Background:The Emerging EULAR NETwork (EMEUNET), founded in 2009, aims to promote education, foster research collaborations and facilitate the integration of young researchers and rheumatologists within EULAR.Objectives:After 10 years, we aimed to interview our members to assess how EMEUNET is fulfilling its goals, understand if there are unmet needs and explore new ideas.Methods:In July 2019 a survey was circulated for 3 months among EMEUNET members via its social media channels. The survey contained 18 closed and 2 open items, in addition to general questions on age, job and country of origin and work.Results:Out of 124 total respondents, most completed all items (120/124) and only a minority had some missing items (4/124). A little over half of the respondents were female (n=69, 54.8%) and median age was 33y (range 25y-42y). Most respondents were born (n=109, 88.6%) and/or worked in Europe (n=114, 92.7%) (fig. 1), although there was also a representation from extra-European countries, which is in line with the general EMEUNET membership (https://emeunet.eular.org/map.cfm).Figure 1.Country of origin and where respondents work at the time of completing the EMEUNET VISE questionnaire.11 (9.1%) had been EMEUNET members for less than 2 years, 81 (66.9%) for 2-5years and 29 (24.0%) for more than 5 years.Figure 2 shows a clear link between the respondents’ perception of EMEUNET aim(s) and the actual aims of EMEUNET set out in our mission statement (https://emeunet.eular.org/mission_statement.cfm).Figure 2.The links between what participants would like to see as EMEUNET aims and the aims of EMEUNET as they are nowMost of the respondents got to know about EMEUNET through a friend/colleague in Rheumatology (n=67, 54.0%), at EULAR/ACR annual conferences (n=32, 25.8%), via social media (n=9, 7.3%), other international meeting (n=6, 4.8%), national Rheumatology meeting (n=6, 4.8%) or via the EMEUNETs country liaisons (n=4, 3.2%).29 respondents (24%) were part of the EMEUNET working group (WG), 43% (n=53) applied before to be part of the WG, 24% (n=29) never applied and 15% (n=19) did not know what the WG was. Most of the respondents who never applied to the WG thought it to be too time consuming. Only 21 (16.9%) felt there was a subgroup in the WG missing and most of those (n=8, 38.1%) found this should fully focus on research collaborations, which is actually part of the general aims of EMEUNET and a focus of all Working Groups.Only a relatively small portion of EMEUNET of respondents (<5%) stated to have approached EMEUNET with their ideas. Although 90.2% (n=110) felt that the opportunity to submit new ideas is a good initiative, only 52.5% (n=..) knew that such possibilities exists. This suggests that EMEUNET could do more to make members aware of this possibility. Additionally, while the main reasons for not contacting EMEUNET with an idea were ‘not having one’ (41.9%) or having ‘no time’ (34.9%), 20.9% feels their ideas would not be received well, which is another aspect offering room for improvement.Twice a year, EMEUNET organises networking events (NE) for their members to discuss their work in an informal setting. We found that 56/120 (46.7%) of the respondents prefer a low-budget (<€20) event, including an activity and the possibility to network, accompanied by drinks and bites. This is much in line with EMEUNETs past NE. In addition, past NEs were often mentioned as an example of ideal events.Conclusion:Awareness on EMEUNET often comes from colleagues and international conferences in rheumatology, which coincides with one of the focuses of EMEUNET to increase visibility in the last 10 years. Expectations about NE are in line with the previously organised NE.Areas for improvement are dissemination of information on the EMEUNET WG, the possibility to submit ideas -which is open to all members- and the increased focus on research collaboration, an aspect on which we are actively working as EMEUNET is fully engaged with the newly launched EULAR Virtual Research Centre.Disclosure of Interests:None declared