scholarly journals Wheat dwarf virus and its impact on the 2020 harvest in some regions of Ukraine

2021 ◽  
pp. 3-9
Author(s):  
L. Mishchenko ◽  
A. Dunich ◽  
I. Mishchenko ◽  
A. Dashchenko ◽  
O. Boyko ◽  
...  

Goal. Identify the virus that causes symptoms of dwarfism and non-earing of winter wheat (reduced or no ear formation), and investigate its effect on plant yields. Methods. Visual diagnostics, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in double sandwich modification (DAS-ELISA), polymerase chain reaction, biometric, determination of yield and its structure, statistical data processing. Results. A study of winter wheat varieties from Vinnytsia, Khmelnytsky, Kyiv, Chernihiv and Cherkasy regions with symptoms of dwarfism, yellowing of leaves and non-earing. ELISA and PCR have shown that the disease is caused by Wheat dwarf virus. The absence of Wheat streak mosaic virus, Barley yellow dwarf virus, Brome mosaic virus and Wheat spindle mosaic virus (Wheat streak mosaic virus) was shown in the studied samples. It was found that the dwarf wheat virus significantly reduces the number of grains in the ear (3.3 times), the weight of grains from the ear (3.4 times) and the weight of 1000 grains (1.9—3.3 times) depending on the degree of damage plants (from moderate to severely affected). Conclusions. The circulation of dwarf wheat virus in agrocenoses of five regions of Ukraine and a significant negative impact of the disease on the yield of winter wheat plants have been established. The obtained results indicate the need for constant monitoring and testing of plants for the presence of wheat dwarf virus in Ukraine.

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 317-320
Author(s):  
Nathan Kleczewski ◽  
Venkataramana Chapara ◽  
Carl A. Bradley

Field surveys in 2009, 2010, 2011, 2019, and 2020 determined the incidence and diversity of viruses present in fields of soft red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) in Illinois. In addition, the putative presence of the bacterial mosaic pathogen, Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. tessellarius (Cmt), was evaluated. A total of 341 fields were sampled across years, and plants were tested for barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV-PAV; BYDV-MAV), barley stripe mosaic virus (BSMV), brome mosaic virus (BMV), cereal yellow dwarf virus (CYDV-RPV), High Plains virus (HPV), Potyvirus group (POTY), soil-borne wheat mosaic virus (SBWMV), tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), wheat spindle streak mosaic virus (WSSMV), wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV), and Cmt using ELISA. Average field incidence across years varied by virus with BYDV-PAV (22%), WSSMV (16%), CYDV-RPV (7%), WSMV (3%), and HPV (0.5%) detected in samples. The bacterial mosaic pathogen (Cmt), or potentially a related species of Clavibacter, was detected the most frequently in each year, with an average incidence of 77%. The consistent detection of Cmt warrants further study to determine the nature of the organisms associated with positive Cmt tests and their role in Illinois wheat production systems.


Plant Disease ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (9) ◽  
pp. 1045-1045 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Najar ◽  
K. M. Makkouk ◽  
S. G. Kumari

