The Minimally Important Difference for Patient Reported Outcomes in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Including the HAQ-DI, Pain, Fatigue, and SF-36

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
pp. 2231-2237 ◽  
Author(s):  
KIM J. COLANGELO ◽  
JANET E. POPE ◽  
CHRISTINE PESCHKEN
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Health Status ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Minimally Important Difference ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Component Score ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Overall Health Status

Objective.We studied patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in 1 clinical practice, and patients enrolled in the 1000 Canadian Faces of Lupus database, to determine the minimally important difference (MID) for pain, fatigue, sleep, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) Physical Component Score (PCS) and SF-36 Mental Component Score (MCS) using a patient-reported overall health status anchor.Methods.Patients with SLE who had 2 consecutive clinic visits and completed a HAQ-DI and a pain, fatigue, and sleep visual analog scale (VAS) (0–100), and an overall health status question: “How would you describe your overall status since your last visit?”: much better, better, the same, worse, or much worse were included. Those who self-rated as better or worse were considered the “minimally changed” subgroups. Patients with 2 consecutive annual visits in the 1000 Canadian Faces of Lupus database who completed the SF-36 and health transition question were eligible.Results.There were 202 patients in London, Ontario (94% women, mean age 50 yrs, mean disease duration 10 yrs). MID for better and worse on a VAS (0–100) were: pain (−15.8, 8.5), fatigue (−13.9, 9.1), and sleep problems (−8.6, 7.6). The MID for HAQ-DI (scale 0 to 3) was −0.08 (better) and 0.14 (worse). The MID for SF-36 was 2.1 (better) and −2.2 (worse) for the PCS and 2.4 (better) and −1.2 (worse) in the MCS.Conclusion.The MID in patients with SLE may be different bidirectionally depending on the measured outcome. The mean change observed for those reporting better than worse outcome in pain and fatigue was greater for better versus worst, in contrast to the HAQ, where the mean change was greater for worsening.

scholarly journals Fatigue in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and neuropsychiatric symptoms is associated with anxiety and depression rather than inflammatory disease activity

Lupus ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 096120332110050
Author(s):  
Rory C Monahan ◽  
Liesbeth JJ Beaart-van de Voorde ◽  
Jeroen Eikenboom ◽  
Rolf Fronczek ◽  
Margreet Kloppenburg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Neuropsychiatric Symptoms ◽  
Anxiety And Depression ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Neuropsychiatric Sle ◽  
Inflammatory Phenotype ◽  
The Mean

Introduction We aimed to investigate risk factors for fatigue in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and neuropsychiatric symptoms in order to identify potential interventional strategies. Methods Patients visiting the neuropsychiatric SLE (NPSLE) clinic of the Leiden University Medical Center between 2007–2019 were included. In a multidisciplinary consensus meeting, SLE patients were classified as having neuropsychiatric symptoms of inflammatory origin (inflammatory phenotype) or other origin (non-inflammatory phenotype). Fatigue was assessed with the SF-36 vitality domain (VT) since 2007 and the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) since 2011. Patients with a score on the SF-36 VT ≥1 standard deviation (SD) away from the mean of age-related controls of the general population were classified as fatigued; patients ≥2 SD away were classified as extremely fatigued. Disease activity was measured using the SLE disease activity index-2000. The influence of the presence of an inflammatory phenotype, disease activity and symptoms of depression and anxiety as measured by the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) was analyzed using multiple regression analyses corrected for age, sex and education. Results 348 out of 371 eligible patients filled in questionnaires and were included in this study . The majority was female (87%) and the mean age was 43 ± 14 years. 72 patients (21%) had neuropsychiatric symptoms of an inflammatory origin. Fatigue was present in 78% of all patients and extreme fatigue was present in 50% of patients with an inflammatory phenotype vs 46% in the non-inflammatory phenotype. Fatigue was similar in patients with an inflammatory phenotype compared to patients with a non-inflammatory phenotype on the SF-36 VT (β: 0.8 (95% CI −4.8; 6.1) and there was less fatigue in patients with an inflammatory phenotype on the MFI and VAS (β: −3.7 (95% CI: −6.9; −0.5) and β: −1.0 (95% CI −1.6; −0.3)). There was no association between disease activity and fatigue, but symptoms of anxiety and depression (HADS) associated strongly with all fatigue measurements. Conclusion This study suggests that intervention strategies to target fatigue in (NP)SLE patients may need to focus on symptoms of anxiety and depression rather than immunosuppressive treatment.

