Ứng dụng dao siêu âm Sonastar trong phẫu thuật cắt gan

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hien Pham Nhu
Keyword(s):  
Liver Resection ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Resection Margin ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Bile Leakage ◽  
Hepatic Veins ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Solitary Liver ◽  
The Mean

Background: Researching specification and evaluating early results after hepatectomy that it’s used with Sonastar ultrasonic tool. Materials and methods: We prospectively examined data of 19 patients who underwent hepatectomy at Hue Central Hospitalfrom 7/2019to 7/2020. Results: The mean ages was 60,7 ± 10,5 range (19 – 90) and males/females was 6:1.. Patients with solitary liver tumor accounted for 79%; while tumors that have satellite cores accounted for 21% of all cases. 68,4% of all patients have tumor that is more than 5cm in size. Blocking hepatic blood flow by clamping of hepatoduodenal ligament accounts for 57,9%, while right and left hepatic vein clamp accounted for 68,4% and 36,8% respectively. In 78,9% of the cases, surgicel was used to cover the liver resection margin, while the in the remainder 21,5% of the cases, BioGlue was used. Large liver resection (2 and more lobes resected) accounted for 73,7% of all cases. Mean liver resection time was 50 ( 45-110) minutes, mean operation time was 125 (90-280) minutes, mean blood loss amount was 250 (150-650)ml. On average, post-operative time was 8 days (7-23). Post-operative complications was observed in 15,9% of cases, and there was 5,3% deceased. Conclusion: Application of Sonastar ultrasonic tool in hepatectomy reduces blood loss, help better manage hepatic veins, thus reducing complications such as bile leakage. It also helps surgeons manage the liver resection margin, minimalizing recurrences cancer

scholarly journals Laennec’s approach for laparoscopic anatomical hemihepatectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Hu ◽  
Gongming Zhang ◽  
Meng Chen ◽  
Chengcheng Zhong ◽  
Mingxu Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Primary Liver Cancer ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Bile Leakage ◽  
Hepatic Veins ◽  
Hepatic Hemangioma ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Laennec’s capsule has been found for about 200 years. However, laparoscopic anatomical right and left hemihepatectomy (LARH and LALH) using Laennec’s approach are rarely reported. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the technical details and the surgical outcomes of 15 patients who underwent LAH via Laennec’s approach between May 2017 and July 2020. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and hospital stay were recorded and analyzed. Results Four of 15 patients were diagnosed with hepatic hemangioma, 2 had hepatolithiasis, and 9 patients had primary liver cancer. During the surgery, Laennec’s approach was used for LAH without conversion to open surgery. Four patients were treated with LARH, and 11 patients were cured with LALH. The mean age of the patients was 62.1 ± 6.5 years, and four were male. The mean operative time, blood loss, and length of the postoperative hospital stay were 193 ± 49 min, 247 ± 120 mL, and 8.7 ± 2.0 days, respectively. There was no incidence of postoperative bile leakage and bleeding. No mortality occurred. We also demonstrated that Laennec’s capsule does exist around the peripheral hepatic veins with histological confirmation. Conclusions Laennec’s approach is safe and feasible for LAH. Precise isolation of Laennec’s approach based on Laennec’s capsule helps to standardize the surgical techniques for laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy.

scholarly journals Treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation using one-stage retropharyngeal release and posterior reduction

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 230949901987046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianfeng Ren ◽  
Feng Gao ◽  
Siyuan Li ◽  
Jiankun Yang ◽  
Yongming Xi
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Atlantoaxial Dislocation ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Irreducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: Irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation (IAAD) has been challenging for spine surgeons. Various methods have been used to treat IAAD, but no consensus has been reached. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the efficacy of anterior submandibular retropharyngeal release and posterior reduction and fixation for IAAD. Methods: From March 2007 to May 2015, 13 patients diagnosed with IAAD underwent anterior submandibular retropharyngeal release and sequential posterior reduction and fixation. The operation time, blood loss, postoperative complications, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores were retrospectively recorded. Results: The surgeries were accomplished successfully. The mean operative time was about 3.8 h. The mean estimated blood loss was about 130 mL. The patients experienced postoperative pharyngeal pain. Only one patient had a vague voice and increased oral discharge postoperatively. At the final follow-up, JOA scores had significantly increased ( p < 0.05), and all the patients had solid bony fusion. Conclusion: The present study reinforces the efficacy and safety of anterior submandibular retropharyngeal release and posterior reduction and fixation for IAAD. It can achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes and is safe for experienced spine surgeons.

scholarly journals From Small Acorns – Developing a Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgical Service

