scholarly journals Five-year Efficacy and Safety of Tocilizumab Monotherapy in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Were Methotrexate- and Biologic-naive or Free of Methotrexate for 6 Months: the AMBITION Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graeme Jones ◽  
Thomas Wallace ◽  
Matthew J. McIntosh ◽  
Laura Brockwell ◽  
Juan J. Gómez-Reino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Serious Infection ◽  
Tocilizumab Monotherapy ◽  
Safety Signals

Objective.To report on the 5-year efficacy and safety results of the AMBITION (Actemra versus Methotrexate double-Blind Investigative Trial In mONotherapy) monotherapy study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00109408, NCT00720798).Methods.Patients with rheumatoid arthritis for whom biologics had not failed or who did not discontinue methotrexate because of lack of efficacy or tolerability were followed up for 5 years to assess the efficacy and serious adverse events (SAE) of tocilizumab (TCZ) monotherapy.Results.Longterm efficacy results showed that efficacy was maintained or improved for up to 264 weeks in patients receiving TCZ monotherapy. Serious infection was the most frequent SAE; no new safety signals were reported.Conclusion.Longterm monotherapy with TCZ demonstrated continuing efficacy and safety.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Baricitinib in Japanese Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Background Methotrexate Therapy: A 12-week, Double-blind, Randomized Placebo-controlled Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 504-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiya Tanaka ◽  
Kahaku Emoto ◽  
Zhihong Cai ◽  
Takehiro Aoki ◽  
Douglas Schlichting ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Active Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Link Type

Objective.To evaluate efficacy and safety, baricitinib [Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2 inhibitor] was compared with placebo in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite background treatment with methotrexate (MTX).Methods.This was a phase IIB, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01469013). Patients had moderate to severe active adult-onset RA despite stable treatment with MTX. Patients (n = 145) were randomized in a 2:1:1:1:1 ratio to placebo or 1 mg, 2 mg, 4 mg, or 8 mg oral baricitinib daily for 12 weeks. The primary analysis compared the combined 4/8-mg dose groups with placebo for the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response rate at 12 weeks. Other outcomes included additional measures of disease activity, physical function, laboratory abnormalities, and adverse events.Results.A significantly higher proportion of patients in the combined 4/8-mg baricitinib group (37/48, 77%) compared with the placebo group (15/49, 31%) had at least an ACR20 response after 12 weeks of treatment (p < 0.001). Significant improvements in disease activity, remission, and physical function were observed as early as Week 2 of treatment with baricitinib, particularly with daily doses of ≥ 4 mg. Only 1 patient receiving baricitinib discontinued because of an adverse event. Adverse event rates with baricitinib doses ≤ 4 mg daily were similar to placebo, but there was a higher incidence of adverse events and laboratory abnormalities in the 8-mg group.Conclusion.In this phase II study, baricitinib was well tolerated and rapidly improved the signs, symptoms, and physical function of Japanese patients with active RA, supporting continued development of baricitinib (clinicaltrials.govNCT01469013).

scholarly journals Olokizumab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin 6, in combination with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis inadequately controlled by methotrexate: efficacy and safety results of a randomised controlled phase III study

2021 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2021-219876
Author(s):  
Evgeniy Nasonov ◽  
Saeed Fatenejad ◽  
Eugen Feist ◽  
Mariana Ivanova ◽  
Elena Korneva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Acr20 Response

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of olokizumab (OKZ) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate (MTX).MethodsIn this 24-week multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, patients were randomised 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneously administered OKZ 64 mg once every 2 weeks, OKZ 64 mg once every 4 weeks, or placebo plus MTX. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response at week 12. The secondary efficacy endpoints included percentage of subjects achieving Disease Activity Score 28-joint count based on C reactive protein <3.2, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index at week 12, ACR50 response and Clinical Disease Activity Index ≤2.8 at week 24. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed throughout the study.ResultsA total of 428 patients were randomised. ACR20 responses were more frequent with OKZ every 2 weeks (63.6%) and OKZ every 4 weeks (70.4%) than placebo (25.9%) (p<0.0001 for both comparisons). There were significant differences in all secondary efficacy endpoints between OKZ-treated arms and placebo. Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were reported by more patients in the OKZ groups compared with placebo. Infections were the most common TESAEs. No subjects developed neutralising antidrug antibodies.ConclusionsTreatment with OKZ was associated with significant improvement in signs, symptoms and physical function of rheumatoid arthritis without discernible differences between the two regimens. Safety was as expected for this class of agents. Low immunogenicity was observed.Trial registration numberNCT02760368.

scholarly journals Subcutaneous Abatacept for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: Longterm Data from the ACQUIRE Trial

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 629-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark C. Genovese ◽  
César Pacheco Tena ◽  
Arturo Covarrubias ◽  
Gustavo Leon ◽  
Eduardo Mysler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Link Type

