Radiation Dose Measurement Technique of the X-Ray Source in the Process of Stabilization

2015 ◽  
Vol 1085 ◽  
pp. 478-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina Miloichikova ◽  
Sergei Stuchebrov ◽  
Angelina Krasnykh ◽  
Alexander Wagner

In the article the radiation burden measurement technique of the X-ray source in the process of stabilization is described. The possibility of using this technique for the dose rate determination from the pulsed X-ray source is presented. The measurement technique approbation results at the pulsed X-ray source RAP-160-5 using thermoluminescent dosimeters DTL-02 are shown.

2015 ◽  
Vol 1084 ◽  
pp. 598-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina Miloichikova ◽  
Sergei Stuchebrov ◽  
Angelina Krasnykh ◽  
Alexander Wagner

In the article the dose rate measurement technique of the pulsed X-ray source RAP-160-5 is presented. The examples of the dose rate spatial distribution for the different pulsed X-ray tube parameters at the different distance between the pulsed X-ray source focus and the detector are demonstrated. The recommendations for the radiation dose optimization to the objects under investigation from the different distance between the pulsed X-ray source focus and the detector are proposed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (0) ◽  
pp. 39-42
Author(s):  
Emi Tomita ◽  
Hiroaki Hayashi ◽  
Takashi Asahara ◽  
Kanako Sakuragawa ◽  
Yasufumi Shitakubo ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 188 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-204
Author(s):  
Y Lahfi ◽  
A Ismail

Abstract The aim of the present study was to evaluate the radiation exposure around the patient table as relative to the cardiologist position dose value. The dose rates at eight points presuming staff positions were measured for PA, LAO 30° and RAO 30° radiographic projections, and then normalized to the cardiologist’s position dose-rate value. The results show that in PA and RAO 30° projections, the normalized dose rate was higher by 9–22% at the right side of the table at a distance of 50 cm, while it was higher up to 31% at the left side for the same measured points in the LAO 30°. The differences of normalized dose rates for the both table sides were lower and decreased at farther positions. The obtained results correspond to the recommendations of staff radiation protection in Cath-labs with regards to X-ray tube and detector positions.


Author(s):  
Caio C. M. Bordallo ◽  
Fernando F. Teixeira ◽  
Marcilei A. G. Silveira ◽  
Joao A. Martino ◽  
Paula G. D. Agopian ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 599-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael W M Jones ◽  
Peter M Kopittke ◽  
Lachlan Casey ◽  
Juliane Reinhardt ◽  
F Pax C Blamey ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims X-ray fluorescence microscopy (XFM) is a powerful technique to elucidate the distribution of elements within plants. However, accumulated radiation exposure during analysis can lead to structural damage and experimental artefacts including elemental redistribution. To date, acceptable dose limits have not been systematically established for hydrated plant specimens. Methods Here we systematically explore acceptable dose rate limits for investigating fresh sunflower (Helianthus annuus) leaf and root samples and investigate the time–dose damage in leaves attached to live plants. Key Results We find that dose limits in fresh roots and leaves are comparatively low (4.1 kGy), based on localized disintegration of structures and element-specific redistribution. In contrast, frozen-hydrated samples did not incur any apparent damage even at doses as high as 587 kGy. Furthermore, we find that for living plants subjected to XFM measurement in vivo and grown for a further 9 d before being reimaged with XFM, the leaves display elemental redistribution at doses as low as 0.9 kGy and they continue to develop bleaching and necrosis in the days after exposure. Conclusions The suggested radiation dose limits for studies using XFM to examine plants are important for the increasing number of plant scientists undertaking multidimensional measurements such as tomography and repeated imaging using XFM.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 242
Author(s):  
Raj Kumar ◽  
A.K. Singh

<p>Radiation countermeasures development was undertaken almost six decade ago at AFRRI, USA with the aim to protect military as well as civilian personals against accidental or deliberate radiation exposure. Later on, with the advancement of radiation technologies and exploration of X-ray or γ-rays for diagnostics and therapeutic purposes, probability of radiation exposure was enhanced multifold. Therefore, importance of radiation countermeasures development was recognised globally. However, despite the concentrated efforts, till date not a single FDA approved radio protective drug is available for emergency uses. Major impediments identified in this are included variability in radio protective efficacy with different experimental models, radiation dose rate, radiation types and differential radio sensitivity of various biological systems. No way to evaluate radio protective efficacy of an agent in human volunteers. It is sufficient to realise that uniform excellence may not be achieved in the area of radiation countermeasure development. However, practical excellence based on the radioprotector’s application scenario can be achieved. Different radiation accidental scenarios and feasible practical parameters of excellence for radiation countermeasure development for particular types of incidental, accidental or deliberated radiation exposure are described.</p>


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Saeedi-Moghadam ◽  
F. Zarei ◽  
B. Zeinali-Rafsanjani ◽  
A. Borhani-Haghighi ◽  
A. Azadbar

Introduction: This study intended to assess the effectiveness of application the mobile X-ray barriers (lead-wall) in reducing the radiation dose to interventionists during the brain angiography procedures. Moreover, the radiation dose of patients also evaluated to assess whether the application of lead-wall affects the patient’s dose or not? Material and method: Two interventionists took part in this study. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD-100) were used to monitor the doses to interventionists. 1st-interventionist routinely used lead-wall and 2nd-interventionist didn’t use it. Demographic information of patients and radiation dose information was also recorded. Results: The results of measurements showed that the radiation dose of the 1st-interventionist was 83.57% lower than the 2nd-interventionist (p = 0.04). The amount of dose/min and DAP/min of the 1st-interventionist’s patients were 33.50% and 17.54% less than the 2nd-interventionist’s patients (p = 0.006) and (p = 0.0004). Discussion and conclusion: The results showed that application of lead wall can effectively reduce the occupational dose and it doesn’t lead to increase the patient’s dose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document