Cancellation of Licenses and Other Special Permits in the Field of Business Activities as Administrative Enforcement Measures: the Essence, Grounds and Problems of Application

2021 ◽  
pp. 20-34
Author(s):  
Ivshina G. G. ◽  

The article deals with topical issues of understanding the essence, grounds and conditions for applying to legal entities-commercial organizations, and individual entrepreneurs such measures of administrative and legal influence as the cancellation of licenses or other special permits granted to them to carry out certain types of business activities or to perform certain actions in the field of entrepreneurship. In administrative law science, there are different approaches to determining the substance of the administrative legal measure under consideration and the purposes of its application. Cancellation of licenses and other special permits is qualified in the literature as a measure of administrative warning, as an administrative and preventive measure, as a preventive and restorative measure, and even as a measure of administrative responsibility. The rules governing the granting and cancellation of licenses and other special permits are not systematized, they are contained in a variety of Federal laws and laws of the subjects of the Russian Federation that establish various grounds for termination of the relevant licenses and permits, including those that are not related to the Commission of any offenses. In this regard, there is a need to conduct a study of the legal nature, grounds and purposes for revoking licenses and other special permits granted to business entities. The purpose of the research is to identify problems of theoretical understanding, regulatory regulation and practical application by Executive authorities, local government bodies and courts of this administrative and legal measure and develop possible approaches to their solution, including by making the necessary changes and additions to the current licensing and permitting legislation. Based on this goal, the research aims to study the relevant Federal laws, scientific and educational literature, analysis and synthesis of materials of judicial practice in cases of revocation of licenses and other special permits issued to commercial organizations and individual entrepreneurs. During the preparation of the work, methods of formal legal analysis and synthesis of normative material and judicial practice were used. As a result of the research the author formulated the following main conclusions: 1) depending on the legally established grounds and purposes for applying the cancellation (termination) of a license or other special permit issued to a legal entity or individual entrepreneur, this measure may be referred to as administrative measures or administrative-legal confirmation of the loss by the license holder of the special right granted to him in the field of business; 2) cancellation of a license or other special permission in the sphere of business activity as a measure of administrative restraint is an authoritative influence of a competent administrative and public body or arbitration court on a legal entity or individual entrepreneur who has been granted a license or other special permission to carry out certain types of business activity or to perform certain actions in the field of business, consisting in making a decision on cancellation (cancellation, invalidation) of the specified licenses or permits in connection with violations committed by their holders of mandatory, including license, requirements aimed at forcibly terminating the relevant illegal activities or actions; 3) a license or other special permit may be revoked (revoked, invalidated) only if the following conditions are met: 1) the holder of a license or other special permit has committed gross (significant) violations of mandatory (license) requirements; 2) prior to the decision to revoke (revoke, invalidate) a license or other special permit, the following administrative enforcement measures were consistently applied to their holder: issuing an order to stop the violations committed and eliminate their harmful consequences; suspending the license (permit) in case of non-fulfillment of the issued order with the issuance of a second order that was not executed within the established period; 4) in order to ensure uniform legal regulation of the granting and termination (cancellation) of licenses and other special permits for certain types of business activities or for performing certain actions in the field of entrepreneurship, it is necessary to prepare and adopt the Federal law «On the basis of licensing and permitting activities in the Russian Federation», which, among other things, must exhaustively define the cases, grounds and procedure for canceling these licenses and permits. Тhe procedure for consideration by arbitration courts of cases on revocation of licenses and other special permits should be set out in a separate Chapter of the Arbitration procedure code of the Russian Federation.

Author(s):  
Сергей Тычинин ◽  
Sergey Tychinin ◽  
Олег Скопенко ◽  
Oleg Skopenko

The relevance of the study of the problem of affiliation of legal entities is determined by the lack of a coherent legal mechanism to ensure the resolution of conflicts of interest between dependent persons. As of today, Russian legislation as a whole does not contain clear provisions regarding the concept of the affiliation of legal entities. Certain laws contain only separate independent concepts, for example, the concept of “affiliation” is used in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation; in the Federal Law «On Competition» - the concept of «group of persons»; in the Tax Code of the Russian Federation - the concept of «interdependent persons». Therefore, the study of the problem of settling relations with affiliates deserves special attention. The objectives of this study are the systematization and analytical study of the legal regulation of the institution of the affiliation of legal entities. In the course of the study, the authors used the following methods: analysis and synthesis, modeling, comparison, analysis of the regulatory framework, synthesis, formal legal method The article examines the issues of legal regulation of the affiliation of a legal entity. The definition of the concept of “affiliation” is given, criteria and signs of affiliation of a legal entity are defined, various scientific approaches to the definition of this category are given, problems of correlation with economic and other types of relations between affiliates are explored. In the course of the study, the authors came to the conclusion that the institution of affiliation in its present form undoubtedly needs to be reformed. It is necessary to develop a unified law, reflecting all the nuances of the concept of “affiliation” and the features of the transactions with affiliated persons.


