scholarly journals Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio as a Marker for Endoscopic Activity in Ulcerative Colitis

Immuno ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 360-368
Author(s):  
Natsuki Ishida ◽  
Satoru Takahashi ◽  
Yusuke Asai ◽  
Takahiro Miyazu ◽  
Satoshi Tamura ◽  
...  

Leukocyte subtypes can be used to evaluate the severity of ulcerative colitis (UC). In this study, we examined the relationship between the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) and the Mayo endoscopic score (MES) in assessing endoscopic activity in UC. Eighty-nine samples of leukocyte subtypes and biomarkers, including fecal calprotectin (FC), the fecal immunochemical occult blood test (FIT), and C-reactive protein (CRP), from 71 patients with UC were retrospectively investigated, along with the MES. The MES was significantly correlated with the LMR, FC, the FIT, and CRP. There were significant differences in the LMR, FC, the FIT, and CRP between groups with an MES < 1 and >2 (p = 0.001, p = 0.003, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). In the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for predicting mucosal healing (MES 0 or 1), the areas under the curve (AUCs) for the LMR, FC, the FIT, and CRP, were 0.712, 0.860, 0.908, and 0.796, respectively. In the analysis of patients without immunomodulators, the correlation of the MES with the LMR and CRP was significant. The LMR can be used to assess endoscopic activity in UC, particularly in patients without immunomodulators.

2015 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-260
Author(s):  
T. Voiosu ◽  
Andreea Benguş ◽  
P. Bălănescu ◽  
Roxana Dinu ◽  
A. Voiosu ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground and Aims. Serum and fecal biomarkers have been used as noninvasive methods for assessing disease activity in ulcerative colitis. C-reactive protein, serum tumor necrosis factor-α and fecal calprotectin are among the most promising such biomarkers. However, their role in the management of ulcerative colitis patients remains to be clarified. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin and tumor necrosis factor-α in detecting clinical and endoscopic activity and predicting disease outcome.Methods. A cohort of ulcerative colitis patients was prospectively evaluated for clinical and endoscopic disease activity using the Mayo score. Serum C-reactive protein and tumor necrosis factor-α levels were measured and a point-of-care method was used for determining Calprotectin levels.Results. Fifty-three patients with ulcerative colitis were followed for a median of 12 months. Fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher in patients with clinically active disease at baseline, but only calprotectin levels correlated with endoscopic activity. Calprotectin values over 300 μg/g had 60% sensitivity and 90% specificity for detecting active endoscopic disease and 61% sensitivity and 89% specificity for predicting mucosal healing.Conclusion. Rapid calprotectin testing is a better predictor of mucosal healing than serum biomarkers and it could improve the management of ulcerative colitis patients by decreasing the need for invasive investigations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S381-S382
Author(s):  
P Golovics ◽  
L Gonczi ◽  
J Reinglass ◽  
C Verdon ◽  
S Pundir ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Optimal management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) requires the accurate assessment of disease activity. Endoscopic evaluation is considered the gold standard approach, but it is invasive. We aimed to determine how strong patient reported outcomes, clinical scores and symptoms correlate with endoscopy for assessment of disease activity in UC patients. Methods 171 patients were included prospectively and consecutively (age: 49 (IQR: 38-61) years, duration 12 (4-19)years, 79 females (46.2%), 57.3% extensive disease, 42.7% on biologicals) at the time of the colonoscopy. The 2 item patient reported outcome (PRO), partial MAYO, Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI), Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES), Baron and Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) scores were calculated. C reactive Protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FCAL) was available in 83 and 45.6% of patients. 17.0% had clinical flare, treatment was escalated in 14.6% of patients. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV values were calculated, ROC analysis and K-statistics were performed. Results Rectal bleeding (RBS), stool frequency (SF) subscore of 0, or total PRO2 remission (RBS 0 and SF ≤1), partial MAYO (≤2) and SCCAI (≤2.5) remission were similarly associated to mucosal healing defined by MES (0 or ≤1) or Baron (0 or ≤1) scores (Table 1). PRO2 (AUCMES0/Baron0: 0.770/0.740, AUCMES0-1/Baron0-1: 0.868/0.858), SF (AUCMES0/Baron0:0.751/0.724, AUCMES0-1/Baron0-1:0842/0.820), RBS (AUCMES0/Baron0: 0.718/0.698, AUCMES0-1/Baron0-1: 0.814/0.845) partial Mayo (AUCMES0/Baron0: 0.823/0.788, AUCMES0-1/Baron0-1: 0.927/0.902) and SCCAI (AUCMES0/Baron0: 0.767/0.752, AUCMES0-1/Baron0-1:0.888/0.867) were similarly associated with mucosal healing in a ROC analysis. There was a strict association between MES 0 and Baron 0 (k=0.917) and UCEIS &lt;4 and MES 0-1 (k=0.813), while moderate to fair agreement between UCEIS &lt;4 and MES 0 (K=0.471) or Baron 0 (K=0.414)/Baron 0-1 (K=0.353), and between MES 0-1 and Baron 0-1 (K= 0.350) scores. Agreement between CRP and clinical remission or endoscopic healing (MES/Baron) was poor (K~0.2), while agreement between FCAL (&gt;100 or &gt;250) and RBS-PRO2 remission (K&gt;100 or &gt;250: 0.44-0.60) or pMAYO (K&gt;100 or &gt;250: 0.41-0.59) or MES/Baron 0 was moderate to good (K&gt;100:0.53-0.52 and K&gt;250:0.57-0.53). Conclusion We found no difference across accuracy of RBS, SF, PRO2, partial Mayo and SCCAI in predicting endoscopic healing. A strong association was found with high PPV for MES/Baron ≤1 and high NPV for MES/Baron 0. FCAL, but not CRP was associated to clinical and endoscopic remission.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eriko Yasutomi ◽  
Toshihiro Inokuchi ◽  
Sakiko Hiraoka ◽  
Kensuke Takei ◽  
Shoko Igawa ◽  
...  

AbstractLeucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein (LRG) may be a novel serum biomarker for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The association of LRG with the endoscopic activity and predictability of mucosal healing (MH) was determined and compared with those of C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal markers (fecal immunochemical test [FIT] and fecal calprotectin [Fcal]) in 166 ulcerative colitis (UC) and 56 Crohn’s disease (CD) patients. In UC, LRG was correlated with the endoscopic activity and could predict MH, but the performance was not superior to that of fecal markers (areas under the curve [AUCs] for predicting MH: LRG: 0.61, CRP: 0.59, FIT: 0.75, and Fcal: 0.72). In CD, the performance of LRG was equivalent to that of CRP and Fcal (AUCs for predicting MH: LRG: 0.82, CRP: 0.82, FIT: 0.70, and Fcal: 0.88). LRG was able to discriminate patients with MH from those with endoscopic activity among UC and CD patients with normal CRP levels. LRG was associated with endoscopic activity and could predict MH in both UC and CD patients. It may be particularly useful in CD.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natsuki Ishida ◽  
Tomohiro Higuchi ◽  
Takahiro Miyazu ◽  
Satoshi Tamura ◽  
Shinya Tani ◽  
...  

AbstractWe evaluated the association between endoscopic scores of colonic inflammation and fecal calprotectin (FC), fecal immunochemical occult blood test (FIT), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Endoscopic scores reflecting the most severe lesion [maximum Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (M-MES) and Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS)] and those reflecting the inflammation of the entire colon [sum of MES (S-MES) and Ulcerative Colitis Colonoscopic Index of Severity (UCCIS)] were evaluated. FC, FIT, and CRP were measured, and their association with the four endoscopic scores was evaluated. Endoscopic scores of 78 complete colonoscopies (66 UC patients) were evaluated using the three biomarkers. FC and CRP tended to correlate more strongly with S-MES and UCCIS than with M-MES and UCEIS. In the M-MES 0, 1 group, compared to CRP, FC and FIT showed stronger correlations with S-MES and UCCIS. Conversely, in the M-MES 2, 3 group, only CRP was significantly correlated with each descriptor. CRP more strongly reflects colon-wide mucosal inflammation than FC and allows reliable assessment of inflammation throughout the colon in active UC.


