Predictors of Incident Depression in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 1823-1833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangyang Huang ◽  
Laurence S. Magder ◽  
Michelle Petri

Objective.Findings from previous studies of predictors of depression among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have been inconsistent. The aim of our study was to identify risk factors that preceded incident depression based on a large, closely followed longitudinal cohort.Methods.Data regarding 1609 patients with SLE in the Hopkins Lupus Cohort who had no history of depression prior to cohort entry were analyzed. Demographic variables, SLE manifestations, laboratory tests, physician’s global assessment, Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-SLE Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI), cumulative organ damage (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index), and onset of depression were recorded at enrollment and each quarterly visit. Rates of incident depression were calculated overall, and in subgroups defined by demographic and clinical variables. Adjusted estimates of association were derived using pooled logistic regression.Results.The incidence of depression was 29.7 episodes per 1000 person-years. In the multivariable analysis, these variables remained as independent predictors of incident depression: recent SLE diagnosis, non-Asian ethnicity, disability, cutaneous activity, longitudinal myelitis, and current prednisone use of 20 mg/day or higher. Global disease activity (SELENA-SLEDAI) was not a significant predictor after controlling for prednisone use.Conclusion.Depression in SLE is multifactorial. Higher-dose prednisone (≥ 20 mg daily) is 1 important independent risk factor. Global disease activity is not a risk factor, but cutaneous activity and certain types of neurologic activity (myelitis) are predictive of depression. The independent effect of prednisone provides clinicians with an additional incentive to avoid and reduce high-dose prednisone exposure in SLE.

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 1392-1398 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALÍ DUARTE-GARCÍA ◽  
HONG FANG ◽  
CHI HUNG TO ◽  
LAURENCE S. MAGDER ◽  
MICHELLE PETRI

Objective.To determine whether there is any seasonal variation in the activity of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) overall and by individual organs.Methods.The study group comprised 2102 patients with SLE who were followed in a prospective longitudinal cohort study. In this cohort, 92.3% of the patients were women. The mean ± SD age of the patients was 47.9 ± 13.9 years, 56.3% were white, 37.1% were African American, and 3.1% were Asian. Global disease activity was recorded by the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment – Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) and the physician’s global assessment. Activity of each organ was also recorded using SLEDAI terms and a visual analog scale (VAS; 0 to 3).Results.There was significant seasonal variation in photosensitive rash (p < 0.0001), which was more frequent in the spring and summer months (p < 0.0001). There was significantly more arthritis activity in spring and summer, as measured by both SELENA-SLEDAI (p = 0.0057) and the joint VAS (p = 0.0047). A decrease in renal activity was found in the summer months compared to the rest of the year (p = 0.0397). Serositis recorded by VAS had higher activity from August to October (p = 0.0392). Anti-dsDNA levels were significantly higher during October and November (p < 0.0001). There was significant seasonal variation in antiphospholipid antibody levels (p < 0.0001) and lupus anticoagulant (p = 0.0003). We found a significant variation in activity through the year in global disease activity as measured by SELENA-SLEDAI (p = 0.048).Conclusion.In the Hopkins Lupus Cohort, skin and joint activity is increased during the spring and summer, but other organs have different patterns. These seasonal variations likely reflect environmental factors that influence disease activity, including ultraviolet light and infections.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 565-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
XiangYang Huang ◽  
Laurence S. Magder ◽  
Michelle Petri

Objective.The risk factors for incident seizures in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were prospectively determined in a cohort study.Methods.A total of 2203 patients with SLE followed longitudinally in the Hopkins Lupus Cohort were analyzed. Demographic variables, clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, and SLE disease activity were recorded at each quarterly visit. Adjusted estimates of association of risk factors for onset of seizure were derived using pooled logistic regression. We examined incident seizures in 3 ways: at the time of diagnosis, more than 45 days after the diagnosis of SLE, and after cohort entry.Results.Of 2203 patients with no history of seizure prior to SLE diagnosis, 157 (7.13%) had the first seizure occurrence at the time of (37 patients, 1.68%) or after diagnosis (120 patients, 5.45%) of SLE. The risk of seizure occurring around the time of SLE diagnosis was higher in patients with a history of malar rash (p = 0.002), proteinuria (p = 0.004), and psychosis (p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis of the first seizure occurring after the diagnosis of SLE showed that history of low C3 (p = 0.0078), psychosis (p < 0.0001), cranial or peripheral neuropathy (p = 0.0043), anti-Sm antibody (p = 0.0551), renal involvement (p = 0.0177), and current corticosteroid dose (p < 0.0001) were independently associated with a higher incidence of seizure. Disease activity was not predictive after adjusting for corticosteroids.Conclusion.Risk of seizure after diagnosis of SLE is increased in those patients with prior psychosis, neuropathy, proteinuria, anti-Sm, low C3, and use of corticosteroids.


