scholarly journals Projected Food-grain Production and Yield in India: An Evidence from Statewise Panel Data Investigation during 1977-2014

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 108
Author(s):  
Ajay Kumar Singh ◽  
Bhim Jyoti
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
RAJARATHINAM ARUNACHALAM ◽  
Subh S S ◽  
Ramji Madhaiyan

Abstract The present investigation was carried out to study the food grain production trends in different states in India based on Panel Regression Model for the period 2001-02 to 2020-2021. The results reveal that between state-to-state food grain production is highly significant the highest food grain production was registered in Uttar Pradesh followed by Punjab and Madhya Pradesh. Very lowest was registered in Kerala and Himachal Pradesh. The findings reveal that the highly significant fixed effect model was found to be suitable to study the trend and this model explains the 82% of variations in food grain production. Over all increasing in food grain production is noted.


Author(s):  
Cristina Aybar-Arias ◽  
Alejandro Casino-Martínez ◽  
José López-Gracia

2008 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subir Sinha

On 2 October 1952, marking Gandhi's fourth birth anniversary after his assassination in 1948, Jawaharlal Nehru, the first prime minister of postcolonial India, launched the Community Development (CD) Programs. Dedicating the programs to Gandhi's memory allowed Nehru to claim symbolic legitimacy for them. At the same time, this centerpiece of Nehruvian policy in the Indian countryside was heavily interventionist, billed as “the method ... through which the [state] seeks to bring about social and economic transformation in India's villages” (Government of India 1952). In its heyday, CD preoccupied the Planning Commission, was linked to the office of the Prime Minister, had a ministry dedicated to it, and formed part of the domain of action of the rapidly proliferating state and other development agencies. Fifteen pilot projects, each covering 300 villages, were launched in all the major states. Planning documents of the day register high enthusiasm and optimism for these programs. However, by the mid-1960s, barely a decade after the fanfare of its launch, the tone of planners toward CD turned first despairing and then oppositional. They called for abandonment of its ambitious aim of the total development of Indian villages in favor of more focused interventions to achieve a rapid increase in food-grain production.


Finance ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 45 ◽  
Author(s):  
François-Éric Racicot ◽  
William F. Rentz ◽  
Raymond Théoret

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (19) ◽  
pp. 5225
Author(s):  
Furong Chen ◽  
Yifu Zhao

This paper investigated the determinants, especially labor transformation, and differences of technical efficiency between main and non-main grain-producing area in China based on a panel data from 30 provinces in the period of 2001–2017. Stochastic frontier production function was used to estimate the level of technical efficiency and the marginal productivity of different inputs. The estimated results showed that land is the most important factor to improve China’s grain output, followed by fertilizers, labor, and machinery inputs. There was a significant 4.6 percent gap of production efficiency between main and non-main producing provinces. Influence of rural labor transformation was confirmed to be positive to improve technical efficiency.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document