Analysis of Stress Intensity Factor and Crack Propagation for Alloy X-750 Pressure Vessel with a Blunting Crack

2010 ◽  
Vol 303-304 ◽  
pp. 63-83
Author(s):  
Ehsan Mahdavi ◽  
Mahmoud Mosavi Mashhadi ◽  
M. Amidpour
Keyword(s):  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Intensity Factor ◽  
Crack Propagation ◽  
Crack Growth ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Linear Elastic ◽  
The Stability

It is well known that the crack growth rate fatigue and stress corrosion cracking can be approximated by a power function of the stress intensity factor. In this study, stress intensity factor for elliptical crack under the uniform tension in linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) is investigated therefore for this purpose, a pressure vessel modeled by finite element. A crack modeled on the pressure vessel and then the stress intensity factor for crack propagation in different methods is evaluated. Finite element analysis calculates stress intensity factor in the values of the J-integral are based on the stress intensity factors, JK, and by evaluating the contour integral directly, JA. The stability of crack growth is considered so the ductile crack extension is determined by pursuing the equilibrium between loading and crack resistance. Using especial method of meshing caused to have accurate results. This method causes to decrease run time and considerable accuracy. Then stress intensity factor is calculated for different position of the crack such as crack front and then compared to each other.

Fracture Mechanics Fatigue Evaluation of a Flowline Clamp Connector Using Finite Element Modeling of a Crack

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curtis Sifford ◽  
Ali Shirani
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Fatigue Life ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Intensity Factor ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Crack Tip ◽  
Element Analysis

Abstract This paper presents the application of the rules from ASME Section VIII, Division 3 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for a fracture mechanics evaluation to determine the damage tolerance and fatigue life of a flowline clamp connector. The guidelines from API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1 Fitness-For-Service for the stress analysis of a crack-like flaw have been considered for this assessment. The crack tip is modeled using a refined mesh around the crack tip that is referred to as a focused mesh approach in API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1. The driving force method is used as an alternative to the failure assessment diagram method to account for the influence of crack tip plasticity. The J integral is determined using elastic-plastic finite element analysis and converted to an equivalent stress intensity factor to be compared to the fracture toughness of the material. The fatigue life is calculated using the Paris Law equation and the stress intensity factor calculated from the finite element analysis. The allowable number of design cycles is determined using the safety factors required from Division 3 of the ASME Pressure Vessel Code.

Fracture Mechanics Fatigue Evaluation of a Flowline Clamp Connector Using Finite Element Modeling of a Crack

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Curtis Sifford ◽  
Ali Shirani
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Fatigue Life ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Fracture Mechanics ◽  
Intensity Factor ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Crack Tip ◽  
Element Analysis

This paper presents the application of the rules from ASME Section VIII, Division 3 of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code for a fracture mechanics evaluation to determine the damage tolerance and fatigue life of a flowline clamp connector. The guidelines from API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1 Fitness-For-Service for the stress analysis of a crack-like flaw have been considered for this assessment. The crack tip is modeled using a refined mesh around the crack tip that is referred to as a focused mesh approach in API 579-1 / ASME FFS-1. The driving force method is used as an alternative to the failure assessment diagram method to account for the influence of crack tip plasticity. The J integral is determined using elastic-plastic finite element analysis and converted to an equivalent stress intensity factor to be compared to the fracture toughness of the material. The fatigue life is calculated using the Paris Law equation and the stress intensity factor calculated from the finite element analysis. The allowable number of design cycles is determined using the safety factors required from Division 3 of the ASME Pressure Vessel Code.

scholarly journals Stress Intensity Factor of Semielliptical Surface Crack in Internally Pressurized Hollow Cylinder—A Comparison between BS 7910 and API 579/ASME FFS-1 Solutions

Materials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel Coêlho ◽  
Antonio Silva ◽  
Marco Santos ◽  
Antonio Lima ◽  
Neilor Santos
Keyword(s):  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Intensity Factor ◽  
Hollow Cylinder ◽  
Crack Depth ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
British Standard ◽  
Percentage Difference ◽  
American Standard

The purpose of this research is to compare both British standard BS 7910 (2013) and American standard API 579/ASME FFS-1 (2016) stress intensity factor (SIF) solutions by considering a series of semielliptical surface cracks located in the external surface of a pressurized hollow cylinder in the axial direction. Finite element analysis was used as a comparison basis for both standards’ SIF results. The solution from the British standard provided consistent results compared to Finite Element (FE) results for crack depth not much higher than half the thickness in the deepest and surface-breaking points. Above those limits, the British standard’s solutions diverged quite a lot from the American standard, whose results followed FE values for every crack depth/thickness ratio tested with a maximum percentage difference of 1.83%.