RMD Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. e002010
Author(s):  
Stavros Giaglis ◽  
Douglas Daoudlarian ◽  
Reinhard E Voll ◽  
Diego Kyburz ◽  
Nils Venhoff ◽  
...  

ObjectivesCell-free DNA is involved in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) but the clinical value of cell-free DNA measurements in SLE is unknown. Our aim was therefore to examine the utility of mitochondrial (mt) DNA and nuclear (n) DNA quantification in SLE.MethodsEDTA plasma was drawn from 103 consecutive patients with SLE and from 56 healthy blood donors. mtDNA and nDNA copy numbers were quantified by PCR from cell-free plasma. Clinical parameters were recorded prospectively.ResultsCirculating mtDNA copy numbers were increased 8.8-fold in the plasma of patients with SLE (median 6.6×107 /mL) compared with controls (median 7.6×106 /mL, p<0.0001). Among all 159 individuals, a cut-off set at 1.8×107 mtDNA copies in a receiver operated curve identified patients with SLE with 87.4% sensitivity and 94.6% specificity; the area under the curve was 0.95 (p<0.0001). mtDNA levels were independent of age or gender, but correlated with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) on multivariable analysis (p=0.004). Conversely, SLEDAI was associated with prednisone dose (p<0.001), anti-double stranded DNA-titres (p=0.003) and mtDNA levels (p=0.005), but not nDNA copy numbers. In 33 patients with SLE with available follow-up, the changes of mtDNA, but not those of nDNA concentrations, robustly correlated with the evolution of the SLEDAI (r=0.55, p=0.001).ConclusionsCirculating mtDNA unlike nDNA molecules are markedly increased in SLE plasma. Regardless of disease activity, circulating mtDNA levels distinguish patients with SLE from healthy controls with high sensitivity and represent an independent marker of SLE activity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 117954412096737
Author(s):  
Samar Alharbi ◽  
Jorge Sanchez-Guerrero

Urticarial vasculitis is an eruption of erythematous wheals that clinically resemble urticaria but histologically show changes of leukocytoklastic vasculitis. In association with connective tissue disease it is most commonly seen complicating Systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) and, less often, Sjogren’s syndrome. Here, we report a 25-year-old woman who developed SLE in 1998. In May 2013 she presented with urticarial vasculitis; her skin biopsy was consistent with leukocytoclastic vasculitis. She also developed bilateral uveitis. She had most of the clinical and laboratory characteristics of hypocomplementic urticarial vasculitis syndrome (HUVS) which is difficult to be differentiated from SLE. She was treated with high-dose prednisone, Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF), colchicine, and Dapsone but failed. We decided to give her Rituximab (RTX), her urticarial vasculitis and uveitis symptoms improved significantly. Unfortunately, later on she presented with severe discoid lupus. We started her on thalidomide and responded well. Our case highlights that Rituximab is a good option for severe refractory urticarial vasculitis and thalidomide is effective in treatment of discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE), and can be used safely in specialist rheumatological practice.


2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rattapol Pakchotanon ◽  
Dafna D. Gladman ◽  
Jiandong Su ◽  
Murray B. Urowitz

