The Revision Requirements of China's Radiation Environment Monitoring Standard System

2013 ◽  
Vol 448-453 ◽  
pp. 353-358
Author(s):  
Wei Wei Lu ◽  
Hui Guo Yue ◽  
Zhi Lun Yuan ◽  
Zheng Wei Yu ◽  
Dong Hui Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Protection ◽  
Radiation Monitoring ◽  
Nuclear Industry ◽  
National Standards ◽  
Standard System ◽  
Radiation Environment ◽  
Environment Monitoring ◽  
Environmental Radiation ◽  
Industry Standards ◽  
Missing Items

In order to establish and improve the radiation environment monitoring standard system, to provide technical support for the radiation environment monitoring system, this work first retrieve the radiation environment monitoring standards, and clear the domestic status of the radiation environment monitoring standards. According to environmental Protection Department of the relevant documents and other relevant information, the radiation environment monitoring standards and methods have been accessed , to find the missing items and issues proposed revision of the system requirements. Summarizing radiation environment monitoring national standards, standards of environmental protection industry, the nuclear industry standard, there are 28 standard missing items need to the health industry standards, inspection and quarantine industry standards, a total of 145 of these standards of environmental radiation monitoring, radiation monitoring of pollution sources, emergency response and early warning and monitoring from a management and technology meet the basic needs of the radiation environment monitoring. Research found that the standards in the revised 57 and in the formulation of 47, develop. After the revision of China's standards system will be further improved. The radiation environment monitoring work will be further strengthened.

Current Issues of Providing the Personnel of the Radiation Hazardous Facilities with Personal Protection Equipment Complying with the Requirements and Working Conditions

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 33-36
Author(s):  
V. Rubcov ◽  
A. Trebuhin ◽  
A. Nefedov ◽  
E. Klochkova ◽  
I. Olenina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Working Conditions ◽  
Energy Use ◽  
Sense Organ ◽  
Nuclear Industry ◽  
Atomic Energy ◽  
National Standards ◽  
Personal Protection ◽  
Personal Protection Equipment ◽  
Regulatory Frameworks ◽  
Industry Standards

Purpose: The article covers issues related to the providing personal protection for the personnel of radiation hazardous facilities. Specific character of working conditions at the enterprises in the field of atomic energy use is caused by extremely high toxic level of radioactive substances and the fact that there is no human sense organ which can identify dangerous levels of radiation exposure. Establishment of mandatory requirements for manufacturing, identification and verification of personal protection equipment (PPE) in the field of atomic energy use is needed because using of low-quality PPE and PPE not complying with working conditions poses a risk for the health of workers. The article provides results of analysis of the regulatory frameworks, both current and under development, which set the requirements for PPE. Results: Since 2017 Rosatom is executing plans for development of series of industry standards specifying requirements for PPE in the field of atomic energy use and methods of their testing. More than 25 interstate and national standards on PPE were included in the Summary list of standardization documents in the field of atomic energy use. PPE was included in the list of products subject to mandatory certification and having requirements for safety assurance in the field of atomic energy use specified. Industry and national standards establishing requirements for PPE protecting from tritium, radioactive noble gases, radioactive iodine, high-toxic alpha-emitting radionuclides, as well as standards on methods of their testing are planned to be developed soon. Conclusion: The system of standardizing requirements for PPE in the field of atomic energy use created by, together with existing system of certification of PPE in the field of atomic energy use will help to increase effectiveness of personal protection of the personnel at radiation and chemical hazardous facilities in nuclear industry.

Current Issues of Providing the Personnel of the Radiation Hazardous Facilities with Personal Protection Equipment

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-28
Author(s):  
V. Rubcov ◽  
A. Trebuhin ◽  
A. Nefedov ◽  
E. Klochkova ◽  
I. Olenina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Working Conditions ◽  
Energy Use ◽  
Sense Organ ◽  
Nuclear Industry ◽  
Atomic Energy ◽  
National Standards ◽  
Personal Protection ◽  
Personal Protection Equipment ◽  
Regulatory Frameworks ◽  
Industry Standards

Purpose: The article covers issues related to the providing personal protection for the personnel of radiation hazardous facilities. Specific character of working conditions at the enterprises in the field of atomic energy use is caused by extremely high toxic level of radioactive substances and the fact that there is no human sense organ which can identify dangerous levels of radiation exposure. Establishment of mandatory requirements for manufacturing, identification and verification of personal protection equipment (PPE) in the field of atomic energy use is needed because using of low-quality PPE and PPE not complying with working conditions poses a risk for the health of workers. The article provides results of analysis of the regulatory frameworks, both current and under development, which set the requirements for PPE. Results: Since 2017 Rosatom is executing plans for development of series of industry standards specifying requirements for PPE in the field of atomic energy use and methods of their testing. More than 25 interstate and national standards on PPE were included in the Summary list of standardization documents in the field of atomic energy use. PPE was included in the list of products subject to mandatory certification and having requirements for safety assurance in the field of atomic energy use specified. Industry and national standards establishing requirements for PPE protecting from tritium, radioactive noble gases, radioactive iodine, high-toxic alpha-emitting radionuclides, as well as standards on methods of their testing are planned to be developed soon. Conclusion: The system of standardizing requirements for PPE in the field of atomic energy use being created, together with existing system of certification of PPE in the field of atomic energy use will help to increase effectiveness of personal protection of the personnel at radiation and chemical hazardous facilities in nuclear industry.

