Multi Objective Optimization in Scheduling of FMS Using Roulette Wheel Selection Process

2012 ◽  
Vol 622-623 ◽  
pp. 35-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Durgesh Sharma ◽  
Suresh Garg ◽  
Chitra Sharma

Most of real-life engineering problems are objectives optimization problems. In many cases objectives under consideration conflict with each other and optimizing a particular solution with respect to a single objective can result in unacceptable results with respect to the other.FMS Scheduling problem is considered as one of the most difficult NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems. Therefore, determining an optimal schedule and controlling an FMS is considered a difficult task. It is difficult for traditional optimization techniques to provide the best solution. In this paper, we propose a multi-objective genetic algorithm for effectively solving job processing FMS Scheduling problem. An attempt has been made to generate a schedule using Genetic Algorithm with Roulette Wheel Base Selection Process to minimize Total Make Span Time and to maximize machine utilization time.

2012 ◽  
Vol 217-219 ◽  
pp. 1444-1448
Author(s):  
Xiang Ke Tian ◽  
Jian Wang

The job-shop scheduling problem (JSP), which is one of the best-known machine scheduling problems, is among the hardest combinatorial optimization problems. In this paper, the key technology of building simulation model in Plant Simulation is researched and also the build-in genetic algorithm of optimizing module is used to optimize job-shop scheduling, which can assure the scientific decision. At last, an example is used to illustrate the optimization process of the Job-Shop scheduling problem with Plant Simulation genetic algorithm modules.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinyu Li ◽  
Prajna Kasargodu Anebgailu ◽  
Jörg Dietrich

<p>The calibration of hydrological models using bio-inspired meta-heuristic optimization techniques has been extensively tested to find the optimal parameters for hydrological models. Shuffled frog-leaping algorithm (SFLA) is a population-based cooperative search technique containing virtual interactive frogs distributed into multiple memeplexes. The frogs search locally in each memeplex and are periodically shuffled into new memeplexes to ensure global exploration. Though it is developed for discrete optimization, it can be used to solve multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems as well.</p><p>In this study, a hydrological catchment model, Hydrological Predictions for the Environment (HYPE) is calibrated for streamflow and nitrate concentration in the catchment using SFLA. HYPE is a semi-distributed watershed model that simulates runoff and other hydrological processes based on physical as well as conceptual laws. SFLA with 200 runtimes and 5 memeplexes containing 10 frogs each is used to calibrate 22 model parameters. It is compared with manual calibration and Differential Evolution Markov Chain (DEMC) method from the HYPE-tool. The preliminary results of the statistical performance measures for streamflow calibration show that SFLA has the fastest convergence speed and higher stability when compared with the DEMC method. NSE of 0.68 and PBIAS of 7.72 are recorded for the best run of SFLA during the calibration of streamflow. In comparison, the HYPE-tool DEMC produced the best NSE of 0.45 and a PBIAS of -3.37 while the manual calibration resulted in NSE of 0.64 and PBIAS of 2.01.</p>


Author(s):  
Elyn L. Solano-Charris ◽  
Libardo S. Gómez-Vizcaíno ◽  
Jairo R. Montoya-Torres ◽  
Carlos D. Paternina-Arboleda

A large number of real-life optimization problems in economics and business are complex and difficult to solve. Hence, using approximate algorithms is a very good alternative to solve this class of problems. Meta-heuristics solution procedures represent general approximate algorithms applicable to a large variety of optimization problems. Most of the meta-heuristics mimic natural metaphors to solve complex optimization problems. This chapter presents a novel procedure based on Bacterial Phototaxis, called Global Bacteria Optimization (GBO) algorithm, to solve combinatorial optimization problems. The algorithm emulates the movement of an organism in response to stimulus from light. The effectiveness of the proposed meta-heuristic algorithm is first compared with the well-known meta-heuristic MOEA (Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm) using mathematical functions. The performance of GBO is also analyzed by solving some single- and multi-objective classical jobshop scheduling problems against state-of-the-art algorithms. Experimental results on well-known instances show that GBO algorithm performs very well and even outperforms existing meta-heuristics in terms of computational time and quality of solution.


