The Role of Combining Biochemical Markers in Assessing the Endoscopic Activity in Ulcerative Colitis

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 1268-1271
Author(s):  
Mihaela Dranga ◽  
Catalina Mihai ◽  
Otilia Gavrilescu ◽  
Anca Cardoneanu ◽  
Mariana Floria ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Biochemical Markers ◽  
Fecal Calprotectin ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
A Prospective Study

Ulcerative colitis (UC) isa chronic, idiopathic and recurrent inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), characterized by periods of activity and remissionwhose monitoring requires invasive explorations associated with discomfort for the patient and important costs. Mucosal healing became one of the most important therapeutic targets in UC. The aim of our study was to identify a score, made up of noninvasive, available, used in current clinical practice biochemical markers, which should correlate with endoscopic activity in UC. We conducted a prospective study on 114 patients with UC. All patients were assessed both for biological inflammatory markers: erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR),C- reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, platelets, albumin, fecal calprotectin (FC) and by colonoscopy to estimate the endoscopic activity using Mayo score. By linear regression, we tried to identify a biochemical score correlated with endoscopic activity. Out of the serological markers,ESR (p=0.014), CRP(p= 0.021) and fibrinogen (p=0.035) correlated with the endoscopic activity of the disease. The best sensitivity to determine the endoscopic activity was given by FC (96.05%) with a predictable negative value of 91.1% (p=0.001). The score determined by linear regression: 1 (ESR]15mm/1h) x 0.305 + 1(fibrinogen]340.5mg/dL) x 0.309+1 (CRP] 5 mg/L) + 1 (calprotectin]200 μg/g) had an increased positive predictive value compared to each and one biomarker, nevertheless, with a sensitivity and specificity inferior to that of FC. Up to now, it is the first attempt to achieve a score made up exclusively of biological markers. The obtained score, although with an increased accuracy, has proven to have a lower predictability in comparison with FC used individually and cannot entirely replace colonoscopy.

scholarly journals Leucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein as a marker of mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eriko Yasutomi ◽  
Toshihiro Inokuchi ◽  
Sakiko Hiraoka ◽  
Kensuke Takei ◽  
Shoko Igawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Fecal Calprotectin ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Immunochemical Test ◽  
Fecal Markers ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

AbstractLeucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein (LRG) may be a novel serum biomarker for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The association of LRG with the endoscopic activity and predictability of mucosal healing (MH) was determined and compared with those of C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal markers (fecal immunochemical test [FIT] and fecal calprotectin [Fcal]) in 166 ulcerative colitis (UC) and 56 Crohn’s disease (CD) patients. In UC, LRG was correlated with the endoscopic activity and could predict MH, but the performance was not superior to that of fecal markers (areas under the curve [AUCs] for predicting MH: LRG: 0.61, CRP: 0.59, FIT: 0.75, and Fcal: 0.72). In CD, the performance of LRG was equivalent to that of CRP and Fcal (AUCs for predicting MH: LRG: 0.82, CRP: 0.82, FIT: 0.70, and Fcal: 0.88). LRG was able to discriminate patients with MH from those with endoscopic activity among UC and CD patients with normal CRP levels. LRG was associated with endoscopic activity and could predict MH in both UC and CD patients. It may be particularly useful in CD.

Effectiveness and Safety of Golimumab in Treating Outpatient Ulcerative Colitis: A Real-Life Prospective, Multicentre, Observational Study in Primary Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Centers

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Tursi ◽  
Leonardo Allegretta ◽  
Nello Buccianti ◽  
Nicola Della Valle ◽  
Walter Elisei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Fecal Calprotectin ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Bowel Diseases ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Background & Aims: Golimumab (GOL) has been recently approved in Italy for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) unresponsive to standard treatments. Our aims were to assess the real-life efficacy and safety of GOL in managing UC outpatients in Italian primary Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) centres.Methods: Consecutive UC outpatients with at least 3-months follow-up were enrolled. Primary end-point was the induction and maintenance of remission in UC, defined as Mayo score ≤2, at 6-month follow-up.Results: Ninety-three patients were enrolled. At 6-month follow-up, remission was obtained in 34 (36.5%) patients. Shorter duration of disease was the only significant predictive factor of remission. Clinical response was achieved in 60 (64.5%) patients, while mucosal healing (MH) was obtained in 18 (19.3%) patients. Sixteen (47.0%) patients under remission were still under therapy with steroids. C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin significantly dropped during the follow-up (p<0.001 for both proteins). Adverse events occurred in 4 (4.3%) patients and 3 of them stopped treatment. Colectomy was performed in only one patient (1.1%).Conclusions: Golimumab seems to be safe and effective in inducing and maintaining remission in real life UC outpatients.Abbreviations: ADA: Adalimumab; CRP: C-reactive Protein; GOL: Golimumab; FC: Fecal calprotectin; IBD: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; IFX: Infliximab; IQR: Interquartile range; MH: Mucosal Healing; SC: Subcutaneously; TBC: Tuberculosis; TNFα: Tumor necrosis factor α; UC: Ulcerative Colitis.    

