Fiscally Responsible Businesses as a Result of COVID-19 Pandemic Shock

2022 ◽  
pp. 161-192
Author(s):  
Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu ◽  
Jarmila Duháček Šebestová

The COVID-19 pandemic and COVID-19 crisis represent impressive motivating forces for advancement, change, evolution, and improvement at a global level. The study focuses on the OECD latest developments in international tax reform work on base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) in the courageous attempt to promote novel global initiatives for responsible tax and to support ambitious global actions for responsible tax principles. The results show the need to establish fiscally responsible businesses as a result of COVID-19 pandemic shock, thus taking back control of countries' tax systems by putting an end to corporate tax evasion and tax havens. The findings address the importance of being in line with tax principles, encouraging responsible financial transactions and behaviors.

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 121-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Zucman

This article attempts to estimate the magnitude of corporate tax avoidance and personal tax evasion through offshore tax havens. US corporations book 20 percent of their profits in tax havens, a tenfold increase since the 1980; their effective tax rate has declined from 30 to 20 percent over the last 15 years, and about two-thirds of this decline can be attributed to increased international tax avoidance. Globally, 8 percent of the world's personal financial wealth is held offshore, costing more than $200 billion to governments every year. Despite ambitious policy initiatives, profit shifting to tax havens and offshore wealth are rising. I discuss the recent proposals made to address these issues, and I argue that the main objective should be to create a world financial registry.


Author(s):  
Nessa Ní Chasaide

Abstract The phenomenon of financialization has given rise to new modes of corporate profit accumulation. This includes the creation of global channels for corporate tax avoidance that are embedded in the operations of global firms. Due to a lack of transparency by multinational companies (MNCs), these channels, and their tax implications, are not easily identified or understood. This article sets out the workings of the ‘global tax games’ which operate via intracompany financial transactions alongside the reorganization of the functions of MNCs. The article highlights the consequences for communities of corporate tax avoidance, whereby corporate shareholders and tax haven states profit at the expense of other states and communities. Thus, people living in tax havens, often unknowingly, benefit from tax revenues that should have been paid elsewhere. It offers a case study of Ireland, an understudied case, but which is repeatedly identified as a key node in the global network of corporate tax avoidance. It emphasizes that, in the case of Ireland, a precursor to a potential alternative development path is the acknowledgement of its problematic role.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rasmus Corlin Christensen

In the wake of the Great Recession, international corporate taxation has risen to the top of the global political agenda. With states seeking to shore up national fiscal systems, the OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project has emerged as the key response in this regard. Among 15 action points, Action 13 on corporate tax transparency has been particularly prominent. By shaping the feasibility of corporate tax strategies and the information resources available to national tax authorities, the Action 13 policy recommendations will fundamentally reconfigure the context of corporate tax behaviour and global wealth chains, i.e. strategies and structures for wealth creation and protection in the global economy. How did these new critical rules come about? Unfortunately, little is known about the micro-level process, dynamics and actors of the BEPS project. This paper provides an original case study of the changing international tax system and the regulatory context of global wealth chains, based on an investigation of the professionals engaged in global tax reform. Drawing on observations, interviews and sequence analysis of professional careers, it studies the dynamics of the professional policy environment and identifies distinct career and knowledge trends. The paper shows that professional competition for prestige and knowledge played a central role in the complex, transnational policy process. Operating within a technical policy environment, far removed from high-level politics, professionals seeking to make their mark on new standards for corporate tax transparency mobilised expertise and network capital, shaping what could be discussed, the criteria for accepted arguments, and who was listened to in the policy process, thus critically affecting the final policy outcomes.


Author(s):  
Leyla Ates ◽  
Alex Cobham ◽  
Moran Harari ◽  
Petr Janský ◽  
Markus Meinzer ◽  
...  