Performance and psychometric properties of lupus impact tracker in assessing patient-reported outcomes in pediatric lupus: Report from a pilot study

Lupus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (13) ◽  
pp. 1781-1789
Author(s):  
Suhas K Ganguli ◽  
Joyce S Hui-Yuen ◽  
Meenakshi Jolly ◽  
Jane Cerise ◽  
Barbara Anne Eberhard
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Damage Index ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean

Objective To evaluate the reliability, validity, feasibility and psychometric performance of the Lupus Impact Tracker (LIT) as a patient reported outcome (PRO) measure tool in pediatric systemic lupus erythematosus (pSLE). Methods This is a prospective, observational, pilot study where patients aged between 12 and 25 years, fulfilling the 1997 ACR classification criteria for SLE, were enrolled. Over 3 consecutive, routine, clinical visits, the patients completed the LIT alongside the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Short Forms (PROMIS-SFs), Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ). Rheumatologists completed the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology (SLICC-ACR) Damage Index. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were also collected. Results Of 46 patients enrolled, 38 patients completed 2 visits and 31 completed all 3 visits. Seventy-eight percent were female, 33% African American, 28% Asian, 15% Caucasian and 17% Hispanic. The mean (SD) age was 17.2 (2.7) years, with a mean (SD) disease duration of 4.6 (3.1) years. The mean (SD) SLEDAI-2K at enrollment was 3.54 (2.96). In the 38 patients who completed two or more visits, intra-class correlation coefficient and Cronbach alpha were calculated to be 0.70 and 0.91 respectively, signifying good reliability of LIT. The LIT showed positive correlation with CHAQ-Disability Index and majority of the PROMIS-SFs parameters. Construct validity was established against clinical disease activity (SLEDAI-2K). Conclusion The preliminary results indicate that the LIT is a reliable and valid instrument to capture PRO in p-SLE. Prospective validation with a larger, multicenter cohort is the next step.

Impaired Health Status and the Effect of Pain and Fatigue on Functioning in Clinical Trial Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 1865-1874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Petri ◽  
Ariane K. Kawata ◽  
Ancilla W. Fernandes ◽  
Kavita Gajria ◽  
Warren Greth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Health Status ◽  
General Population ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Us ◽  
Impaired Health

Objective.Our study evaluated the impaired health status of clinical trial patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and explored the relationship between changes in fatigue and pain and their effect on overall health status.Methods.Pooled treatment and placebo data from a phase Ib clinical trial of adults with moderate/severe SLE were analyzed. Measures included patient-reported Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 Survey, Version 2 (SF-36v2), Fatigue Severity Scale, and numeric rating scales (NRS) for pain and global health assessment and clinician-reported global assessment of disease activity (MDGA). Disease burden was compared to the US general population. Health status of responders and nonresponders on pain or fatigue were compared.Results.The sample included 161 patients with SLE, predominantly female (96%) and white (72%), with average age of 43 ± 11 years. Mean SF-36v2 component summary scores reflected overall problems with physical [physical component summary (PCS); 35.2 ± 9.7] and mental health (mental component summary; 40.9 ± 12.9). Patients with SLE had worse health status on all SF-36v2 subscales than the US general population and comparable age and sex norms (effect size −0.51 to −2.15). Pain and fatigue responders had greater improvements on SF-36v2 scores (bodily pain, physical functioning, social functioning, PCS), patient global health assessment NRS, and MDGA than nonresponders. There was moderate agreement in responder status, based on global assessments by patients and clinicians (68.1%), with some discrepancy between patients who were MDGA responders but patient assessment nonresponders (27.7%).Conclusion.Improvements in patient-reported pain or fatigue correlated with improvements in overall health. Patient assessments offer a unique perspective on treatment outcomes. Patient-reported outcomes add value in understanding clinical trial treatment benefits.

Psychometric Properties of the EuroQol-5D and Short Form-6D in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1209-1216 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROHIT AGGARWAL ◽  
CAITLYN T. WILKE ◽  
A. SIMON PICKARD ◽  
VIKRANT VATS ◽  
RACHEL MIKOLAITIS ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Component Score ◽  
Generic Hrqol ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Euroqol 5D

