The Effect of Liner Thickness on the Color of Y-TZP Based All-Ceramic Restorations

2013 ◽  
Vol 544 ◽  
pp. 380-383
Author(s):  
Ruo Yu Liu ◽  
Yao Kun Zhang ◽  
Shan Yu Zhou ◽  
Chen Hu ◽  
Dong Dong Jing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Color Difference ◽  
Core Material ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Ceramic System ◽  
Eye Color ◽  
Human Eye ◽  
Color Parameters ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Ceramic Restorations ◽  
Different Thickness

To evaluate the effect of various liner thickness on the color of Y-TZP based all-ceramic restorations. Forty disc specimens (10 mm diameter, 0.5 mm thick) were fabricated from IPS e.max ZirCAD core material. The specimens were randomly divided into four groups (n=10) according to layering with different ZL1 IPS e.max ZirLiner thicknesses as: 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm, 0.3 mm and one group had received no treatment as the control group. And 0.6 mm veneering porcelain was fired on the IPS e.max ZirCAD core material by traditional layering technique. Using a spectrophotometer to measure Color parameters L, a and b of the specimens after veneered. ΔE were calculated to compare color difference among the four groups. Intergroup differences of ΔE in different thicknesses were statistically significant at P<0.05. The ΔE between groups with different thickness were 2.03±0.07, 2.88±0.07, 3.54±0.07, 0.86±0.06, 1.47±0.06 and 0.67±0.06 respectively.Usually researchers apply ΔE=1.5 as the threshold for distinguishing two different colors by the human eye. Color difference ΔE between different groups with and without liner application was more than 1.5, which was in the perceptible range, but ΔE of liner application with the thickness of 0.1 mm, 0.2 mm and 0.3 mm were undistinguishable by human eye (ΔE<1.5). Thus liner application of the all ceramic system could significantly affected the final color of the all ceramic restorations and it ameliorated esthetics of Y-TZP all-ceramic restorations to good purpose. However, Changes in the thickness (0.1 mm-0.3 mm) of liner application have no significant effect on the final shade of Y-TZP based all-ceramic restorations.

The Aesthetic Effect of All-Ceramic Pressed Crowns According to the Thickness and Color of the Materials Used - An In Vitro Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 587 ◽  
pp. 349-355
Author(s):  
Sergiu Drafta ◽  
Adelina Popescu ◽  
Vlad Naicu
Keyword(s):  
Human Eye ◽  
Color Parameters ◽  
Varying Thickness ◽  
Dental Abutment ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
The Aesthetic ◽  
Ceramic Restorations ◽  
Final Color

The final color of all-ceramic restorations may be influenced by the varying thickness of the dental abutment. Eighty A2 color (MO and LT) ceramic discs and eighty A3.5 color and four different thicknesses composite discs of were produced. The measurements were performed using the Vita Easyshade spectrophotometer. The results were statistically analyzed. Conclusion: There are no significant differences (perceived by the human eye) of the color parameters in the CIE L*a*b* system when comparing different combinations.

Relative Translucency of IPS E.max LT Core Materials after Veneering and Glazing

2011 ◽  
Vol 492 ◽  
pp. 358-361 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Sun ◽  
Long Quan Shao ◽  
Jun Ai ◽  
Bin Deng ◽  
Ning Wen
Keyword(s):  
Contrast Ratio ◽  
White Background ◽  
Ceramic System ◽  
The Core ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Different Thickness ◽  
Core Materials

