Robotic colorectal surgery. How, when and why.

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 377-379
Author(s):  
S Mera Velasco
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Tomás Larach ◽  
Julie Flynn ◽  
Joseph Kong ◽  
Peadar S. Waters ◽  
Jacob J. McCormick ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
James W.T. Toh ◽  
Kevin Phan ◽  
Seon-Hahn Kim

AbstractThere has been a rapid rise in the number of robotic colorectal procedures worldwide since the da Vinci Surgical System robotic technology was approved for surgical procedures in the year 2000. Several recent meta-analyses and systematic reviews have shown a significant difference in outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. However, these results from pooled data have not been supported by the initial results reported from the Robotic assisted versus laparoscopic assisted resection for rectal cancer trial. In this article, we examine the current evidence for robotic colorectal surgery, assess its features and functionality, evaluate its learning curve and provide our perspective on its future.


2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Averbach ◽  
Pedro Popoutchi ◽  
Oswaldo Wiliam Marques Jr ◽  
Ricardo Z Abdalla ◽  
Sérgio Podgaec ◽  
...  

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is believed to be technically and oncologically feasible. Robotic surgery is an attractive mode in performing minimally-invasive surgery once it has several advantages if compared to standard laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this paper is to report the first known case of colorectal resection surgery using the robotic assisted surgical device in Brazil. A 35-year-old woman with deep infiltrating endometriosis with rectal involvement was referred for colorectal resection using da Vinci® surgical system. The authors also reviewed the most current series and discussed not only the safety and feasibility but also the real benefits of robotic colorectal surgery


2013 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 273-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Ramamoorthy ◽  
Vincent Obias

2013 ◽  
Vol 217 (6) ◽  
pp. 1063-1069.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah S. Keller ◽  
Lobat Hashemi ◽  
Minyi Lu ◽  
Conor P. Delaney

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Long Zhu ◽  
Pei-Jing Yan ◽  
Liang Yao ◽  
Rong Liu ◽  
De-Wang Wu ◽  
...  

Aim. The robotic technique has been established as an alternative approach to laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. The aim of this study was to compare short-term outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer. Methods. The cases of robot-assisted or laparoscopic colorectal resection were collected retrospectively between July 2015 and October 2017. We evaluated patient demographics, perioperative characteristics, and pathologic examination. A multivariable linear regression model was used to assess short-term outcomes between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery. Short-term outcomes included time to passage of flatus and postoperative hospital stay. Results. A total of 284 patients were included in the study. There were 104 patients in the robotic colorectal surgery (RCS) group and 180 in the laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) group. The mean age was 60.5 ± 10.8 years, and 62.0% of the patients were male. We controlled for confounding factors, and then the multiple linear model regression indicated that the time to passage of flatus in the RCS group was 3.45 days shorter than the LCS group (coefficient = −3.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −5.19 to −1.71; P < .001). Additionally, the drainage of tube duration (coefficient = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.3 to 0.87; P < .001) and transfers to the intensive care unit (coefficient = 7.34, 95% CI = 3.17 to 11.5; P = .001) influenced the postoperative hospital stay. The total costs increased by 15501.48 CNY in the RCS group compared with the LCS group ( P = .008). Conclusions. The present study suggests that colorectal cancer robotic surgery was more beneficial to patients because of shorter postoperative recovery time of bowel function and shorter hospital stays.


Author(s):  
Jessie Osborne Paull ◽  
Salvatore A. Parsacandola ◽  
Ada Graham ◽  
Salini Hota ◽  
Natalie Pudalov ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-42
Author(s):  
Muhammad F. Shah ◽  
Irfan I. Nasir ◽  
Amjad Parvaiz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document