scholarly journals Rehabilitation of Movement Disorders and Psychomotor Deficiency in Schizophrenia Residual Type

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-228
Author(s):  
Andrej N. Ilanković ◽  
Vera Ilanković ◽  
Nikola N. Ilanković

Movement disorders and psychomotor deficiency is highly represented among patients in Schizophrenia – residual type.Our therapeutic work and the results we are herewith presenting, reveal that the psychomotor deficiency by Schizophrenia residual conditions represent new and significant indication fields for specific rehabilitation treatment in psychiatry.Evaluation of efficacy after 6 weeks specific rehabilitation treatment with the Vilan method showed: very satisfactory results in correction of involuntary movements of the torso,   bradykinesia of the hands,  praxia  and the simple simultaneous movements; satisfactory correction of involuntary movements of the extremities, walking  and  the facial gestures. No correction was in: involuntary movement of mouth and face, tremor, ideation, ideo‑motor series and in complex simultaneous movement.

Author(s):  
Hiroshi Shibasaki ◽  
Mark Hallett ◽  
Kailash P Bhatia ◽  
Stephen G. Reich ◽  
Bettina Balint

This book is aimed at describing clinical features of various kinds of involuntary movements by demonstrating a number of cases on video. Most of the video cases presented in this book were directly observed and studied by at least one of the five authors, and a few cases were from the published paper with permission. The authors also discuss the current consensus about the classification, pathophysiology, and current treatment of each involuntary movement. This book adopts a unique way of looking at movement disorders by considering two aspects of the diagnosis: Axis 1, the phenomenology, and Axis 2, the etiology and/or pathophysiology. The visual appearance of the disorder, as seen on video, is a big part of Axis 1 diagnosis.


Author(s):  
Nicholas Fletcher

Almost any neurological disorder can produce a disorder of movement but the ‘movement disorders’ include the akinetic rigid syndromes, hyperkinesias, and some tremors. It can sometimes seem, especially with the use of videotape recordings, that diagnosis of movement disorders is mainly a matter of correct visual recognition. Such an approach is not recommended and can lead to mistakes unless, as in other areas of medicine, the history is considered first and the physical signs second. Obvious examples include the family history in Huntington’s disease, developmental history in dystonic cerebral palsy, and neuroleptic drug treatment in patients with tardive dyskinesia. In addition, a single disorder may give rise to several different types of involuntary movement. For example, Huntington’s disease may give rise to an akinetic rigid state, chorea, myoclonus, tics, or dystonia. Patients with Parkinson’s disease taking levodopa may show different types of movement disorder at different times of the day.In akinetic rigid states the diagnostic issue will be whether the patient has idiopathic Parkinson’s disease or one of the other Parkinsonian syndromes. With involuntary movements, the first step in diagnosis is to classify these as dystonia, tics, tremor, chorea, or myoclonus. It must be remembered that involuntary movements are merely physical signs, not diagnostic entities, and that they do not always occur in a pure form; for example, patients with dystonia may have additional choreiform movements or tremor. If more than one form of abnormal movement seems to be present, the diagnosis should be based on the most obvious one. The next step is to decide on the cause of the movements and at this stage the diagnosis must be based upon an accurate and complete history as noted above.The movement disorders are often associated with abnormalities of the basal ganglia and, to some extent, vice versa. This is not entirely correct. Disturbances of basal ganglia function certainly have profound effects on movement with the development of bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, or the various forms of dyskinesia. However, it is not correct when considering the pathophysiology of movement disorders to regard the basal ganglia as an isolated movement control centre. In fact, they are an important but poorly understood component of a much wider motor system. It is also important to remember that the basal ganglia are involved in the processing of limbic and other cognitive processes which may also be disturbed by basal ganglia dysfunction.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Shibasaki ◽  
Mark Hallett ◽  
Kailash P. Bhatia ◽  
Stephen G. Reich ◽  
Bettina Balint

Involuntary movements, also called hyperkinetic movement disorders, are defined as abnormal, unintended movements. They are defined as “abnormal” because not all unintended movements are pathological (reflexive or spontaneous movements also occur but are part of normal function; these include breathing, yawning, blinking, and the like). Involuntary movements can be classified into several categories according to their phenomenological characteristics and then according to the etiology and/or pathophysiology for each kind of involuntary movement. Involuntary movements include tremor, chorea, ballism, athetosis, dystonia, myoclonus, dyskinesia, tics, asterixis, and motor stereotypy. Many of the involuntary movements can occur as side effects of pharmaceutical drugs. Functional or psychogenic involuntary movements are not infrequently encountered.


