Performance of Ozone/ZrCl4 Oxidation in Stabilized Landfill Leachate Treatment

2015 ◽  
Vol 802 ◽  
pp. 501-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siti Nor Farhana Zakaria ◽  
Hamidi Abdul Aziz ◽  
Salem S. Abu Amr
Keyword(s):  
Chemical Oxygen Demand ◽  
Landfill Leachate ◽  
Oxygen Demand ◽  
Landfill Site ◽  
Sanitary Landfill ◽  
Ammoniacal Nitrogen ◽  
Combined Method ◽  
Zirconium Tetrachloride ◽  
Leachate Treatment ◽  
Treatment Facilities

Landfill leachate generation is one of the main problems from sanitary landfill. Chemical oxygen demand (COD), ammoniacal nitrogen (NH3-N), and color are among the most problematic parameters in stabilized leachate. In this regard, dedicated treatment facilities are required before leachate can be discharged into the environment. The performance of the combined ozonation (O3) and zirconium tetrachloride (ZrCl4) to treat two types of stabilized leachate was investigated during this study. Leachate samples were collected from an anaerobic stabilized leachate (Alor Pongsu Landfill Site, APLS) and semi-aerobic stabilized leachate (Pulau Burung Landfill Site, PBLS). Zirconium tetrachloride dosage was determined as 1 g/1 g (COD/ZrCl4 ratio) and then added to the leachate samples with 60 min ozonation at natural leachate pH (8). COD, color, and NH3-N were removed from the APLS sample at 33%, 70%, and 53% rates, respectively, whereas 48%, 75%, and 69%, respectively, from the PBLS samples. Ozone consumption was also calculated with the highest value (3.81 Kg O3/ Kg COD) reported in PBLS, whereas the lowest value (2.32 Kg O3/ Kg COD) was reported in APLS. Biodegradability of (BOD5/COD) was investigated and improved from 0.07 to 0.08 for the APLS samples and 0.05 to 0.11 for the PBLS samples after leachate oxidation. Results showed that the performance of O3/ZrCl4 oxidation is more efficient in treating semi-aerobic stabilized leachate than anaerobic stabilized leachate Moreover, the combined method proved to be more efficient in remediating leachate compared with ozone and zirconium treatment alone.

Ozonation With Catalyst in Landfill Leachate Treatment

2019 ◽  
pp. 324-354
Author(s):  
Siti Nor Farhana Zakaria
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Structure ◽  
Hydrogen Peroxide ◽  
Hydroxyl Radical ◽  
Chemical Oxygen Demand ◽  
Human Health ◽  
Chemical Reaction ◽  
Landfill Leachate ◽  
Treatment Cost ◽  
Oxygen Demand ◽  
Leachate Treatment

Landfill leachate is a hazardous pollutant generated from a landfill site. Discharge of landfill leachate has caused a major contamination to the environment and detrimental to human health. This chapter introduces an alternative method to treat recalcitrant pollutant in leachate by using ozonation with catalyst. The production of hydroxyl radical in ozonation was not enough to oxidize complex molecular structure in the leachate. Theoretically, the addition of catalyst enhances the capacity of radical and accelerates the chemical reaction. The effectiveness of ozonation with Fenton (O3/Fenton), hydrogen peroxide (O3/H2O2), and zirconium tetrachloride (O3/ZrCl4) in removing pollutant such as chemical oxygen demand (COD), color, and improvement of biodegradability by using this process were also discussed in this chapter. Comparison in term of treatment cost and benefits of the application of chemical as catalyst are briefly elaborated at the end of this chapter.

scholarly journals Measuring 81 characterization parameters from different tropical landfill leachates and potential treatment techniques

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 439-450 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Landfill Leachate ◽  
Oxygen Demand ◽  
Treatment Method ◽  
Northern Region ◽  
Sanitary Landfill ◽  
Leachate Treatment ◽  
Municipal Landfill ◽  
Treatment Techniques ◽  
Oxidation Reduction ◽  
Leachate Quality