scholarly journals Fecal Calprotectin, CRP and Leucocytes in IBD Patients: Comparison of Biomarkers With Biopsy Results

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry D Kyle ◽  
Terence A Agbor ◽  
Shajib Sharif ◽  
Usha Chauhan ◽  
John Marshall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Fecal Calprotectin ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Ascending Colon ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Concentration Dependent Manner ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Descending Colon ◽  
Active Inflammation

Abstract Background This study aimed to compare fecal calprotectin (FC) levels with other commonly used parameters as part of patient care during evaluation for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods We recruited adult IBD patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) and compared the results of the patient’s biopsy results (i.e., inflamed versus noninflamed) for six sites (i.e., ileum, ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, rectum) with concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP), total leucocytes and fecal calprotectin (FC). Results We found that FC was significantly elevated in a concentration-dependent manner that correlated with the number of active inflammation sites reported in biopsy. Although CRP and leucocyte measurements trended upwards in line with inflammation reported from biopsy, the results were highly variable and highlighted poor reliability of these biomarkers for indicating IBD inflammation. Conclusions These results strongly suggest that FC correlates best with biopsy reports and is a superior marker than CRP and leucocytes.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of treatment of moderate ulcerative colitis with prolonged mesalazine in real clinical practice

2021 ◽  
pp. 144-151
Author(s):  
O. V. Knyazev ◽  
A. V. Kagramanova ◽  
A. A. Lishchinskaya
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Clinical Remission ◽  
Topical Therapy ◽  
Fecal Calprotectin ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Prolonged Release ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Endoscopic Remission ◽  
Oral Mesalazine ◽  
High Doses

Introduction. Ulcerative colitis (UC) is one of the severe therapeutic diseases. High doses of oral granular mesalazine are required to maintain clinical and endoscopic remission of UC, which may be sufficient and supposedly more acceptable for patients, as some studies showed that adherence to topical therapy is significantly lower than to oral 5-ASA drugs.Objective of the study. To evaluate the efficacy of therapy of patients with moderate left-sided ulcerative colitis (UC) and pancolitis receiving prolonged-release ethylcellulose-coated mesalazine.Materials and methods. The evaluation of the outcomes of treatment of UC patients who received prolonged-release mesalazine was carried out. We examined 87 patients with UC who received granular ethylcellulose-coated mesalazine, of those 38 (43.7%) men and 49 (56.3%) women. The average age of the enrolled patients was 38.3 ± 12.6 years.Results and discussion. After 2 weeks from the beginning of therapy with prolonged-release mesalazine, the majority of patients – 71 (81.6%) responded to the therapy. After 12 weeks, 71 (81.6%) of 87 UC patients, who responded to therapy with prolongedrelease mesalazine, remained in clinical remission. On average, the Mayo score in the group decreased from 7.6 ± 0.99 to 2.6 ± 0.25 points. There was a significant decrease in CRP, ESR, leukocytosis, and fecal calprotectin. After 26 weeks, Mayo score in the group of patients remained on average at the level of 2.2–2.3 points. The number of UC patients with colon mucosal healing was 32 (36.8%) patients. A year after the start of therapy with prolonged-release mesalazine, 69 (79.3%) UC patients who responded to therapy had a clinical remission, of those 32 (36.8%) patients had a clinical and endoscopic remission. During the year of observation, no case of surgical intervention or re-hospitalization due to exacerbation of the disease was recorded in patients with UC who achieved remission.Conclusions. Treatment of moderate active UC should begin with oral mesalazine ≥ 3 g per day in combination with topical mesalazine. The prolonged-release mesalazines are the most preferred

scholarly journals Rapid fecal calprotectin testing predicts mucosal healing better than C-reactive protein and serum tumor necrosis factor α in patients with ulcerative colitis

2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-260
Author(s):  
T. Voiosu ◽  
Andreea Benguş ◽  
P. Bălănescu ◽  
Roxana Dinu ◽  
A. Voiosu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Tumor Necrosis Factor ◽  
Tumor Necrosis ◽  
Tumor Necrosis Factor Α ◽  
Fecal Calprotectin ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Factor Α ◽  
Necrosis Factor

