Evaluation of P-T Limit Curves According to Alternative Fracture Toughness Requirements

2014 ◽  
Vol 1051 ◽  
pp. 896-901
Author(s):  
Sin Ae Lee ◽  
Sung Jun Lee ◽  
Sang Hwan Lee ◽  
Yoon Suk Chang
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Ductile Failure ◽  
Evaluation Procedure ◽  
Limit Curve ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Temperature And Pressure ◽  
Reactor Pressure

During the heat-up and cool-down processes of nuclear power plants, temperature and pressure histories are to be maintained below the P-T limit curve to prevent the non-ductile failure of the RPV(Reactor Pressure Vessel). The ASME Code Sec. XI, App. G describe the detailed procedure for generating the P-T limit curve. The evaluation procedure is containing the evaluation methods of RTNDT using 10CFR50.61. However, recently, Alternative fracture toughness requirements were released 10CFR50.61a. Therefore, in this study, RTNDT of RPV according to the 10CFR50.61a was calculated and used for evaluation of P-T limit curve of a typical RPV under cool-down condition. As a result, it was proven that the P-T curve obtained from 10CFR50.61 is conservative because RTNDT value obtained from the alternative fracture toughness requirements are significantly low.

The method for calculating the probability of brittle destruction of NPP equipment in different operating modes with postulated defectiveness

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-39
Author(s):  
D. A. Kuzmin ◽  
A. Yu. Kuz’michevskiy
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Practical Significance ◽  
Reactor Unit ◽  
Operating Modes ◽  
Brittle Destruction ◽  
Reactor Pressure

The destruction of equipment metal by a brittle fracture mechanism is a probabilistic event at nuclear power plants (NPP). The calculation for resistance to brittle destruction is performed for NPP equipment exposed to neutron irradiation; for example, for a reactor plant such as a water-water energetic reactor (WWER), this is a reactor pressure vessel. The destruction of the reactor pressure vessel leads to a beyond design-basis accident, therefore, the determination of the probability of brittle destruction is an important task. The research method is probabilistic analysis of brittle destruction, which takes into account statistical data on residual defectiveness of equipment, experimental results of equipment fracture toughness and load for the main operating modes of NPP equipment. Residual defectiveness (a set of remaining defects in the equipment material that were not detected by non-destructive testing methods after manufacturing (operation), control and repair of the detected defects) is the most important characteristic of the equipment material that affects its strength and service life. A missed defect of a considerable size admitted into operation can reduce the bearing capacity and reduce the time of safe operation from the nominal design value down to zero; therefore, any forecast of the structure reliability without taking into account residual defectiveness will be incorrect. The application of the developed method is demonstrated on the example of an NPP reactor pressure vessel with a WWER-1000 reactor unit when using the maximum allowable operating loads, in the absence of load dispersion in different operating modes, and taking into account the actual values of the distributions of fracture toughness and residual defectiveness. The practical significance of the developed method lies in the possibility of obtaining values of the actual probability of destruction of NPP equipment in order to determine the reliability of equipment operation, as well as possible reliability margins for their subsequent optimization.

Alternative RTNDT for Linde 80 Weld Materials

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. K. Yoon ◽  
J. B. Hall
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Transition Temperature ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Screening Criteria ◽  
Master Curve Method ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Curve Method

The ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code provides fracture toughness curves of ferritic pressure vessel steels that are indexed by a reference temperature for nil ductility transition (RTNDT). The ASME Code also prescribes how to determine RTNDT. The B&W Owners Group has reactor pressure vessels that were fabricated by Babcock & Wilcox using Linde 80 flux. These vessels have welds called Linde 80 welds. The RTNDT values of the Linde 80 welds are of great interest to the B&W Owners Group. These RTNDT values are used in compliance of the NRC regulations regarding the PTS screening criteria and plant pressure-temperature limits for operation of nuclear power plants. A generic RTNDT value for the Linde 80 welds as a group was established by the NRC, using an average of more than 70 RTNDT values. Emergence of the Master Curve method enabled the industry to revisit the validity issue surrounding RTNDT determination methods. T0 indicates that the dropweight test based TNDT is a better index than Charpy transition temperature based index, at least for the RTNDT of unirradiated Linde 80 welds. An alternative generic RTNDT is presented in this paper using the T0 data obtained by fracture toughness tests in the brittle-to-ductile transition temperature range, in accordance with the ASTM E1921 standard.