In this chapter, we set out a new approach to the geography of profit shifting, based on a range of objectively verifiable criteria. These are combined in the Corporate Tax Haven Index, published for the first time in 2019. We present the technical argument for the index as a meaningful representation of the global distribution of the risks of corporate tax abuse and explore the new geography that emerges. Our findings show the UK’s dominant responsibility for corporate tax avoidance risks and the colonial roots of many exploitative double tax treaties. We discuss the index’s political implications for the immediate process of international tax reform, and for the longer-term prospects for global governance in this area. Greater clarity about the geography of profit shifting is likely to support growing demands for redistribution not only of taxing rights but also of decision-making power in the global architecture for tax governance.


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akanksha Jalan ◽  
R. Vaidyanathan

Purpose This paper is an effort to demystify tax havens – what they mean, what they offer and why they are harmful. It offers a detailed analysis of abusive tax planning by multinational corporations, involving the use of tax havens, shedding light on how corporations use “egregious” tax-sheltering techniques right from their incorporation to avoid payment of income taxes. The paper also discusses global efforts against the phenomenon and policy recommendations. Design/methodology/approach The paper brings together definitions from various sources to accurately define and identify tax haven economies. The key contribution of the paper is to diagrammatically explain the use of tax havens by MNCs right from the time they are incorporated. It explains how every big and small corporate decision is motivated by the desire to save taxes and how tax havens come in handy for such corporations. Findings This paper finds that base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) is a pervasive phenomenon, largely due to the suppliers of tax haven operations. Here, corporate decisions are divided into strategic and operational and further subdivided into investing, operating and financing activities, and provide real-life corporate examples of how tax havens fit into almost every corporate decision. This is the key contribution of the paper. Research limitations/implications This is a review paper that sums up knowledge about tax havens and their use by MNCs. It does not, however, use empirical data to corroborate its findings. It would be interesting to see empirically whether MNCs with greater tax haven operations actually have lower effective tax rates. Practical implications The paper can provide a framework for designing tax policies in a manner that geographical arbitrage can be minimized. It can enable formulation of the necessary incentive structures in the form of penalties, rewards and the like for both the users and providers of tax haven services to curb massive base and profit shifting out of high-tax countries. Social implications The paper is one small step in the direction of bringing about equality in tax payments, i.e. to align real tax systems with the canon of equality that Adam Smith once dreamt of. Taxes should be progressive in nature, implying that the amount of taxes paid should increase with one’s income. However, with the advent of offshore financial centres and egregious tax planning techniques, only the smaller corporations and middle-class individuals end up paying taxes, while the rich and bigger corporations get away easily. Originality/value The paper explores in detail the manner in which MNCs use, rather exploit, regulatory loopholes in tax systems of different countries to save on tax payments. By shifting their tax base from one country to another, MNCs not only hamper Treasury collections but also breed disrespect for the global tax system. The paper can help in designing tax laws in tune with such corporate motives.


Subject Panama’s efforts to improve transparency. Significance On December 12, Oxfam released its list of the world’s worst corporate tax havens. Much to the surprise of the Panamanian press, Panama was not included. After a year of high-profile scandals linked to tax evasion and money laundering, the government is striving to improve transparency levels and clean up the country’s image, in an effort to maintain its position as an international banking centre. Impacts Panama will be one of Latin America’s fastest-expanding economies in 2017 despite the blows to its international image. The government will strive to ensure fast growth is not harmed by multilateral bodies that are monitoring Panama’s transparency efforts. It will also aim to uphold Panama’s attractiveness to multinational companies and banks, safeguarding its role as a strategic business hub.


2021 ◽  
pp. 176-196
Author(s):  
Frédéric Mérand

In addition to economic and financial affairs, Moscovici was in charge of taxation and customs union. In recent years, there have been growing calls for and initiatives to harmonize tax rules at the global level. Now, the day Juncker and Moscovici came to office, the EU was marred by tax scandals, notably in Juncker’s home country, Luxembourg. This chapter describes how the commissioner and his staff, alongside Competition commissioner Margarethe Vestager, forged an alliance with civil society groups and members of the European Parliament to adopt a series of new legislation against tax evasion, including a list of tax havens. They did so despite the need for unanimity in the Council and against the will of several member states such as the Netherlands. The chapter also recounts the Moscovici cabinet’s political role on two seemingly technical issues: the reform of the Value Added Tax code and the impact of Brexit on the customs union.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document