Evaluation of Compressive Strength of Repaired Direct Composite Resin Restorations

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (8) ◽  
pp. 1874-1878
Author(s):  
Sorin Andrian ◽  
Galina Pancu ◽  
Claudiu Topoliceanu ◽  
Nicoleta Tofan ◽  
Simona Stoleriu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Compressive Strength ◽  
Hybrid Composite ◽  
Intermediate Layer ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Bonding Agent ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Composite Resin Restorations ◽  
Aged Composite

The aim of the study was to evaluate and to compare the compressive parameters of repaired composite restoration when using different types of composite resins and a universal bonding agent as an intermediate layer. Aged micro-filled hybrid and nano-filled hybrid composite resins were chosen to simulate old restoration. The same micro-filled hybrid composite resin was used as a repair material. A universal bonding agent applied in etch-and-rinse and self etch strategies was used as an intermediate layer in restoration repair. Non-aged composite resins were considered as control. Compressive strength and compressive modulus were determined by evaluating the samples in a universal testing machine. Lower values of the tested parameters were recorded after aging both types of composite resin when compared to control. Higher values of compressive strength were recorded when nano-filled hybrid composite resin was repaired when compared to micro-filled hybrid composite resin. The strategy of universal bonding agent application as an intermediate layer did not influenced the compressive properties of repaired restoration.

scholarly journals Compressive strength measurements of hybrid dental composites treated with dry heat and light emitting diodes (LED) post cure treatment

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Krisnawaty ◽  
Setiawan Natasasmita ◽  
Dudi Aripin
Keyword(s):  
Compressive Strength ◽  
Hybrid Composite ◽  
Light Emitting Diodes ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Hybrid Composites ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Dental Composite ◽  
Light Emitting ◽  
Led Light ◽  
Dry Heat

Hybrid composites are mostly used on large cavities as restorative dental materials, whether it is used directly or indirectly. The mechanical properties of composite resin shall increase if it is treated with post cure treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate compressive strength differences between dry heat and Light Emitting Diodes (LED) treatment on the hybrid dental composite. A quasi-experimental was applied on this research with a total of 30 samples that were divided into two groups. Each sample was tested using LLOYD Universal Testing Machine with 1 mm/min speed to evaluate the compressive strength. The compressive strength results were marked when the sample was broken. The results of two groups were then analyzed using t-test statistical calculation. The results of this study show that post cure treatment on hybrid composite using LED light box (194.138 MPa) was lower than dry heat treatment (227.339 MPa), which was also significantly different from statistical analysis. It can be concluded that compressive strength of LED light box was lower than dry heat post-cure treatment on the hybrid composite resin.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Adhesive Capacity of Universal Bonding Agents Used in Direct Composite Resins Repair

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (3) ◽  
pp. 574-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Stoleriu ◽  
Sorin Andrian ◽  
Irina Nica ◽  
Andrei Victor Sandu ◽  
Galina Pancu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hybrid Composite ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Bonding Agent ◽  
Interface Bonding ◽  
Sem Images ◽  
Bonding Agents ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Repair Procedure ◽  
Self Etch

The aims of the study were to characterise the resin-resin interface when a universal bonding agent (UBA) was used in two different strategies in direct composite repair and to evaluate the bonding capacity of UBA by microleakage assessment. In study groups a micro-filled hybrid and a nano-filled hybrid composite resins were aged in order to simulate an old restorations. As a repair material was chosen the same micro-filled hybrid composite resin that was used as an old restoration. UBA was applied in etch-and-rinse and self-etch strategies and was used as an intermediate layer in repair procedure. After the repair the samples were aged again. In control groups were included non-aged, repaired composite resins samples. The resin-resin interface was characterised on SEM images and the microleakage at the interface was evaluated by dye penetration assessment. Universal bonding agent used in direct composite resins repair showed a very good adaptation to non-aged micro-filled hybrid and nano-filled hybrid composite resins. Aging by saliva storage of repaired composite resins leaded to an enlargement of resin-resin junction and a increased microleakage irrespective of the strategy (etch-and-rinse or self -etch) used for bonding agent application. Etch-and-rinse strategy for universal bonging agent application determined a better interface bonding when compared to self -etch strategy.

