scholarly journals Effectiveness and Safety of Tocilizumab: Postmarketing Surveillance of 7901 Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in Japan

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takao Koike ◽  
Masayoshi Harigai ◽  
Shigeko Inokuma ◽  
Naoki Ishiguro ◽  
Junnosuke Ryu ◽  
...  

Objective.An all-patient postmarketing surveillance program was conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of tocilizumab (TCZ) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the real-world clinical setting in Japan.Methods.Patients received 8 mg/kg TCZ every 4 weeks and were observed for 28 weeks. Data were collected on patient characteristics, and drug safety and effectiveness.Results.A total of 7901 patients were enrolled. Percentages of total and serious adverse events (AE) were 43.9% and 9.6%, respectively. The most common serious AE were infections (3.8%). Logistic regression analysis identified the following risk factors for the development of serious infection: age ≥ 65 years, disease duration ≥ 10 years, previous or concurrent respiratory disease, and concomitant corticosteroid dose > 5 mg/day (prednisolone equivalent). The incidence rate of serious infections in patients with ≥ 3 risk factors was 11.2%, compared with 1.2% for patients without risk factors. The Week 28 rates of 28-joint Disease Activity Score–erythrocyte sedimentation rate remission, Boolean remission, and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good Response were 47.6%, 15.1%, and 59.4%, respectively. Contributing factors for effectiveness were body weight ≥ 40 kg, less advanced RA, no previous biologics, no concomitant corticosteroids or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and low disease activity at baseline. From the benefit-risk balance analysis, patients with a high probability of remission and a low probability of developing serious infection were most likely to have less advanced RA and to have not received biologics previously.Conclusion.These data confirm the safety and effectiveness of TCZ in patients with RA in the real-world clinical setting in Japan and identify factors that contribute to the successful use of TCZ for RA.

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (8) ◽  
pp. 1368-1375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiko Yamamoto ◽  
Hajime Goto ◽  
Kenzo Hirao ◽  
Atsuo Nakajima ◽  
Hideki Origasa ◽  
...  

Objective.To evaluate the longterm safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a real-world clinical setting in Japan.Methods.In this longterm extension of a single-arm, observational postmarketing surveillance study, a total of 5573 patients who initiated intravenous TCZ between April 2008 and July 2009 were observed for 3 years, regardless of its continuation, for incidence of fatal events, serious infections, malignancy, gastrointestinal perforations, and serious cardiac dysfunction.Results.Of the 5573 patients who were enrolled, 4527 patients (81.23%) completed 3 years of followup. There were no increases in the proportions of patients with fatal events, serious infection, malignancy, GI perforation, or serious cardiac dysfunction over 3 years. The all-cause mortality rate during followup was 2.58% (0.95/100 patient-yrs), and the standardized mortality ratio was 1.27 (95% CI, 1.08 to 1.50). Patients who were older with longer disease duration and respiratory comorbidities were more likely to discontinue TCZ treatment following serious infection during the first year. Among patients who completed 3 years of TCZ treatment, serious infection developed at a constant rate during the 3-year treatment period. The proportion of malignancy during followup was 2.24% (0.83/100 patient-yrs), and the standardized incidence ratio was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.95).Conclusion.The safety profile of TCZ was consistent over time regarding mortality, serious infections, malignancy, gastrointestinal perforation, and serious cardiac dysfunction. These data confirm the longterm safety of TCZ use in patients with RA in a real-world clinical setting.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-81
Author(s):  
Tsutomu Takeuchi ◽  
Naoko Wakasugi ◽  
Satoshi Uno ◽  
Hirofumi Makino

