Influence of Material on Automotive Crash-Box Crashworthiness Subjected to Low Velocity Impact

2013 ◽  
Vol 655-657 ◽  
pp. 169-172
Author(s):  
Yan Jie Liu ◽  
Chun Yan Xia ◽  
Lin Ding ◽  
Chun Hua Liu

Crash-box equipped at the front end of a car, is one of the most important automotive parts for crash energy absorption. In case of frontal crash accident, it is expected to be collapsed with absorbing crash energy prior to other body parts so that the damage of the main cabin frame is minimized and passengers may be saved. Crash-box usually was made a mental thin walled tube. In the paper, automobile crash-box at low-velocity impact was studied by using Finite Element Method. The FE model of the tube was validated by comparing the experimental results and FE model results. Results show that on average the difference of these was within 10%.The good correlation of results obtained show that the numerical analyses are reliable. Crash-box of carbon steel and aluminum alloy materials are compared, it indicates that the peak impact force and maximum energy absorption have certain effect to energy-absorbing component with different materials.

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 670-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinghao Li ◽  
John F Hunt ◽  
Shaoqin Gong ◽  
Zhiyong Cai

This paper presents the experimental behavior of low-energy impact and quasi-static compression test of shifted-tri-axial structural wood-fiber-based composite panels made from laminated paper. The experimental results were analyzed based on design parameters and configurations of panels for the further design and optimization. The results showed that the face stiffness and strength was a significant factor to improve both impact performance and compressive performance. The panels made with additional carbon fiber fabric composite faces had higher energy absorption compared with the same panels made without it. The core configuration also affected the impact behavior of the panels, the foam filled core integrated with the shifted-tri-axial rib structure improved the impact load and absorbed more energy than the same panels without the foam. Further, the structure and size of the element in the core influenced the impact performance and energy absorption. The location for both compression and impact at the triangular lattice element center of the ribs had higher absorbed energy than the location at the hexagonal lattice element center of the ribs. A 3D contour surface map of maximum energy absorption was made based on the experimental data, the contour shows localized energy absorption based on the impact location on the core, the small triangular lattice element of the core had highest maximum energy absorption of panels. For both the quasi-static compression tests and the low-velocity impact tests, the panels with the same core configuration had similar compressive load–displacement trends during the early contact phase. However, the peak load was higher in compression than the peak load for the low-velocity impact for panels with the same configuration.


2020 ◽  
Vol 191 ◽  
pp. 108599 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Islam ◽  
M.A. Kader ◽  
P.J. Hazell ◽  
J.P. Escobedo ◽  
A.D. Brown ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
P. K. Karsh ◽  
Bindi Thakkar ◽  
R. R. Kumar ◽  
Vaishali ◽  
Sudip Dey

Purpose: To investigate the probabilistic low-velocity impact of functionally graded (FG) plate using the MARS model, considering uncertain system parameters. Design/methodology/application: The distribution of various material properties throughout FG plate thickness is calculated using power law. For finite element (FE) formulation, isoparametric elements with eight nodes are considered, each component has five degrees of freedom. The combined effect of variability in material properties such as elastic modulus, modulus of rigidity, Poisson’s ratio, and mass density are considered. The surrogate model is validated with the FE model represented by the scatter plot and the probability density function (PDF) plot based on Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). Findings: The outcome of the degree of stochasticity, impact angle, impactor’s velocity, impactor’s mass density, and point of impact on the maximum value of contact force (CFmax ), plate deformation (PDmax), and impactor deformation (IDmax ) are determined. A convergence study is also performed to determine the optimal number of the constructed MARS model’s sample size. Originality/value: The results illustrate the significant effects of uncertain input parameters on FGM plates’ low-velocity impact responses by employing a surrogate-based MARS model.


2019 ◽  
Vol 165 ◽  
pp. 247-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lin Xiao ◽  
Guanhui Wang ◽  
Si Qiu ◽  
Zhaoxiang Han ◽  
Xiaodan Li ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 838 ◽  
pp. 29-35
Author(s):  
Michał Landowski ◽  
Krystyna Imielińska

Flexural strength and low velocity impact properties were investigated in terms of possibile improvements due to epoxy matrix modification by SiO2 nanoparticles (1%, 2%, 3%, 5%, 7%wt.) in glass/epoxy laminates formed using hand lay-up method. The matrix resin was Hexion L285 (DGEBA) with Nanopox A410 - SiO2 (20 nm) nanoparticle suspension in the base epoxy resin (DGEBA) supplied by Evonic. Modification of epoxy matrix by variable concentrations of nanoSiO2 does not offer significant improvements in the flexural strength σg, Young’s modulus E and interlaminar shear strength for 1% 3% and 5% nanoSiO2 and for 7% a slight drop (up to ca. 15-20%) was found. Low energy (1J) impact resistance of nanocomposites represented by peak load in dynamic impact characteristics was not changed for nanocompoosites compared to the unmodified material. However at higher impact energy (3J) nanoparticles appear to slightly improve the impact energy absorption for 3% and 5%. The absence or minor improvements in the mechanical behaviour of nanocomposites is due to the failure mechanisms associated with hand layup fabrication technique: (i.e. rapid crack propagation across the extensive resin pockets and numerous pores and voids) which dominate the nanoparticle-dependent crack energy absorption mechanisms (microvoids formation and deformation).


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nitin Tekavde ◽  
Srikari Srinivas ◽  
Vinod Banthia ◽  
Suman Mittemari

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document