Objective.Assess longterm tolerability, safety, and efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) abatacept (ABA) in methotrexate-refractory patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods.The phase III, multinational Abatacept Comparison of Sub[QU]cutaneous Versus Intravenous in Inadequate Responders to MethotrexatE (ACQUIRE) trial comprised a 6-month, randomized, double-blind (DB) period, in which patients received intravenous (IV) or SC ABA, plus MTX, followed by an open-label, longterm extension (LTE), in which patients received SC ABA, 125 mg/week. Safety and efficacy from the LTE (∼3.5 yrs of exposure) are reported.Results.Patients who completed the DB period (1372/1385, 99.1%) entered the LTE; 1134 patients (82.7%) kept taking the treatment at time of reporting. Mean (SD) was 31.9 months (6.8); median (range) exposure was 33.0 (8–44) months. Patients entering the LTE had longstanding, moderate-to-severe disease [mean 7.6 (7.9) yrs and DAS28 (C-reactive protein) 6.2 (0.9)]. Incidence rates (events/100 patient-yrs) were reported for serious adverse events (8.76, 95% CI 7.71, 9.95), infections (44.80, 95% CI 41.76, 48.01), serious infections (1.72, 95% CI 1.30, 2.27), malignancies (1.19, 95% CI 0.86, 1.66), and autoimmune events (1.31, 95% CI 0.95, 1.79). Twenty-seven patients (2%) experienced injection-site reactions; all except 1 were mild. American College of Rheumatology 20, 50, and 70 responses achieved during the DB period were maintained through the LTE, and on Day 981 were 80.2% (95% CI 77.2, 83.2), 63.5% (95% CI 58.2, 68.9), and 39.5% (95% CI 34.0, 44.9) for patients who kept taking SC ABA, and 80.0% (95% CI 77.0, 83.0), 63.2% (95% CI 57.8, 68.7), and 39.2% (95% CI 33.7, 44.7) for those who switched from IV to SC ABA.Conclusion.These findings support SC ABA as a well-tolerated and efficacious longterm treatment for patients with RA and inadequate response to MTX (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00559585).

Sertraline in the treatment of panic disorder

1998 ◽  
Vol 173 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter D. Londborg ◽  
Robert Wolkow ◽  
Ward T. Smith ◽  
Eugene Duboff ◽  
Donald England ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Panic Disorder ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
Panic Attacks ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Hamilton Anxiety Scale ◽  
Higher Doses ◽  
Clinical Global Impression Improvement

BackgroundThis study compared the efficacy and safety of sertraline to placebo in treating panic disorder.Method178 out-patients with panic disorder who exhibited at least four panic attacks during the four weeks prior to screening and three during the two weeks of lead-in were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with sertraline (50, 100 or 200 mg) or placebo.ResultsSertraline was superior to placebo in reducing the number of panic attacks, situational attacks, unexpected attacks, limited symptom attacks, and time spent worrying (all P < 0.01) and the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (P < 0.05), although Clinical Global Impression (Improvement) did not significantly differentiate groups at 12 weeks and at end-point. No serious adverse events were associated with sertraline. No dose relationship was found for adverse events; overall drop-out rates were not different for sertraline or placebo, although more sertraline-treated subjects discontinued for adverse events, typically early in the study. Only dry mouth and ejaculation failure (primarily ejaculation delay) were associated significantly with sertraline. Conclusions Sertraline was effective and safe in reducing panic attacks. Higher doses were no more effective than the 50 mg dose.

Effect on efficacy and safety trial outcomes of also enrolling patients on ongoing glucocorticoid therapy in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials of tocilizumab or adalimumab or methotrexate monotherapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 460-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Safy-Khan ◽  
Johannes W G Jacobs ◽  
Maria J H de Hair ◽  
Paco M J Welsing ◽  
Michael D Edwardes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Joint Damage ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Safety Outcomes ◽  
Trial Outcomes

BackgroundIn rheumatoid arthritis (RA) trials, inclusion of patients on background treatment with glucocorticoids (GCs) might impact efficacy and safety outcomes.ObjectivesTo determine if inclusion of patients on background GC use influenced efficacy and safety outcomes of RA randomised clinical trials on initiation of tocilizumab (TCZ) or adalimumab (ADA) or methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy.MethodsData of four double-blind RA randomised controlled trials (AMBITION, ACT-RAY, ADACTA and FUNCTION) with in total four TCZ, one ADA and two MTX monotherapy arms were analysed. Analyses of covariance of changes from baseline to week 24 in efficacy endpoints and radiographic progression up to week 104 were performed, correcting for relevant covariates. Incidence rates of serious adverse events (SAEs) were assessed.ResultsNo statistically significant differences were found in efficacy parameters between background GC users and non-GC users, except for less radiographic progression associated with GC usage in one MTX arm. SAE rates were not statistically significantly different between GC users and non-GC users in the treatment arms.ConclusionNo effect of including patients on background GC treatment on efficacy and safety trial outcomes was found, with the exception of reduced radiological joint damage in one MTX arm.