This study compared the translucency of IPS e.max all-ceramic system of A and D color series veneered and glazed at clinically appropriate thicknesses. Core specimens (n = 5) of IPS e.max were produced and veneered with IPS e.max veneering porcelain to final dimensions (13 mm in diameter, 0.6 mm in thickness for core specimens with a thickness of 0.3 and 1.0 mm for core specimens with a thickness of 0.5 mm). Luminous reflectance was measured three times each specimen with a calibrated spectrophotometer after veneering and again after glazing cycle. Contrast ratios (CR=Yb/Yw) were measured from the luminous reflectance (Y)of the tested specimens with a black (Yb) and a white background (Yw). There was no significant difference in contrast ratios of specimens within the same color series before and after glazing (P > 0.05). Significant difference was found in the contrast ratios of specimens of the same color but different thickness before and after glazing (P < 0.05). The specimens with a thickness of 1.0mm presents significantly higher contrast ratios than specimens of the same color with a thickness of 0.6mm before and after glazing. The contrast ratios of glazed specimens were significantly lower than nonglazed ones. The Contrast ratio increases as the thickness of the core veneer materials increase, while luminosity and chroma are not related to relative translucency. The glazing cycle results in decreased opacity for core veneer materials.

Test of Relative Translucency of 5 All-Ceramic Core Materials

2013 ◽  
Vol 591 ◽  
pp. 289-292
Author(s):  
Jian Feng Chen ◽  
Rui Jie Dang ◽  
Li Sheng Zhao ◽  
Bin Deng ◽  
Bin Gu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Color Difference ◽  
Core Material ◽  
White Background ◽  
Ceramic Core ◽  
Black And White ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Core Materials

Objective:To study the relative translucency of 5 veneered and glazed all-ceramic systems core material, including Procerra AllCeram Alumina, Vita In-Ceram Zirconium, Ivoclar Vivodent Empress, In-Ceram Spinell and Colored Zirconia. Methods: Under standard black and white background, the surface light reflectivity of 5 veneered all-ceramic systems core material was determined with contact color difference meter, and the ratio of Yb /Yw was calculated. Results: After veneered, the relative translucency of 5 core materials all declined, and ranged from 0.6740 of In-Ceram Spinell to 1.00 of In-Ceram zirconia, among of that In-Ceram Spinell was most transparent. Conclusion: Among the groups, there is no significant differences among Empress II, Procera AllCeram and Colored Zirconia (IL1,IL2,IL3). Compared with Procera AllCeram and Vita In-Ceram Zirconium , Procera AllCeram has significant difference. There is a significant difference between Procera AllCeram and In-Ceram Spinell.

scholarly journals Effect of the framework material on the final color of all-ceramic restorations

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 219
Author(s):  
Márcia Borba ◽  
Queli Nunes Sonza ◽  
Álvaro Della Bona
Keyword(s):  
Tetragonal Zirconia ◽  
Color Difference ◽  
Polycrystalline Alumina ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Framework Materials ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Ceramic Restorations ◽  
Study Hypothesis ◽  
Final Color

OBJECTIVES: to evaluate the effect of the type of ceramic framework material on the final color of all-ceramic restorations. The hypotheses tested were: (1) the final color of the restoration is different than the porcelain shade selected initially to veneer the framework and (2) different framework materials result in different colors of all-ceramic restorations. METHODS: Steel models simulating abutment teeth were used to design all-ceramic fixed partial dentures (FPDs). The FPDs were produced using three different framework materials (n=8): (YZ) yttria partially stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (LAVA, 3M); (IZ) glass-infiltrated alumina/zirconia (Vita In-Ceram Zirconia); (AL) polycrystalline alumina (Vita In-Ceram AL). Each framework was veneered with the recommended porcelain, VM9 for YZ and VM7 for IZ and AL groups (Vita). The porcelain shade used was 2M2. A uniform thickness of 1.2 mm of porcelain was applied around the retainers. The color difference (ΔE) and lightness difference (ΔL) between the selected porcelain shade (2M2) and the color of the final restoration were obtained using a clinical spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade). Statistical analysis was performed using One-Way ANOVA and Tukey’s test (α=0.05). RESULTS: The ΔE mean values, standard deviation and statistical ranking for the experimental groups were: (YZ) 2.38 ± 0.44b; (IZ) 2.92 ± 0.67ab; (AL) 3.43 ± 0.84a. AL group showed the highest ΔE and ΔL mean values. IZ showed an intermediate ΔE value and statistically similar to AL and YZ groups. There was no significant difference between ΔL values for YZ and IZ groups. CONCLUSION:  Although the color difference between all experimental groups and the porcelain shade selected to veneer the restorations could be visually detected (ΔE>1.0), only AL showed a difference above the clinical threshold (ΔE>3.0). Thus, the first study hypothesis was partially accepted. In addition, the type of framework ceramic influenced the final restoration color, accepting the second study hypothesis.

