Effects of Major Parameters on the P-T Limit Curve Construction of Embrittled Reactor Vessel

2004 ◽  
Vol 261-263 ◽  
pp. 1647-1652
Author(s):  
Sung Gyu Jung ◽  
In Gyu Park ◽  
Chang Soon Lee ◽  
Myung Jo Jhung
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Neutron Fluence ◽  
Crack Depth ◽  
Reactor Vessel ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Crack Orientation ◽  
Limit Curve ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Potential Failure ◽  
Reactor Pressure

To prevent the potential failure of the reactor pressure vessel (RPV), it is requested to operate RPV according to the pressure-temperature (P-T) limit curve during the heat-up and cool-down process. The procedure to make the P-T limit curve was suggested in the ASME Code but it has been known to be too conservative for some cases. In this paper, the conservatism of the ASME Code Sec. XI, App. G was investigated by performing a series of sensitivity analyses. The effects of six parameters such as crack depth, crack orientation, clad thickness, fracture toughness, cooling rate, and neutron fluence were analyzed. The results of P-T limit curves are compared to one another.

Evaluation of P-T Limit Curves According to Alternative Fracture Toughness Requirements

2014 ◽  
Vol 1051 ◽  
pp. 896-901
Author(s):  
Sin Ae Lee ◽  
Sung Jun Lee ◽  
Sang Hwan Lee ◽  
Yoon Suk Chang
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Ductile Failure ◽  
Evaluation Procedure ◽  
Limit Curve ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Temperature And Pressure ◽  
Reactor Pressure

During the heat-up and cool-down processes of nuclear power plants, temperature and pressure histories are to be maintained below the P-T limit curve to prevent the non-ductile failure of the RPV(Reactor Pressure Vessel). The ASME Code Sec. XI, App. G describe the detailed procedure for generating the P-T limit curve. The evaluation procedure is containing the evaluation methods of RTNDT using 10CFR50.61. However, recently, Alternative fracture toughness requirements were released 10CFR50.61a. Therefore, in this study, RTNDT of RPV according to the 10CFR50.61a was calculated and used for evaluation of P-T limit curve of a typical RPV under cool-down condition. As a result, it was proven that the P-T curve obtained from 10CFR50.61 is conservative because RTNDT value obtained from the alternative fracture toughness requirements are significantly low.

In-Service Inspection Ultrasonic Testing of Reactor Pressure Vessel Welds for Assessing Flaw Density and Size Distribution Per 10 CFR 50.61a, Alternate Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against Pressurized Thermal Shock

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edmund J. Sullivan ◽  
Michael T. Anderson ◽  
Wallace Norris
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Density Distribution ◽  
Thermal Shock ◽  
Size Distribution ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Ultrasonic Testing ◽  
Reactor Vessel ◽  
Pressurized Thermal Shock ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Reactor Pressure

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed a research program that concluded that the risk of through-wall cracking of a reactor pressure vessel (RPV) due to a pressurized thermal shock (PTS) event is much lower than previously estimated. The NRC subsequently developed a rule, §50.61a, published on January 4, 2010, entitled “Alternate Fracture Toughness Requirements for Protection Against Pressurized Thermal Shock Events.” The §50.61a rule, which is optional, requires licensees to analyze the results from periodic volumetric examinations required by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code. These analyses are intended to determine if the actual flaw density and size distribution in the licensee’s reactor vessel beltline welds are bounded by the flaw density and size distribution values used in the PTS technical basis. Under a contract with the NRC, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory has been working on a program to assess the ability of current inservice inspection ultrasonic testing (UT) techniques, as qualified through the ASME Code to detect small fabrication or inservice-induced flaws located in RPV welds and adjacent base materials. As part of this effort, the investigators have pursued an evaluation, based on the available information, of the capability of UT to provide flaw density/distribution inputs for making RPV weld assessments in accordance with §50.61a. This paper presents the results of an evaluation of data from the 1993 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Unit 3, “Spirit of Appendix VIII reactor vessel examination,” a comparison of the flaw density/distribution from this data with the distribution in §50.61a, possible reasons for differences, and plans and recommendations for further work in this area.

