scholarly journals Artificial intelligence as a subject of property law

2020 ◽  
pp. 328-332
Author(s):  
Yelizaveta Tymoshenko
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Process Automation ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

The article considers artificial intelligence (AI) as a new and existing subject of legal relations. It is described in detail about hisability to be a full participant in the relationship of intellectual property rights. Artificial intelligence allows computers to learn fromtheir own experience, adapt to given parameters and perform tasks that previously could only be done by humans. In most cases, theuse of artificial intelligence, whether for playing chess or as an unmanned vehicle, is extremely important to be able to learn and processnatural language. That is, the development and awareness of AI is needed. Thanks to information technology, computers can be “taught”to perform certain tasks by processing large amounts of data and identifying patterns in them.Artificial intelligence is not in itself identical to the concept of “process automation”, but the development of AI will lead to thefact that more and more tasks will be under the power of a computer program. Therefore, it is important to start adapting the legislationto future realities now. It is necessary to define the range of rights and responsibilities of AI, to indicate its legal status. Accordingly, itis necessary to determine who will be the legal bearer of all rights and responsibilities that will arise as a result of the creation of a particularcreative object. In the field of intellectual property law, AI is seen as a new source of creativity, a source capable of producingnew results.The article offers consideration of these issues in the field of intellectual property, as for several years there are examples of worksinvented by artificial intelligence. For a long time, programs were just a tool to help the author create a work. However, with the deve -lopment of machine learning and neural networks, artificial intelligence has learned to create a variety of objects: images, videos, music,design. Since the result obtained by artificial intelligence can be potentially protective, the article discusses the question of who shouldrecognize the rights to objects created by AI.

scholarly journals Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property Law

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-98
Author(s):  
Swapnil Tripathi ◽  
Chandni Ghatak
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Human Intervention ◽  
Intellectual Property Law ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Artificial Intelligence Systems

Artificial intelligence systems have been gaining widespread momentum in today’s progressing tech-savvy world. With sophisticated technologies being incorporated in the same, it is only a matter of time these systems start to produce marvelous inventions without human intervention of any kind. This brings forth pertinent questions concerning Intellectual Property Rights, (IPR) for, it challenges not only traditional notions of concepts such as patents and copyrights, but also leads to the emergence of questions related to the regulation of such creations amidst others. This paper seeks to provide insight into the expanding scope of IPR laws and artificial intelligence, along with the inevitable challenges it brings from a worldwide lens on the matter. It also attempts to provide suggestions transcending IPR, and seeks to address questions concerning criminal liability for the content created by such technologies.

The Relationship Between Intellectual Property and Administrative Law

2021 ◽  
pp. 109-120
Author(s):  
Laurent Manderieux
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Direct Consequence ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Property Law ◽  
International Level ◽  
Intellectual Property Law ◽  
Law And Policy ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Research Analysis

Intellectual property and administrative law entertain a long-standing, though ambiguous relationship. Intellectual property rights (IPR) depend on a number of institutions, and primarily from intellectual property offices granting several of them, which fall into the administrative structure of each country. The direct consequence of the relevance of administrative law for the research, analysis, and understanding of intellectual property law is that certain IP-related questions cannot be properly addressed without using the tool provided by administrative law. Indeed, intellectual property and administrative law partly overlap, as both branches of law are nationally characterized and country-specific, changing from country to country, and both have experienced significant changes related to globalization from the national to the international level. The growing regulation of intellectual property at the international level has somehow brought about an expansion of the intersection between intellectual property and administrative law and procedures. Therefore, complete, thorough research on intellectual property law and policy must take into account the conceptual tools and categories elaborated in administrative law.

scholarly journals Artificial Intelligence and the Limitations of Information

Information ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Walton
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Information Processing ◽  
General Intelligence ◽  
Selection Pressures ◽  
Artificial General Intelligence ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
The Way

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning promise to make major changes to the relationship of people and organizations with technology and information. However, as with any form of information processing, they are subject to the limitations of information linked to the way in which information evolves in information ecosystems. These limitations are caused by the combinatorial challenges associated with information processing, and by the tradeoffs driven by selection pressures. Analysis of the limitations explains some current difficulties with AI and machine learning and identifies the principles required to resolve the limitations when implementing AI and machine learning in organizations. Applying the same type of analysis to artificial general intelligence (AGI) highlights some key theoretical difficulties and gives some indications about the challenges of resolving them.

