scholarly journals Renal Replacement Therapy in Austere Environments

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina M. Yuan ◽  
Robert M. Perkins

Myoglobinuric renal failure is the classically described acute renal event occurring in disaster environments—commonly after an earthquake—which most tests the ingenuity and flexibility of local and regional nephrology resources. In recent decades, several nephrology organizations have developed response teams and planning protocols to address disaster events, largely focusing on patients at risk for, or with, acute kidney injury (AKI). In this paper we briefly review the epidemiology and outcomes of patients with dialysis-requiring AKI after such events, while providing greater focus on the management of the end-stage renal disease population after a disaster which incapacitates a pre-existing nephrologic infrastructure (if it existed at all). “Austere” dialysis, as such, is defined as the provision of renal replacement therapy in any setting in which traditional, first-world therapies and resources are limited, incapacitated, or nonexistent.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen L. Krechmery ◽  
Diego Casali

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common syndrome encountered in critical illness and is associated with significant morbidity and increased mortality. Despite attempts to prevent the development of AKI, its incidence continues to rise, probably due to increased recognition in the setting of clearer definitions of the stages of AKI. Despite advances in the field of Nephrology, the treatment of AKI and its complications remains difficult in clinical practice. Critical care clinicians must have an understanding of the current definitions, pathophysiology, and treatment modalities. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is a mainstay of treatment, but a lack of consensus regarding the optimal timing for initiation remains. There is a need for further research regarding both the timing of initiation of RRT and biomarkers that might allow earlier detection, differentiation of etiologies and monitoring of interventions. This review contains 3 figures, 4 tables, and 31 references Key Words: acute kidney injury (AKI), KDIGO, renal replacement therapy (RRT), risk, injury, failure, loss of kidney function, end stage renal disease (RIFLE), nephrology  


2019 ◽  
pp. 193-200
Author(s):  
Sara Samoni ◽  
Claudio Ronco

In the absence of any effective pharmacologic therapies, severe acute kidney injury (AKI) is usually managed through renal replacement therapy (RRT). According to evidence, RRT should be considered when renal capacity cannot guarantee a sufficient metabolic, electrolyte, and fluid balance. Once the initiation of RRT has been decided, physicians must address the vascular access placement and prescribe the modality, the dose, and the anticoagulation of the treatment. As RRT should be tailored to the patient, initial prescriptions should be varied according to the current patient’s need. Once the acute kidney insult has been solved, a full, partial, or no renal recovery may occur. Hence, different degrees of chronic kidney disease (CKD) may persist. It is generally accepted that AKI and CKD are closely linked in a highly complex relationship. The development of AKI and the worsening of CKD might recycle in the patient life until end-stage renal disease.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen L. Krechmery ◽  
Diego Casali

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common syndrome encountered in critical illness and is associated with significant morbidity and increased mortality. Despite attempts to prevent the development of AKI, its incidence continues to rise, probably due to increased recognition in the setting of clearer definitions of the stages of AKI. Despite advances in the field of Nephrology, the treatment of AKI and its complications remains difficult in clinical practice. Critical care clinicians must have an understanding of the current definitions, pathophysiology, and treatment modalities. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is a mainstay of treatment, but a lack of consensus regarding the optimal timing for initiation remains. There is a need for further research regarding both the timing of initiation of RRT and biomarkers that might allow earlier detection, differentiation of etiologies and monitoring of interventions. This review contains 3 figures, 4 tables, and 31 references Key Words: acute kidney injury (AKI), KDIGO, renal replacement therapy (RRT), risk, injury, failure, loss of kidney function, end stage renal disease (RIFLE), nephrology  


2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Clark ◽  
Martine Leblanc ◽  
Zaccaria Ricci ◽  
Claudio Ronco

Background/Aims: Delivered dialysis therapy is routinely measured in the management of patients with end-stage renal disease; yet, the quantification of renal replacement prescription and delivery in acute kidney injury (AKI) is less established. While continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is widely understood to have greater solute clearance capabilities relative to intermittent therapies, neither urea nor any other solute is specifically employed for CRRT dose assessments in clinical practice at present. Instead, the normalized effluent rate is the gold standard for CRRT dosing, although this parameter does not provide an accurate estimation of actual solute clearance for different modalities. Methods: Because this situation has created confusion among clinicians, we reappraise dose prescription and delivery for CRRT. Results: A critical review of RRT quantification in AKI is provided. Conclusion: We propose an adaptation of a maintenance dialysis parameter (standard Kt/V) as a benchmark to supplement effluent-based dosing of CRRT. Video Journal Club “Cappuccino with Claudio Ronco” at http://www.karger.com/?doi=475457


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S6-S7
Author(s):  
Chih-Chia Liang ◽  
Hung-Chieh Yeh ◽  
Pei-Shan Chen ◽  
Chin-Chi Kuo ◽  
Hsiu-Yin Chiang

Abstract Background Sepsis is the most common cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) and about one-third of patients with sepsis-associated AKI (SA-AKI) develop acute kidney diseases (SA-AKD) and may progress to unfavorable outcomes. We aimed to study the characteristics and outcomes associated with SA-AKI and SA-AKD. Methods This cohort study included adult inpatients with first-time sepsis who were admitted during 2003-2017, had qualifying serum creatinine (SCr) measurements at baseline (-365 to -3 days), -2 to +7 days, and +8 to +90 days of sepsis index day, and survived the first 90 days (Figure 1). Sepsis was identified using an electronic medical records-based Sepsis-3 criteria. We classified sepsis inpatients into SA-AKI(-), SA-AKD(-), SA-relapsed-AKD, and SA-nonrecovery-AKD (Figure 2). ESRD and mortality were ascertained by linking to the Catastrophic Illness records and to National Death Registry, respectively. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the risk of mortality and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) associated with SA-AKI/AKD subtypes. Figure 1. Flowchart of the selection process of adult sepsis survivors (N = 4226 patients). Figure 2. Definitions of sepsis associated-acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) and sepsis associated-acute kidney disease (SA-AKD). Results Of 4,226 eligible sepsis inpatient survivors, 47.1% developed SA-AKI and 10.1% progressed to SA-AKD (5.4% relapsed and 4.7% nonrecovery). Patient with AKI and non-recovered AKD had the worst baseline renal function (SCr, 1.3 mg/dL) (Table 1). The multivariable analyses revealed that SA-relapsed AKD was significantly associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality for 1-year (aHR 1.67; 95% CI 1.25, 2.24), 3-year (aHR 1.38; 95% CI 1.11, 1.71), and overall (aHR 1.35; 95% CI 1.12, 1.61), compared with SA-AKI(-). SA-relapsed AKD and SA-nonrecovery AKD were both significantly associated with 1-year, 3-year, and overall ESRD, with the risk of about 4-fold or higher than SA-AKI(-) (Table 2). Table 1. Baseline characteristics and outcomes among adult sepsis survivors, by different SA-AKI/AKD subtypes. Table 2. Risk of all-cause mortality and end stage renal disease (ESRD) among adult sepsis survivors. Conclusion Sepsis survivors who initially had AKI and developed relapsed or nonrecovery AKD tended to have worse outcomes of all-cause and ESRD, compared with those without AKI. Unexpectedly, patients with non-recovered AKD did not have a higher mortality risk, possibly because we have selected those who survived the first 90 days of sepsis. We will develop two-stage prediction models to identify sepsis patients at risk of developing AKI and SA-AKI patients at risk of developing different types of AKD. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


Critical Care ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. R109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew S Allegretti ◽  
David JR Steele ◽  
Jo David-Kasdan ◽  
Ednan Bajwa ◽  
John L Niles ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document