2008 ◽  
Vol 90 (7) ◽  
pp. 606-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
JK Smith ◽  
AG Acheson ◽  
JAD Simpson ◽  
J Stewart ◽  
IJ Beckingham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Resection Margin ◽  
Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Morbidity Rate ◽  
Lymph Node Retrieval ◽  
Clear Resection Margin ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Randomised Controlled

INTRODUCTION Randomised controlled trials have shown that laparoscopic colorectal surgery is equal in terms of safety to open surgery. Benefits have been seen for length of stay, blood loss, immune suppression and analgesia requirements. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of introducing laparoscopic colorectal surgery to our unit. PATIENTS AND METHODS Prospectively collected cases of all patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery between July 2003 and July 2007 were reviewed. RESULTS A total of 143 patients (75 males and 68 females) with amean age of 65.8 years (range, 21–95 years) underwent surgery. Laparoscopic resection for colorectal malignancy was performed in 93 patients (65%). The conversion rate for all cases was 14.7%. Mean operative time was 203 min (range, 100–400 min), with amean blood loss of 180 ml. The mean number of lymph nodes in malignant cases was 13.8 with clear resection margin in all but one case. The mean postoperative stay was 5.6 days (median, 4 days; range, 2–35 days). UKCCR standard for lymph node retrieval was achieved in 62.6% of cases. There were four postoperative deaths. The overall 30-day morbidity rate was 21.7%. The service is consultant-led with 9.8% of cases performed by senior trainees and 37% of procedures performed by two consultants. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is technically feasible and safe in our hands. Although operative time is longer, this is counterbalanced by shorter hospital stay. The results from this series support the findings of others and continuing development of this service.

scholarly journals Laennec's Approach for Laparoscopic anatomical Hemihepatectomy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Hu ◽  
Gongming Zhang ◽  
Meng Chen ◽  
Chengcheng Zhong ◽  
Mingxu Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Primary Liver Cancer ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Bile Leakage ◽  
Hepatic Veins ◽  
Hepatic Hemangioma ◽  
Conversion To Open Surgery ◽  
Histological Confirmation

Abstract Background: Laennec's capsule has been found for about 200 years. However, laparoscopic anatomical right and left hemihepatectomy (LARH and LALH) using the Laennec's approach are rarely reported. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the technical details and the surgical outcomes of 15 patients who underwent LAH via Laennec's approach between May 2017 and July 2020. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and hospital stay were recorded and analyzed. Results: 4 of 15 patients were diagnosed with hepatic hemangioma, 2 had hepatolithiasis, and 9 patients had primary liver cancer. During the surgery, Laennec's approach was used for LAH without conversion to open surgery. 4 patients were treated with LARH and 11 patients were cured with LALH. The operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay were 193 ± 49 min, 247 ± 120 mL and 8.7 ± 2.0 days, respectively. There was no incidence of postoperative bile leakage and bleeding. No mortality occurred. We also demonstrated that Laennec's capsule does exist around the peripheral hepatic veins with histological confirmation. Conclusions: Laennec's approach is safe and feasible for LAH. Precise isolation of Laennec's approach based on Laennec's capsule helps to standardize the surgical techniques for laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy.

scholarly journals Comparison of Early versus Interval Tonsillectomy in Cases of Peritonsillar Abscess

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Muhammad Ahmed Khan ◽  
Attique Ahmed ◽  
Muhammad Khan
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Peritonsillar Abscess ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
Secondary Hemorrhage ◽  
Perioperative Blood Loss ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare early versus interval tonsillectomy in cases of peritonsillar abscess.Study Design: Comparative study.Place and Duration of Study: The study was carried out at ENT Department of Combined Military Hospital, Mardan from January 2017 to January 2018.Materials and Methods: A total 50 patients were selected from ENT outpatient department. All the cases were randomly divided into two groups of 25 each. Group A underwent early tonsillectomy after initial incision and drainage, Group B underwent interval tonsillectomy after 6 weeks. Both the groups were compared in terms of perioperative blood loss, operation time, ease of dissection and postoperative complications including pain and hemorrhage. Tonsillectomy was done with bipolar cautery in all the cases.Results: The mean age was 30.22 + 8.25. Out of 50 patients, 42 (84%) were males and 8 (16%) were females. The mean operative time of surgery in group A (early tonsillectomy) was 45.04+5.78 minutes compared to 32.72+4.37 minutes for group B (interval tonsillectomy (p=0.00). Mean post-operative pain in group A was 3.68+2.12 compared to group B where mean score was 3.36+1.93 (p=0.579). There were 3 cases of mild perioperative blood loss, 19 cases of moderate and 3 of severe perioperative blood loss in group A. There were 18 cases of mild perioperative blood loss, 7 cases of moderate and no case of severe perioperative blood loss in group B (p=0.00). Dissection was found to be significantly easier in group B (interval tonsillectomy). There were 7 cases of post-op secondary hemorrhage in group A compared to 3 in group B (p=0.289). All these cases of secondary hemorrhage were managed conservatively.Conclusion: Interval tonsillectomy is a safer procedure as compared to early tonsillectomy in terms of perioperative blood loss, operative time, dissection with almost similar post-op pain and similar risk of post tonsillectomy hemorrhage. How to cite this: Khan MA, Ahmed A, Khan M.  Comparison of Early versus Interval Tonsillectomy in Cases of Peritonsillar Abscess. Life and Science. 2020; 1(1): 24-28.  doi: https://doi.org/10.37185/L&S.1.1.13