Technical Elements of Machine Learning for Intellectual Property Law

2021 ◽  
pp. 11-27
Author(s):  
Anthony Man-Cho So
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Face Recognition ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Speech Synthesis ◽  
Text Processing ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Game Playing ◽  
Board Game ◽  
Music Retrieval

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have transformed our lives in profound ways. Indeed, AI has not only enabled machines to see (eg, face recognition), hear (eg, music retrieval), speak (eg, speech synthesis), and read (eg, text processing), but also, so it seems, given machines the ability to think (eg, board game-playing) and create (eg, artwork generation). This chapter introduces the key technical elements of machine learning (ML), which is a rapidly growing sub-field in AI and drives many of the aforementioned applications. The goal is to elucidate the ways human efforts are involved in the development of ML solutions, so as to facilitate legal discussions on intellectual property issues.

Human rights principles in the WIPO Marrakesh Treaty: driving change in copyright law from within

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 282-302
Author(s):  
Lida Ayoubi
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Visually Impaired ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Human Rights Law ◽  
Limitations And Exceptions ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Marrakesh Treaty

The number of countries joining the WIPO Marrakesh Treaty for the visually impaired has been gradually increasing since its adoption in 2013. This article evaluates the contribution of the WIPO Marrakesh Treaty to the untangling and understanding of the interface of intellectual property law and human rights law. It analyses the significance of the human rights language used in the Treaty as well as its mandatory copyright exceptions. It is argued that the significance of the Treaty mainly lies in its inclusion of human rights principles. This, together with the introduction of compulsory copyright limitations and exceptions, forms the innovative approach of the Treaty that reshapes the contours of the relationship between intellectual property rights and human rights.

scholarly journals A Quest to Prohibit Immoral Inventions? An Analysis of Law and Policy in Human Biotechnology

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 61-65
Author(s):  
Kun Shao
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Rapid Evolution ◽  
Law And Policy ◽  
Patent Systems ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

This paper consists of an identification and analysis of the place of, and role of ethics play, in the various patent systems currently in force in Europe. As for the rapid evolution of biotechnology advances, it is significant to observe the response from legislators and the measures put in place to address the further issues. Contemporaneously, this work aims to act as a commentary on the relationship of biotechnology with intellectual property rights, and on the role played in this respect by law.

Taxonomy, Type Specimens, and the Making of Biological Property in Intellectual Property Rights Law

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bronwyn Parry
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Biological Property ◽  
Pivotal Role ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Type Specimens ◽  
American System ◽  
Functional Mechanisms ◽  
The Relationship

AbstractDespite remaining the most iconic and highly valorized metrical technology of the entire, now globally universalized, project of zoological and botanical taxonomy, very little attention has been given to highlighting the pivotal role that type specimens also play in constructing and disciplining contemporary relations to living property. Building on my earlier work on the relationship between biological classification and regulation,1 this article provides an overdue analysis of this technology's significance in introducing deposition, priority of publication, and authorship as the key conceptual and functional mechanisms not only of taxonomic classification, but also of the ascendant system for prosecuting rights to ownership of biological novelties in the contemporary era: the Euro-American system of intellectual property law.

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KARYA SENI BATIK YANG BELUM TERDAFTAR MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inggrit Fernandes
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Rapid Growth ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Property Law ◽  
Market Demand ◽  
Work Of Art

Batik artwork is one of the treasures of the nation's cultural heritage. Batik artwork is currently experiencing rapid growth. The amount of interest and market demand for this art resulted batik artwork became one of the commodities in the country and abroad. Thus, if the batik artwork is not protected then the future can be assured of a new conflict arises in the realm of intellectual property law. Act No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright has accommodated artwork batik as one of the creations that are protected by law. So that this work of art than as a cultural heritage also have economic value for its creator. Then how the legal protection of the batik artwork yaang not registered? Does this also can be protected? While in the registration of intellectual property rights is a necessity so that it has the force of law to the work produced

Management of Economics and State "Bottom"

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 76-91
Author(s):  
E. D. Solozhentsev
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Probabilistic Models ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Special Software ◽  
Human Quality ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

The scientific problem of economics “Managing the quality of human life” is formulated on the basis of artificial intelligence, algebra of logic and logical-probabilistic calculus. Managing the quality of human life is represented by managing the processes of his treatment, training and decision making. Events in these processes and the corresponding logical variables relate to the behavior of a person, other persons and infrastructure. The processes of the quality of human life are modeled, analyzed and managed with the participation of the person himself. Scenarios and structural, logical and probabilistic models of managing the quality of human life are given. Special software for quality management is described. The relationship of human quality of life and the digital economy is examined. We consider the role of public opinion in the management of the “bottom” based on the synthesis of many studies on the management of the economics and the state. The bottom management is also feedback from the top management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document