Predictive Accuracy of Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for Hospital Mortality Decreases With Increasing Comorbidity Burden Among Patients Admitted for Suspected Infection*

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (8) ◽  
pp. 1081-1088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Parks Taylor ◽  
Andrew McWilliams ◽  
Brice T. Taylor ◽  
Alan C. Heffner ◽  
Shih-Hsiung Chou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Predictive Accuracy ◽  
Suspected Infection ◽  
Comorbidity Burden ◽  
Failure Assessment

scholarly journals The association between the quick sequential organ failure assessment score prior to emergency ICU admission and outcomes in adults with suspected infection

2020 ◽  
pp. 149-154
Author(s):  
S Pillay ◽  
T Kisten ◽  
HM Cassimjee
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Icu Mortality ◽  
Suspected Infection ◽  
Icu Admission ◽  
Icu Stay ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Qsofa Score ◽  
Length Of Icu Stay

Background: Sepsis and septic shock are leading causes of mortality world-wide. In patients outside the intensive care unit (ICU) a rising qSOFA (quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) score correlates with mortality risk. We sought to investigate if the duration of a qSOFA score ≥ 2 prior to ICU admission further affects outcomes, namely: ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality and length of ICU stay. Method: A retrospective chart review was performed using the electronic ICU database at a quaternary level hospital in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, examining entries from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2017. The review included 235 emergency in-hospital adult admissions with suspected infection, of which 144 had a qSOFA score ≥ 2 prior to ICU admission. Results: There was no significant association between the duration of a qSOFA score ≥ 2 prior to ICU admission and ICU mortality (p = 0.975), in-hospital mortality (p = 0.918) and length of ICU stay until demise (p = 0.848) or discharge (p = 0.624). The qSOFA score was significantly associated with ICU mortality with scores of 0, 1, 2 and 3 resulting in ICU mortality rates of 0%, 22.5%, 53.7% and 84.6% respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The duration of a qSOFA score ≥ 2 prior to emergency ICU admission was not significantly associated with ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality or length of ICU stay in adults with suspected infection.

scholarly journals Quick sequential organ failure assessment versus systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria for emergency department patients with suspected infection

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Shiraishi ◽  
Satoshi Gando ◽  
Toshikazu Abe ◽  
Shigeki Kushimoto ◽  
Toshihiko Mayumi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome ◽  
Inflammatory Response ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Suspected Infection ◽  
Prognostic Accuracy ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Sirs Criteria

AbstractPrevious studies have shown inconsistent prognostic accuracy for mortality with both quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) and the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria. We aimed to validate the accuracy of qSOFA and the SIRS criteria for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with suspected infection in the emergency department. A prospective study was conducted including participants with suspected infection who were hospitalised or died in 34 emergency departments in Japan. Prognostic accuracy of qSOFA and SIRS criteria for in-hospital mortality was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. Of the 1060 participants, 402 (37.9%) and 915 (86.3%) had qSOFA ≥ 2 and SIRS criteria ≥ 2 (given thresholds), respectively, and there were 157 (14.8%) in-hospital deaths. Greater accuracy for in-hospital mortality was shown with qSOFA than with the SIRS criteria (AUROC: 0.64 versus 0.52, difference + 0.13, 95% CI [+ 0.07, + 0.18]). Sensitivity and specificity for predicting in-hospital mortality at the given thresholds were 0.55 and 0.65 based on qSOFA and 0.88 and 0.14 based on SIRS criteria, respectively. To predict in-hospital mortality in patients visiting to the emergency department with suspected infection, qSOFA was demonstrated to be modestly more accurate than the SIRS criteria albeit insufficiently sensitive.Clinical Trial Registration: The study was pre-registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000027258).

scholarly journals Accuracy of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score for In-Hospital Mortality by Race and Relevance to Crisis Standards of Care

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. e2113891
Author(s):  
William Dwight Miller ◽  
Xuan Han ◽  
Monica E. Peek ◽  
Deepshikha Charan Ashana ◽  
William F. Parker
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Assessment Score ◽  
Failure Assessment