scholarly journals Multicenter Propensity Score-Based Study of Laparoscopic Repeat Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Subgroup Analysis of Cases with Tumors Far from Major Vessels

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 3187
Author(s):  
Arimasa Miyama ◽  
Zenichi Morise ◽  
Luca Aldrighetti ◽  
Giulio Belli ◽  
Francesca Ratti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Resection ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Hepatic Veins ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Repeat Liver Resection

Less morbidity is considered among the advantages of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for HCC patients. However, our previous international, multi-institutional, propensity score-based study of emerging laparoscopic repeat liver resection (LRLR) failed to prove this advantage. We hypothesize that these results may be since the study included complex LRLR cases performed during the procedure’s developing stage. To examine it, subgroup analysis based on propensity score were performed, defining the proximity of the tumors to major vessels as the indicator of complex cases. Among 1582 LRLR cases from 42 international high-volume liver surgery centers, 620 cases without the proximity to major vessels (more than 1 cm far from both first–second branches of Glissonian pedicles and major hepatic veins) were selected for this subgroup analysis. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed based on their patient characteristics, preoperative liver function, tumor characteristics and surgical procedures. One hundred and fifteen of each patient groups of LRLR and open repeat liver resection (ORLR) were earned, and the outcomes were compared. Backgrounds were well-balanced between LRLR and ORLR groups after matching. With comparable operation time and long-term outcome, less blood loss (283.3±823.0 vs. 603.5±664.9 mL, p = 0.001) and less morbidity (8.7 vs. 18.3 %, p = 0.034) were shown in LRLR group than ORLR. Even in its worldwide developing stage, LRLR for HCC patients could be beneficial in blood loss and morbidity for the patients with less complexity in surgery.

EARLY RESULTS OF SINGLE-PORT LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY

2017 ◽  
pp. 103-106
Author(s):  
Minh Duc Pham
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Minimal Invasive ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Sils Port ◽  
The Mean ◽  
A New Technique

Background: Conventional three–port laparoscopic appendectomy is becoming popular for the treatment of acute appendicitis. In this report, we present the early results of a new technique of laparoscopic appendectomy conducted through a single-port. Patients and Methods: From March 2011 to October 2013, we have performed 86 operations Single Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy at Hue University Hospital and Hue Central Hospital. SILS Port (Covidien) is used, it can be performed with basic laparoscopic instruments. Results: In this study, 86 patients underwent Single-Port laparoscopic appendectomy, among them 52.33% were femele, 47.67% were male, female/male ratio was 1.09. The mean age was 33.09. An orther trocar insertion was required in 2 patients (2.33%). The mean operation time was 42.03 minutes and mean postoperative hospital stay 3.37 days. Postoperative complication occurred in 2 case (2.33%) was of omphalitis. During 2 weeks follow up, 2 case (2.33%) was of omphalitis. Conclusions: Single - port intracorporeal appendectomy is a safe, minimal invasive procedure with excellent cosmetic results. Key words: Single Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy, appendectomy

scholarly journals Nonstructural bone graft for single-segment lumbar tuberculosis: surgical indications, clinical efficacy, and preliminary experiences in 34 patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 030006052098278
Author(s):  
Xing Du ◽  
Yunsheng Ou ◽  
Guanyin Jiang ◽  
Yong Zhu ◽  
Wei Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Bone Graft ◽  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Bone Grafts ◽  
Surgical Indications ◽  
Operative Blood Loss ◽  
The Mean