2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 17-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fayçal Belkaid ◽  
Zaki Sari ◽  
Mehdi Souier

In this paper, the authors’ interest is focused on the scheduling problem on identical parallel machines with consumable resources in order to minimize the makespan criterion. Each job consumes several components which arrive at different times. The arrival of each component is represented by a curve-shaped staircase. This problem is NP-hard, further, there are not universal methods making it possible to solve all the cases effectively, especially for medium or large instances. A genetic algorithm is proposed to solve this problem due to proven great performance in solving combinatorial optimization problems. To check its effectiveness this algorithm is compared with an exact resolution method which enumerates all possible solutions for small instances and with a heuristic for large instances. Various randomly generated instances, which can represent realistic situations, are tested. The computation results show that this algorithm outperforms heuristic procedure and is tailored for larger scale problems.


Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (13) ◽  
pp. 1456
Author(s):  
Stefka Fidanova ◽  
Krassimir Todorov Atanassov

Some of industrial and real life problems are difficult to be solved by traditional methods, because they need exponential number of calculations. As an example, we can mention decision-making problems. They can be defined as optimization problems. Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) is between the best methods, that solves combinatorial optimization problems. The method mimics behavior of the ants in the nature, when they look for a food. One of the algorithm parameters is called pheromone, and it is updated every iteration according quality of the achieved solutions. The intuitionistic fuzzy (propositional) logic was introduced as an extension of Zadeh’s fuzzy logic. In it, each proposition is estimated by two values: degree of validity and degree of non-validity. In this paper, we propose two variants of intuitionistic fuzzy pheromone updating. We apply our ideas on Multiple-Constraint Knapsack Problem (MKP) and compare achieved results with traditional ACO.


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Alejandro Castellanos-Alvarez ◽  
Laura Cruz-Reyes ◽  
Eduardo Fernandez ◽  
Nelson Rangel-Valdez ◽  
Claudia Gómez-Santillán ◽  
...  

Most real-world problems require the optimization of multiple objective functions simultaneously, which can conflict with each other. The environment of these problems usually involves imprecise information derived from inaccurate measurements or the variability in decision-makers’ (DMs’) judgments and beliefs, which can lead to unsatisfactory solutions. The imperfect knowledge can be present either in objective functions, restrictions, or decision-maker’s preferences. These optimization problems have been solved using various techniques such as multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs). This paper proposes a new MOEA called NSGA-III-P (non-nominated sorting genetic algorithm III with preferences). The main characteristic of NSGA-III-P is an ordinal multi-criteria classification method for preference integration to guide the algorithm to the region of interest given by the decision-maker’s preferences. Besides, the use of interval analysis allows the expression of preferences with imprecision. The experiments contrasted several versions of the proposed method with the original NSGA-III to analyze different selective pressure induced by the DM’s preferences. In these experiments, the algorithms solved three-objectives instances of the DTLZ problem. The obtained results showed a better approximation to the region of interest for a DM when its preferences are considered.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Faramarz Khosravi ◽  
Alexander Rass ◽  
Jürgen Teich

Real-world problems typically require the simultaneous optimization of multiple, often conflicting objectives. Many of these multi-objective optimization problems are characterized by wide ranges of uncertainties in their decision variables or objective functions. To cope with such uncertainties, stochastic and robust optimization techniques are widely studied aiming to distinguish candidate solutions with uncertain objectives specified by confidence intervals, probability distributions, sampled data, or uncertainty sets. In this scope, this article first introduces a novel empirical approach for the comparison of candidate solutions with uncertain objectives that can follow arbitrary distributions. The comparison is performed through accurate and efficient calculations of the probability that one solution dominates the other in terms of each uncertain objective. Second, such an operator can be flexibly used and combined with many existing multi-objective optimization frameworks and techniques by just substituting their standard comparison operator, thus easily enabling the Pareto front optimization of problems with multiple uncertain objectives. Third, a new benchmark for evaluating uncertainty-aware optimization techniques is introduced by incorporating different types of uncertainties into a well-known benchmark for multi-objective optimization problems. Fourth, the new comparison operator and benchmark suite are integrated into an existing multi-objective optimization framework that features a selection of multi-objective optimization problems and algorithms. Fifth, the efficiency in terms of performance and execution time of the proposed comparison operator is evaluated on the introduced uncertainty benchmark. Finally, statistical tests are applied giving evidence of the superiority of the new comparison operator in terms of \epsilon -dominance and attainment surfaces in comparison to previously proposed approaches.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document