.403). This current retrospective study did not find any benefit of statin use on primary and secondary outcomes of the patients admitted to an academic hospital with sepsis.

scholarly journals Quick sequential organ failure assessment versus systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria for emergency department patients with suspected infection

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Shiraishi ◽  
Satoshi Gando ◽  
Toshikazu Abe ◽  
Shigeki Kushimoto ◽  
Toshihiko Mayumi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome ◽  
Inflammatory Response ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Suspected Infection ◽  
Prognostic Accuracy ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Sirs Criteria

AbstractPrevious studies have shown inconsistent prognostic accuracy for mortality with both quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria. We aimed to validate the accuracy of qSOFA and the SIRS criteria for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with suspected infection in the emergency department. A prospective study was conducted including participants with suspected infection who were hospitalised or died in 34 emergency departments in Japan. Prognostic accuracy of qSOFA and SIRS criteria for in-hospital mortality was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. Of the 1060 participants, 402 (37.9%) and 915 (86.3%) had qSOFA ≥ 2 and SIRS criteria ≥ 2 (given thresholds), respectively, and there were 157 (14.8%) in-hospital deaths. Greater accuracy for in-hospital mortality was shown with qSOFA than with the SIRS criteria (AUROC: 0.64 versus 0.52, difference + 0.13, 95% CI [+ 0.07, + 0.18]). Sensitivity and specificity for predicting in-hospital mortality at the given thresholds were 0.55 and 0.65 based on qSOFA and 0.88 and 0.14 based on SIRS criteria, respectively. To predict in-hospital mortality in patients visiting to the emergency department with suspected infection, qSOFA was demonstrated to be modestly more accurate than the SIRS criteria albeit insufficiently sensitive.Clinical Trial Registration: The study was pre-registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000027258).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document