Study on the Integrated Method of SEM and DEMATEL

2014 ◽  
Vol 926-930 ◽  
pp. 3722-3727
Author(s):  
Wei Meng
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Structural Equation Modeling ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Model Fitting ◽  
Assessment Model ◽  
Model Specification ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Model Assessment ◽  
Integrated Method ◽  
Model Modification

This paper compares Structural Equation Modeling and Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory. Structural Equation Modeling and Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory are all methods to study factors’ structure problem. Some steps of the two methods can completely replace each other and complement each other. This paper puts forward an integrated method of Structural Equation Modeling and Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory that includes competing model specification, model fitting, model assessment, model modification and result explain.

scholarly journals Public Opinion in Policy Studies: Lessons from the Logic of Structural Equation Modeling

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nate Breznau
Keyword(s):  
Public Opinion ◽  
Structural Equation Modeling ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Context Effects ◽  
General Social Survey ◽  
Model Fitting ◽  
The United States ◽  
Model Specification ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Policy Studies

Policy studies scholars regularly investigate linkages between public opinion and policy. The use of public opinion as a variable in empirical research poses special challenges. In this article I suggest that the logic and methods inherent in the art of structural equation modeling provide opportunities to overcome some of these challenges. I describe this type of logic as it pertains to measurement error, context effects and endogeneity. Using General Social Survey data for the United States and taking thermostatic feedback models as an example, I demonstrate why it is important for policy scholars to attend to (a) measurement modeling and cross-level isomorphism, (b) shocks that might bias survey response patterns and (c) endogeneity implied by the theoretically reciprocal nature of opinion and policy feedback. These examples come with discussions of why scholars should pay attention to model specification so that theory and empirics are in unison and how to perform model fitting and testing to better develop theories and models of policy processes.

scholarly journals The use and misuse of structural equation modeling in management research

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nebojsa S. Davcik
Keyword(s):  
Structural Equation Modeling ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Conceptual Knowledge ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Measurement Model ◽  
Model Specification ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Research Practice ◽  
Management Research ◽  
Content Type

Purpose – The research practice in management research is dominantly based on structural equation modeling (SEM), but almost exclusively, and often misguidedly, on covariance-based SEM. The purpose of this paper is to question the current research myopia in management research, because the paper adumbrates theoretical foundations and guidance for the two SEM streams: covariance-based and variance-based SEM; and improves the conceptual knowledge by comparing the most important procedures and elements in the SEM study, using different theoretical criteria. Design/methodology/approach – The study thoroughly analyzes, reviews and presents two streams using common methodological background. The conceptual framework discusses the two streams by analysis of theory, measurement model specification, sample and goodness-of-fit. Findings – The paper identifies and discusses the use and misuse of covariance-based and variance-based SEM utilizing common topics such as: first, theory (theory background, relation to theory and research orientation); second, measurement model specification (type of latent construct, type of study, reliability measures, etc.); third, sample (sample size and data distribution assumption); and fourth, goodness-of-fit (measurement of the model fit and residual co/variance). Originality/value – The paper questions the usefulness of Cronbach's α research paradigm and discusses alternatives that are well established in social science, but not well known in the management research community. The author presents short research illustration in which analyzes the four recently published papers using common methodological background. The paper concludes with discussion of some open questions in management research practice that remain under-investigated and unutilized.

scholarly journals MODEL PEER ASSESSMENT PADA PEMBELAJARAN KOLABORATIF ELABORASI IPS TERPADU DI SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rochmiyati Rochmiyati
Keyword(s):  
Structural Equation Modeling ◽  
Social Skills ◽  
Collaborative Learning ◽  
Social Studies ◽  
Social Skill ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Cognitive Skill ◽  
Assessment Model ◽  
Equation Modeling

