scholarly journals DEMATERIALIZZAZIONE DELLA FISICA

Author(s):  
Giacomo Mauro D'Ariano

Quantum Mechanics has taught us a lesson that goes well beyond a set of new physical laws. It has provided us with genuine “theorems of epistemology”. We now know that there are situations when the observation of the world cannot be considered as the mere reading of a reality pre-existing the observation, whereas there are circumstances where the knowledge of the whole do not corresponds to the knowledge of the parts (holism). We know that there are incompatible properties that are complementary. We know that there exist properties of the whole that are incompatible with any property of each part. The notion of “object” defined in terms of its “properties ” is in contrast with its mereologic connotation according to which objects can be composed to form new objects. The particle ontology as localizable unity is in contrast with the Malament theorem in quantum field theory. To the above add the fact that the two more general fundamental theories in physics – the quantum theory of fields and the general relativity of Einstein – are logically incompatible. In order to reconcile the logical coherence of the observations with their theoretical explanation we need a radical change of paradigm. The solution here proposed is to abandon the vision of the world as a “mechanism” and to substitute it with that of “algorithm”. This is the paradigm of the “universe as a huge computer” that have been latent within the community since Richard Feynman, and nowadays is resurrecting in physics, showing its full theoretical power. In the new algorithmic vision the “mechanics” becomes an emergent phenomenology. Without the need of physical primitive, the new “informational” program allows us to found physics on solid axiomatic grounds. The quantum theory of abstract systems along with the free quantum field theory are derived from information-theoretic axioms. The axioms of quantum theory all have an epistemological connotation, and pertain the possibility of falsifying the propositions of the theory. They reconnect holism with reductionism, probabilism and falsifiability, substituting the notion of “object” with that of “system” and of “event”, and logically implying the theorem of quantum theory without the need of using the abstract Hilbert-spaces toolkit. The free quantum field theory (Weyl, Dirac e Maxwell) is obtained by adding axioms of minimization of algorithmic complexity. The informational framework well separates the notions of “experiment”and “theory”: the theory connects input with output, the experiment being identified with the collection of input, output, and objective intermediate events. The objective reality (experiment) is made of “icons” with which we interact: the theory is the underlying algorithm. The paradigm describes the tapestry of reality as pure software, “software”. “Software without hardware”: the dematerialization of physics. “Reality without realism” means pure logical coherentism.

Scientific realism has traditionally maintained that our best scientific theories can be regarded as more or less true and as representing the world as it is (more or less). However, one of our very best current theories—quantum mechanics—has famously resisted such a realist construal, threatening to undermine the realist stance altogether. The chapters in this volume carefully examine this tension and the reasons behind it, including the underdetermination generated by the multiplicity of formulations and interpretations of quantum physics, each presenting a different way the world could be. Authors in this volume offer a range of alternative ways forward: some suggest new articulations of realism, limiting our commitments in one way or another; others attempt to articulate a ‘third way’ between traditional forms of realism and antirealism, or are critical of such attempts. Still others argue that quantum theory itself should be reconceptualised, or at least alternative formulations should be considered in the hope of evading the problems faced by realism. And some examine the nature of these issues when moving beyond quantum mechanics to quantum field theory. Taken together they offer an exciting new set of perspectives on one of the most fundamental questions in the philosophy of modern physics: how can one be a realist about quantum theory, and what does this realism amount to?


2006 ◽  
Vol 03 (07) ◽  
pp. 1303-1312 ◽  
Author(s):  
WEIGANG QIU ◽  
FEI SUN ◽  
HONGBAO ZHANG

From the modern viewpoint and by the geometric method, this paper provides a concise foundation for the quantum theory of massless spin-3/2 field in Minkowski spacetime, which includes both the one-particle's quantum mechanics and the many-particle's quantum field theory. The explicit result presented here is useful for the investigation of spin-3/2 field in various circumstances such as supergravity, twistor programme, Casimir effect, and quantum inequality.


1971 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 623-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Stumpf

Abstract Dynamics of quantum field theory can be formulated by functional equations. To develop a complete functional quantum theory one has to describe the physical information by functional operations only. Such operations have been defined in preceding papers. To apply these operations to physical problems, the corresponding functionals have to be known. Therefore in this paper calculational procedures for functionals are discussed. As high energy phenomena are of interest, the calculational procedures are given for spinor field functionals. Especially a method for the calculation of stationary and Fermion-Fermion scattering functionals is proposed.


Author(s):  
Adrian Kent

We describe postulates for a novel realist version of relativistic quantum theory or quantum field theory in Minkowski space and other background space–times, and illustrate their application with toy models.


2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 205-236
Author(s):  
Reinhold A. Bertlmann

Abstract My discussions with John Bell about reality in quantum mechanics are recollected. I would like to introduce the reader to Bell’s vision of reality which was for him a natural position for a scientist. Bell had a strong aversion against “quantum jumps” and insisted to be clear in phrasing quantum mechanics, his “words to be forbidden” proclaimed with seriousness and wit – both typical Bell characteristics – became legendary. I will summarize the Bell-type experiments and what Nature responded, and discuss the implications for the physical quantities considered, the real entities and the nonlocality concept due to Bell’s work. Subsequently, I also explain a quite different view of the meaning of a quantum state, this is the information theoretic approach, focusing on the work of Brukner and Zeilinger. Finally, I would like to broaden and contrast the reality discussion with the concept of “virtuality,” with the meaning of virtual particle occurring in quantum field theory. With some of my own thoughts I will conclude the paper which is composed more as a historical article than as a philosophical one.


Author(s):  
Roman G. Shulyakovsky ◽  
Alexander S. Gribowsky ◽  
Alexander S. Garkun ◽  
Maxim N. Nevmerzhitsky ◽  
Alexei O. Shaplov ◽  
...  

Instantons are non-trivial solutions of classical Euclidean equations of motion with a finite action. They provide stationary phase points in the path integral for tunnel amplitude between two topologically distinct vacua. It make them useful in many applications of quantum theory, especially for describing the wave function of systems with a degenerate vacua in the framework of the path integrals formalism. Our goal is to introduce the current situation about research on instantons and prepare for experiments. In this paper we give a review of instanton effects in quantum theory. We find in stanton solutions in some quantum mechanical problems, namely, in the problems of the one-dimensional motion of a particle in two-well and periodic potentials. We describe known instantons in quantum field theory that arise, in particular, in the two-dimensional Abelian Higgs model and in SU(2) Yang – Mills gauge fields. We find instanton solutions of two-dimensional scalar field models with sine-Gordon and double-well potentials in a limited spatial volume. We show that accounting of instantons significantly changes the form of the Yukawa potential for the sine-Gordon model in two dimensions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document