<div> <p>Raw municipal landfill leachate is extremely polluted wastewater and it regards as one of the drawbacks of the sanitary landfill treatment method. If the untreated landfill leachate is discharged to the natural environment, a great problem for the environment can be created, particularly for the water resources. To assess fresh leachate; collection, analyzing for various parameters, and comparing with the standards are essential. Thus, this study was purposed to examine the characteristics of different landfill leachate samples collected from three tropical landfill sites. The results of the formed leachate at the anaerobic Kulim Sanitary Landfill, semi-aerobic Pulau Burung Landfill Site, and anaerobic Kuala Sepetang landfill leachate in the northern region of Malaysia have been analyzed for 27 parameters and compared. The studied parameters in the present study were&nbsp; phenols, zeta potential, oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD<sub>5</sub>),&nbsp; heavy metals, nitrogen compounds, salinity, electrical conductivity etc. For checking the risks of the leachate on the environment, the obtained results were compared with the Malaysia Standards. In addition, the leachate treatment opportunities upon the characterization are highlighted in this study. The effectiveness of various applications in treating leachate collected from municipal landfill was presented and discussed. It could be concluded that the knowledge of leachate quality is particularly significant in choosing an appropriate treatment techniques</p> </div> <p>&nbsp;</p>

scholarly journals Electrocoagulation Treatment for Removal of Color and Chemical Oxygen Demand in Landfill Leachate using Aluminum Electrode

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 89-92
Keyword(s):  
Chemical Oxygen Demand ◽  
Landfill Leachate ◽  
Applied Voltage ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Oxygen Demand ◽  
Experimental Result ◽  
Aluminum Electrode ◽  
Electrolysis Time ◽  
Leachate Treatment ◽  
Electrode Distance

The present research work mainly deals with the removal percentage of Color and Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) on landfill leachate by using electrocoagulation (EC) process. An EC process was carried out with an aluminium electrode and it act as both anode and cathode. The study mainly targets the factors affecting on electrode material, electrolysis time, initial pH, applied voltage, inter-electrode distance. The experimental result reveals that there was raise in BOD/COD ratio from 0.11 to 0.66 and the maximum percentage removal achieved were COD and Color 78.4% and 77.0% respectively. The optimum inter-electrode distance 1cm with electrode surface area 35 cm2 and optimum electrolysis time of 90 min at optimum applied voltage 10V, stirring speed 250 rpm and pH is 9.3. These results showed that the EC process is appropriate and well-organized approach for the landfill leachate treatment.

Treatment of a complex landfill leachate with peat

1978 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Cameron
Keyword(s):  
Chemical Oxygen Demand ◽  
Ferric Chloride ◽  
Landfill Leachate ◽  
Metal Removal ◽  
Oxygen Demand ◽  
Treatment Method ◽  
Manganese Concentration ◽  
Chemical Pretreatment ◽  
Iron Manganese

The use of cheap, locally available peat as a treatment method for landfill leachate was investigated by passing leachate through plexiglass columns filled with an amorphous-granular peat. Preliminary adjustment of pH showed that reducing pH to 4.8 dramatically reduced adsorption. Increasing the pH to 8.4, metal removal was increased owing to filtration of precipitated metals. The best adsorption of metals occurred at the 'natural' pH of 7.1. Manganese was found to be the limiting pollutant. At the 0.05 mg/ℓ maximum acceptable manganese concentration 94% of the total metals were removed, requiring 159 kg of peat per 1000 ℓ of leachate.Resting the peat for 1 month did significantly increase removal capacity.Desorption of some contaminants occurred when water was percolated through the peat. The desorption test effluent was not toxic to fish although iron, lead and COD (chemical oxygen demand) exceeded acceptable values.Chemical pretreatment using lime and ferric chloride achieved significant iron, manganese and calcium removals. Chemical pretreatment followed by peat adsorption offered no advantage other than reducing toxicity to fish.Peat treatment alone was effective in reducing concentrations to a level that was non-toxic to fish.