Author(s):  
Rosanna Cannatelli ◽  
Alina Bazarova ◽  
Davide Zardo ◽  
Olga Maria Nardone ◽  
Uday Shivaji ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a common surrogate marker of mucosal healing (MH) in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). We investigated the optimum FC thresholds for defining endoscopic remission (ER) and histological remission (HR) using advanced endoscopic techniques. Patients and Methods In this cross-sectional study, we collected clinical, endoscopic, histological data, and FC from 76 UC and 41 CD patients. Receiver operating characteristic curves were created to evaluate the optimum cut-off of FC to predict ER evaluated by Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES), Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS), and modified PICaSSO (Paddington International Virtual Chromoendoscopy Score) for UC patients and Simple Endoscopic Score (SES-CD) in CD patients; and HR was scored by the Robarts Histology Index (RHI) and Nancy Index for UC and modified Riley for CD. Results In UC patients, the best thresholds of FC to identify ER calculated with MES, UCEIS, and modified PICaSSO were 112, 148, and 161 mcg/g with accuracy of 86.9% 86.8%, and 81.6%, respectively. The best value of FC to predict HR was 112 mcg/g and 172 mcg/g with accuracy of 84.2% and 81.6% for RHI and Nancy Index, respectively. In CD patients, the best cut-off of FC to predict ER was 96 mcg/g with accuracy of 82.9%. The HR was best predicted by an FC value of 225 mcg/g with accuracy of 75.6%. Conclusions The FC value threshold between 112 and 172 mcg/g could identify ER and HR in UC patients, whereas a value under 225 mcg/g should be considered for CD patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S098-S098
Author(s):  
E Zittan ◽  
A H Steinhart ◽  
H Aran ◽  
R Milgrom ◽  
E Koifman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Commonly used endoscopic indices in IBD lack ability to provide overall disease burden and severity, generate low inter-observer agreement, and demonstrate incomplete validation of some scores. We developed a new endoscopic reporting tool, the Toronto IBD Global Endoscopic Reporting (TIGER) score for Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. The aim of our study was to compare the usability and validity of the TIGER score against fecal calprotectin (FC), C-reactive protein (CRP) and IBD DISK score in UC patients. Methods A cohort of 53 UC patients participated in the study. Blinded IBD experts reviewed and graded ileocolonoscopy videos. In the validation phase, the TIGER score was compared to (1) the Mayo endoscopic score serving as a reference standard and; (2) inflammatory biomarkers FC, CRP and; (3) IBD Disk. Results Inter-observer reliability of the TIGER score per segment between reviewers was excellent, Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC)=0.94; [95%CI: 0.92–0.96]. For categorized TIGER score, lowest overall agreement was 96.6% [95%CI: 93.5–98.6] and lowest kappa 0.91 [95%CI: 0.84–0.98], reflecting excellent agreement. Overall agreement per segment between Mayo endoscopic score and TIGER was 84% [95%CI:74%-90%] and kappa coefficient 0.60 [95%CI: 0.42–0.808]. Per subject analysis for UC yielded overall agreement of 80% [95%CI: 64–91] and kappa coefficient 0.44 [95%CI: 0.14–0.75]. There was a significant correlation between TIGER and FC (r s = .794, p &lt; .0001). There was a significant correlation between TIGER and IBD Disk (r s = .613, p &lt; .0001). As expected, there was a lower correlation between TIGER score and CRP (r s = .309, p &lt; .0850) in UC patients. Conclusion The TIGER endoscopic score demonstrates significant correlation with FC and IBD disk score in ulcerative colitis patients and thus can be used as a reliable and simple endoscopic score for UC patients to capture overall endoscopic disease burden.


2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 1268-1271
Author(s):  
Mihaela Dranga ◽  
Catalina Mihai ◽  
Otilia Gavrilescu ◽  
Anca Cardoneanu ◽  
Mariana Floria ◽  
...  

Ulcerative colitis (UC) isa chronic, idiopathic and recurrent inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), characterized by periods of activity and remissionwhose monitoring requires invasive explorations associated with discomfort for the patient and important costs. Mucosal healing became one of the most important therapeutic targets in UC. The aim of our study was to identify a score, made up of noninvasive, available, used in current clinical practice biochemical markers, which should correlate with endoscopic activity in UC. We conducted a prospective study on 114 patients with UC. All patients were assessed both for biological inflammatory markers: erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR),C- reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, platelets, albumin, fecal calprotectin (FC) and by colonoscopy to estimate the endoscopic activity using Mayo score. By linear regression, we tried to identify a biochemical score correlated with endoscopic activity. Out of the serological markers,ESR (p=0.014), CRP(p= 0.021) and fibrinogen (p=0.035) correlated with the endoscopic activity of the disease. The best sensitivity to determine the endoscopic activity was given by FC (96.05%) with a predictable negative value of 91.1% (p=0.001). The score determined by linear regression: 1 (ESR]15mm/1h) x 0.305 + 1(fibrinogen]340.5mg/dL) x 0.309+1 (CRP] 5 mg/L) + 1 (calprotectin]200 μg/g) had an increased positive predictive value compared to each and one biomarker, nevertheless, with a sensitivity and specificity inferior to that of FC. Up to now, it is the first attempt to achieve a score made up exclusively of biological markers. The obtained score, although with an increased accuracy, has proven to have a lower predictability in comparison with FC used individually and cannot entirely replace colonoscopy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Tursi ◽  
Leonardo Allegretta ◽  
Nello Buccianti ◽  
Nicola Della Valle ◽  
Walter Elisei ◽  
...  