Objective This study was performed to evaluate the surgical indications, clinical efficacy, and preliminary experiences of nonstructural bone grafts for lumbar tuberculosis (TB). Methods Thirty-four patients with lumbar TB who were treated with nonstructural bone grafts were retrospectively assessed. The operative time, operative blood loss, hospital stay, bone graft fusion time, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment grade, and Cobb angle were recorded and analyzed. Results The mean operative time, operative blood loss, hospital stay, Cobb angle correction, and Cobb angle loss were 192.59 ± 42.16 minutes, 385.29 ± 251.82 mL, 14.91 ± 5.06 days, 9.02° ± 3.16°, and 5.54° ± 1.09°, respectively. During the mean follow-up of 27.53 ± 8.90 months, significant improvements were observed in the ESR, CRP concentration, VAS score, ODI, and ASIA grade. The mean bone graft fusion time was 5.15 ± 1.13 months. Three complications occurred, and all were cured after active treatment. Conclusions Nonstructural bone grafts may achieve satisfactory clinical efficacy for appropriately selected patients with lumbar TB.

scholarly journals Microscopic extra-laminar sequestrectomy (MELS) for the treatment of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation: report of the surgical technique, patient selection, and clinical outcomes

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunxiao Wang ◽  
Yao Zhang ◽  
Xiaojie Tang ◽  
Haifei Cao ◽  
Qinyong Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Lumbar Disc Herniation ◽  
Disc Herniation ◽  
Lumbar Disc ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Operation Duration ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background The area which located at the medial pedicle, posterior vertebral body and ventral hemilamina is defined as the hidden zone. Surgical management of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation (HZLDH) is technically challenging due to its difficult surgical exposure. The conventional interlaminar approach harbors the potential risk of post-surgical instability, while other approaches consist of complicated procedures with a steep learning curve and prolonged operation time. Objective To introduce microscopic extra-laminar sequestrectomy (MELS) technique for treatment of hidden zone lumbar disc herniation and present clinical outcomes. Methods Between Jan 2016 to Jan 2018, twenty one patients (13 males) with HZLDH were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent MELS (19 patients underwent sequestrectomy only, 2 patients underwent an additional inferior discectomy). The nerve root and fragment were visually exposed using MELS. The operation duration, blood loss, intra- and postoperative complications, and recurrences were recorded. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the modified MacNab criteria were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Postoperative stability was evaluated both radiologically and clinically. Results The mean follow-up period was 20.95 ± 2.09 (18–24) months. The mean operation time was 32.43 ± 7.19 min and the mean blood loss was 25.52 ± 5.37 ml. All patients showed complete neurological symptom relief after surgery. The VAS and ODI score were significantly improved at the final follow-up compared to those before operation (7.88 ± 0.70 vs 0.10 ± 0.30, 59.24 ± 10.83 vs 11.29 ± 3.59, respectively, p < 0.05). Seventeen patients (81%) obtained an “excellent” outcome and the remaining four (19%) patients obtained a “good” outcome based the MacNab criteria. One patient suffered reherniation at the same level one year after the initial surgery and underwent a transforaminal endoscopic discectomy. No major complications and postoperative instability were observed. Conclusions Our observation suggest that MELS is safe and effective in the management of HZLDH. Due to its relative simplicity, it comprises a flat surgical learning curve and shorter operation duration, and overall results in reduced disturbance to lumbar stability.

scholarly journals Safety and effectiveness evaluation of a two-handed technique combining harmonic scalpel and laparoscopic Peng’s multifunction operative dissector in laparoscopic hemihepatectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingwei Cai ◽  
Guixing Jiang ◽  
Yuelong Liang ◽  
Yangyang Xie ◽  
Junhao Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Harmonic Scalpel ◽  
Peak Level ◽  
Bile Leakage ◽  
Liver Parenchyma ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Case Group ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
And Control

Abstract Objectives This study was designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a two-hand technique combining harmonic scalpel (HS) and laparoscopic Peng’s multifunction operative dissector (LPMOD) in patients who underwent laparoscopic hemihepatectomy (LHH). Methods We designed and conducted a case-control study nested in a prospectively collected laparoscopic liver surgery database. Patients who underwent LHH for liver parenchyma transection using HS + LPMOD were defined as cases (n = 98) and LPMOD only as controls (n = 47) from January 2016 to May 2018. Propensity score matching (1:1) between the case and control groups was used in the analyses. Results The case group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss in milliliters (169.4 ± 133.5 vs. 221.5 ± 176.3, P = 0.03) and shorter operative time in minutes (210.5 ± 56.1 vs. 265.7 ± 67.1, P = 0.02) comparing to the control group. The conversion to laparotomy, postoperative hospital stay, resection margin, the mean peak level of postoperative liver function parameters, bile leakage rate, and others were comparable between the two groups. There was no perioperative mortality. Conclusions We demonstrated that the two-handed technique combing HS and LPMOD in LHH is safe and effective which is associated with shorter operative time and less intraoperative blood loss compared with LPMOD alone. The technique facilitates laparoscopic liver resection and is recommended for use.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document