scholarly journals Effects of filler volume of nanosisal in compressive strength of composite resin

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 183
Author(s):  
Dwi Aji Nugroho ◽  
W. Widjijono ◽  
N. Nuryono ◽  
Widya Asmara ◽  
Wijayanti Dwi Aastuti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Compressive Strength ◽  
Fossil Fuels ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Natural Fibers ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Inorganic Filler ◽  
Filler Materials ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Volume Group

Background: One of the composite resin composition is inorganic filler. The production of inorganic filler materials was highly dependent on non-degradable, and nonrenewable fossil fuels. Therefore, natural fibers can be used as substitute for inorganic fillers. One that can be developed is sisal. Purpose: This study aimed to determine the effects of nanosisal filler volume on compressive strength of composite resin. Methods: In this study, composite resins with nano-sized sisal as filler were manufactured and labeled as nanosisal composites. This research processed sisal fibers into nano size and mixed them with Bis-GMA, UDMA, TEGDMA, Champhorquinone (Sigma Aldrich). Nanofiller composite (Z350 XT, 3M, ESPE) was utilized as a control. The 20 samples utilized were divided into 4 groups (each group containing five samples): Group A contained nanosisal composite of 60% filler volume, group B, nanosisal composite of 65% filler volume, group C, nanosisal composite of 70% filler volume and group D, nanofiller composite (Z350 XT, 3M, ESPE). Samples were 2 mm in diameter and 6 mm in height. The sample was tested for compressive strength using a universal testing machine (UTM). Data was analyzed by means of a Kruskal Wallis procedure. Results: The mean of the compressive strength of the nanosisal composite 60% was 16.80 MPa; the nanosisal composite 65% was 10.80 MPa, the nanosisal composite 70% was 7.20 MPa and the nanofiller composite was 7.40 MPa. There was a significant difference in data analysis (p = 0.033; p < 0.05). Conclusion: In this study, the filler volume of nanosisal influenced the compressive strength of a composite resin and the nanosisal filler volume was recomended at 60%.

scholarly journals Compressive strength differences between hybrid composites using post curing light box with LED and dry heating, in vitro

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Krisnawaty ◽  
Setiawan Natasasmita ◽  
Dudi Aripin
Keyword(s):  
Compressive Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Hybrid Composites ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Dry Heat ◽  
Hybrid Type ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Dry Heating

A hybrid type of composite resins is used as dental restorative materials in a wide cavity directly or indirectly. The mechanical properties of the composite resin would increase post-curing. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences between the compressive strength of hybrid type composite resin post-curing using LED light box and dry heating. This type of research was a quasi-experimental in vitro with the sample size of 30 samples which were divided into two groups. Each sample was tested using a Universal Testing Machine (Lloyd) at a speed of 1 mm/minute to test the compressive strength. Compressive strength values were recorded when the sample broke. The average value of compressive strength of the two treatment groups was statistically calculated using t-test. The results, of this study, showed that a hybrid composite resin with post curing using a light box with LED was at 194.138 Mpa which was lower than using the dry heat of 227.339 Mpa. It showed the statistically significant difference. The conclusion of this study was that the compressive strength of post-cured hybrid composites using a light box with LED was significantly lower than the post-curing using dry heat.

scholarly journals Compressive strenght of hybrid composites and nanofilled composites after post curing using light box

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tirza Rizany ◽  
Mochammad Richata Fadil ◽  
Endang Sukartini
Keyword(s):  
Compressive Strength ◽  
Experimental Research ◽  
Hybrid Composite ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Hybrid Composites ◽  
Strength Test ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Compressive Strength Test ◽  
Average Compressive Strength

Introduction: Nanofilled composite resins and resin hybrid composites are often used for the manufacture of composite indirect restorations because it has the addition of filler to add strength materials. This study aimed to compare the compressive strength of composites and composite hybrid nanofilled after post curing using light box. Methods: The research conducted was experimental research, with samples divided into two groups of each 10 specimens of hybrid composite resin and nanofilled. Composite cylindrical diameter of 3mm and 6mm high in post-curing for 180 seconds using a light box compressive strength test was then performed using a Lloyd Instruments LRX Plus, 1 mm/mnt speed. Results: The results were the average compressive strength of post-curing hybrid composites 234.61 MPa higher than the average post-curing composite nanofilled that was 196.60 MPa. Conclusion: the compressive strength of hybrid composite after post curing with light box is greater than the nanofilled composite.

