Alchemy and Accountability

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Martin

In a free system such as the market economy, the first level of regulation is not exogenous government regulation, it is endogenous accountability. How does endogenous regulation work?

1991 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-173
Author(s):  
Ronald H. Coase

Abstract During the two centuries following the publication of Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations the economists’ main objective has been to improve his analysis and in particular his basic statement that government regulation and economic planning are not necessary for the functioning of an efficient economy, since the price system (the «invisible hand») can successfully coordinate the economy.However, the excessive attention to prices deviated research from other aspects of the economic system. Coase’s effort, through his articles on «The nature of the firm» (1937) and «The problem of social cost» (1960), was to introduce in the traditional economic theory some institutional elements. The contribution of the first article was essentially the introduction into economic analysis of transaction costs. In the second article it was shown that contracting in absence of transaction costs maximizes the wealth, quite apart from the assignment of property rights.The introduction of institutional elements can be very helpful for reforms in Eastern European countries, because market economy can only work through appropriate institutions.


1997 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-171
Author(s):  
Muhammad Akram Khan

IntroductionThe recent past has seen fundamental changes in the government’srole in the economy. With the defeat of socialism and the worldwideonslaught of privatization, a new scenario is emerging. The direct roleof government is shrinking and its indirect role is increasing. Arguably,privatization does not necessarily mean “no government,” but rather“better government.” As a result, the following new issues are emerging:What is the extent and nature of government regulation in theeconomy? How can government play an effective role in the redistributionof economic power and still keep the free market economy undisturbed?What structural changes are necessary to protect the publicinterest? How can government itself be regulated? How can we preventgovernment from becoming an instrument of injustice and tyranny?The present paper seeks to discuss these questions from the Islamicperspective.Need for GovernmentWe need government to provide the fundamental legal and socialframework for a free market economy. This framework implies necessarylaws that define the property and other rights, enforce contracts,and describe the status and form of various business organizations. Weneed government to define the rules of the game. Through legislationthe government acts as a referee and forbids foul play. It prohibitscheating and the sale of adulterated foods and drugs; it establishes ...


2004 ◽  
pp. 24-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Buzdalov

In the article conceptual and practical questions of natural rent are examined. Special attention is paid to the principles and mechanism of its forming and distribution in a market economy. Land rent is analyzed in more details. Methodical approaches and means of government regulation of rent mechanism, provision of equal economic terms and stimuli of effective production to producers are offered.


Liquidity ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-166
Author(s):  
Muchtar Riva’i

The law arrangement of franchise law was first explicitly regulated by the Government Regulation No. 16 of 1997 which is then updated by Government Regulation No. 42 of 2007 to be created in an agreement that at least contains clauses as stipulated by Article 5 of the Government Regulation. However, franchise arrangements also associated with a variety of other laws and regulations applicable in Indonesia. This article is going to state that the importance of partnerships with small and medium enterprises as an effort to encourage the involvement of the wider economic community.


2014 ◽  
pp. 77-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Menyashev

There is a popular view in Russian studies arguing that underdevelopment of Russian civil society is partly responsible for the failure of liberal idea in Russia. Fragmented society sees no alternative to massive government regulation, that is why support of strong state is so high. If this logic is true, the differences in civicness across urban societies should show up in liberal parties support. This paper estimates this effect using social capital framework and drawing upon the data from Russian regions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document