AbstractBackground and Aims. Serum and fecal biomarkers have been used as noninvasive methods for assessing disease activity in ulcerative colitis. C-reactive protein, serum tumor necrosis factor-α and fecal calprotectin are among the most promising such biomarkers. However, their role in the management of ulcerative colitis patients remains to be clarified. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin and tumor necrosis factor-α in detecting clinical and endoscopic activity and predicting disease outcome.Methods. A cohort of ulcerative colitis patients was prospectively evaluated for clinical and endoscopic disease activity using the Mayo score. Serum C-reactive protein and tumor necrosis factor-α levels were measured and a point-of-care method was used for determining Calprotectin levels.Results. Fifty-three patients with ulcerative colitis were followed for a median of 12 months. Fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher in patients with clinically active disease at baseline, but only calprotectin levels correlated with endoscopic activity. Calprotectin values over 300 μg/g had 60% sensitivity and 90% specificity for detecting active endoscopic disease and 61% sensitivity and 89% specificity for predicting mucosal healing.Conclusion. Rapid calprotectin testing is a better predictor of mucosal healing than serum biomarkers and it could improve the management of ulcerative colitis patients by decreasing the need for invasive investigations.

P077 A NEW TREATMENT APPROACH FOR INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: INTRACOLONIC BIFIDOBACTERIUM AND XYLOGLUCAN APPLICATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S35-S36
Author(s):  
Hüseyin Bozkurt
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Single Administration ◽  
Diagnostic Strategies ◽  
Bifidobacterium Animalis ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) pathogenesis includes the altered gut microbiota, environmental factors, human immune responses and genetic. Reduced bifidobacteria level is associated with IBD. Xyloglucan is a plant based prebiotic oligosaccharide. Bifidobacteria level is increased in the presence of xyloglucan. In this article we aim to share the results of our cases; Ulcerative colitis (UC) patients treated by intracolonic single administration of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis and Xyloglucan combination. Methods Ten UC patients were evaluated; before and after intracolonic single administration of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis and Xyloglucan combination with colonoscopic laboratory and clinical examination. Results Age, sex, diagnosis, disease location, previous medications are summarized in Table 1. All the patients had active ulcerative colitis disease before the administration. The Mayo Score was used to assess the severity of UC. 2 cases had extensive colitis and 8 patients had left-sided colitis. After 6 weeks of the administration mucosal healing and resolution of colonic symptoms were seen. These results are summarized in Table 2. Of the 10 cases, 7 were undertaken 5-ASA +Azathiopurine and three were undertaken vedolizumab treatment. Intracolonic single Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis and xyloglucan administration was found effective in the mucosal healing and resolution of colonic symptoms in ulcerative colitis patients. Conclusions Herein we reported the importance of Bifidobacterium and xylooligosaccharide combination in IBD. Colonoscopic single Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis and xyloglucan administration is a new method that has no side effect and easy to apply for treatment of IBD.This application might provide enhancement of non-stimulatory status and higher biodiversity in colonic mucosa so mucosal healing may be improved rapidly. However, it would be necessary to develop diagnostic strategies in order to discriminate which patients would benefit from this strategy.

scholarly journals P690 A propensity score weighted comparison of vedolizumab, adalimumab, and golimumab in patients with ulcerative colitis: Real-life data from the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SN-IBD)

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S561-S562
Author(s):  
F S Macaluso ◽  
M Ventimiglia ◽  
W Fries ◽  
A Viola ◽  
M Cappello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Treatment Persistence ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Abstract Background No real-life study aiming at comparing at the same time the effectiveness of vedolizumab (VDZ), adalimumab (ADA), and golimumab (GOL) in Ulcerative colitis (UC) is currently available. Methods Data of consecutive patients with UC treated with VDZ, ADA, and GOL from June 2015 to December 2018 were extracted from the cohort of the Sicilian Network for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SN-IBD). A three-arms propensity score-adjusted analysis was performed to reduce bias caused by imbalanced covariates at baseline, including the proportion of TNF-α inhibitor naïve and non-naïve patients, using the Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) method. The effectiveness was evaluated at 8 weeks, 52 weeks, and as treatment persistence at the end of follow-up. The clinical endpoints were steroid-free clinical remission (partial Mayo score &lt;2 without steroid use) and clinical response (reduction of the partial Mayo score ≥2 points with a concomitant decrease of steroid dosage compared with baseline). The sum of the two outcomes was defined as a clinical benefit. The achievement of mucosal healing (endoscopic Mayo score 0–1) was assessed after at least 6 months of biological treatment. Results A total of 463 treatments (VDZ: n = 187; ADA: n = 168; GOL: n = 108) were included, with a median follow-up of 47.6 weeks (IQR 20.0–85.9). At 8 weeks, a clinical benefit was achieved in 70.6% patients treated with VDZ, in 68.5% patients treated with ADA, and in 67.6% patients treated with GOL (p = n.s. for all comparisons). After 52 weeks, VDZ showed better rates of clinical benefit compared with both ADA (71.6% vs. 47.5; OR: 2.79, 95% CI 1.63–4.79, p &lt; 0.001) and GOL (71.6% vs. 40.2%; OR: 3.77, 95% CI 2.08–6.80, p &lt; 0.001), while the difference between ADA and GOL was not significant. Cox survival analysis demonstrated that patients treated with VDZ had a reduced probability of treatment discontinuation compared with those treated with ADA (HR: 0.42, 95% CI 0.28–0.64, p &lt; 0.001) and GOL (HR: 0.30, 95% CI 0.19–0.46, p &lt; 0.001), while patients treated with ADA had a reduced risk of treatment discontinuation compared with those treated with GOL (HR: 0.71, 95% CI 0.50–1.00, p = 0.048). Post-treatment mucosal healing rates showed a numerical but non-significant difference in favour of VDZ (48.1%) compared with ADA and GOL (38.0% and 34.6%, respectively). Conclusion In the first study comparing at the same time the clinical effectiveness of VDZ, ADA, and GOL in UC patients via propensity score-adjusted analysis, VDZ was superior to both subcutaneous agents at 52 weeks and as treatment persistence, while ADA showed a superior treatment persistence compared with GOL.