Evaluation of qSOFA as a Predictor of Mortality Among ICU Patients With Positive Clinical Cultures—A Retrospective Cohort Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1278-1284
Author(s):  
Barry Kelly ◽  
Johann Patlak ◽  
Shahzad Shaefi ◽  
Dustin Boone ◽  
Ariel Mueller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Assessment Score ◽  
Failure Assessment ◽  
Discriminative Value

Objective: To compare the discriminative value of the quick-sequential organ failure assessment score (qSOFA) to SOFA in a critically ill population, in which a microbial pathogen was isolated within 48 hours of admission to intensive care. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Academic tertiary referral center from July 2008 to June 2017. Patients: Hospitalized patients admitted to intensive care unit. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality for all patients with confirmed positive microbiological cultures within 48 hours of admission to intensive care unit (ICU). Subgroup analysis was performed on patients with pathogenic bacteremia or positive cultures in cerebrospinal fluid. Of the 11 415 patients analyzed with positive microbiology specimens within 48 hours of admission, 2933 (25.7%) had a qSOFA ≥2. Of these, 16.6% reached the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality. Unsurprisingly, the discriminative value of qSOFA on admission was significantly worse than that of SOFA (0.73 vs 0.76; P = .0004), despite observing a significant association between qSOFA category and in-hospital mortality ( P < .0001). In secondary analyses, similar observations were found using qSOFA within 6 and 24 hours of ICU admission. When analysis was focused on patients with pathogenic bacteremia or positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cultures (n = 1646), there was no significant difference between the discriminative value of qSOFA and SOFA (0.75 vs 0.78; P = .17). Conclusions: Quick-sequential organ failure assessment score at admission was not superior to SOFA in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with positive clinical cultures within 48 hours of admission to ICU. Quick-sequential organ failure assessment score at admission to the ICU was associated with mortality and showed reasonable calibration and discrimination. When the analysis was focused on patients with pathogenic bacteremia or positive CSF cultures, qSOFA performed similarly to SOFA in discriminatory those who will die from sepsis.

scholarly journals Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Component Score Prediction of In-hospital Mortality From Sepsis

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (8) ◽  
pp. 810-817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tushar Gupta ◽  
Michael A. Puskarich ◽  
Elizabeth DeVos ◽  
Adnan Javed ◽  
Carmen Smotherman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Sofa Score ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Predictive Ability ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Icu Stay ◽  
Relative Contribution ◽  
Failure Assessment

Objectives: Early organ dysfunction in sepsis confers a high risk of in-hospital mortality, but the relative contribution of specific types of organ failure to overall mortality is unclear. The objective of this study was to assess the predictive ability of individual types of organ failure to in-hospital mortality or prolonged intensive care. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of adult emergency department patients with sepsis from October 1, 2013, to November 10, 2015. Multivariable regression was used to assess the odds ratios of individual organ failure types for the outcomes of in-hospital death (primary) and in-hospital death or ICU stay ≥ 3 days (secondary). Results: Of 2796 patients, 283 (10%) experienced in-hospital mortality, and 748 (27%) experienced in-hospital mortality or an ICU stay ≥ 3 days. The following components of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score were most predictive of in-hospital mortality (descending order): coagulation (odds ratio [OR]: 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-1.93), hepatic (1.58, 95% CI: 1.32-1.90), respiratory (OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.21-1.47), neurologic (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.07-1.35), renal (OR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.02-1.27), and cardiovascular (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.01-1.25). For mortality or ICU stay ≥3 days, the most predictive SOFA components were respiratory (OR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.79-2.16), neurologic (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.54-1.92), cardiovascular (OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.23-1.54), coagulation (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.10-1.55), and renal (OR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.08-1.30) while hepatic SOFA (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.98-1.37) did not reach statistical significance ( P = .092). Conclusion: In this retrospective study, SOFA score components demonstrated varying predictive abilities for mortality in sepsis. Elevated coagulation or hepatic SOFA scores were most predictive of in-hospital death, while an elevated respiratory SOFA was most predictive of death or ICU stay >3 days.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document