Objective.To assess the long-term safety and effectiveness of tacrolimus for treating lupus nephritis (LN) in the real-world clinical setting.Methods.This is an ongoing, open-label, noncomparative, observational, postmarketing surveillance study conducted across 275 sites in Japan. Registered patients with LN were followed for 10 years. Here we report data relating to 5 years of tacrolimus maintenance therapy at the interim data cutoff in August 2016.Results.Of 1395 registered patients, 1355 received tacrolimus maintenance therapy for LN and provided safety data. The most common serious adverse drug reactions (ADR) included pneumonia (1.1%), herpes zoster (1.0%), cellulitis (1.0%), and diabetes mellitus (1.0%). ADR occurred mainly within the first 28 weeks of tacrolimus treatment, and no marked increase was observed during the follow-up period. Subgroup analyses suggested that risk factors for commonly observed ADR associated with tacrolimus included inpatient management, LN disease severity, increasing age, abnormal renal or hepatic function, and comorbid or previous disease. The cumulative rate of progression to renal failure (based on the attending physician’s assessment) was 0.8% at Year 1 and 6.6% at Year 5. Cumulative relapse rates were 7.8% and 30.6%, respectively. Urine protein:creatinine ratio, serum anti-dsDNA antibody levels, complement C3 levels, and steroid-sparing effects were all significantly improved from 4 weeks after tacrolimus treatment initiation (P < 0.001) and were sustained over 5 years.Conclusion.Long-term tacrolimus maintenance treatment over 5 years in the real-world clinical setting was well tolerated and effective in a large population of patients with LN (www.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01410747).


2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 604-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan M. Goodman ◽  
Vivian P. Bykerk ◽  
Edward DiCarlo ◽  
Ryan W. Cummings ◽  
Laura T. Donlin ◽  
...  

Objective.Rates of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain high for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who are at risk of flaring after surgery. We aimed to describe rates, characteristics, and risk factors of RA flare within 6 weeks of THA and TKA.Methods.Patients with RA were recruited prior to elective THA and TKA surgery and prospectively followed. Clinicians evaluated RA clinical characteristics 0–2 weeks before and 6 weeks after surgery. Patients answered questions regarding disease activity including self-reported joint counts and flare status weekly for 6 weeks. Per standard of care, biologics were stopped before surgery, while glucocorticoids and methotrexate (MTX) were typically continued. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify baseline characteristics associated with postsurgical RA flares.Results.Of 120 patients, the mean age was 62 years and the median RA duration 14.8 years. Ninety-eight (82%) met 2010/1987 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria, 53 (44%) underwent THA (and the rest TKA), and 61 (51%) were taking biologics. By 6 weeks, 75 (63%) had flared. At baseline, flarers had significantly higher disease activity (as measured by the 28-joint Disease Activity Score), erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and pain. Numerically more flarers used biologics, but stopping biologics did not predict flares, and continuing MTX was not protective. A higher baseline disease activity predicted flaring by 6 weeks (OR 2.12, p = 0.02).Conclusion.Flares are frequent in patients with RA undergoing arthroplasty. Higher baseline disease activity significantly increases the risk. Although more patients stopping biologics flared, this did not independently predict flaring. The effect of early postsurgery flares requires further study.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 1759720X1983115
Author(s):  
Louis Bessette ◽  
Boulos Haraoui ◽  
Andrew Chow ◽  
Isabelle Fortin ◽  
Sanjay Dixit ◽  
...  

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, and the impact on patients’ productivity, pain, and fatigue, in Canadian practice. Methods: FαsT-CAN, a 2-year prospective, observational study, evaluated CZP use in Canadian adults with moderate to severe, active RA. The primary objective was to assess the proportion of patients achieving 28-joint Disease Activity Scores (DAS28) <2.6 at Week 104. Secondary and additional endpoints assessed the improvements in Patients’ Assessment of Arthritis Pain (PtAAP), fatigue, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and the proportion of patients achieving minimal clinically important differences (MCID) in HAQ-DI. Validated arthritis-specific Work Productivity Surveys (WPS-RA) assessed the RA-associated impact on productivity. Incidence of CZP-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was reported for patients receiving ⩾1 dose of CZP (safety set). Results: The full analysis set (baseline DAS28 ⩾ 2.6, ⩾1 dose of CZP and ⩾1 valid post-baseline DAS28 measurement) included 451 of the 546 patients recruited into the study; a total of 229/451 (50.8%) patients completed Week 104. At Week 104, 90/451 (20.0%) patients achieved DAS28 < 2.6. Rapid improvements in disease activity, pain, and fatigue were observed. At Week 104, 66.2% of patients achieved HAQ-DI MCID. Patients employed at Week 104, reported reduced absenteeism, and improved productivity. CZP-related TEAEs were consistent with the known CZP safety profile. Conclusions: CZP was an effective RA treatment in Canadian practice, and no new CZP-related safety signals were identified. The improvements in household and workplace productivity are the first observations in a real-world Canadian setting.


