The Benefits of an E-Business Performance Measurement System

Author(s):  
David Barnes ◽  
Matthew Hinton

This chapter investigates how organizations have been adapting their performance measurement practices in response to their adoption of e-business in their business operations. It aims to identify the features and benefits of an effective e-business performance measurement system. Twelve organizations known to have had some success in developing performance measurement systems suitable for the online environment were studied. The researchers found that these organizations adopted an incremental rather than a radical approach to changing their performance measurement system for e-business, thereby avoiding the costs and disruption associated with the introduction of more complex performance metrics. Secondly, they eschewed the use of best practice recipes (such as the balanced scorecard). The study concludes that although these results may be at odds with the prescriptive generic performance measurement literature, they may be appropriate for the current state of development of e-business.

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 216-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Uturytė-Vrubliauskienė

Despite the significant growth of information technologies investments, evidence of their influence on organization performance remains inconclusive. Nowadays it is very important to realize whether expected economic benefits of information technologies investments are being recognized in organizations. Currently organizations can no longer afford basically to lose their money in e-business initiatives without developing and using suitable metrics to measure the effectiveness of such investments and to find out the relationship between e-business and organization performance. The study describes research aimed at determining the exact nature of such e-business performance measurement systems. The basic objective of this study is to discover performance measurement system for evaluating the efficiency of e-business solutions. Santrauka Svarbiausias šiuolaikinės organizacijos tikslas – didinti verslo vertę sėkmingai taikant konkurencingas priemones. Dėl to organizacijos yra priverstos ieškoti alternatyvių būdų, kaip spręsti verslo problemas. Dabartinėje visuomenėje, vykstant sparčiai technologijų kaitai ir globalizacijos procesui, verslas ir informacinės technologijos yra neatsiejami. Organizacijos, norėdamos tinkamai valdyti duomenis, keistis jais su partneriais ieško įvairių informacinių technologijų sprendimų. Organizacijų investicijos į informacines technologijas per pastaruosius du dešimtmečius auga labai stipriai. Tačiau sudėtinga įvertinti, kokią įtaką verslo efektyvumui turi diegiamos ir naudojamos informacinės technologijos. Todėl pasaulinės konkurencinės rinkos sąlygomis veiklos vertinimas tampa svarbia ekonomine problema. Sėkmingą verslą garantuoja informacija apie kiekvieno produkto ar vartotojo pelningumą ir atskirų padalinių veiklos efektyvumą. Mokslinio tyrimo rezultatai rodo, kad trūksta galimybių įvertinti verslo veiksmingumą. Pagrindinis šio straipsnio tikslas – veiksmingumo matavimo sistemos paieškos, leidžiančios įvertinti elektroninio verslo sprendimų našumą. Atskleidžiant poreikį kurti ir diegti tokias sistemas organizacijose, įrodant, kad veiksmingumo sistemos, taikomos šiuo metu, netinka taikyti organizacijoms, jos turi būti adaptuotos ir gebėti įvertinti informacinių technologijų įtaką veiklos našumui.


Author(s):  
Wim Van Grembergen ◽  
Isabelle Amelinckx

The Balanced Scorecard (BSC) initially developed by Kaplan and Norton is a performance measurement system that supplements traditional financial measures with the criteria that measure performance from three additional perspectives: customer perspective, internal business perspective, and innovation and learning perspective. In recent years, the Balanced Scorecard has been applied to information technology in order to ensure that IT is fairly evaluated. The proposed methodology can also be applied to e-business initiatives. In this chapter, it is illustrated how the BSC can be used to measure and manage e-business initiatives. A generic e-business Balanced Scorecard is proposed and its development and implementation is discussed.


2002 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 181-187
Author(s):  
K. Johnson

Performance measurement can be an effective tool in driving organization improvement to enable your utility to become more competitive, or improve customer satisfaction. WERF Project #99-WWF-7, Developing and Implementing a Performance Measurement System, is developing performance measurement systems by investigating a number of “best practices” in other industries and implementing selected practices at various water/wastewater utilities nationwide to determine how these practices can be adapted and applied. This joint WERF/AWWARF research project has been underway since mid-1999 to provide methods and tools that enable the utility to develop and implement a performance measurement system based on a demonstrated, proven approach. The Volume I Report summarizes the secondary research and project approach. Well designed, properly implemented performance measurement systems can enable utilities to achieve new levels of performance in terms of efficiency, quality, and effectiveness. Interest in performance measurement is increasing in all competitive businesses and industries today, and has been advanced through concepts such as the Balanced Scorecard. Utilities can employ these same concepts and learn “best practices” from other industries' experiences. While a performance measurement system alone does not improve performance or make a utility competitive, when combined with an appropriate business strategy and performance improvement initiatives, it can drive a cycle of change. A successful performance measurement system combines a holistic approach around improved business practices and effective human/organizational strategies in addition to actual performance information for operational decision-making.