Study on the Relationship Between Interaction Factors and Stress Intensity Factor for Elliptical Flaws

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kisaburo Azuma ◽  
Yinsheng Li ◽  
Kunio Hasegawa
Keyword(s):  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Intensity Factor ◽  
Crack Front ◽  
Elastic Solid ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Linear Elastic ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
Interaction Factors ◽  
The Relationship

The interaction of multiple flaws in close proximity to one another may increase the stress intensity factor of the flaw in structures and components. This interaction effect is not distributed uniformly along the crack front. For instance, the strongest interaction is generally observed at the point closest to a neighboring flaw. For this reason, the closest point could show a higher value of the stress intensity factor than all other points in some cases, even if the original value at the point of the single flaw is relatively low. To clarify the condition when the closest point shows the maximum stress intensity factor, we investigated the interaction of two similar elliptical flaws in an infinite model subjected to remote tension loading. The stress intensity factor of the elliptical flaws was obtained by performing finite element analysis of a linear elastic solid. The results indicated that the interaction factors along the crack front can be expressed by a simple empirical formula. Finally, we show the relationship between geometrical features of the flaw and the stress intensity factor at the closest point to a neighboring flaw.

Finite Element Fracture Mechanics Study of Pre-Northridge Connections

2006 ◽  
Vol 324-325 ◽  
pp. 1007-1010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Bo Liu ◽  
Chang Hai Zhai ◽  
Yong Song Shao ◽  
Li Li Xie
Keyword(s):  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Intensity Factor ◽  
Fracture Behavior ◽  
Integral Approach ◽  
J Integral ◽  
Finite Element Analyses ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Weld Root

The objective was to quantify the variation of stress intensity factor to weld root flaw sizes in steel frame connections. Finite-element analyses were used to study fracture toughness in welded beam-column connections. Investigations of fracture behavior mainly focused on the standard pre-Northridge connection geometry. Finite element analysis was performed using the ANSYS computer program. Stress intensity factor was calculated through a J-integral approach. Results show that stress intensity factor is not uniform and is largest in the middle of beam flange. Stress intensity factor increases nearly linear with the increase of flaw size. Backing bars have little effect on weld fractures.

Finite Element Analysis of Polyethylene Pipe Butt Fusion Joints with Circumferential Surface Cracks

2013 ◽  
Vol 785-786 ◽  
pp. 1151-1158
Author(s):  
Zhi Bin Zhu ◽  
Xiao Xiang Yang ◽  
Li Jing Chen ◽  
Nai Chang Lin ◽  
Zhi Tuo Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stress Intensity Factor ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Stress Intensity ◽  
Intensity Factor ◽  
Viscoelastic Material ◽  
Surface Crack ◽  
Crack Depth ◽  
Surface Cracks ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Polyethylene Pipe

Based on the viscoelastic material property of polyethylene pipe, software ANSYS was used to simulate and analyze the mechanical property of polyethylene pipe butt fusion joints with circumferential surface crack defects. The viscoelastic material creep parameters were characterized as Prony series and 1/4 node singular element was selected for meshing along the boundaries of the crack, then the stress intensity factor of polyethylene pipe butt fusion joints with circumferential surface crack was calculated under the uniform internal pressure. Through the finite element simulation, the result showed that polyethylene pipe were most likely to fracture failure when crack initiated. Thus the viscoelasticity of materials can be ignored when analyzing the stress intensity factor of circumferential surface cracks of polyethylene pipe. the main influencing factor of the circumferential crack defects was the ratio of the crack depth to the thickness of polyethylene pipe.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document