Background & Aims: Golimumab (GOL) has been recently approved in Italy for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) unresponsive to standard treatments. Our aims were to assess the real-life efficacy and safety of GOL in managing UC outpatients in Italian primary Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) centres.Methods: Consecutive UC outpatients with at least 3-months follow-up were enrolled. Primary end-point was the induction and maintenance of remission in UC, defined as Mayo score ≤2, at 6-month follow-up.Results: Ninety-three patients were enrolled. At 6-month follow-up, remission was obtained in 34 (36.5%) patients. Shorter duration of disease was the only significant predictive factor of remission. Clinical response was achieved in 60 (64.5%) patients, while mucosal healing (MH) was obtained in 18 (19.3%) patients. Sixteen (47.0%) patients under remission were still under therapy with steroids. C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin significantly dropped during the follow-up (p<0.001 for both proteins). Adverse events occurred in 4 (4.3%) patients and 3 of them stopped treatment. Colectomy was performed in only one patient (1.1%).Conclusions: Golimumab seems to be safe and effective in inducing and maintaining remission in real life UC outpatients.Abbreviations: ADA: Adalimumab; CRP: C-reactive Protein; GOL: Golimumab; FC: Fecal calprotectin; IBD: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; IFX: Infliximab; IQR: Interquartile range; MH: Mucosal Healing; SC: Subcutaneously; TBC: Tuberculosis; TNFα: Tumor necrosis factor α; UC: Ulcerative Colitis.    


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S613-S614
Author(s):  
P Golovics ◽  
L Gonczi ◽  
J Reinglass ◽  
C Verdon ◽  
W Afif ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Optimal management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) requires the accurate assessment of disease activity. Endoscopic evaluation is considered the gold standard approach, but it is invasive. We aimed to determine how strong patient reported outcomes, clinical scores and symptoms correlate with endoscopy for assessment of disease activity in UC patients. Methods One hundred and thirty-six patients were included prospectively (age: 48 (IQR: 38–61) years, duration 12 (4–19) years, 63 females, 53.7% extensive disease, 40.4% on biologicals) at the time of the colonoscopy. The 2 item patient reported outcome (PRO), partial MAYO, Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI), Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES), Baron and Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) scores were calculated. C reactive Protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin (FCAL) was available in 58.1 and 33.8% of patients. 20.7% had clinical flare, treatment was escalated in 17.8% of patients. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV values were calculated, ROC analysis and K-statistics were performed. Results Rectal bleeding(RBS), stool frequency(SF) subscore of 0, or total PRO2 remission(RBS0 and SF≤1), partial MAYO(≤2) and SCCAI(≤2.5) remission were similarly associated to mucosal healing defined by MES(0 or ≤1) or Baron (0 or ≤1) scores (Table 1). PRO2 remission (AUCMES0/Baron0:0.747/0.715, AUCMES0-1/Baron0-1:0.867/0.863), SF AUCMES0/Baron0:0.731/0.703, AUCMES0-1/Baron0-1:0851/0.839), RBS(AUCMES0/Baron0:0.708/0.685, AUCMES0-1/Baron0-1:0.828/0.835) partial Mayo (AUCMES0/Baron0:0.792/0.755, AUCMES0-1/Baron0-1:0.917/0.903) and SCCAI (AUCMES0/Baron0:0.738/0.724, AUCMES0-1/Baron0-1:0.908/0.880) were similarly associated with mucosal healing in a ROC analysis. There was a string association between MES and Baron (k=0.798), while moderate agreement between UCEIS and MES (K=0.451) or Baron (K=0.499) scores. Agreement between CRP and clinical remission or endoscopic healing (MES/Baron) was poor (K~0.2), while agreement between FCAL (&gt;100 or &gt;250) and RBS-PRO2 remission (K&gt;250:0.56–0.61) or MES/Baron 0 was moderate to good(K&gt;100:0.54-0.53 and K&gt;250:0.50–0.54) Conclusion We found no difference across accuracy of RBS, SF, PRO2, partial Mayo and SCCAI in predicting endoscopic healing. A strong association was found with high PPV for MES/Baron ≤1 and high NPV for MES/Baron 0. FCAL, but not CRP was associated to clinical and endoscopic remission.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document