scholarly journals Occupational ALARA Planning for Reactor Pressure Vessel Dismantling at Kori Unit 1

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (15) ◽  
pp. 5346
Author(s):  
Juyoul Kim ◽  
Batbuyan Tseren
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Exposure ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Occupational Safety ◽  
Health Management ◽  
Primary Component ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Safety And Health ◽  
Reactor Pressure

Assessing workers’ safety and health during the decommissioning of nuclear power plants (NPPs) is an important procedure in terms of occupational radiation exposure (ORE). Optimizing the radiation exposure through the “As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA)” principle is a very important procedure in the phase of nuclear decommissioning. Using the VISIPLAN 3D ALARA planning tool, this study aimed at assessing the radiological doses to workers during the dismantling of the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) at Kori NPP unit 1. Fragmentation and segmentation cutting processes were applied to cut the primary component. Using a simulation function in VISIPLAN, the external exposure doses were calculated for each work operation. Fragmentation involved 18 operations, whereas segmentation comprised 32 operations for each fragment. Six operations were additionally performed for both hot and cold legs of the RPV. The operations were conducted based on the radioactive waste drum’s dimensions. The results in this study indicated that the collective doses decreased as the components were cut into smaller segments. The fragmentation process showed a relatively higher collective dose compared to the segmentation operation. The active part of the RPV significantly contributed to the exposure dose and thus the shielding of workers and reduced working hours need to be considered. It was found that 60Co contained in the stainless steel of the reactor vessel greatly contributed to the dose as an activation material. The sensitivity analysis, which was conducted for different cutting methods, showed that laser cutting took a much longer time than plasma cutting and contributed higher doses to the workers. This study will be helpful in carrying out the occupational safety and health management of decommissioning workers at Kori NPP unit 1 in the near future.

Upgrading the Operational Safety of Nuclear Power Plants Through the TACIS Nuclear Safety Assistance Programme

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bie`th ◽  
R. Ahlstrand ◽  
C. Rieg ◽  
P. Trampus
Keyword(s):  
European Commission ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Safety ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Nuclear Safeguards ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Reactor Pressure

The European Union’ TACIS programme was established for the New Independent States since 1991. One priority for TACIS funding is nuclear safety. The European Commission has made available a total of € 944 million for nuclear safety programmes covering the period 1991–2003. The TACIS nuclear safety programme is devoted to the improvement of the safety of Soviet designed nuclear installations in providing technology and safety culture transfer. The Joint Research Center (JRC) of the European Commission is carrying out works in the following areas: • On-Site Assistance for TACIS Nuclear Power Plants; • Design Safety and Dissemination of TACIS results; • Reactor Pressure Vessel Embrittlement for VVER in Russia and Ukraine; • Regulatory Assistance; • Industrial Waste Management and Nuclear Safeguards. This paper gives an overview of the Scientific and Technical support that JRC is providing for the programming and the implementation of the TACIS nuclear safety programmes. In particular, two new projects are being implemented to get an extensive understanding of the VVER reactor pressure vessel embritttlement and integrity assessment.

