Effect of Shrub Planting on Runoff and Sediment under Simulated Rainfall

2012 ◽  
Vol 212-213 ◽  
pp. 141-144
Author(s):  
Pei Qing Xiao ◽  
Wen Yi Yao ◽  
Chang Gao Wang
Keyword(s):  
Shear Stress ◽  
Sediment Yield ◽  
Simulated Rainfall ◽  
Slope Gradient ◽  
Flow Shear ◽  
Sediment Yields ◽  
Hydraulic Mechanism ◽  
Flow Shear Stress ◽  
Sediment Reduction ◽  
Runoff And Sediment Yield

Effect of shrub on runoff and sediment yield and its hydraulic mechanism of shrub were studied under rainfall intensities of 45, 87 and 127mm/h with 20°slope gradient using simulated rainfall experiment. the results showed that average runoff rates ranged from 39.7 to 126.0 L/min for bare plots and 0.77 to 4.83 L/min for shrub plots, and the runoff rates from shrub plots were much less than from bare plots. Average sediment yields varied from 3636.7 to 9436.3 g/min for bare plots and from 28.0 to 421.6 g/min for shrub plots. The critical flow shear stress of 1.65 N/m2 on shrub slope and 0.861 N/m2 on bare slope were got under experiment condition. The sediment yield increased with the increase of flow shear stress. The experiment results are meaningful for quantifying runoff and sediment reduction and deepening soil erosion mechanical process also.

Effect of Grass on Reducing Runoff and Sediment and its Critical Flow Shear Stress

2014 ◽  
Vol 1010-1012 ◽  
pp. 1145-1148
Author(s):  
Pei Qing Xiao ◽  
Er Yang ◽  
Peng Jiao
Keyword(s):  
Shear Stress ◽  
Sediment Yield ◽  
Critical Flow ◽  
Slope Gradient ◽  
Flow Shear ◽  
Mechanical Process ◽  
Sediment Yields ◽  
Flow Shear Stress ◽  
Sediment Reduction ◽  
Runoff And Sediment Yield

Reduction effects of grass on runoff and sediment yield and its mechanical mechanism of grass was studied under rainfall intensities of 45, 87 and 127mm/h with 20°slope gradient using simulated rainfall experiment. the results showed that average runoff rates ranged from 39.7 to 126.0 L/min for bare plots and 0.34 to 6.22 L/min for grass plots, and the runoff rates from grass plots were much less than from bare plots. Average sediment yields varied from 3636.7 to 9436.3 g/min for bare plots and from 26.7 to 581.5 g/min for grass plots. The critical flow shear stress of 2.85 N/m2 on grass slope and 0.861 N/m2 on bare slope were got under experiment condition. The sediment yield increased with the increase of flow shear stress. The experiment results are meaningful for quantifying runoff and sediment reduction and deepening soil erosion mechanical process also.

Soil Erosion Process in Sloped Shrub Plots under Simulated Rainfall

2011 ◽  
Vol 347-353 ◽  
pp. 2094-2097 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pei Qing Xiao ◽  
Wen Yi Yao ◽  
Chang Gao Wang
Keyword(s):  
Soil Erosion ◽  
Sediment Yield ◽  
Rainfall Intensity ◽  
Infiltration Rate ◽  
Simulated Rainfall ◽  
Slope Gradient ◽  
Erosion Process ◽  
Infiltration Process ◽  
Negative Relation ◽  
Runoff And Sediment Yield

Runoff, sediment yield and infiltration process of shrub plots were studied under rainfall intensities of 45, 87 and 127 mm/h with 20° slope gradient using simulated rainfall experiment. The results showed that cumulative runoff and cumulative sediment yield of shrub plot had an obvious positive correlation with rainfall time. Under rainfall intensity of 45 mm/h, runoff and sediment yield of shrub plot kept a constant level. Under rainfall intensity of 87 mm/h, runoff kept a fluctuant increase, whereas sediment yield basically kept steady. Under rainfall intensity of 127 mm/h, runoff and sediment yield of shrub plot increased evidently due to the formation of erosion pits. Infiltration rate of shrub plot had a negative relation with runoff as well as sediment yield.