Effect of Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Thickness on the Color of Discromic Substate

2014 ◽  
Vol 614 ◽  
pp. 95-99
Author(s):  
Alexandra Botos ◽  
Cristina Gasparik ◽  
Horatiu Colosi ◽  
Mandra Badea ◽  
Diana Dudea
Keyword(s):  
Composite Material ◽  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Sucrose Solution ◽  
Lithium Disilicate ◽  
Color Difference ◽  
Ceramic Layer ◽  
Color Parameters ◽  
Die Material ◽  
Ceramic Thickness ◽  
Ceramic Restorations

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the thickness of lithium disilicate ceramics (medium opacity) on the color perception of pressed full-ceramic restorations, in various situations of discromic substrate. The color parameters of ceramic disks (10 mm diameter, thickness 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, 1.5mm), (n=5), of IPS e.max® Press MO 0 (Ivoclar Vivadent) were evaluated upon samples of light cured composite material that simulate the shade of prepared teeth (IPS Natural Die Material Kit, Ivoclar Vivadent) (disks 10mm diameter, 5mm thickness). Saturated sucrose solution was interposed between the ceramic disks and the composite disks. The color parameters CIE L*, a*, b* were recorded by using a spectrophotometer (VITA Easyshade® Advance, VITA Bad Säckingen, Germany). The color difference E was calculated. Statistical analysis of the data revealed that the increase in thickness of the ceramic layer will lead to an increased masking of the discolored background by the ceramic layer.

Test of Relative Translucency for Four All-Ceramic Core Material after Veneering Ceramic

2013 ◽  
Vol 544 ◽  
pp. 388-391
Author(s):  
Jian Feng Chen ◽  
Li Sheng Zhao ◽  
Yan Zhao ◽  
Bin Deng ◽  
Bin Gu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Color Difference ◽  
Core Material ◽  
Ceramic Core ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Core Materials

Objective: To study the relative translucency of 4 veneered and glazed all-ceramic systems core material, including Vita In-Ceram Alumina, Vita In-Ceram Zirconium, Ivoclar Vivodent Empress and Colored Zirconia. Methods: Under standard black and write background, the surface light reflectivity of 4 veneered all-ceramic systems core material was determined with contact color difference meter, and the ratio of Yb /Yw was calculated. Results: After veneered, the relative translucency of 4 core materials all declined, and ranged from 0.8015 of Colored Zirconia to 1.00 of In-Ceram zirconia, among of that Empress II and Colored Zirconia were most transparent. Conclusion: Among the groups, there is no significant difference between Empress II and Colored Zirconia(IL1,IL2,IL3). Compared with Vita In-Ceram Alumina and Vita In-Ceram Zirconium, Vita In-Ceram Alumina(AL1) has significant difference. There is no significant difference between Vita In-Ceram Zirconium and Vita In-Ceram Alumina(AL2,AL3,AL4).