Objective.Health related quality of life (HRQOL) is an important patient-reported outcome in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We evaluated the psychometric properties of 2 widely used preference-based generic HRQOL measures, EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) and Short Form-6D (SF-6D), among United States patients with SLE.Methods.Patients with SLE enrolled at an academic institution were assessed for self-reported generic HRQOL (EQ-5D, Medical Outcomes Study SF-36), disease activity, and disease damage SF-6D. Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS) were calculated from SF-36. Criterion validity, convergent validity, and known-groups comparisons were evaluated for EQ-5D and SF-6D. Sensitivity to change (t tests, effect size) was evaluated in a subset of the cohort followed longitudinally.Results.One hundred sixty-seven patients with SLE were enrolled. Related domains on the EQ-5D and SF-36 correlated strongly, e.g., mobility and physical functioning (r = 0.60), whereas unrelated domains showed weak to moderate correlation. EQ-5D index, EQ-5D visual analog scale, and SF-6D score correlated strongly among each other as well as with most domains of SF-36. Both EQ-5D and SF-6D indices differentiated among patients of varied disease severity. EQ-5D and SF-6D were found to be sensitive to self-reported change in health but insensitive to change in disease activity longitudinally. Disease activity and damage showed weak correlation with HRQOL measures.Conclusion.The SF-6D and EQ-5D exhibited satisfactory psychometric properties for use among US patients with SLE. Measures of disease activity and damage were weakly correlated with HRQOL, suggesting that HRQOL is an important complementary source of information about patients with SLE.

scholarly journals Categorization of Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Using Disease Activity, Patient-Reported Outcomes and Transcriptomic Signatures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Arcani ◽  
Elisabeth Jouve ◽  
Laurent Chiche ◽  
Noemie Jourde-Chiche
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Depression Symptoms ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Objective Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) display symptoms that are not always related to disease activity and may distort clinical trial results. Recently, a clinical categorization based on the presence of type 1 (inflammatory manifestations) and/or type 2 (widespread pain, fatigue, depression) symptoms has been proposed in SLE. Our aim was to develop a type 2 score derived from the Short-Form health survey (SF-36) to categorize SLE patients and to compare immunological and transcriptomic profiles between groups. Methods Seventeen items from the SF-36 were selected to build a type 2 score for 50 SLE patients (100 visits; LUPUCE cohort) and the SLEDAI was used to define type 1 symptoms. Patients were categorized in four groups: minimal (no symptoms), type 1, type 2 and mixed (both type 1 and type 2 symptoms). Clinical, immunological and transcriptomic profiles were compared between the groups. Results Type 2 scores ranged from 0 to 31, with a cut-off value of 14 (75th percentile). The sample categorization was: minimal in 39%, type 1 in 37%, type 2 in 9% and mixed in 15%. Type 2 patients were older than minimal patients and had a longer disease duration than type 1 and mixed patients. Immunological data and modular interferon signatures did not differ between the groups. Conclusion Patients with SLE can be categorized into four clinical groups using the SLEDAI score and our SF-36-derived type 2 score. This categorization is non-redundant with immunological or transcriptomic profiles and could prove useful to stratify patients in clinical trials.

Cross-cultural Validation of a Disease-specific Patient-reported Outcome Measure for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Canada

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 1327-1333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josiane Bourré-Tessier ◽  
Ann E. Clarke ◽  
Rachel A. Mikolaitis-Preuss ◽  
Mark Kosinski ◽  
Sasha Bernatsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Patient Reported

Objective.The LupusPRO, a disease-targeted patient-reported outcome measure, was developed and validated in US patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We report the results of the cross-cultural validation study of the English version of the LupusPRO among patients in Canada with SLE.Method.The LupusPRO was administered to English-speaking Canadian patients with SLE. Demographic, clinical, and serological characteristics were obtained, and the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) and LupusPRO were administered. Disease activity was ascertained using the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) and the Lupus Foundation of America definition of flare (Yes/No). Damage was assessed using the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI). Physician disease activity and damage assessments were also ascertained using visual analog scales. A mail-back LupusPRO form was completed within 2–3 days of the index visit. Items tested were internal consistency reliability (ICR), test-retest reliability (TRT), convergent and discriminant validity (against corresponding domains of the SF-36), criterion validity (against disease activity or health status), and known-groups validity.Results.Participants were 123 Canadian patients with SLE (94% women); mean age was 47.7 (SD 14.8) years. The median (interquartile range) SELENA-SLEDAI and SDI were 4 (6) and 1 (3), respectively. The ICR of the LupusPRO domains ranged from 0.60 to 0.93, while the TRT range was 0.62–0.95. Measures observed were convergent and discriminant validity with corresponding domains of SF-36, criterion validity, and known-groups validity against disease activity, damage, and health status. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit.Conclusion.The LupusPRO has fair psychometric properties among Canadian patients with SLE, and prospective studies to establish minimally important difference are continuing.