scholarly journals Relationships between Riparian Vegetation Pattern and the Hydraulic Characteristics of Upslope Runoff

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 2966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qinghe Zhao ◽  
Yifan Zhang ◽  
Shanshan Xu ◽  
Xiaoyu Ji ◽  
Shuoqian Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shear Stress ◽  
Vegetation Cover ◽  
Riparian Vegetation ◽  
Flow Resistance ◽  
Overland Flow ◽  
Vegetation Pattern ◽  
Hydraulic Characteristics ◽  
Slope Gradient ◽  
Flow Shear ◽  
Flow Shear Stress

Riparian vegetation plays a vital role in inhibiting soil and water loss, but few studies have quantified the relationships between vegetation spatial pattern and the hydraulic characteristics of upslope runoff. This study investigated how hydraulic characteristics (e.g., runoff coefficient, flow regime, flow resistance, and flow shear stress of overland flow) responded to differences in vegetation cover (15% and 30%), slope gradient (5°, 10°, 15°, and 20°), and vegetation pattern in the riparian zone along the lower Yellow River, China, based on landscape pattern analysis and a runoff scouring experiment with flow rates of 9 and 15 L/min and an experimental plot size of 1 m × 3 m. We found that runoff generation on shallow slopes was moderated by increasing vegetation cover, but that this moderating effect decreased on steeper slopes. The regime of overland flow switched from laminar and subcritical on the 5° slope (Fr = 0.56–0.87) to laminar and critical on the 10°, 15°, and 20° slopes (Fr = 1.02–2.18). Flow resistance increased with vegetation cover and flow rate and decreased with slope gradients, and it was larger on shallow slopes with high vegetation cover. Flow shear stress had a range of 1.42–3.55 N m−2, and it increased with increasing slope gradient, vegetation cover, and flow rate. The hydraulic characteristics of upslope runoff, especially flow resistance, were significantly related to vegetation pattern at both the landscape and class levels. Flow resistance was negatively related to patch density, and positively related to perimeter–area fractal dimension and connectance index. The influencing mechanism of landscape patterns on soil erosion processes is dependent on the landscape scale, since the relationships between flow resistance and some landscape pattern indices (aggregation index, effective mesh size, and splitting index) were opposite at the landscape level compared to the class level. We conclude that fragmented vegetation distributions reduce flow resistance, and that riparian vegetation could be managed to inhibit slope erosion by increasing flow resistance.

scholarly journals The Effect of Fluid Flow Shear Stress and Substrate Stiffness on Yes-Associated Protein (YAP) Activity and Osteogenesis in Murine Osteosarcoma Cells

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 3128
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Coughlin ◽  
Ali Sana ◽  
Kevin Voss ◽  
Abhilash Gadi ◽  
Upal Basu-Roy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shear Stress ◽  
Fluid Flow ◽  
Bone Cells ◽  
Bone Cancer ◽  
Substrate Stiffness ◽  
Flow Shear ◽  
Fluid Movement ◽  
Flow Shear Stress ◽  
Fluid Flow Shear Stress ◽  
New Treatments

Osteosarcoma (OS) is an aggressive bone cancer originating in the mesenchymal lineage. Prognosis for metastatic disease is poor, with a mortality rate of approximately 40%; OS is an aggressive disease for which new treatments are needed. All bone cells are sensitive to their mechanical/physical surroundings and changes in these surroundings can affect their behavior. However, it is not well understood how OS cells specifically respond to fluid movement, or substrate stiffness—two stimuli of relevance in the tumor microenvironment. We used cells from spontaneous OS tumors in a mouse engineered to have a bone-specific knockout of pRb-1 and p53 in the osteoblast lineage. We silenced Sox2 (which regulates YAP) and tested the effect of fluid flow shear stress (FFSS) and substrate stiffness on YAP expression/activity—which was significantly reduced by loss of Sox2, but that effect was reversed by FFSS but not by substrate stiffness. Osteogenic gene expression was also reduced in the absence of Sox2 but again this was reversed by FFSS and remained largely unaffected by substrate stiffness. Thus we described the effect of two distinct stimuli on the mechanosensory and osteogenic profiles of OS cells. Taken together, these data suggest that modulation of fluid movement through, or stiffness levels within, OS tumors could represent a novel consideration in the development of new treatments to prevent their progression.