A survey conducted during April 2000 to identify viruses infecting cereal crops in different regions (Beja, Bizerte, Cap-bon, Jendouba, Kairouan, Siliana, and Zaghouan) of Tunisia covered 15 barley, 21 durum wheat, and 7 bread wheat randomly selected fields. Virus incidences were determined on the basis of laboratory testing of 100 to 200 randomly collected samples from each field. A total of 5,227 random (1,654 barley, 2,546 durum wheat, and 1,027 bread wheat) and 1,430 symptomatic (451 barley, 746 durum wheat, and 233 bread wheat) samples were collected. Samples were tested for the presence of five different viruses by tissueblot immunoassay (TBIA) (1) at the Virology Laboratory of INRAT. Antisera used were for Barley stripe mosaic virus (2), Barley yellow dwarf virus (PAV serotype) (2), Wheat streak mosaic virus (3), Barley yellow striate mosaic virus (BYSMV) provided by E. Luisoni, IFA, Turino, Italy (4), and Wheat dwarf virus (WDV) provided by J. Vacke, Research Institute of Crop Production, Prague, Chech Republic. BYDVPAV was detected in seven barley (from three fields), 25 durum wheat (10 fields), and eight bread wheat (three fields) samples from all except the Siliana region. BYSMV was detected in three barley (three fields), 16 durum wheat (six fields), and four bread wheat (three fields) samples from the Beja, Bizerte, Cap-bon, Jendouba, and Siliana regions. WDV was detected in five barley (three fields), nine durum wheat (four fields), and four bread wheat (one field) samples from the Beja, Cap-bon, and Bizerte regions. BSMV was detected in 49 barley (six fields) and 25 durum wheat (five fields) samples from the Beja, Bizerte, Cap-bon, Kairouan, and Zaghouan regions. This is the first record of BYSMV, BSMV, and WDV infecting cereal crops in Tunisia, but their incidence in fields was less than 1%. However, BSMV incidence was 10.5% in one barley field from the Cap-bon region. Virus incidence in symptomatic plants was a bit higher and ranged from 0.8% for WDV in bread wheat to 6% for BSMV in barley. References: (1) K. M. Makkouk and A. Comeau. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 100:71, 1994. (2) K. M. Makkouk and S. G. Kumari. Rachis Newsl. 12(1/2):24, 1993. (3) K. M. Makkouk and S. G. Kumari. Rachis Newsl. 16(1/2):74, 1997. (4) R. G. Milne et al. Intervirology 25:83, 1986.


Plant Disease ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 318-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Byamukama ◽  
S. Tatineni ◽  
G. Hein ◽  
J. McMechan ◽  
S. N. Wegulo

Wheat curl mites (WCM; Aceria tosichella) transmit Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV), Triticum mosaic virus (TriMV), and Wheat mosaic virus (WMoV) to wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the Great Plains region of the United States. These viruses can be detected in single, double, or triple combinations in leaf samples. Information on incidence of viruses in WCM at the end of the growing season is scant. The availability of this information can enhance our knowledge of the epidemiology of WCM-transmitted viruses. This research was conducted to determine the frequency of occurrence of WSMV, TriMV, and WMoV in WCM populations on field-collected maturing wheat spikes and to determine differences in WCM densities in three geographical regions (southeast, west-central, and panhandle) in Nebraska. Maturing wheat spikes were collected from 83 fields across Nebraska in 2011 and 2012. The spikes were placed in proximity to wheat seedlings (three- to four-leaf stage) in WCM-proof cages in a growth chamber and on sticky tape. WCM that moved off the drying wheat spikes in cages infested the wheat seedlings. WCM that moved off wheat spikes placed on sticky tape were trapped on the tape and were counted under a dissecting microscope. At 28 days after infestation, the wheat plants were tested for the presence of WSMV, TriMV, or WMoV using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and multiplex polymerase chain reaction. WSMV was the most predominant virus detected in wheat seedlings infested with WCM from field-collected spikes. Double (TriMV+WSMV or WMoV+WSMV) or triple (TriMV+ WMoV +WSMV) virus detections were more frequent (47%) than single detections (5%) of TriMV or WSMV. Overall, 81% of the wheat seedlings infested with WCM tested positive for at least one virus. No significant association (P > 0.05) was found between regions for WCM trapped on tape. These results suggest that WCM present on mature wheat spikes harbor multiple wheat viruses and may explain high virus incidence when direct movement of WCM into emerging winter wheat occurs in the fall.


2011 ◽  
pp. 52-55
Author(s):  
Melinda Apró ◽  
Mária Papp ◽  
Eszter Cseh ◽  
Richard Gáborjányi ◽  
József Horváth ◽  
...  

The past years cereal diseases, including the virus diseases have been increased in Hungary as well as worldwide. The aim of our work was to survey the virus infection of South Hungarian wheat fields. Leaf samples were collected in Szeged at the experimental farm of Cereal Research Nonprofit Co., in April and Junes of 2009 and 2010. DAS ELISA tests were carried out using Loewe antisera of Brome mosaic virus (BMV), Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV), Barley stripe mosaic virus (BSMV), Brome streak mosaic virus (BStMV), Wheat dwarf virus (WDV), and Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV) and measured with Labsystem Multiscan RC Elisa reader at 405nm. In the samples of 2009 the Wheat dwarf and Wheat streak mosaic viruses were dominated. It was also significant the appearance of the. Barley yellow dwarf virus. 2010. was favourable for the spread of the virus vectors, therefore the incidence of virus diseases increased.