Nuclear Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity Assessment: Enhancement Provided by 3D Modeling Flaw Stability Calculations

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adolfo Arrieta-Ruiz ◽  
Eric Meister ◽  
Henriette Churier
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Reactor ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
Potential Damage ◽  
Vessel Integrity ◽  
Reactor Pressure

Structural integrity of the Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) is one of the main considerations regarding safety and lifetime of Nuclear Power Plants (NPP) since this component is considered as not reasonably replaceable. Brittle fracture risk associated with the embrittlement of RPV steel in irradiated areas is the main potential damage. In France, deterministic integrity assessment for RPV is based on the crack initiation stage. The stability of an under-clad postulated flaw in the core area is currently evaluated under a Pressurized Thermal Shock (PTS) through a fracture mechanics simplified method. One of the axes of EDF’s implemented strategy for NPP lifetime extension is the improvement of the deterministic approach with regards to the input data and methods so as to reduce conservatisms. In this context, 3D finite element elastic-plastic calculations with flaw modelling have been carried out recently in order to quantify the enhancement provided by a more realistic approach in the most severe events. The aim of this paper is to present both simplified and 3D modelling flaw stability evaluation methods and the results obtained by running a small break LOCA event.

Master Curve Approach for Some Japanese Reactor Pressure Vessel Steels

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minoru Tomimatsu ◽  
Takashi Hirano ◽  
Seiji Asada ◽  
Ryoichi Saeki ◽  
Naoki Miura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Pressure Vessel Steels ◽  
The World ◽  
Reactor Pressure ◽  
Plant Components

The Master Curve Approach for assessing fracture toughness of reactor pressure vessel (RPV) steels has been accepted throughout the world. The Master Curve Approach using fracture toughness data obtained from RPV steels in Japan has been investigated in order to incorporate this approach into the Japanese Electric Association (JEA) Code 4206, “Method of Verification Tests of the Fracture Toughness for Nuclear Power Plant Components”. This paper presents the applicability of the Master Curve Approach for Japanese RPV steels.

Technical Basis for Cases N-629 and N-631 as an Alternative for RTNDT Reference Temperature

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. G. Merkle ◽  
K. K. Yoon ◽  
W. A. VanDerSluys ◽  
W. Server
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Threshold Level ◽  
Nuclear Regulatory Commission ◽  
New Approach ◽  
The Us ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Regulatory Commission ◽  
Technical Basis

ASME Code Cases N-629/N-631, published in 1999, provided an important new approach to allow material specific, measured fracture toughness curves for ferritic steels in the code applications. This has enabled some of the nuclear power plants whose reactor pressure vessel materials reached a certain threshold level based on overly conservative rules to use an alternative RTNDT to justify continued operation of their plants. These code cases have been approved by the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission and these have been proposed to be codified in Appendix A and Appendix G of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. This paper summarizes the basis of this approach for the record.

Comparison of Pressure-Temperature Limit Curves Calculation

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Lu ◽  
H. Y. Qian ◽  
P. Huang ◽  
R. S. Wang
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Temperature Limit ◽  
Nuclear Industry ◽  
Primary Concern ◽  
Limit Curve ◽  
Irradiation Embrittlement ◽  
Strong Basis ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Made In

Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) is one of the most important components in a nuclear power plant (NPP). The primary concern of aging mechanism for RPV is irradiation embrittlement. In order to prevent brittle fracture, during NPP heatup and cooldown processes, the pressure and temperature in RPV should be kept under the pressure-temperature (P-T) limit curve. The P-T limit curve method originated from a WRC bulletin in 1972 and was included in ASME Sec. XI App. G.. Since then, much effort for reducing the conservatism of the P-T limit curve calculation has been made in many countries. Technology developed over the last 30 years has provided a strong basis for revising the P-T limit curve methodology. Up to now, changes have been made in the latest version of the ASME and RCCM codes. In this paper, the P-T limit curve methodologies given by the ASME code, the RCCM code, and Chinese Nuclear Industry Standard EJ/T 918 are studied. The differences of the P-T curve methodologies in previous and current versions for the ASME and RCCM codes are discussed. Two P-T curve calculation methods based on the RCCM code Ver. 2007 are proposed, due to lack of specific description for the calculation method in the RCCM code. Comparison of the P-T curves obtained using methods from different codes is also performed. It shows that using static fracture toughness KIC instead of reference fracture toughness KIR to calculate P-T curves can increase acceptable operating region during NPP heatup and cooldown processes significantly. Comparing with the latest versions of the ASME and RCCM codes, the current Chinese Standard is more conservative.