Fracture Toughness Characterization of Midland Beltline Weld After High Dose of Irradiation

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail A. Sokolov ◽  
Randy K. Nanstad
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Neutron Fluence ◽  
National Laboratory ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Pressure Vessel Steel ◽  
Vessel Steel ◽  
Oak Ridge ◽  
Reactor Pressure

The Heavy-Section Steel Irradiation (HSSI) Program at Oak Ridge National Laboratory includes a task to investigate the shape of the fracture toughness master curve for reactor pressure vessel steel highly embrittled as a consequence of irradiation exposure, and to examine the ability of the Charpy 41-J shift to predict the fracture toughness shift. As part of this task, a low upper-shelf WF-70 weld obtained from the beltline region of the Midland Unit 1 reactor pressure vessel was characterized in terms of static initiation and Charpy impact toughness in the unirradiated and irradiated conditions. Irradiation of this weld was performed at the University of Michigan Ford Reactor at 288°C to neutron fluence of 3.4×1019 neutron/cm2 in the HSSI irradiation-anneal-reirradiation facility. This reusable facility allowed the irradiation of either virgin or previously irradiated material in a well-controlled temperature regime, including the ability to perform in-situ annealing. This was the last capsule irradiated in this facility before reactor shut down. Thus, the Midland beltline weld was irradiated within the HSSI Program to three fluences — 0.5×1019; 1.0×1019; and 3.4×1019 neutron/cm2. It was anticipated that it would provide an opportunity to address fracture toughness curve shape and Charpy 41-J shift compatibility issues at different levels of embrittlement, including the highest dose considered to be in the range of the current end of life fluence. It was found that the Charpy 41-J shift practically saturated after neutron fluence of 1.0×1019 neutron/cm2. The transition fracture toughness shift after 3.4×1019 neutron/cm2 was only slightly higher than that after 1.0×1019 neutron/cm2. In all cases, transition fracture toughness shifts were lower than predicted by the Regulatory Guide 1.99, Rev. 2 equation.

An Update on the Investigation of Fracture Toughness Properties of the High Flux Reactor Vessel From Surveillance Test Campaign in 2017

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kolluri ◽  
F. H. E. de Haan – de Wilde ◽  
H. S. Nolles ◽  
A. J. M. de Jong
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Fracture Surface ◽  
Neutron Fluence ◽  
Reactor Vessel ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
High Flux ◽  
High Flux Reactor ◽  
Flux Reactor ◽  
Vessel Material

Abstract The reactor vessel of the High Flux Reactor (HFR) in Petten has been fabricated from Al 5154-O alloy grade with a maximum Mg content of 3.5 wt. %. The vessel experiences large amount of neutron fluences (notably at hot spot), of the order of 1027 n/m2, during its operational life. Substantial damage to the material’s microstructure and mechanical properties can occur at these high fluence conditions. To this end, a dedicated surveillance program: SURP (SURveillance Program) is executed to understand, predict and measure the influence of neutron radiation damage on the mechanical properties of the vessel material. In the SURP program, test specimens fabricated from representative HFR vessel material are continuously irradiated in two specially designed experimental rigs. A number of surveillance specimens are periodically extracted and tested to evaluate the changes in fracture toughness properties of the vessel as function neutron fluence. The surveillance testing results of test campaigns performed until 2015 were published previously in [1, 2]. The current paper presents fracture toughness and SEM results from the recent surveillance campaign performed in 2017. The fracture toughness specimen tested in this campaign received a thermal neutron fluence of 13.56 x1026 n/m2, which is ∼8.9 × 1025 n/m2 more than the thermal fluence received by the specimen tested in SURP 2015 campaign. These results from this campaign have shown no change in the fracture toughness from the values measured in the previous SURP campaign. The SEM observations are performed to study the fracture surface, to measure (by WDS) the transmutation Si formed near crack tip and to investigate various inclusions in the microstructure. SEM fracture surface investigation revealed a tortuous (bumpy) fracture surface constituting micro-scale dimples over majority of the fracture area. Islands of cleavage facets and secondary cracks have been observed as well. EDS analysis of various inclusions in the microstructure revealed presence of Fe rich inclusions and Mg-Si rich precipitates. Additionally, inclusions rich in Al-Mg-Cr-Ti were identified. Finally, changes in mechanical properties of Al 5154-O alloy with an increase in neutron fluence (or transmutation Si) are discussed in correlation with SEM microstructure and fracture morphology observed in SEM. TEM investigation of precipitate microstructure is ongoing and those results will be published in future.