Objective.To examine whether more consistent use of antimalarial agents (AM) leads to better results in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).Methods.From a longitudinal cohort study, we identified inception patients with a minimum of 5 years of followup. They were divided into 3 groups: patients who took AM > 60% of the time (group A), those who took AM < 60% of the time (group B), and those who did not receive AM (group C) during the first 5 years of followup. Outcomes included increase in Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI), flare, achieving low disease activity (LDA), adjusted mean Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000, cumulative doses of steroids (CMS), and AM-related retinal toxicity. Regression analysis models were constructed to identify predictors of the outcomes.Results.There were 459 patients identified: 236 (51.4%) in group A, 88 (19.2%) in group B, and 135 (29.4%) in group C. The changes in SDI, flare event, and CMS were significantly lower in group A, which more often achieved LDA. Multivariable analysis revealed that the patients in group A had a lower risk of increasing SDI and were more likely to achieve LDA at Year 5 compared to the patients in group C. Patients taking AM had lower CMS over the 5 years of followup. There was only 1 patient with AM-related retinal toxicity in each group.Conclusion.More consistent use of an AM over the first 5 years of SLE is associated with better outcomes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 393-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sasha Bernatsky ◽  
Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman ◽  
Michelle Petri ◽  
Murray B. Urowitz ◽  
Dafna D. Gladman ◽  
...  

Objective.To assess lung cancer risk in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), relative to demographics, drug exposures, smoking, and disease activity.Methods.We analyzed data from 14 SLE cohorts. We calculated adjusted HR estimates for lung cancer in SLE, relative to demographics, smoking, time-dependent medication exposures, and cumulative disease activity [mean adjusted SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) scores]. This project was approved by the ethics boards of all participating institutions, including the Institutional Review Board of the McGill University Health Centre. The ethics approval number for the Cancer Risk study is GEN-06-031.Results.Within these 14 SLE cohorts, 49 incident lung cancers occurred. Among lung cancer cases, 59.0% were in the highest SLEDAI quartile at baseline versus 40.8% of lung cancer–free SLE controls. The vast majority (84.2%) of SLE lung cancer cases were ever-smokers at baseline, versus 40.1% of those without lung cancer. In adjusted models, the principal factors associated with lung cancer were ever smoking (at cohort entry) and current age. Estimated adjusted effects of all drugs were relatively imprecise, but did not point toward any drug exposures as strong lung cancer risk factors.Conclusion.We saw no clear evidence for drugs as a trigger for lung cancer risk in SLE, although drug risk estimates were relatively imprecise. Smoking may be the most significant modifiable lung cancer risk factor in SLE.


2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 2355-2358 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANAM. BERTOLI ◽  
LUIS M. VILÁ ◽  
JOHN D. REVEILLE ◽  
GRACIELA S. ALARCÓN

ObjectiveTo determine whether C-reactive protein (CRP) measured by a high sensitivity (hs) assay is a surrogate marker of disease activity and damage in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).MethodsFive hundred eighty-eight patients with SLE participating in a multiethnic cohort (Hispanic, African American, and Caucasian) were studied. Disease activity was measured with the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure-Revised (SLAM-R) and damage with the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Damage Index (SDI). hs-CRP was measured by immunometric assay. Disease activity and hs-CRP were measured at enrollment and damage accrual at last visit. The association of hs-CRP with the SLAM-R and SDI was examined by univariable (Pearson’s correlation) and multivariable (linear regression) analyses. The association of hs-CRP and each individual domain of the SLAM-R and SDI was examined by Spearman’s correlation.Resultshs-CRP was associated with the SLAM-R in the univariable (r = 0.35, p < 0.001) and multivariable (t = 7.11, coefficient β = 0.27, p < 0.001) analyses. It also correlated with the constitutional, eye, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, neuromotor, and laboratory domains of the SLAM-R. hs-CRP was associated with the SDI (r = 0.12, p = 0.004) in the univariable analysis but not in the multivariable analysis. When the individual domains of the SDI were analyzed, hs-CRP correlated with the renal, pulmonary, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, and diabetes domains.Conclusionhs-CRP was associated with disease activity but not with overall damage accrual; however, it correlated with specific domains of the damage index. hs-CRP may be useful to monitor the course of the disease and predict its intermediate outcome, but longitudinal studies with serial hs-CRPmeasurements are necessary to define its clinical value.


Lupus ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 239-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.C.M.S. Fialho ◽  
E. Bonfá ◽  
L.F. Vitule ◽  
E. D'Amico ◽  
V. Caparbo ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 145 (5) ◽  
pp. 380-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. H. Garin ◽  
J. W. Sleasman ◽  
G. A. Richard ◽  
A. A. Iravani ◽  
R. S. Fennell

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document