scholarly journals Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio as a Marker for Endoscopic Activity in Ulcerative Colitis

Immuno ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 360-368
Author(s):  
Natsuki Ishida ◽  
Satoru Takahashi ◽  
Yusuke Asai ◽  
Takahiro Miyazu ◽  
Satoshi Tamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Roc Analysis ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Occult Blood ◽  
Fecal Calprotectin ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Lymphocyte To Monocyte Ratio ◽  
Endoscopic Score ◽  
The Relationship

Leukocyte subtypes can be used to evaluate the severity of ulcerative colitis (UC). In this study, we examined the relationship between the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) and the Mayo endoscopic score (MES) in assessing endoscopic activity in UC. Eighty-nine samples of leukocyte subtypes and biomarkers, including fecal calprotectin (FC), the fecal immunochemical occult blood test (FIT), and C-reactive protein (CRP), from 71 patients with UC were retrospectively investigated, along with the MES. The MES was significantly correlated with the LMR, FC, the FIT, and CRP. There were significant differences in the LMR, FC, the FIT, and CRP between groups with an MES < 1 and >2 (p = 0.001, p = 0.003, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). In the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for predicting mucosal healing (MES 0 or 1), the areas under the curve (AUCs) for the LMR, FC, the FIT, and CRP, were 0.712, 0.860, 0.908, and 0.796, respectively. In the analysis of patients without immunomodulators, the correlation of the MES with the LMR and CRP was significant. The LMR can be used to assess endoscopic activity in UC, particularly in patients without immunomodulators.

scholarly journals Treatment Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Current Status in Daily Practice

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 465-471 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tessa E.H. Römkens ◽  
Kim Gijsbers ◽  
Wietske Kievit ◽  
Frank Hoentjen ◽  
Joost P.H. Drenth
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Bowel Disease ◽  
Normal Mucosa ◽  
Mucosal Healing ◽  
Treatment Targets ◽  
Mayo Score ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel

Background & Aims: Recently, treatment goals in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in clinical trials have shifted from mainly symptom-based to more mucosa-driven. Real world data on treatment priorities are lacking. We aimed to investigate the current practice and most commonly used definitions of IBD treatment targets among Dutch gastroenterologists. Methods: Dutch gastroenterologists were asked to participate in a computer-based nation-wide survey. We asked questions on demographics, opinion and current practice regarding IBD treatment targets. Results: Twenty-four percent (134/556) of the respondents completed the survey. For both Crohn’s disease (CD) (47.3%, 61/129) and ulcerative colitis (UC)(45%, 58/129) the main treatment goal was to achieve and maintain deep remission, defined as clinical, biochemical and endoscopic remission. Seventy-six percent of the participants use mucosal healing (MH) as a potential treatment target for IBD, whereas 22.6% use histological remission. There is no single definition for MH in IBD. The majority use Mayo score ≤ 1 in UC (52%) and ‘macroscopic normal mucosa’ in CD (66%). Conclusion: More stringent and mucosa-driven treatment targets as ‘deep remission’ and ‘mucosal healing’ have found traction in clinical practice. The most commonly used definition for MH in routine practice is endoscopic MAYO score ≤ 1 in UC and ‘macroscopic normal mucosa’ in CD. Abbreviations: CD: Crohn’s disease; CDEIS: Crohn‘s Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity; IBD: Inflammatory Bowel Disease; IBDU: IBD unclassified; IOIBD: International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; MH: Mucosal healing; MMH: Microscopic mucosal healing; PROMS: Patient reported outcome measures; SES-CD: Simple endoscopic score for Crohn’s disease; UC: ulcerative colitis; UCEIS: Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document