scholarly journals Application of Electrocoagulation with a New Steel-Swarf-Based Electrode for the Removal of Heavy Metals and Total Coliforms from Sanitary Landfill Leachate

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 5009
Author(s):  
Mayk Teles de Oliveira ◽  
Ieda Maria Sapateiro Torres ◽  
Humberto Ruggeri ◽  
Paulo Scalize ◽  
Antonio Albuquerque ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Metals ◽  
Landfill Leachate ◽  
Lower Cost ◽  
Sanitary Landfill ◽  
Leachate Treatment ◽  
Removal Of Heavy Metals ◽  
Waste Characteristics ◽  
Electrode Passivation ◽  
Steel Swarf ◽  
Sanitary Landfill Leachate

Sanitary landfill leachate (LL) composition varies according to climate variables variation, solid waste characteristics and composition, and landfill age. Leachate treatment is essentially carried out trough biological and physicochemical processes, which have showed variability in efficiency and appear a costly solution for the management authorities. Electrocoagulation (EC) seems a suitable solution for leachate treatment taking into account the characteristics of the liquor. One of the problems of EC is the electrode passivation, which affects the longevity of the process. One solution to this problem could be the replacement of the electrode by one made of recyclable material, which would make it possible to change it frequently and at a lower cost. The objective of the present work was to evaluate the removal of heavy metals (As, Ba, Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Pb, Mn, Ni, Se and Zn) and coliforms from a LL by EC using electrodes made from steel swarf (SfE) up to 8 h. Removal efficiencies of detected heavy metals were 51%(Cr), 59%(As), 71%(Cd), 72%(Zn), 92%(Ba), 95%(Ni) and >99%(Pb). The microbial load of coliforms in leachate was reduced from 10.76 × 104 CFU/mL (raw leachate) to less than 1 CFU/mL (after treatment with SfE) (i.e., approximately 100% reduction). The use of SfE in EC of LL is very effective in removing heavy metals and coliforms and can be used as alternative treatment solution for such effluents.

Scale-up and cost analysis of a photo-Fenton system for sanitary landfill leachate treatment

2016 ◽  
Vol 283 ◽  
pp. 76-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tânia F.C.V. Silva ◽  
Amélia Fonseca ◽  
Isabel Saraiva ◽  
Rui A.R. Boaventura ◽  
Vítor J.P. Vilar
Keyword(s):  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Landfill Leachate ◽  
Scale Up ◽  
Sanitary Landfill ◽  
Leachate Treatment ◽  
Fenton System ◽  
Sanitary Landfill Leachate

Raw landfill leachate treatment using an electrocoagulation process with a novel rotating electrode reactor

2019 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 458-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Samir Naje ◽  
Mohammed A. Ajeel ◽  
Isam Mohamad Ali ◽  
Hussein A. M. Al-Zubaidi ◽  
Peter Adeniyi Alaba
Keyword(s):  
Landfill Leachate ◽  
Suspended Solids ◽  
Treatment Process ◽  
Oxygen Demand ◽  
Neutral Medium ◽  
Leachate Treatment ◽  
Rotating Speed ◽  
Electrode Distance ◽  
Treatment Performance ◽  
Electrocoagulation Process

Abstract In this work, landfill leachate treatment by electrocoagulation process with a novel rotating anode reactor was studied. The influence of rotating anode speed on the removal efficiency of chemical oxygen demand (COD), total dissolved solids (TDS), and total suspended solids (TSS) of raw landfill leachate was investigated. The influence of operating parameters like leachate pH, leachate temperature, current, and inter-distance between the cathode rings and anode impellers on the electrocoagulation performance were also investigated. The results revealed the optimum rotating speed is 150 rpm and increasing the rotating speed above this value led to reducing process performance. The leachate electrocoagulation treatment process favors the neutral medium and the treatment performance increases with increasing current intensity. Furthermore, the electrocoagulation treatment performance improves with increasing leachate temperature. However, the performance reduces with increasing inter-electrode distance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document