Plant Disease ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 89 (8) ◽  
pp. 912-912 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Lemmetty ◽  
E. Huusela-Veistola

During June and July of 2004, several diseased plants in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were reported by agricultural advisers in the southern and southwestern coastal area of Finland. The plants showed extreme dwarfing, various yellowing symptoms, and reduced or no heading. The damage varied considerably. Yield loss estimates in direct-drilled winter wheat fields were approximately 20 to 40% and in worst cases as much as 100%. A few leafhoppers (Psammotettix alienus Dahlb.) were collected from the field with sweep nets and yellow traps. Roots and symptomatic leaves of winter wheat and the leafhoppers were first tested using a commercial polyclonal antibody (DSMZ, Braunschweig, Germany) specific for Wheat dwarf virus (WDV). For the leaf and root samples, routine double-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) procedures were used. Five leafhoppers per sample were homogenized with the extraction buffer provided. The homogenate was centrifuged and the extract was evaluated using DAS-ELISA (2). The highest absorbance values were obtained from leafhoppers suspected to be viruliferous. The mean values varied from 1.002 to 1.990 after incubation in the substrate for 2 h. The absorbance values of several leaf samples exceeded the virus-positive threshold but were lower than those of the viruliferous leafhoppers. The virus was not detected in roots. Low absorbance values of virus-positive plants were confirmed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with primers specific for WDV (1). Total DNA extracts (DNeasy Plant Mini Kit; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) from symptomatic leaves were tested using puRe Taq Ready-To-Go PCR beads (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, UK). The PCR amplicon was the expected size (1,201 bp). The high absorbance value of the leafhoppers showed that the leafhoppers were carriers of the virus. These results confirmed that the causal agent of dwarfing and yellowing symptoms in winter wheat was WDV (genus Mastrevirus, family Geminiviridae). References: (1) A. Kvarnheden et al. Arch Virol 147:205, 2002. (2) J. Vacke and R. Cibulka. Plant Prot. Sci. 35:41, 2000.


Plant Disease ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 288-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kira L. Bowen ◽  
John F. Murphy ◽  
Kathy L. Flanders ◽  
Paul L. Mask ◽  
Ruhui Li

The most important viral diseases of wheat are caused by Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV, strains PAV and MAV) and Cereal yellow dwarf virus (CYDV, strain RPV). Starting in 2000, winter wheat crops growing in northern, central, and southern Alabama were evaluated for the occurrence of BYDV-PAV and CYDV-RPV. In addition to these viruses, samples were tested for the presence of Soilborne wheat mosaic virus (SBWMV), Wheat spindle streak mosaic virus (WSSMV), and Wheat streak mosaic virus (WSMV). BYDV-PAV and CYDV-RPV were found throughout the state, alone or as co-infections, in 14.6% of the samples collected in 2000 and 12.2% of samples in 2001. PAV was found at a lower incidence than RPV (4.3 and 9.9%, respectively) in 2000; however, in 2001, PAV was detected in 8.2% and RPV in 1.9% of the samples. There was less rainfall than the 30-year average during the 1999-2000 growing season, and this may have contributed to differences in the relative incidence of PAV and RPV between the 2 years. SBWMV, WSSMV, and WSMV also were detected in Alabama in 2, 7.8, and 5.4% of the samples collected in 2000, respectively, and in 9.6, 34.3, and 18.5% of the samples collected in 2001, respectively. This is the first report of WSMV in Alabama winter wheat.


Crop Science ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 371-375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen M. Bauske ◽  
Frederic L. Kolb ◽  
Adrianna D. Hewings ◽  
Gordon Cisar

Euphytica ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 139 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick Hakizimana ◽  
Amir M.H. Ibrahim ◽  
Marie A.C. Langham ◽  
Jackie C. Rudd ◽  
Scott D. Haley

2015 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laima Urbanavičienė ◽  
Donatas Šneideris ◽  
Marija Žižytė

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document