The Arabic LupusPRO: A Cross-Cultural Validation of a Disease-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Tool for Quality of Life in Lupus Patients

Lupus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (13) ◽  
pp. 1727-1735
Author(s):  
Nourhan Elameen Elkaraly ◽  
Samah Ismail Nasef ◽  
Aziza Sayed Omar ◽  
Ahmed Mahmoud Fouad ◽  
Meenakshi Jolly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Arabic Version ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Objective To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Arabic version of LupusPRO v.1.8 and to test its reliability and validity. Methods LupusPRO was translated into the Arabic language following a standard procedure with forward-backward translation and was tested in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) before use. The Arabic version was administered to 107 Egyptian SLE patients, along with a validated Arabic version of RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 (SF-36). The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were determined. Validity was assessed by correlating LupusPRO scores with SF-36, Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment–Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI). The conceptual framework of the Arabic LupusPRO was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results Among the 107 SLE patients, 95% were women with a median (range) age of 32 (18-55) years, median (range) SELENA-SLEDAI of 6 (0-23) and median (range) SDI of 0 (0-6). The Cronbach's alpha for the Arabic LupusPRO ranged from 0.71 to 0.98, except for the social support domain (0.65). Test-retest reliability ranged from 0.95 to 0.99. Convergent validity with corresponding domains of SF 36 was satisfactory. For criterion validity, there was a weak but significant correlation between several LupusPRO domains with SELENA-SLEDAI. CFA showed a good model fit. Conclusion The Arabic version of LupusPRO v1.8 is a reliable and valid tool for measuring quality of life among Arabic speaking SLE patients.

Outcomes of neuropsychiatric events in systemic lupus erythematosus based on clinical phenotypes; prospective data from the Leiden NP SLE cohort

Lupus ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 543-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Magro-Checa ◽  
L J J Beaart-van de Voorde ◽  
H A M Middelkoop ◽  
M L Dane ◽  
N J van der Wee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Meaningful Improvement ◽  
Neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Patient Reported

Objective The objective of this study was to assess whether clinical and patient’s reported outcomes are associated with a different pathophysiological origin of neuropsychiatric events presenting in systemic lupus erythematosus. Methods A total of 232 neuropsychiatric events presenting in 131 systemic lupus erythematosus patients were included. Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus diagnosis was established per event by multidisciplinary evaluation. All neuropsychiatric events were divided according to a suspected underlying pathophysiological process into one of the following: non-neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus related, inflammatory and ischaemic neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus. The clinical outcome of all neuropsychiatric events was determined by a physician-completed four-point Likert scale. Health-related quality of life was measured with the subscales of the patient-generated Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire. The change between scores at paired visits of all domain scores, mental component summary (SF-36 MCS) and physical component summary (SF-36 PCS) scores were retrospectively calculated and used as patient-reported outcome. The association among these outcomes and the different origin of neuropsychiatric events was obtained using multiple logistic regression analysis. Results The clinical status of 26.8% non-neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus events, 15.8% ischaemic neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus and 51.6% inflammatory neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus improved after re-assessment. Almost all SF-36 domains had a positive change at re-assessment in all groups independently of the origin of neuropsychiatric events. Neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus ( B = 0.502; p < 0.001) and especially inflammatory neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus ( B = 0.827; p < 0.001) had better clinical outcome, with change in disease activity being the only important predictor. The change in SF-36 MCS was also independently associated with neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus ( B = 5.783; p < 0.05) and inflammatory neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus ( B = 11.133; p < 0.001). Disease duration and change in disease activity were the only predictors in both cases. The change in SF-36 PCS was only negatively associated with age. Conclusion Inflammatory neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus events have better clinical outcome and meaningful improvement in SF-36 MCS than ischaemic neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus or non-neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus.

Validation and verification of the Japanese version of the systemic lupus erythematosus symptom checklist for patient quality of life

Lupus ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 096120332110050
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Doi ◽  
Koichiro Ohmura ◽  
Yuya Tabuchi ◽  
Motomu Hashimoto ◽  
Yudai Takase ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Physician Global Assessment ◽  
Symptom Checklist ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Patient Reported

Objective The systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) symptom checklist (SSC) is a patient-reported outcome measure consisting of 38 queries. We translated SSC into Japanese and attempted to validate its usefulness for evaluating the quality of life (QOL) of SLE patients and identify factors that affect QOL. Methods Data from the Medical Outcomes Study Short-form 36 questionnaire (SF-36), Japanese LupusPRO, the Japanese version of the SSC (SSC-J) questionnaire, SLEDAI-2k, and the physician global assessment (PGA) were obtained on the same day from 226 SLE outpatients of the Kyoto Lupus cohort at Kyoto University Hospital. Relationships between the total scores or each item of SSC-J and SF-36, Japanese LupusPRO, SLEDAI-2k, or PGA were analyzed by Spearman’s rank test. Results The total scores of SSC-J correlated with the scores of SF-36 and Japanese LupusPRO. In each item of SSC-J, all 38 items correlated with the physical component summary and mental component summary of SF-36 as well as the Health-Related QOL (HRQOL) scores of Japanese LupusPRO, but not with the non-HRQOL of LupusPRO. SSC-J scores correlated with age, PGA, and corticosteroid doses, but not with SLEDAI-2k. Conclusions SSC-J is suitable as a disease-specific QOL assessment tool for SLE.