1988 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 979-985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur S. Walters ◽  
Doris Wright ◽  
James Boudwin ◽  
Karl Jones

Three hysterical movement disorders are reported: a case of hysterical bilateral blepharospasm which later presented as hysterical hemifacial spasm, a case of hysterical myoclonus, and a case of hysterical parkinsonism. Two patients presented with a relative indifference to preceding life experiences that would normally have evoked considerable emotion. Two of the cases first presented at an older age and one of these older patients was a man. Two of the patients agreed to hypnotherapy and supportive psychotherapy. In both cases the “involuntary” movements disappeared during hypnosis. In the third case, there was a complete spontaneous resolution of symptoms in a neurological condition where resolution would not be expected to occur.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Devin Mackay ◽  
Edison Miyawaki

The hyperkinetic movement disorders include heterogeneous diseases and syndromes, all characterized by one or a variety of excessive, involuntary movements. The hyperkinetic movement disorders are heterogeneous in clinical presentation, but a rational and practical approach to diagnosis exists based on new genetic correlations and targeted laboratory investigations. Treatments informed by a still-developing picture of motor pathophysiology offer significant benefit for these disorders. This chapter discusses choreiform disorders, including patterns in choreiform diagnosis; tremor disorders; paroxysmal disorders, including tics and myoclonus; dystonias, including monogenic primary dystonias; and pathophysiology and treatment in the hyperkinetic movement disorders. Figures include clinical photos, computed tomography scans, and an algorithm representing cortical-subcortical circuitry. Tables delineate definitions, distinguishing clinical features, medications, genetics, protein products, and treatments associated with various disorders.  This review contains 6 figures, 12 tables, and 145 references.


2021 ◽  
pp. 571-575
Author(s):  
Paul E. Youssef ◽  
Kenneth J. Mack ◽  
Kelly D. Flemming

Movement disorders are conventionally divided into 2 major categories. Hyperkinetic movement disorders (also called dyskinesias) are excessive, often repetitive, involuntary movements that intrude into the normal flow of motor activity. This category includes chorea, dystonia, myoclonus, stereotypies, tics, and tremor. Hypokinetic movement disorders are akinesia (lack of movement), hypokinesia (reduced amplitude of movement), bradykinesia (slow movement), and rigidity. Parkinsonism is the most common hypokinetic movement disorder. In childhood, hyperkinetic disorders are common, whereas hypokinetic movement disorders are relatively uncommon.


2009 ◽  
pp. 551-574
Author(s):  
John N. Caviness

Surface EMG, EEG, and elicited response results provide a simple and noninvasive means of studying movement disorders. These techniques are particularly helpful in classifying involuntary movements such as tremor and myoclonus. In addition, EMG can assist with designing and performing botulinum toxin injections.


2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (31) ◽  
pp. 8867-8872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nima Khalighinejad ◽  
Patrick Haggard

“Sense of agency” refers to the experience that links one’s voluntary actions to their external outcomes. It remains unclear whether this ubiquitous experience is hardwired, arising from specific signals within the brain’s motor systems, or rather depends on associative learning, through repeated cooccurrence of voluntary movements and their outcomes. To distinguish these two models, we asked participants to trigger a tone by a voluntary keypress action. The voluntary action was always associated with an involuntary movement of the other hand. We then tested whether the combination of the involuntary movement and tone alone might now suffice to produce a sense of agency, even when the voluntary action was omitted. Sense of agency was measured using an implicit marker based on time perception, namely a shift in the perceived time of the outcome toward the action that caused it. Across two experiments, repeatedly pairing an involuntary movement with a voluntary action induced key temporal features of agency, with the outcome now perceived as shifted toward the involuntary movement. This shift required involuntary movements to have been previously associated with voluntary actions. We show that some key aspects of agency may be transferred from voluntary actions to involuntary movements. An internal volitional signal is required for the primary acquisition of agency but, with repeated association, the involuntary movement in itself comes to produce some key temporal features of agency over the subsequent outcome. This finding may explain how humans can develop an enduring sense of agency in nonnatural cases, like brain–machine interfaces.


1982 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 218-220
Author(s):  
V.A. Fasano ◽  
G. Broggi ◽  
S. Zeme ◽  
G. Lo Russo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document