Determination of Pressure-Temperature Limit Curves Using Deterministic and Probabilistic Approaches

2006 ◽  
Vol 306-308 ◽  
pp. 333-338
Author(s):  
Sung Gyu Jung ◽  
In Gyu Park ◽  
Chang Soon Lee ◽  
Hyun Su Kim ◽  
Tae Eun Jin
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Probabilistic Approach ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Safety Margin ◽  
Temperature Limit ◽  
Limit Curve ◽  
Level Increase ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Potential Failure

Reactor pressure vessel (RPV) is the most critical component in nuclear power plant. RPV is subjected to radiation embrittlement, which is characterized as neutron fluence-dependent reduction in fracture toughness of the material. Therefore, risk for potential failure of RPV increases as operating time and fluence level increase. To prevent the potential failure, it is requested for RPV to operate in accordance with pressure-temperature (P-T) limit curve during operation. However, it has been reported that P-T limit curve which is typically developed in accordance with the procedure in ASME code is too conservative. Therefore, in order to investigate the conservatism of current P-T limit curve and develop more realistic one, probabilistic approach based on the risk was utilized in this paper. The resulting P-T limit curve is very higher than that from deterministic approach, and can be used as alternative operation limit of the RPV, because probabilistic P-T limit curve seems to have enough safety margin for potential failure of RPV.

Comparison of Pressure-Temperature Limit Curves Calculation

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Lu ◽  
H. Y. Qian ◽  
P. Huang ◽  
R. S. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Temperature Limit ◽  
Nuclear Industry ◽  
Primary Concern ◽  
Limit Curve ◽  
Irradiation Embrittlement ◽  
Strong Basis ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Made In

Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) is one of the most important components in a nuclear power plant (NPP). The primary concern of aging mechanism for RPV is irradiation embrittlement. In order to prevent brittle fracture, during NPP heatup and cooldown processes, the pressure and temperature in RPV should be kept under the pressure-temperature (P-T) limit curve. The P-T limit curve method originated from a WRC bulletin in 1972 and was included in ASME Sec. XI App. G.. Since then, much effort for reducing the conservatism of the P-T limit curve calculation has been made in many countries. Technology developed over the last 30 years has provided a strong basis for revising the P-T limit curve methodology. Up to now, changes have been made in the latest version of the ASME and RCCM codes. In this paper, the P-T limit curve methodologies given by the ASME code, the RCCM code, and Chinese Nuclear Industry Standard EJ/T 918 are studied. The differences of the P-T curve methodologies in previous and current versions for the ASME and RCCM codes are discussed. Two P-T curve calculation methods based on the RCCM code Ver. 2007 are proposed, due to lack of specific description for the calculation method in the RCCM code. Comparison of the P-T curves obtained using methods from different codes is also performed. It shows that using static fracture toughness KIC instead of reference fracture toughness KIR to calculate P-T curves can increase acceptable operating region during NPP heatup and cooldown processes significantly. Comparing with the latest versions of the ASME and RCCM codes, the current Chinese Standard is more conservative.

Irradiation Induced Changes in Mechanical and Microstructural Properties of the High Flux Reactor Vessel: Update of the Results From 2014 and 2015 Surveillance Test Campaigns

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Kolluri ◽  
F. H. E. de Haan-de Wilde ◽  
H. S. Nolles ◽  
A. J. M. de Jong ◽  
F. A. van den Berg
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Neutron Fluence ◽  
Reactor Vessel ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
High Flux ◽  
High Flux Reactor ◽  
Operational Life ◽  
Flux Reactor ◽  
Vessel Material

The reactor vessel of the High Flux Reactor (HFR) in Petten has been fabricated from Al 5154 - O alloy grade with a maximum Mg content of 3.5 wt. %. The vessel experiences large amount of neutron fluences (notably at hot spot), of the order of 1027 n/m2, during its operational life. Substantial damage to the material’s microstructure and mechanical properties can occur at these high fluence conditions. To this end, a dedicated surveillance program: SURP (SURveillance Program) is executed to understand, predict and measure the influence of neutron radiation damage on the mechanical properties of the vessel material. In the SURP program, test specimens fabricated from representative HFR vessel material are continuously irradiated in two specially designed experimental rigs. A number of surveillance specimens are periodically extracted and tested to evaluate the changes in fracture toughness properties of the vessel as a function neutron fluence. The surveillance testing results of test campaigns performed until 2009 were already published by N. V. Luzginova et. al. [1]. The current paper presents results from the two recent surveillance campaigns performed in 2014 and 2015. The fracture toughness and tensile testing results are reported. Changes in mechanical properties of Al 5154-O alloy with an increase in neutron fluence are discussed in correlation with the irradiation damage microstructure observed in TEM and the fracture morphology observed in SEM. The HFR surveillance testing results are compared to the historically published results on irradiated aluminum alloys and conclusions about the evolution of embrittlement trends in relation with irradiation induced damage mechanisms in HFR vessel are drawn at the end.