2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guilherme Francisco Frederico ◽  
Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes ◽  
Anil Kumar ◽  
Vikas Kumar

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present a theoretical approach based on the balanced scorecard (BSC) with regard to performance measurement – PM in supply chains for the Industry 4.0 era.Design/methodology/approachThis paper combines the literature of PM and specifically the BSC with the literature related to the dimensions of supply chain in the context of Industry 4.0.FindingsDimensions extracted from the literature based on supply chains within the context of Industry 4.0 showed a strong alignment with the four perspectives of the BSC, which make it suitable to be considered as a performance measurement system (PMS) for supply chains in this new context.Research limitations/implicationsFrom theoretical perspective, this study contributes to the limited literature on PM for supply chains in Industry 4.0 era. The study proposes a supply chain 4.0 Scorecard and strongly support researchers to conduct future empirical researches in order to get a deeper understanding about PM in supply chains in the Industry 4.0 era. As limitations, the theoretical framework proposed needs further empirical research in other to validate it and obtain new insights over the investigation conducted and presented into this paper.Practical implicationsPractitioners can use this study as a guide to develop more effective performance measurement systems – PMSs in their organizations.Originality/valueThis research is unique as it addresses a significant knowledge gap related to PM in supply chains in the Industry 4.0 era. It brings a significant contribution in terms of understanding how to measure performance in supply chains in this new era.


2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Bryant ◽  
Denise A. Jones ◽  
Sally K. Widener

There has been an emphasis in recent years on understanding how value is created within the firm. To understand what drives value, managers must have in place performance measurement systems designed to capture information on all aspects of the business, not just the financial results. Many firms are implementing a Balanced Scorecard (BSC) performance measurement system that tracks measures across four hierarchical perspectives: learning and growth, internal business processes, customer, and financial perspectives. Although BSCs should ideally be tailored to each firm's unique strategy, evidence shows that managers tend to rely on generic measures, particularly as measures of the outcome of each perspective. We use cross-sectional data on seven archival measures from 125 firms over a five-year period to proxy for typical outcome measures of the four BSC perspectives. We find that a model that allows each outcome measure to be associated with outcome measures in all higherlevel BSC perspectives captures the value-creation process better than a relatively simple model that allows each measure to be a driver of only the next perspective in the BSC hierarchy. We also find differences in the relations among performance measures when firms implement a performance measurement system that contains both financial and nonfinancial measures versus one that relies solely on financial measures.


2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clara Xiaoling Chen

ABSTRACT The Campbell, Datar, Kulp, and Narayanan (2015; hereafter, CDKN) study empirically investigates how the quality of a firm's business strategy can be tested and validated using statistical analysis of the firm's internal performance measurement system. Using data from the balanced scorecard of a convenience store chain, their study provides empirical evidence that the company's internal performance measures reveal timely information about problems with the strategy and can help identify where and why the strategy failed. In this brief discussion of the study, I first summarize the major strengths of their study, then discuss my concerns and comments, and finally point out some potential extensions. In summary, CDKN's study is important in that it makes significant contributions to several streams of literature. CDKN have inspired follow-up studies on the use of performance measurement systems to evaluate strategy and the testing of business models, and has opened up exciting opportunities for future research.


2002 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 543-557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesley O. Hagood ◽  
Lee Friedman

One of the most significant challenges faced by public personnel executives today is measuring the performance of their human resources information system (HRIS) in order to justify the value-added contribution of the HRIS to accomplishing the organization's mission. Over the last year, the CIA developed and implemented a balanced scorecard-based performance measurement system for its HRIS to justify cost and highlight the effectiveness of the system. The HRIS Program Director, Patricia Minard, used the Kaplan-Norton balanced scorecard framework to identify and align the organization's goals, objectives, and measures; to gather baseline data to measure against established measurement targets; and to measure and demonstrate the value-added contribution of the HRIS.


Author(s):  
Gayuh Mukti Rahmatullah ◽  
Amak Mohamad Yaqoub

Indonesia is the largest archipelago in the world which of course, has many ports as a place reliance ship. Ports in Indonesia is always crowded by various ship activities. Such vessels require fossil fuels as the material preparation to continue the journey. This has become a business opportunity for PT. Pelayaran Hub Maritim Indonesia as a company engaged in fuel distribution. The operational activities of PT. Pelayaran Hub Maritim Indonesia has made performance measurement yet of the financial aspects only. Therefore, this study aims to design a performance measurement system for companies based on four perspectives of the balanced scorecard is a financial perspective, a marketing perspective, internal business process perspective and learning and growth perspective. This study uses a qualitative method research approach to the type of research in the form of action research case study, the data used is primary data. Data from this study obtained by interviewing the informant is determined based on the balanced scorecard perspectives. Results of this research is a performance measurement system and the weighting of each of the key performance indicators with paired comparison method to get the level of importance of each strategic objective.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document