scholarly journals THU0253 FATIGUE AND PAIN REMAIN PROMINENT AND IMPACTFUL IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS (SLE): A CROSS-SECTIONAL SURVEY OF SLE PATIENTS IN THE UNITED STATES

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 353.2-354
Author(s):  
J. Birt ◽  
M. Hadi ◽  
N. Sargalo ◽  
E. Brookes ◽  
P. Swinburn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Joint Pain ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Joint Stiffness ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean

Background:Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory condition impacting multiple organ systems.1,2SLE affects approximately 1.5 million Americans, disproportionately females of reproductive age, and is more prevalent in non-Caucasian populations.3Fatigue and pain are some of the most prominent symptoms of SLE, contributing to the heavy disease burden and disruption to daily life.4This study aimed to further understand the burden of SLE. Lilly worked with the Lupus Foundation of America (LFA) and Evidera to develop the SLE-UPDATE (Understanding Preferences, Disease Activity and Treatment Expectations) survey.Objectives:To understand the patient-perceived symptom burden of SLE, in particular pain and fatigue, within the current landscape of therapeutic options. This study also focused on current treatment patterns in SLE patients.Methods:This was a cross-sectional, non-interventional, online survey study conducted in partnership with the LFA. English-speaking United States patients aged ≥18 years with a self-reported diagnosis of SLE completed the survey following online screening and informed consent. Descriptive data are presented by means (standard deviation [SD]) for continuous measures, and frequency (n, %) for dichotomous measures. Demographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes were collected including the FACIT-Fatigue (range 0-52, higher scores indicate less fatigue), Pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (0 [none] to 10 [worst imaginable]), Worst Joint Pain NRS (0 [none] to 10 [worst imaginable]), and the LupusPRO, a validated, lupus-specific quality of life (QoL) instrument (range 0-100, higher scores indicate better QoL).Results:A total of 500 patients with SLE completed the survey. Patients were predominantly female (75%), white/Caucasian (76%), with a mean age of 42.6 years and mean disease duration of 11.1 years.Most patients with SLE rated their overall condition as either good (38%) or fair (31%), with 8% rating poor and 7% excellent. Current non-biologic prescription medication use included: antimalarials 42%, corticosteroids 33%, immunosuppressants 33%, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) 32%, other analgesics 15% and 10% were using tofacitinib. Biologic therapies were being used by only 19%, including intravenous (IV) Benlysta (37%),subcutaneous(SC) Benlysta (25%), rituximab (17%), and 22% were using other biologics. Fatigue was the most commonly reported symptom (69%), with 40% of patients ranking fatigue as their most bothersome SLE symptom. Forty eight percent of patients with current fatigue rated the severity as moderate and 33% as severe. The mean (SD) FACIT-Fatigue score was 22.9 (12.0). The next most commonly reported symptoms were joint stiffness (57%), sleep problems (55%), joint pain/swelling (53%), and muscle pain (52%). Sixty percent of patients reported experiencing pain all or most of the time over the past seven days. A total of 30% of patients with current joint pain/swelling rated it as severe, and 24% of patients with current joint stiffness rated it as severe. The mean scores for Worst pain NRS and Worst Joint Pain NRS were both 5.8 out of 10.The LupusPRO domains indicated by respondents as the most impacted by SLE were Emotional Health, Pain/Vitality, and Lupus Medications.Conclusion:Fatigue, followed by pain and joint stiffness, were the most common patient-reported symptoms contributing to the overall SLE disease burden. Further research could highlight the efforts required to address the inadequacies in treatment and management of pain and fatigue in this patient population.Disclosure of Interests:Julie Birt Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Monica Hadi: None declared, Nashmel Sargalo: None declared, Ella Brookes: None declared, Paul Swinburn: None declared, Leslie Hanrahan: None declared, Karin Tse: None declared, Natalia Bello Vega Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Kirstin Griffing Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Maria Silk Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Laure Delbecque Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Diane L Kamen Consultant of: Consulted on SLE survey development for Lilly and consulted on SLE trial protocol development for EMD Serono in 2019

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document