scholarly journals Duloxetine in the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence

2005 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin C Michel ◽  
Matthias Oelke
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Stress Urinary Incontinence ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Striated Muscle ◽  
Bladder Capacity ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Cytochrome P450 1A2 ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Urethral Striated Muscle

This manuscript reviews the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of duloxetine and its efficacy and safety in women with stress urinary incontinence. Duloxetine is a selective inhibitor of neuronal serotonin and norepinephrine uptake which increases urethral striated muscle activity and bladder capacity. Duloxetine is readily absorbed and extensively metabolized; cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) inhibiting drugs can markedly increase duloxetine exposure. The clinical efficacy of duloxetine has consistently been demonstrated in several randomized, double-blind studies in women with moderate-to-severe stress urinary incontinence, but the additional benefit relative to placebo was moderate. Duloxetine treatment is frequently associated with adverse events such as nausea, dry mouth, fatigue, insomnia and constipation, but serious adverse events are rare. Therefore, duloxetine appears suitable for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

scholarly journals P.027 Efficacy and Safety of Eptinezumab Initiated During a Migraine Attack: Results from the RELIEF Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 48 (s3) ◽  
pp. S27-S28
Author(s):  
PK Winner ◽  
P McAllister ◽  
G Chakhava ◽  
J Ailani ◽  
L Mehta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Migraine Attack ◽  
Rapid Onset ◽  
Migraine Treatment ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Bothersome Symptom ◽  
Post Infusion ◽  
Headache Pain

Background: Eptinezumab is approved for migraine prevention, with demonstrated rapid onset of preventive benefit. RELIEF evaluated the efficacy and safety of eptinezumab initiated during a migraine attack. Methods: RELIEF (NCT04152083; parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled) randomized adults with migraine (4-15d/mo in 3mo prior to screening) to eptinezumab 100mg or placebo, administered IV within 1-6h of qualifying migraine onset. Co-primary efficacy endpoints were time to headache pain freedom and time to absence of most bothersome symptom (MBS). Results: Eptinezumab (n=238) compared with placebo (n=242) achieved significantly faster headache pain freedom (median 4h vs 9h; hazard ratio=1.54, P=0.0006) and absence of MBS (2h vs 3h; 1.75, P<0.0001). At 2h, 23.5% and 12.0% (P=0.0009) of eptinezumab-treated and placebo patients, respectively, reported headache pain freedom, and 55.5% and 35.8% (P<0.0001) reported absence of MBS. Significantly fewer eptinezumab-treated patients used rescue medication within 24h (31.5% vs 59.9%; P<0.0001). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 10.9% eptinezumab-treated and 10.3% placebo patients; no serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions: Infusion of the preventive migraine treatment, eptinezumab, during a migraine resulted in rapid and sustained freedom from headache pain and MBS vs placebo, starting 2h post-infusion, decreasing need for acute medication within 24h post-infusion. No notable safety findings were identified.

scholarly journals Longterm Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Abatacept in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: 5-year Results from a Phase IIIb Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (8) ◽  
pp. 1085-1092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark C. Genovese ◽  
César Pacheco-Tena ◽  
Arturo Covarrubias ◽  
Gustavo Leon ◽  
Eduardo Mysler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Multinational Trial ◽  
Serious Infection ◽  
Longterm Treatment ◽  
Phase Iiib ◽  
Inadequate Responders

Objective.To assess 5-year safety, tolerability, and efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) abatacept (ABA) in methotrexate (MTX)-refractory patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods.The Abatacept Comparison of sub[QU]cutaneous versus intravenous in Inadequate Responders to methotrexatE (ACQUIRE) phase IIIb, randomized, double-dummy, multinational trial compared efficacy and safety of SC and intravenous (IV) ABA in patients with RA. In the initial 6-month double-blind (DB) period, patients received IV or SC ABA, plus MTX, and in the subsequent open-label longterm extension (LTE) period, all patients received SC ABA (125 mg/wk). The final 5-year safety, tolerability, and efficacy analyses are reported.Results.Of 1385 patients who completed the DB period, 1372 entered LTE and 945 (68.8%) completed ≥ 5 years of treatment. During LTE, 97 (7.1%) patients discontinued treatment because of an adverse event (AE). Incidence rate (IR; event/100 patient-yrs of exposure; based on LTE data, 95% CI) for AE of interest were the following: serious AE 7.73 (6.96–8.58), infection 38.60 (36.24–41.12), serious infection 1.68 (1.35–2.07), malignancies 1.09 (0.84–1.42), and autoimmune disorders 1.33 (1.05–1.69), and were stable over time. No association between immunogenicity and either worsening of ABA safety or loss of efficacy was noted. Efficacy in the LTE was consistent with the DB period and was maintained to the end of the study.Conclusion.These 5-year data establish that SC ABA (125 mg/wk) has a consistent safety profile and durable efficacy for longterm treatment of patients with RA who had an inadequate response to MTX.

Efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim compared with pegfilgrastim in patients with breast cancer who are receiving chemotherapy.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19587-e19587
Author(s):  
Igor Bondarenko ◽  
Oleg Gladkov ◽  
Reiner Elaesser ◽  
Anton Buchner ◽  
Peter Bias
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Severe Neutropenia ◽  
Study Medication ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Increased Risk

e19587 Background: Cancer chemotherapy frequently causes neutropenia, leading to an increased risk of infections and delays in subsequent chemotherapy treatments. Pegfilgrastim is a pegylated recombinant form of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) that extends the half-life and requires less frequent dosing than nonpegylated G-CSF. Lipegfilgrastim is a glycosylated and pegylated G-CSF. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim in chemotherapy-naïve patients with breast cancer who are candidates to receive docetaxel/doxorubicin. Methods: In this double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, noninferiority trial, patients with high-risk stage II, III, or IV breast cancer and an absolute neutrophil count ≥1.5x109 cells/L were randomly assigned to lipegfilgrastim 6 mg (n=101) or pegfilgrastim 6 mg (n=101). Study medication was injected subcutaneously on day 2 of the chemotherapy cycle (4 cycles maximum). Primary efficacy endpoint was the duration of severe neutropenia (days with an absolute neutropenia count <0.5x109 cells/L) during cycle 1. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of febrile neutropenia. Efficacy analysis population included patients who were randomized but did not have major protocol violations. Results: Overall, 37%, 46%, and 17% of patients had stage II, III, and IV breast cancer, respectively. The mean duration of severe neutropenia in cycle 1 was 0.7 days in the lipegfilgrastim group and 0.8 days in the pegfilgrastim group (poisson regression least squares mean [95% CI] -0.218 [-0.498 to 0.062]). 56% and 49%, respectively, did not experience severe neutropenia in cycle 1. Three patients experienced febrile neutropenia; all were in the pegfilgrastim group during cycle 1. 28% of patients in the lipegfilgrastim group and 26% in the pegfilgrastim group had adverse events that the investigator considered to be related to study medication. Three and 7 patients, respectively had serious adverse events. Conclusions: The results of this study confirm that the efficacy of lipegfilgrastim is comparable with pegfilgrastim. No unexpected safety events were observed.

scholarly journals Tocilizumab in early progressive rheumatoid arthritis: FUNCTION, a randomised controlled trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 75 (6) ◽  
pp. 1081-1091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerd R Burmester ◽  
William F Rigby ◽  
Ronald F van Vollenhoven ◽  
Jonathan Kay ◽  
Andrea Rubbert-Roth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Randomised Controlled

ObjectivesThe efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ), an anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody, has not previously been evaluated in a population consisting exclusively of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsIn a double-blind randomised controlled trial (FUNCTION), 1162 methotrexate (MTX)-naive patients with early progressive RA were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to one of four treatment groups: 4 mg/kg TCZ+MTX, 8 mg/kg TCZ+MTX, 8 mg/kg TCZ+placebo and placebo+MTX (comparator group). The primary outcome was remission according to Disease Activity Score using 28 joints (DAS28–erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) <2.6) at week 24. Radiographic and physical function outcomes were also evaluated. We report results through week 52.ResultsThe intent-to-treat population included 1157 patients. Significantly more patients receiving 8 mg/kg TCZ+MTX and 8 mg/kg TCZ+placebo than receiving placebo+MTX achieved DAS28-ESR remission at week 24 (45% and 39% vs 15%; p<0.0001). The 8 mg/kg TCZ+MTX group also achieved significantly greater improvement in radiographic disease progression and physical function at week 52 than did patients treated with placebo+MTX (mean change from baseline in van der Heijde–modified total Sharp score, 0.08 vs 1.14 (p=0.0001); mean reduction in Health Assessment Disability Index, −0.81 vs −0.64 (p=0.0024)). In addition, the 8 mg/kg TCZ+placebo and 4 mg/kg TCZ+MTX groups demonstrated clinical efficacy that was at least as effective as MTX for these key secondary endpoints. Serious adverse events were similar among treatment groups. Adverse events resulting in premature withdrawal occurred in 20% of patients in the 8 mg/kg TCZ+MTX group.ConclusionsTCZ is effective in combination with MTX and as monotherapy for the treatment of patients with early RA.Trial registration numberClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01007435

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document