Warm Pre-Stress Tests of the Irradiated RPV Base Material of Beznau Unit 1

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Obermeier ◽  
Stefan Heußner ◽  
Heinz Hägeli ◽  
Herbert Schendzielorz ◽  
Marco Kaiser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Base Material ◽  
Reactor Pressure Vessel ◽  
Stress Effect ◽  
Loading Conditions ◽  
Stress Tests ◽  
Reactor Pressure

According to the pertinent regulations, the integrity of a reactor pressure vessel (RPV) of a nuclear power plant is to be assessed by fracture mechanics for postulated flaws under most severe loading conditions. In such an analysis usually loss of coolant accidents are assumed to cause highest possible loading of the structural material of the RPV. This is due to the fact that such a pressurized thermal shock (PTS) event during which cold emergency coolant is injected into the primary system generates additional thermal stresses in the RPV wall. Based on the applicable regulation, the initiation of postulated flaws is to be excluded by the comparison of the calculated crack tip loading and the fracture toughness of the particular material. This kind of assessment was motivation of various research projects in the last decades addressing both evaluation approaches and experimental testing. A crucial result in this context is the existence of the so-called warm pre-stress effect (WPS) on the resulting fracture toughness. Generally, it is known as the increase of the apparent fracture toughness of a flaw in a specimen or structure after loading at high temperatures, generally in the upper shelf region, followed by a reloading at a lower temperature. This represents the typical loading scenario postulated for the assessment of a RPV during a PTS event. Experiments were performed to quantify this effect in the case of the irradiated reactor pressure vessel base material of the nuclear power plant Beznau unit 1. This paper presents the results of the Master Curve tests to determine the reference temperature (according to ASTM E 1921) and the design and testing of the warm pre-stress experiments using irradiated 10×10 mm reconstituted single edge notch bend (SE(B)) specimens. The design of these warm pre-stress tests was based on the loading transients for postulated surface and sub-surface flaws investigated within the scope of the assessment of the Beznau unit 1 reactor pressure vessel against brittle failure. Finite element simulations were performed to transfer the loading conditions at the crack tip of the RPV determined during the brittle fracture safety assessment onto the SE(B) specimen. The simulation results were used to control the loading conditions as a function of time and temperature during the experimental tests. The fracture toughness values of the warm pre-stress specimens were finally compared with the original fracture toughness values determined in the absence of a warm pre-stress effect to demonstrate the increase of the safety margin when the warm pre-stress effect is taken into account.

Effects of Major Parameters on the P-T Limit Curve Construction of Embrittled Reactor Vessel

2004 ◽  
Vol 261-263 ◽  
pp. 1647-1652
Author(s):  
Sung Gyu Jung ◽  
In Gyu Park ◽  
Chang Soon Lee ◽  
Myung Jo Jhung
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Neutron Fluence ◽  
Crack Depth ◽  
Reactor Vessel ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Crack Orientation ◽  
Limit Curve ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Potential Failure ◽  
Reactor Pressure

To prevent the potential failure of the reactor pressure vessel (RPV), it is requested to operate RPV according to the pressure-temperature (P-T) limit curve during the heat-up and cool-down process. The procedure to make the P-T limit curve was suggested in the ASME Code but it has been known to be too conservative for some cases. In this paper, the conservatism of the ASME Code Sec. XI, App. G was investigated by performing a series of sensitivity analyses. The effects of six parameters such as crack depth, crack orientation, clad thickness, fracture toughness, cooling rate, and neutron fluence were analyzed. The results of P-T limit curves are compared to one another.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document