scholarly journals An IoT LoRaWAN Network for environmental radiation monitoring

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
L. Gallego Manzano ◽  
H. Boukabache ◽  
S. Danzeca N. Heracleous ◽  
F. Murtas ◽  
D. Perrin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Monitoring ◽  
Environmental Radiation

scholarly journals Mechanisms for Management of Environmental Protection in Europe

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 25-30
Author(s):  
Массеров ◽  
D. Messerov
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Management ◽  
European Union ◽  
Environmental Protection ◽  
Environmental Regulation ◽  
The State ◽  
Control Mechanisms ◽  
Environment Monitoring ◽  
Industrialized Countries ◽  
The European Union ◽  
State Of The Environment

The experience of the industrialized countries on the state of the environment monitoring convincing shows that their success in environmental regulation are mainly due to the use of modern environmental management methods. The experience of the European Union concerning the control mechanisms in the field of environmental protection and the possibility of its application in Russia are analyzed.

scholarly journals Separation Methods of TLD Dose Components for Environmental Radiation Monitoring.

1994 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 399-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yus R. AKHMAD ◽  
Yukimasa IKEBE ◽  
Michikuni SHIMO ◽  
Takao IIDA ◽  
Haruo OBAYASHI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Monitoring ◽  
Environmental Radiation

6. The European Union and the environment

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart Bell ◽  
Donald McGillivray ◽  
Ole W. Pedersen ◽  
Emma Lees ◽  
Elen Stokes
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Environmental Protection ◽  
Environmental Law ◽  
National Standards ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Law And Policy ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Different Sources ◽  
The Eu

This chapter provides a brief overview of how the EU shapes UK environmental law and policy. It begins by providing an introductory guide to EU law, outlining the key institutions of the EU, the different sources of EU law, and how EU law is made. The chapter then proceeds to look at the more substantive elements of EU law as they affect environmental protection, starting with the policy and constitutional bases for EU environmental law, and gives a flavour of the scope of EU environmental legislation, before considering the scope for national standards to exceed those set at EU level or to disrupt trade between the Member States. This is followed by a discussion of the challenges faced in making EU environmental law work, and then with some thoughts on the impact of Brexit and how this may shape UK environmental law.

scholarly journals Establishment of a low dose rate gamma ray calibration field for environmental radiation monitoring devices

2019 ◽  
Vol 186 (4) ◽  
pp. 538-538
Author(s):  
Munehiko KOWATARI ◽  
Hiroshi YOSHITOMI ◽  
Sho NISHINO ◽  
Yoshihiko TANIMURA ◽  
Tetsuya OHISHI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Rate ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Gamma Ray ◽  
Radiation Monitoring ◽  
Environmental Radiation ◽  
Low Dose Rate ◽  
Monitoring Devices

scholarly journals Can a comparison of clinical and deep space irradiation scenarios shed light on the radiation response of the brain?

2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (1115) ◽  
pp. 20200245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Limoli
Keyword(s):  
Occupational Exposures ◽  
Functional Change ◽  
Radiation Environment ◽  
Neurocognitive Deficits ◽  
Deep Space ◽  
Environmental Radiation ◽  
Cellular Targets ◽  
Inhibitory Circuits ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Brain

Not surprisingly, our knowledge of the impact of radiation on the brain has evolved considerably. Decades of work have struggled with identifying the critical cellular targets in the brain, the latency of functional change and understanding how irradiation alters the balance between excitatory and inhibitory circuits. Radiation-induced cell kill following clinical fractionation paradigms pointed to both stromal and parenchymal targets but also defined an exquisite sensitivity of neurogenic populations of newly born cells in the brain. It became more and more apparent too, that acute (days) events transpiring after exposure were poorly prognostic of the late (months-years) waves of radiation injury believed to underlie neurocognitive deficits. Much of these gaps in knowledge persisted as NASA became interested in how exposure to much different radiation types, doses and dose rates that characterize the space radiation environment might impair central nervous system functionality, with possibly negative implications for deep space travel. Now emerging evidence from researchers engaged in clinical, translational and environmental radiation sciences have begun to fill these gaps and have uncovered some surprising similarities in the response of the brain to seemingly disparate exposure scenarios. This article highlights many of the commonalities between the vastly different irradiation paradigms that distinguish clinical treatments from occupational exposures in deep space.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document