Water Environmental Quality Evaluation Based on Visualize Classification for Huangbizhuang Reservoir of South-North Water Transfer Project

2012 ◽  
Vol 468-471 ◽  
pp. 2955-2958
Author(s):  
Da Lei Zhang ◽  
Yi Han Li ◽  
Ying Jie Sun ◽  
Fan Qiao ◽  
Mou Lv
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Environmental Quality ◽  
Quality Evaluation ◽  
Water Quality Monitoring ◽  
Quality Standard ◽  
Water Transfer ◽  
Evaluation Indexes ◽  
North Water ◽  
Individual Evaluation ◽  
Water Environmental Quality

According to the water quality monitoring data for Bashang section of Huangbizhuang reservoir conveying water for South-North Water Transfer Project from 2006 to 2009, individual evaluation, quarterly evaluation and overall merit were employed for water environmental quality evaluation with visualize classification on the ground of water quality standard classification, the results indicated most of individual evaluation indexes were within class Ⅰ or Ⅱand the indexes of quarterly evaluation and overall merit were with class Ⅰ which the third quarterly evaluation index was higher than that of the other three quarters, thus overall water quality was good enough for satisfying water quality

Application of Circulator Clarifier + Gravity Valve-Less Filtrate in the Disposal of Coal Mine Wastewater

2012 ◽  
Vol 518-523 ◽  
pp. 2366-2369
Author(s):  
Qun Ying Zhao ◽  
Yu Shu Wang ◽  
Xiao Li Fan
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Surface Water ◽  
Engineering Design ◽  
Environmental Quality ◽  
Coal Mine ◽  
Sewage Treatment ◽  
Quality Standard ◽  
Environmental Quality Standard ◽  
Mine Wastewater ◽  
Water Environmental Quality

The characteristic of coal mine wastewater was introduced. Engineering design and practical run of circulator clarifier +gravity valve-less were summed up for treating wastewater of coal mine. Practice indicated that the process was steady and reliable, the effluent satisfied water quality Ⅲ standard of Surface Water Environmental Quality Standard (GB3838-2002),and there was remarkable economic results during the process of sewage treatment.

Application of the European Communities Directive on Dangerous Substances to List II Substances in the U.K.

1984 ◽  
Vol 16 (5-7) ◽  
pp. 159-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Mance ◽  
A R O'Donnell
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Quality Management ◽  
Environmental Quality ◽  
Current Practice ◽  
Water Quality Management ◽  
Quality Standard ◽  
Environmental Quality Standard ◽  
Dangerous Substances ◽  
Quality Objective ◽  
Water Uses

This paper discusses the environmental quality objective (EQO) approach to water quality management and defines the terms EQO and environmental quality standard (EQS). The proposed list of water uses is presented. The derivation of EQSs for each use is discussed and the EQS values proposed for six list II substances are reported. The relevence of these values, and problems associated with the control of individual substances, are discussed in relation to current practice.

Water Environmental Quality Assessment and Protection Strategies of the Xinlicheng Reservoir, China

2014 ◽  
Vol 501-504 ◽  
pp. 1863-1867
Author(s):  
Xian Fu Zhang ◽  
Chang Lai Xiao ◽  
Yong Qing Li ◽  
Ding Feng Song
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Environmental Quality ◽  
Pollution Index ◽  
Longitudinal Axis ◽  
Ammonia Nitrogen ◽  
Reservoir Water ◽  
Index Method ◽  
Nutrient Emissions ◽  
Protection Strategies ◽  
Water Environmental Quality

Based on the monthly monitoring data in the Xinlicheng Reservoir from 2008 to 2011 in 3 zones (fluvial, transitional and lacustrine), 6 water quality variables were selected as evaluation indicators to evaluate the water environmental quality by improved Nemerow comprehensive pollution index method. The results indicated the reservoir water quality reached classII or III during the study period and met the requirements of centralized drinking water. No significant differences (P > 0.05) for Nemerow indexes were detected among seasons and zones. However, that Nemerow indexes slightly decreased along the longitudinal axis of reservoir showed the water quality in the lacustrine zone was better than that in the fluvial zone, which implied the reservoir ecological system had self-purification function. The improved Nemerow index method based on weight is objective, and the pollution factor with maximum weight is total phosphorus (TP) which is followed by ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) and total nitrogen (TN). Water quality protection strategies should focus on controlling nutrient emissions and prevent eutrophication, including exogenous governance and endogenous control.

scholarly journals Identifikasi Kualitas Air dan Beban Pencemaran Sungai Bedadung di Intake Instalasi Pengolahan Air PDAM Kabupaten Jember

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
Hendra Andiananta Pradana ◽  
Sri Wahyuningsih ◽  
Elida Novita ◽  
Aisyah Humayro ◽  
Bambang Herry Purnomo
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Water Treatment ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Water Quality Monitoring ◽  
Quality Standard ◽  
T Test ◽  
Anthropogenic Activity ◽  
Pollution Load ◽  
Grab Sampling ◽  
Water Treatment Plants