2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérôme Avouac ◽  
Christophe Meune ◽  
Camille Chenevier-Gobeaux ◽  
Philippe Dieudé ◽  
Didier Borderie ◽  
...  

Objective.To measure concentrations of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (HS-cTnT) and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to examine correlates.Methods.The plasma concentrations of HS-cTnT and NT-proBNP were measured in consecutive patients with RA and compared to values obtained from age-matched and sex-matched healthy controls.Results.We included 236 unrelated patients with RA (192 females, 57 ± 13 yrs) and 213 controls (170 females, 55 ± 15 yrs). Seventy-one patients with RA were free of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors. HS-cTnT and NT-proBNP concentrations were significantly higher in the total cohort of patients with RA (p = 0.03 and p < 0.0001, respectively) and in the subgroup free of CV risk factors (p = 0.02 and p < 0.0001, respectively) compared to controls. In addition, both the total cohort of patients with RA and the subgroup free of CV risk factors were more likely to have levels above the cutoff concentrations of HS-cTnT (p = 0.003 and p = 0.007, respectively) and NT-proBNP (p = 0.0001 and p < 0.0001, respectively) than controls. Patients with RA and increased C-reactive protein (CRP) levels had higher HS-cTnT (p = 0.03) and NT-proBNP (p = 0.02) concentrations. HS-cTnT levels positively correlated with the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28-CRP; r = 0.2, p = 0.020). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that increased HS-cTnT levels were independently associated with a DAS28-CRP > 5.1 (OR 11.8; 95% CI 1.6–35.5) and a body mass index > 30 kg/m2 (OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.3–5.5).Conclusion.HS-cTnT and NTproBNP are increased in patients with RA, independent of CV risk factors. The association between HS-cTnT, NT-proBNP, and CRP, together with the correlation between HS-cTnT and disease activity, support the link between myocardial injury/dysfunction and inflammation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 378-379
Author(s):  
B. Fautrel ◽  
R. Caporali ◽  
E. Holdsworth ◽  
B. Donaghy ◽  
M. Khalid ◽  
...  