Author(s):  
V. Y. Volkov

The article deals with the administrative and legal status of commercial and non-commercial organizations. The author conducts a theoretical and methodological analysis of the administrative and legal status of commercial and non-commercial organizations. The author focuses on the fact that in modern Russian legislation there are processes of duplication of norms in the field of legal regulation of legal entities: the same issues are regulated by the civil code of the Russian Federation and special Federal laws, which in some cases leads to contradictions. The author notes that the administrative and legal status of commercial and non-commercial organizations in a number of representatives of legal science is studied in fragments, representing mainly a list of elements, without justification of why these characteristics are highlighted. The author concludes that the administrative and legal status of commercial and non-commercial organizations is a certain structure consisting of several blocks, which, in turn, consist of interrelated elements, the exclusion of which leads to the termination of the administrative and legal status.


Author(s):  
Татьяна Алексеевна Безгодкова ◽  
Людмила Дмитриевна Туршук

В статье рассматриваются проблемы правового регулирования наследования имущества члена крестьянского (фермерского) хозяйства. КФХ может существовать в двух формах: как юридическое лицо и без образования юридического лица. ГК РФ определяет порядок перехода по наследству имущества лишь КФХ без образования юридического лица. The article deals with the problems of legal regulation of inheritance of property of a member of a peasant (farmer) farm. PFF can exist in two forms: as a legal entity and without the formation of a legal entity. The Civil Code of the Russian Federation defines the procedure for the inheritance of property only in a farm without the formation of a legal entity.


Author(s):  
Rinat Mikhailovich Karimov

In this article Karimov analyzes whether it is necessary to amend available safety measures in relation to judicial authorities of the Russian Federation. The aim of the research is to analyze the current order of weapon issue to judges in the Russian Federation. The object of the research is the social relations rising in the process of implementation of legal provisions about the order of weapon issue to judges in the Russian Federation. The subject of the research is the legal acts that regulate the order of weapon issue to judges in the Russian Federaton. The researcher analyzes kinds of weapons that can be issued to a judge upon his or her written inquiry. The research is based on the comparative legal analysis of previous provisions about the order of weapon issue to judges and legal provisions that have been implemented just lately. The analysis is also based on the use of such research methods as analysis and synthesis, generalisation and logical research method. The author of the article proves the idea that the legal specificiation of the order of weapon issue to judges in the Russian Federation will eliminate possibility of attacking judges or their family members. The author focuses on the gaps in relevant legal regulations and suggests to review and make changes in the current law that regulates the order of weapon issue to judges. 


Author(s):  
Elina Leonidovna Sidorenko ◽  
Ekaterina Aleksandrovna Khalizeva

  This article is dedicated to the analysis of the system of offences related to the illicit circulation of digital securities in the Russian Federation. Special attention is given to the peculiarities of the mechanism of constructing the system of offences in the sphere of digital economy. The article analyzes the basic FATF acts pertinent to digital assets; examines the alarm signals in using such assets to launder proceeds acquired by illegal means or used to finance terrorism. The author reviews recommendations on application of risk-based approach in the process of creating due legal regulation of digital assets in the FATF member-states (including Russia). As a research task, the article aims to determine which acts associated with the illicit circulation of digital securities are the subjected to criminalization, as well as the composition of these offences considering the technological aspect of the mixed (economic and technological) nature of such assets. The corresponding draft federal laws “On the Amendments to the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation” and “On the Amendments to the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses”, developed by the Ministry of Finances of the Russian Federation, comprise the legislative normative framework for this research. The conclusion is made on the reception (accounting) of recommendations for further development of such regulation in the Russian Federation.  


Author(s):  
O. V. Morozov ◽  
M. A. Vasiliev ◽  
A. G. Biryukov

The Central Bank, the emission center, the reserve system, the federal treasury all these and other names are used to show the element of economy of a concrete state functioning, which controls money, i.e. estimates and administrates the money mass, buying capacity of residents in respect of goods, jobs and services, exerts influence on inflation processes and so on. The article provides results of researching the standing of normative and legal regulation, practice of using authority and responsibility, specific features of the Bank of Russia functioning as a relatively independent body of state governance and on this basis the articles studies the trends of improving management, norms of work development, procedures of working out and submitting to the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation reports on federal laws bills, whose regulation is included in the competence of the Central Bank. Proposals dealing with amendments to the Federal law ‘About the Central Bank (the Bank of Russia)’ were formulated.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-315
Author(s):  
D.Yu. VORONIN