ABSTRAKLatar belakang: Salah satu sumber air permukaan yang memiliki peran vital bagi ekosistem perairan dan makhluk hidup adalah sungai. Sungai Bedadung merupakan salah satu sungai besar yang melewati wilayah Perkotaan Kabupaten Jember. Air dari sungai tersebut dimanafaatkan sebagai pemasok air baku untuk PDAM Kabupaten Jember. Akan tetapi akibat tekanan aktivitas antropogenik menurunkan kualitas air sungai tersebut. Pemantauan kualitas air diperlukan sebagai salah satu pertimbangan pengendalian pencemaran pada air sungai tersebut. Tujuan penelitian ini mengidentifikasi kondisi kualitas air dan beban pencemaran di intake intalasi pengolahan air (IPA) PDAM Kabupaten Jember.Metode: Pengambilan contoh air secara grab sampling dilakukan di intake IPA Tegal Gede dan IPA Tegal Besar dengan beberapa parameter kualitas air yang diamati yaitu suhu, kekeruhan, TDS, pH, DO, BOD, COD, yang dibandingkan dengan baku mutu Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 82 tahun 2001 serta debit air yang digunakan untuk menghitung beban pencemaran serta dilanjutkan uji t untuk mengetahui perbandingan kondisi beban pencemaran.Hasil: Hasil penelitian menujukkan bahwa kualitas air sungai di intake IPA Tegal Gede dan IPA Tegal Besar secara berurutan tergolong kelas I dan III. Nilai COD di intake IPA Tegal Besar tergolong kelas III. Nilai beban pencemaran menujukkan perbedaan yang signifikan pada kedua intake IPA. Beban pencamaran di IPA Tegal Gede dan Tegal Besar dengan nilai rata-rata secara berurutan yaitu 24,96 kg/hari dan 74,03 kg/hari.Simpulan: Kualitas air Sungai Bedadung berdasarkan parameter fisika dan kimia di intake IPA Tegal Gede di IPA Tegal Besar secara berurutan tergolong kelas I dan III serta kondisi beban pencemaranya beragam.ABSTRACTBackground: River as one of surface water resources has a vital role for ecosystems and organism. Jember Regency Municipal Waterworks utilized the river as water raw resources. However, the pressure of anthropogenic activity decreases the river's water quality. Water quality monitoring is needed as a consideration for pollution controlling in the river. The focus research identified the condition of water quality and pollution load in the water treatment plants (WTP) intake of Jember Regency Municipal Waterworkers.Method: The water sampling by grab sampling was carried out at intake of Tegal Gede and Tegal Besar WTP with several observed pysicochemical parameters i.e temperature, turbidity, TDS, pH, DO, BOD, COD compered with the quality standard of Government Regulation No. 82 of 2001 and stream flow for pollution load measurement and continued by t-test to compire the pollution load conditions.Result: The results denote that the water quality in Tegal Gede and Tegal Besar WTP intakes were classified into first (I) and third (III) class. COD caused water quality decreased in intake of Tegal Besar WTP. The t-test of the pollution load represented a significantly difference at the both water treatment plants locations. Pollution load at Tegal Gede and Tegal Besar WTP showed the average values of 24.96 kg/day and 74.03 kg/day. Conclusion: The water quality refer to physicochemical parameter in intake of Tegal Gede and Tegal Besar were categorized WTP into first (I) and third (III) class, furthermore the condition of the pollution load varies.

scholarly journals Water Quality Assessment Klang River Water Treatment Plants

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4.35) ◽  
pp. 639
Author(s):  
HA Mohiyaden ◽  
LM Sidek ◽  
G Hayder ◽  
MN Noh
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Water Treatment ◽  
Quality Assessment ◽  
River Water ◽  
Treatment Plant ◽  
Water Quality Assessment ◽  
Water Quality Monitoring ◽  
Quality Standard ◽  
Pollutant Removal ◽  
Unit Process

The quality of Klang river water is deteriorating dramatically since it is in urban places every day and become one of the major problems.  Therefore, the Malaysian government had initiated one river cleaning project named River of Life (ROL) project. This project is for rehabilitating and restoring the Klang river. A series of river water treatment plant (RWTP)s have been operated in Klang river catchment since 2014. Six RWTPs station has been monitored up to eight stations until presents. Eight parameters consisting of physio-chemical types and biological types have been recorded. RWTP effluent discharges are targeted to achieve Malaysia Interim National Water Quality Standard (INWQS) under Class II B. Since previous RWTP performance only emphasized on local river pollutants and certain conditions, this paper will investigate the effectiveness of full-scale RWTP unit process for river condition. Water quality assessment are involved which are consist of effluent water quality monitoring and pollutant removal efficiency. Most of the major pollutants able to be reduced by more than 50% reduction. Although BOD and AN still not able to achieve standard range gazetted by INWQS Class IIB, there is an improvement of river water quality at Klang River by using IFAS technology adopted in the RWTP system.

Monitoring of water transfer from Katse Dam into the Upper Vaal river system: water utility’s perspective

2003 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 97-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Lepono ◽  
H.H. Du Preez ◽  
M. Thokoa
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Drinking Water ◽  
River System ◽  
Water Quality Monitoring ◽  
Water Transfer ◽  
Monitoring Programme ◽  
Quality Monitoring ◽  
Transfer Scheme ◽  
Chemical Monitoring ◽  
Before And After

Water quality is of prime importance to Rand Water’s core business of ensuring a reliable supply of good quality drinking water to more than 10 million people. Rand Water has, therefore, implemented a water quality monitoring programme of the source water as well as the drinking water produced. The establishment of the Lesotho Highlands Water Transfer scheme necessitated the expansion of the monitoring programme. In 1996, Rand Water and Lesotho Highlands Development Authority (LHDA) signed an agreement to jointly develop an extensive water quality monitoring programme for the Lesotho Highlands Water Project (LHWP). Prior to this agreement, monitoring was mainly undertaken by consultants on behalf of LHDA in the main feeder rivers within the Katse Dam catchment (donor system). On the recipient system (Ash/Liebenbergsvlei), extensive physical and chemical monitoring was undertaken by Rand Water and Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF). Biological monitoring was however only carried out superficially prior to the release of water. Information gained from carrying out biological and chemical assessments clearly indicates that the water from LHWP has negatively impacted on the biological communities in the recipient system. The importance of detailed before and after biological and physio-chemical monitoring of both donor and recipient systems is emphasised.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document