Background:The principles of treat to target (T2T) include defining an appropriate treatment target, assessed at pre-defined intervals, with a commitment to changing therapeutic approach if the target is not met (1). T2T is recommended as a key strategy for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Objectives:To explore attitudes towards T2T, its implementation and stated treatment goals among physicians and their patients with RA.Methods:The Adelphi RA Disease Specific Programme™ was a large, quantitative, point-in-time survey conducted amongst rheumatologists (n=296) and their consulting patients with RA (n=3042) in Europe (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK) between Q4 2019–Q3 2020. Physicians were recruited via publicly available lists, completing an online survey and medical record extraction for their next 10–12 consecutive patients. The same patients were invited to voluntarily complete a self-report questionnaire (n=1098, 36% response), collecting data on attitudes towards T2T and treatment goals.Results:Physicians reported that 76% of patients were in remission (DAS28: <2.6) or had low disease activity (DAS28: 2.6 – 3.2), and 24% had moderate-high disease activity (DAS28: >3.2). Patient mean age was 53.0 years (SD 14.0), mean time since diagnosis was 7.2 years (SD 7.2). The proportion of patients currently receiving an advanced therapy (AT; defined as biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD) was 68%, of whom 70% were on a first line AT. No difference was observed between disease activity groups.In the physician survey, 86% of physicians stated they followed T2T principals in at least some of their RA patients, and would utilize a T2T approach in RA patients with moderate-high disease activity (61%), the most uncontrolled patients (37%) and those who do not respond well to initial therapy (34%). In this sample of real-world RA patients, 66% were reported by physicians to be on a T2T plan at the time of data collection. The most common physician-reported targets were remission (DAS28: <2.6) (75%), improvement of quality of life (QoL) (41%) and reduction of pain (31%), with 85% of physicians perceiving these treatment goals were fully or partially met. The most stated reasons for not implementing T2T was physician preference not to adjust current treatment (34%), patient preference not to adjust current treatment (23%), and there are no achievable goals for this patient (16%).Overall, 29% of patients reported they were involved in setting their T2T goals, while 34% stated their T2T goals were set by their physicians only, and 29% perceived no T2T goal had been set (n=620). The most common overall T2T goals from the patient perspective were remission (61%), controlling symptoms (41%), and reducing impact on QoL (34%). Of those patients who acknowledged a T2T goal had been set (n=407), 77% reported their T2T goal was fully or partially achieved.Of 719 patients who had moderate-high disease activity, 57% were on a T2T plan, with 46% of physicians perceiving these treatment goals were fully or partially met. The most common physician-stated reason for not implementing T2T was a lack of achievable targets (29%).Conclusion:Rheumatologists in this study reported a strong belief in T2T. The most common physician-set T2T goals were remission, improvement of QoL and reduction of pain, corresponding with T2T goals as reported by patients. However, a third of patients in this cohort were not aware of a defined T2T objective in their management, which may be a result of a perceived lack of achievable goals by physicians. It may be desirable to promote more patient involvement in defining achievable targets amongst those with moderate-high disease activity who despite best efforts may not reach a clinical state of remission. Further research is needed to identify and understand goals important to RA patients.References:[1]van Vollenhoven R. Treat-to-target in rheumatoid arthritis - are we there yet? Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2019;15(3):180-6.Acknowledgements:This study was funded by Galapagos NV, Belgium.Medical writing support was provided by Gary Sidgwick, PhD (Adelphi Real World, Bollington, UK) and editorial support was provided by Debbie Sherwood, BSc, CMPP (Aspire Scientific, Bollington, UK), both funded by Galapagos NV.Disclosure of Interests:Bruno Fautrel Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, BMS, Celgene, Celltrion, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, MSD, Mylan, NORDIC Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, SOBI, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roberto Caporali Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Sanofi, Fresenius Kabi, Samsung Bioepis, MSD, Consultant of: Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Elizabeth Holdsworth Employee of: Adelphi Real World, Bethany Donaghy Employee of: Adelphi Real World, Mona Khalid Shareholder of: Galapagos, Employee of: Galapagos, Mark Moore Shareholder of: Gilead Sciences, Speakers bureau: Gilead Sciences (only as employee), Paid instructor for: Gilead Sciences (only as employee), Consultant of: Gilead Sciences (only as employee), Grant/research support from: Gilead Sciences (only as employee), Employee of: Gilead Sciences, and previously Sanofi and AstraZeneca, Katrien Van Beneden Shareholder of: Galapagos, Employee of: Galapagos, Yves Piette Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Galapagos, Grünenthal and Sandoz, Grant/research support from: Amgen, Mylan and UCB, Susana Romero-Yuste Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Grunenthal, Kern Pharma, Lilly, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Janssen, Consultant of: AbbVie, Biogen, Fresenius, Galapagos, Gebro, Janssen, Lilly, Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Jasper Broen Shareholder of: Pharming Group, Consultant of: Galapagos, Gilead, Novartis, Peter C. Taylor Consultant of: AbbVie, Biogen, Galapagos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Nordic Pharma, Fresenius, UCB, Grant/research support from: Celgene, Galapagos, Gilead, Lilly


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document