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan perangkat peer assessment pada pembelajaran kolaboratif IPS yang baik, valid, handal, dan fit yang dapat digunakan untuk melakukan penilaian kecakapan social siswa secara obyektif. Penelitian ini adalah untuk mengembangkan perangkat peer assessment kecakapan sosial yang disebut Rubrik Kecakapan Sosial. Perangkat pendukung adalah Jurnal Kecakapan Kognitif, Lembar Kendali Pembelajaran Kolaboratif, dan Rubrik Profil Keterlaksanaan. Subyek penelitian guru dan siswa kelas VIII (delapan) dari Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Data dianalisis dengan Structural Equation Modeling. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Rubrik Kecakapan Sosial untuk mengukur kemampuan komunikasi, tanggung jawab individu, tanggung jawab terhadap kelompok, kerjasama dan kompetisi siswa. Hasil analisis rubrik kecakapan sosial, jurnal kecakapan kognitif dan lembar kendali pembelajaran kolaboratif dinyatakan valid dan reliabel. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa konstruk Rubrik Kecakapan Sosial akurat, konstruk Jurnal Kecakapan Kognitif akurat, dan konstruk Rubrik Profil Model Peer Assessment akurat, dan  model peer assessment mempunyai dampak positif pada peningkatan perolehan nilai rata-rata kelas pada kecakapan kognitif. Kata kunci: model, peer assessment, pembelajaran kolaboratif, elaborasi, IPS Terpadu______________________________________________________________ PEER ASSESSMENT MODEL ON COLLABORATIVE ELABORATION LEARNING FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY SOCIAL STUDIES IN THE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLSAbstract This study aims at developing instruments for peer assessment model on collaborative elaboration learning for Interdisciplinary Social Studies which are good, valid, reliable, and accurate, to guide teachers carrying out assessment for social skill objectively. This study is research and development to develop an instrument of peer assessment for social skills called Rubric for Student Social Skills. The supporting instruments are Journal for Student Cognitive Skills, Sheet for Control of Collaborative Learning and Rubric for Profile of Peer Assessment.  The subjects of this study were teachers and pupils in the eighth grades of Junior High Schools. The data were analyzed by Structural Equation Modeling. The results of research show that Rubric for Student Social Skills measures commucation skill, individual responsibility, responsibility to group, cooperation and pupil competision. The analysis result shows that Rubric for Social Skill, Journal for Cognitive Skill, and Sheets of Control Collaborative Learning are valid and reliable. The result shows that the construct of Rubric for Social Skill accurate, the construct of Journal for Cognitive Skill are accurate, and the construct of Rubric for Profil Peer Assessment accurate, and model of peer assessment have positive impact on increasing the average score on cognitive skill.Keywords : model, peer assessment, collaborative, elaboration, interdisciplinary social studies

scholarly journals Gaya Hidup, Orientasi Pilihan Strategi dan Pengambilan Keputusan Usaha pada UMKM di Kota Palembang

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-84
Author(s):  
Anastasia Sri Sukistini ◽  
◽  
Antonius Singgih Setiawan ◽  
Agustinus Widyartono ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Structural Equation Modeling ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
Partial Least Squares ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Strategy Choice ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Questionnaire Data ◽  
Business Decision

This study aims to prove the effect of lifestyle, strategy choice orientation on business decision making. This study uses primary data through a survey of culinary entrepreneurs in Palembang. The questionnaire data used in this study were 92 (61.3%). Analysis of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Partial Least Squares (PLS) using Warp PLS software version 5.0 to examine the research. The results of the study show that the lifestyle and strategy choice orientation affects business decision-making.

scholarly journals The Effect of Marketing Mix upon The Consumer’s Decision Making to Buy a Product at PT. Griya Pagelaran Bogor,

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
Sumardjono Jono ◽  
Heni Ardila
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Structural Equation Modeling ◽  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Analytical Method ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Price Level ◽  
Marketing Mix ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Level Of Significance

The purpose of this study is to determine and prove whether the variablesof the marketing mix significantly has influenced the consumer’s decision making tobuy the product at PT. Griya Pagelaran Bogor. The population of this study are thenumber of unknown sampling determination using Maximum Likelihood estimationmethod by taking samples of consumers who their needs has met with theresearcher requirement as many as 150 respondents. The analytical method hasused is Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) using AMOS 21 program. The result ofthe research shows that 1) Product Variables have a significance level of 0.05 whichis 1,965 > 1,96 and value (p) probability 0,49 ≤ 0.05. Then Ha is accepted andsignificant effect. 2) Variable Price level of significance 0.05 is 2.023 > 1.96 and hasa probability of 0.43 which is below 0.05. And the value (p) probability ≤ 0.05 then Hais accepted and significant effect. 3) Place Variables significance level of 0.05 is2.251 > 1.96 and has a probability of 0.24 which is below 0.05. And the value (p)probability ≤ 0.05 then Ha is accepted and significant effect. 4) Promotion Variables0.05 level of significance is 3.435 > 1.96 and has a probability in accordance with therecommended. And the value (p) probability ≤ 0.05 then Ha accepted and significanteffect.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document