Runoff and sediment yield from snowmelt and rainfall as influenced by forage type and grazing intensity

1998 ◽  
Vol 78 (4) ◽  
pp. 699-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. I. Gill ◽  
M. A. Naeth ◽  
D. S. Chanasyk ◽  
V. S. Baron
Keyword(s):  
Sediment Yield ◽  
Environmental Sustainability ◽  
Grazing Intensity ◽  
Annual Runoff ◽  
Rainfall Simulation ◽  
Sediment Yields ◽  
Natural Rainfall ◽  
Grazing Intensities ◽  
Grazing Systems ◽  
Runoff And Sediment Yield

Currently, there is interest in Western Canada in extending the grazing season using perennial and annual forages. Of greatest concern is the environmental sustainability of these grazing systems, with emphasis on their ability to withstand erosion. A study to examine the runoff and sediment yields of annual and perennial forages in central Alberta was initiated in 1994. Runoff and sediment yield were quantified under snowmelt and rainfall events for two seasons. Rainfall simulation was used to further examine runoff under growing season conditions. Four forage treatments (two annuals: triticale and a barley/triticale mixture and two perennials: smooth bromegrass and meadow bromegrass) and three grazing intensities (light, medium and heavy) were studied, each replicated four times. Total annual runoff was dominated by snowmelt. Generally runoff volumes, sediment yields, sediment ratios and runoff coefficients were all low. Bare ground increased with increasing grazing intensity and was significantly greater in annuals than perennials for all grazing intensities. Litter biomass decreased with increasing grazing intensity and was generally similar in all species for both years at heavy and medium grazing intensities. Results from the rainfall simulation corroborated those under natural rainfall conditions and generally indicated the sustainability of these grazing systems at this site. Key words: Forages, soil erosion, sustainability, rainfall simulation

Temporal gradient in shear-induced signaling pathway: involvement of MAP kinase, c-fos, and connexin43

2000 ◽  
Vol 278 (5) ◽  
pp. H1598-H1605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuping Bao ◽  
Craig B. Clark ◽  
John A. Frangos
Keyword(s):  
Shear Stress ◽  
Mrna Expression ◽  
Signaling Pathway ◽  
Steady Shear ◽  
Flow Shear ◽  
Temporal Gradient ◽  
Step Flow ◽  
Shear Component ◽  
Flow Shear Stress ◽  
Impulse Flow

The effect of a temporal gradient in shear and steady shear on the activity of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/ERK2), c- fos, and connexin43 (Cx43) in human endothelial cells was investigated. Three laminar flow profiles (16 dyn/cm2), including impulse flow (shear stress abruptly applied for 3 s), ramp flow (shear stress smoothly transitioned at flow onset), and step flow (shear stress abruptly applied at flow onset) were utilized. Relative to static controls, impulse flow stimulated the phosphorylation of ERK1/ERK2 8.5- to 7.5-fold, respectively at 10 min, as well as the mRNA expression of c- fos 51-fold at 30 min, and Cx43 8-fold at 90 min. These high levels of mRNA expression were sustained for at least 4 h. In contrast, ramp flow was unable to significantly induce gene expression and even inhibited the activation of ERK1/ERK2. Step flow, which contains both a sharp temporal gradient in shear stress and a steady shear component, elicited only moderate and transient responses, indicating the distinct role of these fluid shear stimuli in endothelial signal transduction. The specific inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase PD-98059 inhibited impulse flow-induced c -fos and Cx43 mRNA expression. Thus these findings implicate the involvement of ERK1/ERK2, c -fos, and Cx43 in the signaling pathway induced by the temporal gradient in shear.

Microfluidic models of physiological or pathological flow shear stress for cell biology, disease modeling and drug development

2019 ◽  
Vol 117 ◽  
pp. 186-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huaying Chen ◽  
Zhihang Yu ◽  
Siwei Bai ◽  
Huaxiu Lu ◽  
Dong Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shear Stress ◽  
Drug Development ◽  
Cell Biology ◽  
Disease Modeling ◽  
Flow Shear ◽  
Flow Shear Stress
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document