Laser Therapy Evaluation in Complications of Restorations by Total-Etch Technique

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 921-925
Author(s):  
Cristina Angela Ghiorghe ◽  
Andra Claudia Gamen ◽  
Tiberiu Tirca ◽  
Sorin Andrian ◽  
Anca Melian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Treatment ◽  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Hybrid Composite ◽  
Study Groups ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Anterior Teeth ◽  
Carious Lesions ◽  
Etch And Rinse

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of laser therapy in post-operative sensitivity by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to the 57 patients after restoration with two different resins composite. In the first group (28 patients, 30 teeth) it was restored the cavity class I Black with micro-hybrid composite Filtek Z250 - Adper Single Bond (3M/ESPE). In the second group (29 patients, 30 teeth) it was restored the cavity class III Black with nano-hybrid composite Ceram X One Sphere Tec-Prime and Bond One (Etch&Rinse) (Dentsply). The restorative treatments were performed by the same practitioner on posterior and anterior teeth diagnosed with mid-sized chronic carious lesions. Total etch (etch and rinse) strategy of adhesion was used for both composite resins. The laser treatment was performed in 2 sessions at 48 hours and after 7 days, for both study groups using laser Whitening Lase II (DMC Dental). Mean scores for VAS indices decreased significantly at 48 hours and 7 days, following laser treatment for all the investigated parameters (materials, sex, age) (p [ 0.05).

scholarly journals BULKFILL TECHNIQUES WITH INTERMEDIATE LAYER TO MARGINAL ADAPTATION RESTORATION OF CLASS II COMPOSITE RESIN

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Mochammad Raidjffan Zulkarnaen Tabona ◽  
Adioro Soetojo ◽  
Ira Widjiastuti
Keyword(s):  
Dental Caries ◽  
Intermediate Layer ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Base Layer ◽  
Marginal Adaptation ◽  
Layer Technique ◽  
Natural Teeth ◽  
Composite Resin Restorations ◽  
Resin Restorations

Background: Dental caries is a hard tissue disease caused by bacterial metabolic activity that causes demineralization, teeth that have caries should be filled in order to function again. One of the restorative materials closer to natural teeth is composite resin because it is the same colour as natural teeth and is easy to shape. As for the placement technique, bulkfill is also used because it is more time-efficient, and irradiation is accompanied by applying the restoration material in one batch. However, the bulkfill technique often causes micro-leakage of dental caries deposition. The intermediate layer is an intermediate layer used to prevent micro-leakage at the edges of the restoration as a base layer for restoration to create a good adaptation before applying packable composite resin. Therefore, bulkfill coating technique with the intermediate layer can reduce the risk of microleakage. Purpose: To describe the bulkfill technique with an intermediate layer against marginal adaptation with class II composite resin restorations. Review: The literature sources used in the preparation of the articles through several databases with descriptions. More journals say that micro-leakage in class II cavity deposition with the intermediate layer technique is better than the bulkfill technique because the intermediate layer technique has better bond strength than the bulkfill technique. If the Bulkfill technique is modified with the Intermediate layer technique, it can show good correlation and internal adaptation. Conclusion: Bulkfill technique with an intermediate layer against marginal adaptation with class II composite resin restorations can reduce the microleakage rate by reducing the polymerization's shrinkage strain.