Test of Relative Translucency for Three Veneered All-Ceramic Systems Core Material

2010 ◽  
Vol 177 ◽  
pp. 302-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Ting Ma ◽  
Yuan Fu Yi ◽  
Long Quan Shao ◽  
Jie Mo Tian ◽  
Kang Lin Hou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Difference ◽  
Color Difference ◽  
Core Material ◽  
Significant Statistical Difference ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Core Materials

Objective: To study the relative translucency of 3 veneered and glazed all-ceramic systems core material, including Vita In-Ceram Alumina, Vita In-Ceram Zirconium and Ivoclar Vivodent Empress. Methods: Under standard black and write background, the surface light reflectivity of 3 veneered all-ceramic systems core material was determined with contact color difference meter, and the ratio of Yb /Yw was calculated. Results: After veneered, the relative translucency of 3 core materials all declined, and ranged from 0.8880 of Empress II to 1.00 of In-Ceram zirconia, among of that Empress II was most transparent. Conclusion: The relative translucency of 3 veneered all-ceramic systems core material had significant statistical difference. There was a decreasing range as Vitadur Alpha dentin (standard) > Empress II (0.8 mm) > In-Ceram Alumina > In-Ceram Zirconia.

Effect of Background Color on In-Ceram and Cercon All-Ceramic Core Material

2011 ◽  
Vol 412 ◽  
pp. 356-360
Author(s):  
Yi Han Liu ◽  
Hong Chen Liu ◽  
Bin Deng ◽  
Long Quan Shao ◽  
Yuan Fu Yi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Color Difference ◽  
Core Material ◽  
Chromium Alloy ◽  
Background Color ◽  
Ceramic Core ◽  
Nickel Chromium ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Color Differences ◽  
Human Eyes ◽  
Core Materials

The present paper probes into the effect of background color of different post-core materials on the core materials of In-Ceram AL2 Electroformed Alumina, Z21 Electroformed Zirconia, Cercon base color Zirconia, and Cercon base Zirconia. The spectrocolorimeter was used to measure colorimetric values of all groups of samples against the background of noble metal, nickel-chromium alloy, silver amalgam and resin, and to calculate the color difference among the groups. The result showed that the color difference of Cercon base color Zirconia viewed against different backgrounds was identifiable by human eyes (ΔE > 1.5). In contrast, the color differences of In-Ceram AL2 Electroformed Alumina, Z21 Electroformed Zirconia and Cercon base Zirconia viewed against different backgrounds were unidentifiable by human eyes (ΔE < 1.5). Based on this, it can be stated that Cercon base color Zirconia is significantly affected by background color. Thus, proper method to shelter the background color should be adopted. In addition, AL2 Electroformed Alumina, Z21 Electroformed Zirconia, and Cercon base color Zirconia are less influenced by the background color, thus it is not necessary to cover the background color.

A Comparative Study of Relative Translucency of Six All-Ceramic Restorations

2018 ◽  
Vol 281 ◽  
pp. 729-734
Author(s):  
Mei Ling Zhang ◽  
Yang Huang ◽  
Rong Jian Lu ◽  
Bin Deng
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Anterior Tooth ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Multiple Comparison Test ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Ceramic Blocks ◽  
Ceramic Restorations ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Choice Method

Purpose: Compared relative translucency of IPS e.max CAD,Vita Suprinity,Lava Zirconia,Cercon Zirconia,Zenostar and upcera Zirconia, to provide a reference for the clinical aesthetic choice. Method: Relative translucency were calculated from the luminous reflectance (Y) of the specimens with a black (Yb) and a white backing (Yw) to give Yb/Yw with Minolta CR-321.One-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s multiple comparison test were used to analyze the data (P<0.05). Results: Relative translucency of control group was 0.577-0.843,while experimental group was from 0.798(IPS e.max CAD) to 0.947(upcera Zirconia),there were significantly different between the groups. The relative translucency of the six systems are as follows: IPS e.max CAD >Vita Suprinity >Lava Zirconia >Cercon Zirconia >Zenostar >upcera Zirconia. Conclusion: There were significantly different between the six groups, for patients with anterior tooth areas restoration and high aesthetic requirements, IPS e.max CAD and Vita Suprinity are recommended; For patients with poor transmittance of adjacent teeth, and the abutments are dark which need to be covered can choose Lava Zirconia and Cercon Zirconia; For low transparency like posterior areas and severe tetracycline teeth, upcera Zirconia and Zenostar ceramic blocks may be considered.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document