The paper presents a research of the new legal regulation for such an institute in relation to a regional and equal court, as the referral of a case received in accordance with part 4 of Article 39 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation to a court of general jurisdiction, which is in jurisdiction to hear a case as it is assigned by law. The absence of procedural legal regulation of this action, which is, in author’s opinion, has an obvious procedural nature, and researched practice general jurisdiction courts demonstrate the uncertainty in implementation of the considered reform. The author analyzes the new procedural institution on the basis of his own vision of a number of procedural norms, as well as scholar works and historical experience. In particular, the author reasoning that the courts are to issue special rulings on the referral of cases received from arbitration to the courts of general jurisdiction. Moreover, the author considers the mechanism for adopting such a judicial act. The article presents a wide range of practical examples of the implementation of considered provision, as well as the difference in the approaches of the appellate courts to assess these implementation practice. In conclusion, the article presents the proposals for further improvement of the regulation of considered issue. Most likely such an improvement will be impossible without the universal approach established by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Such improvements should result in uniform judicial practice, as well as further developments of procedural legislation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 43-54
Author(s):  
T. E. Rozhdestvenskaya ◽  
A. G. Guznov

The emergence and diffusion of digital assets, especially cryptocurrencies, necessitated their legal regulation. The paper investigates the main approaches to the legal regulation, which is already implemented in the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and other federal laws. Particular attention is paid to the novelties of the legal regulation that have been envisaged in the draft Federal Law “On Digital Financial Assets.” The draft Federal Law is being currently debated in the State Duma of the Russian Federation. The paper analyses in detail the concept of digital financial assets as a specific type of digital rights. The author also compares the concepts of uncertified securities and non-cash money. The author investigates the issues of digital financial assets issuance and peculiarities of their circulation. The paper substantiates the requirements applied to information systems and their operators included into the draft law in compliance with which the issue of digital financial assets is carried out.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-81
Author(s):  
Veronika Kolbina ◽  
Elena Nevzgodina

Introduction. The article is devoted to the study of possibility and conditions of the foreclosure on the only housing in the citizen bankruptcy case and the need to improve Russian legislation that regulates these relations. Purpose. The purpose of the article is to analyze the current state of the problem of the foreclosure on the only housing in the citizen bankruptcy case, to identify deficiencies of the legislation that regulates these relations, taking into account the need to achieve a balance of citizens right to be provided with housing and his creditors rights, conscientiously interested in the most complete satisfaction of their requirements in bankruptcy case and suggest the improvement of these legislation. Methodology. To achieve the purpose both general and private scientific research methods were used, in particular, methods of scientific analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction, functional and systemic methods, formal legal and comparative legal methods, methods of interpretation of law and legal forecasting. Results. Higher courts of the Russian Federation recognized the possibility of derogating from the maxim on the inadmissibility of the foreclosure on the only housing established by the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. This requires introducing into Russian law a mechanism of the foreclosure on the only housing, which allows protecting the rights of creditors and, at the same time, preserving sufficient guarantees of the citizen’s right to housing. Conclusion. Despite the relevance of the foreclosure on the only housing, it should be recognized that the corresponding task is not easy to solve. However, in judicial practice (especially in bankruptcy cases) there has been a tendency to deviate from the idea of comprehensive executive immunity in relation to a single dwelling, which will inevitably be reflected in the current procedural and bankruptcy laws. At the same time, any regulation of these relations should presuppose judicial control in the sphere of issues relating to foreclosure on the only residential premises. In any case, the improvement of the legislation should not put a citizen in a difficult social situation and lead to a violation of his constitutional right to housing.


Lex Russica ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 30-38
Author(s):  
Yu. A. Meteleva

The problem of liability of persons managing a legal entity was raised in Russian civil law after the adoption of legislation on joint-stock companies. At the beginning, it was more theoretical in nature, since the civil legislation did not contain any mechanisms for the implementation of such liability. To date, due to the reform of the Civil Code and changing approaches in jurisprudence, disputes concerning property liability of directors have formed a considerable category of cases. The paper analyzes the elements of such civil wrongs as damage caused to a legal entity by persons who are members of the managerial boards and are able to exercise a significant impact on such boards. All elements of the civil wrong under consideration are being analyzed: the act, the consequences (damage), the causal link between the act and the consequences, and the fault of the wrong-doer. The paper also elucidates the participants involved in such disputes. Exploring specific court cases, the author shows which acts of directors are recognized by the courts as illegal, what restrictions are expressed in the legal standings of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation to qualify as illegal different acts of directors and other persons. In the vast majority of cases of this category, persons exercising the functions of the sole executive body are prosecuted. Sometimes they are also the participants at the same time. The scope of persons covered by the term “determining the acts of a legal entity” is not defined in the law, which also hampers judicial practice. Judicial proceedings bringing such persons to justice are exceptional. Therefore, the author proposes to define in the Civil Code all persons who can commit an act and thereby cause damage to a legal entity. In addition, it is proposed to establish criteria of unreasonableness and dishonesty of actions of directors and other persons.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document