The Significance of Crack Depth (a) and Crack Depth-to-Width Ratio (a/W) With Respect to the Behavior of Very Large Specimens

1997 ◽  
Vol 119 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Smith ◽  
S. T. Rolfe
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Cleavage Fracture ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Crack Depth ◽  
Width Ratio ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Existing Structures ◽  
Safety And Reliability ◽  
Low Constraint ◽  
Reactor Pressure

Previous studies have shown that there is an increase in cleavage fracture toughness of laboratory specimens with shallow flaws compared with those laboratory specimens having deep flaws. Typical crack depths in real structures generally are very small relative to the member width. Therefore, the crack depth to structural member width (a/W) ratios are very small (less than 0.1). Accordingly, the effect of this observation on the behavior of larger structures that actually represent typical engineering applications could be significant. Using experimental and analytical results from previous studies on A533-B steel specimens, the effect of the shallow flaw behavior with respect to very large specimens was examined. Using the Dodds and Anderson constraint correction, predictions of the cleavage fracture toughness of large-scale wide-plate tests and full thickness clad beams from an actual reactor pressure vessel were shown to compare favorably with actual test results. The results of these studies suggest the possibility of predicting the increase in fracture toughness for low constraint structural geometries using high-constraint laboratory test specimen results. The ability to take advantage of this increase in toughness in analysis of actual structures could be very useful in estimating the actual safety and reliability of existing structures with service cracks.

A Proposal for the Maximum KIc for Use in ASME Code Flaw and Fracture Toughness Evaluations

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark T. Kirk ◽  
Gary L. Stevens ◽  
Marjorie Erickson ◽  
Shengjun Sean Yin
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Transition Temperature ◽  
Empirical Models ◽  
Ferritic Steels ◽  
Transition Regime ◽  
Upper Limit ◽  
Pressurized Thermal Shock ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
The One ◽  
Reactor Pressure

Nonmandatory Appendices A [1] and G [2] of Section XI of the ASME Code use the KIc curve (indexed to the material reference transition temperature, RTNDT) in reactor pressure vessel (RPV) flaw evaluations, and for the purpose of establishing RPV pressure-temperature (P-T) limits. Neither of these appendices places an upper-limit on the KIc value that may be used in these assessments. Over the years, it has often been suggested by some of the members of the ASME Section XI Code committees that are responsible for maintaining Appendices A and G that there is a practical upper limit of 200 ksi√in (220 MPa√m) [4]. This upper limit is not well recognized by all users of the ASME Code, is not explicitly documented within the Code itself, and the one source known to the authors where it is defended [4] relies on data that is either in error, or is less than 220 MPa√m. However, as part of the NRC/industry pressurized thermal shock (PTS) reevaluation effort, empirical models were developed that propose common temperature dependencies for all ferritic steels operating on the upper shelf. These models relate the fracture toughness properties in the transition regime to those on the upper shelf and, combined with data for a wide variety of RPV steels and welds on which they are based, suggest that the practical upper limit of 220 MPa√m exceeds the upper shelf fracture toughness of most RPV steels by a considerable amount, especially for irradiated steels. In this paper, available models and data are used to propose upper bound limits of applicability on the KIc curve for use in ASME Code, Section XI, Nonmandatory Appendices A and G evaluations that are consistent with available data for RPV steels.

Pressure-temperature limit curve for reactor vessel evaluated by ASME code

2002 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myung Jo Jhung ◽  
Seok Hun Kim ◽  
Sung Gyu Jung
Keyword(s):  
Temperature Limit ◽  
Reactor Vessel ◽  
Limit Curve ◽  
Asme Code
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document