scholarly journals Prognostic significance of heat shock protein 105 in lung adenocarcinoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Morii
1999 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. S244
Author(s):  
P. Athanassiadou ◽  
E. Petrakakou ◽  
A. Ioakim-Liossi ◽  
M. Gonidi ◽  
E. Stergiou ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Tavassol ◽  
Oliver F Starke ◽  
Horst Kokemüller ◽  
Gerd Wegener ◽  
Corinna CM Müller-Tavassol ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youngran Kang ◽  
Woon Yong Jung ◽  
Hyunjoo Lee ◽  
Wonkyung Jung ◽  
Eunjung Lee ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. CRA8007-CRA8007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh S. Ramalingam ◽  
Glenwood D. Goss ◽  
Zoran Gojko Andric ◽  
Igor Bondarenko ◽  
Bojan Zaric ◽  
...  

CRA8007 Background: Heat shock protein 90 chaperone function is critical for the biological effects of several oncoproteins. Ganetespib (G) is a highly potent 2nd-generation Hsp90 inhibitor with a favorable safety profile and single-agent clinical activity. Methods: Based on synergistic preclinical interactions between docetaxel (D) and G, we conducted a randomized (1:1), international open-label study of D with or without G. Patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma, one prior systemic therapy, and ECOG PS 0/1 were included. D was given at 75 mg/m2 on day 1 of a three-week cycle. In the experimental arm, D was given on day 1 and G at 150 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15. The co-primary endpoints were PFS in patients with elevated LDH (eLDH) levels, or tumors harboring KRAS mutations. Key secondary endpoints were OS and PFS in all adenocarcinoma patients. Target enrollment was 240 adenocarcinoma, 120 eLDH, and 80 mKRAS patients. Statistical tests are 1-sided. Results: Enrollment of 255 adenocarcinoma patients completed in November 2012; results are reported for this population. Patient characteristics were balanced (median age 60 years, males ~60%, PS 0 ~40% and never-smoker ~25%). For D+G vs. D the median number of cycles delivered was 5 vs. 4; the grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia 38% vs. 37%; fatigue 4% vs. 3%; anemia 7% vs. 6%; diarrhea 3% vs. 0; fever with neutropenia 8% vs. 2%. At the time of abstract submission OS HR was 0.69 (90% CI 0.48 to 0.99, p=0.093), the PFS HR was 0.70 (90% CI 0.53 to 0.94, p=0.012), and the ORR was 15% vs 11%, favoring D+G. For patients that were enrolled >6 months after diagnosis of advanced NSCLC (N=175; 69%), a prespecified stratification factor, the OS HR was 0.41 (90% CI 0.25 to 0.67, p=0.0009), the PFS HR was 0.47 (90% CI 0.32 to 0.69, p=0.0005), and the ORR was 16% vs 12%. Updated results for both populations above, as well as for the eLDH and mKRAS subsets, will be presented. Conclusions: D+G demonstrated improvement in OS, PFS, and ORR over D alone for second-line therapy of lung adenocarcinoma. A phase III study in second-line advanced adenocarcinoma patients (> 6 months from diagnosis) is ongoing (GALAXY-2). Clinical trial information: NCT01348126.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document