One-Year Clinical Evaluation of Composite Restorations in Posterior Teeth: Effect of Adhesive Systems

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. E30-E37 ◽  
Author(s):  
RH Sundfeld ◽  
RS Scatolin ◽  
FG Oliveira ◽  
LS Machado ◽  
RS Alexandre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Composite Resin ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Marginal Integrity ◽  
Composite Resin Restorations ◽  
One Year

SUMMARY This clinical study assessed the performance of posterior composite resins applied with the Adper™ Single Bond Plus (SB) and Adper™ Scotchbond SE (SE) adhesive systems and Filtek™ Supreme Plus composite resin, using modified US Public Health Service criteria. A total of 97 restorations were placed in posterior teeth by two calibrated operators. Application of the materials followed manufacturers' instructions. The restorations were evaluated by two examiners at baseline and after one year. Statistical analyses were conducted using the proportion test at a significance level of 5% (p&lt;0.05). All the restorations evaluated (ie, 100%) received an alpha rating for the criteria of marginal discoloration and marginal integrity at baseline. At one year, for marginal discoloration, 64.6% of SB and 61.2% of SE received an alpha rating. For marginal integrity, 72.9% of SB and 77.6% of SE received an alpha rating. The other restorations received bravo ratings for both criteria. None of the teeth that received the restorative systems presented caries lesions around the restorations. A total of eight teeth presented postoperative sensitivity one week after baseline, five with SB and three with SE; the symptom had disappeared one year later. One year later, composite resin restorations using either adhesive system showed satisfactory clinical performance.

scholarly journals Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontics brackets on composite resin restorations with different surface treatments

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 98-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Antonio Ribeiro ◽  
Ariane Vicente de Morais ◽  
Daniel Paludo Brunetto ◽  
Antonio Carlos de Oliveira Ruellas ◽  
Monica Tirre Souza de Araujo
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Dental Enamel ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Composite Resin Restorations ◽  
Resin Restorations

INTRODUCTION: Orthodontic patients frequently present composite resin restorations, however there are few studies that evaluate the best way for orthodontic bonding in this situation. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this work was to evaluate the bond strength of orthodontic brackets in resin restorations with surface treatment. METHODS: Fifty one bovine lower incisors were randomly divided into three groups. On the control group (CG) the brackets were bonded to dental enamel; on experimental groups, brackets were bonded to resin restoration with diamond drill treatment (EGT) and with no treatment (EGN). The teeth were placed in PVC tubes with autopolymerized acrylic resin. The shear test was performed in EMIC universal testing machine. The groups were submitted to ANOVA analysis of variance with Tukey post test to verify the statistical difference between groups (α = 0.05). RESULTS: CG (6.62 MPa) and EGT (6.82 MPa) groups presented similar results, while EGN (5.07 MPa) obtained statistically lower results (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Therefore, it is concluded that the best technique for bonding of orthodontic brackets on composite resin restorations is the performance of surface detritions.

scholarly journals Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Helena Barbosa ◽  
Régia Luzia Zanata ◽  
Maria Fidela de Lima Navarro ◽  
Osvaldo Benoni Nunes
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Aluminum Oxide ◽  
Hybrid Composite ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Complete Sequence ◽  
Composite Resins ◽  
Average Surface Roughness ◽  
Surface Smoothness ◽  
Average Surface ◽  
System Data

This study examined the average surface roughness (Ra, µm) of 2 microfilled (Durafill and Perfection), 1 hybrid (Filtek Z250) and 2 packable composite resins (Surefil and Fill Magic), before (baseline) and after eight different finishing and polishing treatments. The surface roughness was assessed using a profilometer. Ten specimens of each composite resin were randomly subjected to one of the following finishing/polishing techniques: A - carbide burs; B - fine/extrafine diamond burs; C - Sof-Lex aluminum oxide discs; D - Super-Snap aluminum oxide discs; E - rubber polishing points + fine/extrafine polishing pastes; F - diamond burs + rubber polishing points + fine/extrafine polishing pastes; G - diamond burs + Sof-Lex system; H - diamond burs + Super-Snap system. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test. Significant differences (p<0.05) were detected among both the resins and the finishing/polishing techniques. For all resins, the use of diamond burs resulted in the greatest surface roughness (Ra: 0.69 to 1.44 µm). The lowest Ra means were obtained for the specimens treated with Sof-Lex discs (Ra: 0.11 to 0.25 µm). The Ra values of Durafill were lower than those of Perfection and Filtek Z250, and these in turn had lower Ra than the packable composite resins. Overall, the smoothest surfaces were obtained with the use the complete sequence of Sof-Lex discs. In areas that could not be reached by the aluminum oxide discs, the carbide burs and the association between rubber points and polishing pastes produced satisfactory surface smoothness for the packable and hybrid composite resins, respectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document